Doğum Öncesi Fetal İzlem

O'Neill E, Thorp J. Antepartum evaluation of the fetus and fetal well being. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;55(3):722-30.

Johnson GJ, Clark SL, Turrentine MA. Antepartum Testing for the Prevention of Stillbirth: Where Do We Go From Here? Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):1407-1411.

Bocking AD. The relationship between heart rate and asphyxia in the animal fetus. Clin Invest Med. 1993 Apr;16(2):166-75.

Gabbe, S.G., Niebyl, J.R. and Simpson, J.L. (2007) Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 5th Edition, Churchill Livingstone, London.

Liston R, Sawchuck D, Young D; Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada; British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 Sep;29(9 Suppl 4):S3-56. Erratum in: J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 Nov;29(11):909

Antepartum Fetal Surveillance: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 229. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 1;137(6):e116-e127.

Williams KP, Farquharson DF, Bebbington M, Dansereau J, Galerneau F, Wilson RD, Shaw D, Kent N. Screening for fetal well-being in a high-risk pregnant population comparing the nonstress test with umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;188(5):1366-71.

Velazquez MD, Rayburn WF. Antenatal evaluation of the fetus using fetal movement monitoring. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;45(4):993-1004.

Dutton PJ, Warrander LK, Roberts SA, Bernatavicius G, Byrd LM, Gaze D, Kroll J, Jones RL, Sibley CP, Frøen JF, Heazell AE. Predictors of poor perinatal outcome following maternal perception of reduced fetal movements--a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39784.

Raynes-Greenow CH, Gordon A, Li Q, Hyett JA. A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Feb 5;13:32.

Gillieson, M., Dunlap, H., Nair, R., & Pilon, M. Placental site, parity, and date of quickening. Obstetrics and gynecology, 1984; 64(1), 44–45.

Moore TR, Piacquadio K. A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 May;160(5 Pt 1):1075-80.

Devoe LD. Antenatal Fetal Assessment: Contraction Stress Test, Nonstress Test, Vibroacoustic Stimulation, Amniotic Fluid Volume, Biophysical Profile, and Modified Biophysical Profile-An Overview. Vol. 32, Seminars in Perinatology. 2008. p. 247–52.

Ray M, Freeman R, Pine S, Hesselgesser R. Clinical experience with the oxytocin challenge test. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972 Sep 1;114(1):1–9.

Garite TJ, Freeman RK , Hochleutner I, Lınzey ME. Oxytocin challenge test; achieving the desired goals. Obstet Gynecol. 1978 51:614.

Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: Development of a fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Mar 15;136(6):787–95.

Manning FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999 Dec;26(4):557-77.

Manning FA, Snijders R, Harman CR, Nicolaides K, Menticoglou S, Morrison I. Fetal Biophysical Profile Score VI. Correlation with Antepartum Umbilical Venous Fetal Ph. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993 Oct; 169(4):755-63.

Manning FA, Morrison I, Harman CR, Lange IR, Menticoglou S. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: In 19,221 referred high-risk pregnancies: II: An analysis of false-negative fetal deaths. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157(4):880–4.

Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Ingardia CJ, Nochimson DJ. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value. Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Sep;62(3):271-8.

Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ, Weinbaum PJ. The use and misuse of the fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;156(3):527-33.

Manning FA, Lange IR, Morrison I, Harman CR. Fetal biophysical profile score and the nonstress test: a comparative trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Sep;64(3):326-31.

Manning FA, Morrison I, Lange IR, Harman CR, Chamberlain PF. Fetal biophysical profile scoring: selective use of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;156(3):709-12.

Eden RD, Seifert LS, Kodack LD, Trofatter KF, Killam AP, Gall SA. A modified biophysical profile for antenatal fetal surveillance. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;71(3 Pt 1):365-9.

Miller DA, Rabello YA, Paul RH. The modified biophysical profile: Antepartum testing in the 1990s. 1996.

Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, Freeman RK, Dorchester W. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):231-4.

Bardakci M, Balci O, Acar A, Colakoglu MC. Comparison of modified biophysical profile and doppler ultrasound in predicting the perinatal outcome at or over 36 weeks of gestation. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010 Jun;69(4):245–50.

O'Neill E, Thorp J. Antepartum evaluation of the fetus and fetal well being. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;55(3):722-30.

Johnson GJ, Clark SL, Turrentine MA. Antepartum Testing for the Prevention of Stillbirth: Where Do We Go From Here? Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):1407-1411.

Bocking AD. The relationship between heart rate and asphyxia in the animal fetus. Clin Invest Med. 1993 Apr;16(2):166-75.

Gabbe, S.G., Niebyl, J.R. and Simpson, J.L. (2007) Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 5th Edition, Churchill Livingstone, London.

Liston R, Sawchuck D, Young D; Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists of Canada; British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Fetal health surveillance: antepartum and intrapartum consensus guideline. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 Sep;29(9 Suppl 4):S3-56. Erratum in: J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 Nov;29(11):909

Antepartum Fetal Surveillance: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 229. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 1;137(6):e116-e127.

Williams KP, Farquharson DF, Bebbington M, Dansereau J, Galerneau F, Wilson RD, Shaw D, Kent N. Screening for fetal well-being in a high-risk pregnant population comparing the nonstress test with umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;188(5):1366-71.

Velazquez MD, Rayburn WF. Antenatal evaluation of the fetus using fetal movement monitoring. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;45(4):993-1004.

Dutton PJ, Warrander LK, Roberts SA, Bernatavicius G, Byrd LM, Gaze D, Kroll J, Jones RL, Sibley CP, Frøen JF, Heazell AE. Predictors of poor perinatal outcome following maternal perception of reduced fetal movements--a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39784.

Raynes-Greenow CH, Gordon A, Li Q, Hyett JA. A cross-sectional study of maternal perception of fetal movements and antenatal advice in a general pregnant population, using a qualitative framework. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Feb 5;13:32.

Gillieson, M., Dunlap, H., Nair, R., & Pilon, M. Placental site, parity, and date of quickening. Obstetrics and gynecology, 1984; 64(1), 44–45.

Moore TR, Piacquadio K. A prospective evaluation of fetal movement screening to reduce the incidence of antepartum fetal death. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 May;160(5 Pt 1):1075-80.

Devoe LD. Antenatal Fetal Assessment: Contraction Stress Test, Nonstress Test, Vibroacoustic Stimulation, Amniotic Fluid Volume, Biophysical Profile, and Modified Biophysical Profile-An Overview. Vol. 32, Seminars in Perinatology. 2008. p. 247–52.

Ray M, Freeman R, Pine S, Hesselgesser R. Clinical experience with the oxytocin challenge test. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972 Sep 1;114(1):1–9.

Garite TJ, Freeman RK , Hochleutner I, Lınzey ME. Oxytocin challenge test; achieving the desired goals. Obstet Gynecol. 1978 51:614.

Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: Development of a fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Mar 15;136(6):787–95.

Manning FA. Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1999 Dec;26(4):557-77.

Manning FA, Snijders R, Harman CR, Nicolaides K, Menticoglou S, Morrison I. Fetal Biophysical Profile Score VI. Correlation with Antepartum Umbilical Venous Fetal Ph. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993 Oct; 169(4):755-63.

Manning FA, Morrison I, Harman CR, Lange IR, Menticoglou S. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: In 19,221 referred high-risk pregnancies: II: An analysis of false-negative fetal deaths. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;157(4):880–4.

Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Ingardia CJ, Nochimson DJ. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value. Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Sep;62(3):271-8.

Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ, Weinbaum PJ. The use and misuse of the fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;156(3):527-33.

Manning FA, Lange IR, Morrison I, Harman CR. Fetal biophysical profile score and the nonstress test: a comparative trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Sep;64(3):326-31.

Manning FA, Morrison I, Lange IR, Harman CR, Chamberlain PF. Fetal biophysical profile scoring: selective use of the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Mar;156(3):709-12.

Eden RD, Seifert LS, Kodack LD, Trofatter KF, Killam AP, Gall SA. A modified biophysical profile for antenatal fetal surveillance. Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Mar;71(3 Pt 1):365-9.

Miller DA, Rabello YA, Paul RH. The modified biophysical profile: Antepartum testing in the 1990s. 1996.

Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, Freeman RK, Dorchester W. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;84(2):231-4.

Bardakci M, Balci O, Acar A, Colakoglu MC. Comparison of modified biophysical profile and doppler ultrasound in predicting the perinatal outcome at or over 36 weeks of gestation. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010 Jun;69(4):245–50.