Uterin Kontraksiyon Monitorizasyon

Teegala B, Kalyansundar A, Ramesh B. Uterine contraction measurement device and a fetal monitoring system. 2018. WO 2011/023521 Al.

Ricci SS, Kyle T. Maternity and pediatric nursing. New York: Lippincott William and Wilkins; 2009.

Das S, Roy K, Saha CK. A novel step towards machine diagnosis of fetal status in utero: Calculation of baseline variability. In Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Research in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (ICRCICN). Kolkata: IEEE Press; 2015, p. 230–234.

Young RC, Marinescu PS, Seligman NS. Monitoring uterine contractions during labor: current challenges and future directions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5S):S1192-S1208.

Caldeyro- Barcia R, Poseiro JJ: Physiiology of the uterine contraction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 3:386, 1960.

Young RC, Marinescu PS, Seligman NS. Monitoring uterine contractions during labor: current challenges and future directions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5S):S1192-S1208.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:192. Reaffirmed 2021.

Lindgren L. The influence of uterine motility upon cervical dilatation in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 117:530.

Frey HA, Tuuli MG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Can contraction patterns predict neonatal outcomes? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:1422–7.

Arrabal PP, Nagey DA. Is manual palpation of uterine contractions accurate? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;174(1 Pt 1):217-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70397-6. PMID: 8572010.

Bakker PCAM, Zikkenheimer M, van Geijn HP. The quality of intrapartum uterine activity monitoring. J Perinat Med 2008;36 (03):197–201.

1 Wilmink FA, Wilms FF, Heydanus R, Mol BWJ, Papatsonis DNM. Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter: a report of two cases and review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21(12):880–883.

Harper LM, Shanks AL, Tuuli MG, Roehl KA, Cahill AG. The risks and benefits of internal monitors in laboring patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;209(1):38.e1-6.

Euliano TY, Nguyen MT, Darmanjian S, McGorray SP, Euliano N, Onkala A, Gregg AR. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):66.e1-6.

Marion W.C. Vlemminx, Kirsten M.J. Thijssen, Galin I. Bajlekov, Jeanne P. Dieleman, M. Beatrijs Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt, S. Guid Oei,Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter,European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Volume 215, 2017, e197-205.

Garfield R. E. and Maner W. L., Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions, Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. (2007) 18, no. 3, 289–295,

Reinhard J., Hayes-Gill B., Schiermeier S. et al., Uterine activity monitoring during labour - a multi-centre, blinded two-way trial of external tocodynamometry against electrohysterography, Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. (2011) 215, no. 5, 199–204.

EulianoTY, NguyenMT, Darmanjian S, Busowski JD, Euliano N, Gregg AR.Monitoring uterine activity duringlabor: clinicianinterpretation of electrohysterography versus intrauterine pressure catheter and tocodynamometry. Am J Perinatol 2016;33(09):831–838.

Moni SS, Kirshenbaum R, Comfort L, Kuba K, Wolfe D, Xie X, Negassa A, Bernstein PS. Noninvasive monitoring of uterine electrical activity among patients with obesity: a new external monitoring device. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jul;3(4):100375.

Teegala B, Kalyansundar A, Ramesh B. Uterine contraction measurement device and a fetal monitoring system. 2018. WO 2011/023521 Al.

Ricci SS, Kyle T. Maternity and pediatric nursing. New York: Lippincott William and Wilkins; 2009.

Das S, Roy K, Saha CK. A novel step towards machine diagnosis of fetal status in utero: Calculation of baseline variability. In Proceedings of 2015 IEEE International Conference on Research in Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (ICRCICN). Kolkata: IEEE Press; 2015, p. 230–234.

Young RC, Marinescu PS, Seligman NS. Monitoring uterine contractions during labor: current challenges and future directions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5S):S1192-S1208.

Caldeyro- Barcia R, Poseiro JJ: Physiiology of the uterine contraction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 3:386, 1960.

Young RC, Marinescu PS, Seligman NS. Monitoring uterine contractions during labor: current challenges and future directions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5S):S1192-S1208.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:192. Reaffirmed 2021.

Lindgren L. The influence of uterine motility upon cervical dilatation in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973; 117:530.

Frey HA, Tuuli MG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Can contraction patterns predict neonatal outcomes? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:1422–7.

Arrabal PP, Nagey DA. Is manual palpation of uterine contractions accurate? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan;174(1 Pt 1):217-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70397-6. PMID: 8572010.

Bakker PCAM, Zikkenheimer M, van Geijn HP. The quality of intrapartum uterine activity monitoring. J Perinat Med 2008;36 (03):197–201.

1 Wilmink FA, Wilms FF, Heydanus R, Mol BWJ, Papatsonis DNM. Fetal complications after placement of an intrauterine pressure catheter: a report of two cases and review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21(12):880–883.

Harper LM, Shanks AL, Tuuli MG, Roehl KA, Cahill AG. The risks and benefits of internal monitors in laboring patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;209(1):38.e1-6.

Euliano TY, Nguyen MT, Darmanjian S, McGorray SP, Euliano N, Onkala A, Gregg AR. Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of 3 methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):66.e1-6.

Marion W.C. Vlemminx, Kirsten M.J. Thijssen, Galin I. Bajlekov, Jeanne P. Dieleman, M. Beatrijs Van Der Hout-Van Der Jagt, S. Guid Oei,Electrohysterography for uterine monitoring during term labour compared to external tocodynamometry and intra-uterine pressure catheter,European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Volume 215, 2017, e197-205.

Garfield R. E. and Maner W. L., Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions, Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. (2007) 18, no. 3, 289–295,

Reinhard J., Hayes-Gill B., Schiermeier S. et al., Uterine activity monitoring during labour - a multi-centre, blinded two-way trial of external tocodynamometry against electrohysterography, Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. (2011) 215, no. 5, 199–204.

EulianoTY, NguyenMT, Darmanjian S, Busowski JD, Euliano N, Gregg AR.Monitoring uterine activity duringlabor: clinicianinterpretation of electrohysterography versus intrauterine pressure catheter and tocodynamometry. Am J Perinatol 2016;33(09):831–838.

Moni SS, Kirshenbaum R, Comfort L, Kuba K, Wolfe D, Xie X, Negassa A, Bernstein PS. Noninvasive monitoring of uterine electrical activity among patients with obesity: a new external monitoring device. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jul;3(4):100375.