Bal Arısı Kolonisinde Yaşam ve İletişim
Özet
Bu bölüm, bal arısı kolonilerindeki yaşamı ve bireyler arası iletişimi inceler. Bal arıları sosyal böceklerdir ve kolonide uyumlu bir düzen içinde çalışarak yavru bakımı, besin toplama, depolama, savunma gibi görevleri yerine getirirler. Koloninin iletişiminde feromonlar, titreşimler ve danslar kritik rol oynamaktadır. Bal arısı kolonilerinde feromonlar, koloni birliğini ve iş bölümünü sağlayarak bir süper organizma gibi çalışmalarına olanak tanır. Bu detaylar, bal arısı kolonilerinin karmaşık sosyal yapısını ve bu yapının sürdürülmesinde feromonların oynadığı merkezi rolü ortaya koymaktadır. Bal arısı kolonilerinin yaşam düzeni ve bireyler arasındaki iletişimi, ortak bir yuvada hayatta kalmaya, gelişmeye ve topluluk halinde yaşamaya verilebilecek en iyi örneklerden birisidir.
Referanslar
Winston ML.The biology of the honeybee. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1987
Seeley TD. The honey bee colony as a superorganism. American Scientist. 1989a; 77: 546-553. doi: 10.2307/27856005
Keller L. Behavioral plasticity: levels of sociality in bees. Current Biology. 2003; 13(16): R644-R645. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00571-2
Seeley TD. Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1982; 11: 287-293. doi:10.1007/BF00299306
Seeley TD. The Wisdom of the Hive: the Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press. 1995
Wilson EO, Hölldobler. Eusociality: origin and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2005; 102(38):13367-13371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505858102
Crailsheim K. The protein balance of the honey bee worker. Apidologie. 1990; 21(5):417-429
Wharton KE, Dyer FC., Huang ZY, Getty, T. The honeybee queen influences the regulation of colony drone production. Behavioral Ecology. 2007; 18(6):1092-1099. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm086.
Smith ML, Koenig PA, Peters JM. The cues of colony size: how honey bees sense that their colony is large enough to begin to invest in reproduction. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2017; 220(9):1597-1605. doi: 10.1242/jeb.150342
Haydak MH. Honey bee nutrition. Annual review of entomology. 1970; 15(1), 143-156. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.15.010170.001043
Beetsma J. The Process of Queen-Worker Differentiation in the Honeybee. Bee World. 1979; 60(1):24–39. doi:10.1080/0005772X.1979.1109772
Crailsheim K. The flow of jelly within a honeybee colony. Journal of Comparative Physiology B. 1992; 162: 681-689.
Page Jr RE, Peng CYS. Aging and development in social insects with emphasis on the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Experimental gerontology. 2001; 36(4-6):695-711. doi:10.1016/S0531-5565(00)00236-9
Wang Y, Ma LT, Xu BH. Diversity in life history of queen and worker honey bees, Apis mellifera L. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 2014; 18(2): 145-149. doi:10.1016/j.aspen.2014.11.005
Sieber KR, Dorman T, Newell N, Yan H. (Epi)Genetic Mechanisms Underlying the Evolutionary Success of Eusocial Insects. Insects. 2021; 12(6):498. doi.org/10.3390/insects12060498
Estoup A, Solignac M, Cornuet JM. Precise assessment of the number of patrilines and of genetic relatedness in honeybee colonies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1994; 258:1-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0133.
Ruttner F. (Ed.). Queen rearing: Biological basis and technical instruction (pp. 358). Apimondia Publishing House.1983.
Koeniger N, Koeniger G. Reproductive isolation among species of the genus apis. Apidologie. 2000; 31:313-339. doi: 10.1051/apido:2000125.
Schlüns H, Moritz RFA, Neumann P, et al. Multiple nuptial flights, sperm transfer and the evolution of extreme polyandry in honeybee queens. Animal Behavior. 2005; 70:125-131. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.11.005
Ratnieks FLW, Foster KR, Wenseleers T. Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annual Review of Entomology. 2006; 51:581-608. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151003.
Koeniger N., Koeniger G. Mating flight duration of Apis mellifera queens: As short as possible, as long as necessary. Apidologie. 2007; 38:606-611. doi: 10.1051/apido:2007060
Koeniger N., Koeniger G., Gries M., Tingek S. Drone competition at drone congregation areas in four Apis species. Apidologie. 2005; 36:211-221. doi: 10.1051/apido:2005011
Johnson BR. Division of labor in honeybees: form, function, and proximate mechanisms. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology. 2010; 64:305-316. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0874-7
Johnson BR. Honey Bee Biology; Seeley, T.D., Ed.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA; Oxford, UK. 2023.
Calderone NW. Proximate mechanisms of age polyethism in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Apidologie. 1998; 29:127-158.
Johnson BR. Organization of work in the honeybee: a compromise between division of labour and behavioural flexibility. Prob R Soc Lond B. 2003; 270:147-152. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2207
Johnson BR. Limited flexibility in the temporal caste system of the honey bee. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2005; 58:219-226. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0949-z
Johnson BR. Within-nest temporal polyethism in the honey bee. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2008; 62:777-784. doi: 10.1007/s00265-007-0503-2
Robinson GE. Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annual Review of Entomology. 1992; 37:637-65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.003225
Velthuis HH. Observations on transmission of queen substance in honey bee colony by attendants of queen. Behaviour. 1972; 41:105-129
Crailsheim K, Schneider LHW, Hrassnigg N, et al. Pollen consumption and utilization in worker honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica): dependence on individual age and function. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1992; 38: 409-419. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(92)90117-V
Seeley TD. Social foraging in honeybees-how nectar foragers assess their colony nutritional status. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1989b; 24:181-189
Robinson GE, Page RE. Genetic determination of nectar foraging, pollen foraging, and nest-site scouting in honey bee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1989; 24:317-323.
Pankiw T, Tarpy DR, Page RE. Genotype and rearing environment affect honeybee perception and foraging behaviour. Animal Behaviour. 2002; 64: 663-672. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.3096
Elekonich, M. M., Schulz, D. J., Bloch, G., & Robinson, G. E. Juvenile hormone levels in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) foragers: foraging experience and diurnal variation. Journal of Insect Physiology, 2001; 47(10), 1119-1125.
Schulz DJ, Sullivan JP, Robinson GE. Juvenile hormone and octopamine in the regulation of division of labor in honey bee colonies. Hormones and Behavior. 2002; 42(2): 222-231. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1806
Schilcher F, Scheiner R. New insight into molecular mechanisms underlying division of labor in honeybees. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 2023; 59:101080. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2023.101080
Pankiw T, Page RE. Response Thresholds to Sucrose Predict Foraging Division of Labor in Honeybees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2000. 47 (4): 265-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050664
Simone-Finstrom M, Gardner J, Spivak M. Tactile learning in resin foraging honeybees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2010; 64:1609-1617. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0974-4
Kühnholz S, Seeley T. The control of water collection in honey bee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1997; 41:407-422. doi:10.1007/s002650050402
Nicolson SW. Water homeostasis in bees, with the emphasis on sociality. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2009; 212(3): 429-434. doi: 10.1242/jeb.022343
Ostwald MM, Smith ML, Seeley TD. The behavioral regulation of thirst, water collection and water storage in honey bee colonies. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2016; 219(14): 2156-2165. Doi: 10.1242/jeb.139824
Nakamura J, Seeley TD. The functional organization of resin work in honeybee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2006; 60: 339-349. Doi:10.1007/S00265-006-0170-8
Free J.B. Pheromones of Social Bees. London: Chapman and Hall; 1987.
Leoncini I, Le Conte Y, Costagliola G, Plettner E, Toth AL, Wang M, Huang Z, Bécard JM, Crauser D, Slessor KN, Robinson GE. Regulation of behavioral maturation by a primer pheromone produced by adult worker honey bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(50):17559-17564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407652101.
Trhlin M, Rajchard J. Chemical communication in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.): A review. Vet Med-Czech. 2011; 56(6):265-273. doi: 10.17221/1543-VETMED.
Bortolotti L, Costa C. Chemical Communication in the Honey Bee Society. In: Mucignat-Caretta C, editor. Neurobiology of Chemical Communication. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2014. Chapter 5. PMID: 24830041.
Wyatt TD. Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.). 2003.
Slessor KN, Foster LJ, Winston ML. in Pheromone Communication in Social Insects, eds. Vander Meer, R. K., Breed, M. D., Winston, M. L. & Espelie, K. E. (Westview, Boulder, CO), pp. 331-343.1988
Ali M.F, Morgan E.D. Chemical communication in insect communities: A guide to insect pheromones with special emphasis on social insects. Biological Reviews Camb Philos. 1990; 65(3):227-247.
Slessor KN, Winston ML, Le Conte Y. Pheromone communication in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2005; 31(11):2731-2745. Doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-7623-9
Le Conte Y, Hefetz A. Primer pheromones in social Hymenoptera. Annual review of entomology. 2008; 53:523-542.
Mumoki, F.N., Crewe, R.M. Pheromone communication in honey bees (Apis mellifera) G.J. Blomquist, R.G. Vogt (Eds.), Insect Pheromone Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (second ed.), Academic Press, Elsevier, London, San Diego, Cambridge (MA), Oxford (2021), pp. 183-236, 10.1016/B978-0-12-819628-1.00006-7
Pankiw T, Winston ML, Slessor KN. Queen attendance behavior of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) that are high and low responding to queen mandibular pheromone Insectes Sociaux, 1995; 41:371-378. doi: 10.1007/BF01242165
Pankiw T, Page REJr, Fondrk MK. Brood pheromone stimulates pollen foraging in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1998; 44:193–198. Doi: 10.1007/s002650050531
Villar G, Baker TC, Patch HM, et al. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying sex- and maturation-related variation in pheromone responses in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology. 2015; 201(7):731-739. Doi: 10.1007/s00359-015-1006-7
Villar G, Grozinger CM. Primer effects of the honeybee, Apis mellifera, queen pheromone 9-ODA on drones. Animal Behaviour. 2017; 127(1):271-279. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.03.023
Winston ML, Slessor KN. Honey bee primer pheromones and colony organization: Gaps in our knowledge. Apidologie. 1998; 29:81-95. doi: 10.1051/apido:19980105
Hoover, S.E.R., Winston, M.L. & Oldroyd, B.P. Retinue attraction and ovary activation: responses of wild type and anarchistic honey bees (Apis mellifera) to queen and brood pheromones. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2005; 59: 278-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0039-2
Keeling CI, Slessor KN, Higo HA, Winston ML. New components of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen retinue pheromone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003;100(8):4486-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0836984100. E
Butler CG, Fairey EM. Pheromones of the honeybee: biological studies of the mandibular gland secretion of the queen. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1964; 3(2):65-76.
Gary NE, Marston J. Mating behavior of drone honey bees with queen models (Apis mellifera L.). Animal Behaviour. 1971; 19:299–304.
Loper GM, Taylor OR Jr, Foster LJ, et al., Relative attractiveness of queen mandibular pheromone components to honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) drones. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1996; 35: 122-123. Doi: 10.1080/00218839.1996.11100923
Plettner E, Otis GW, Wimalaratne PDC, et al., Species- and caste-determined mandibular gland signals in honey bees (Apis). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1997; 23:363-377. doi:10.1023/B: JOEC.0000006365.20996.a2
Brockmann A, Dietz D, Spaethe J, et al., Beyond 9-ODA: Sex pheromone communication in the European honey bee Apis mellifera L. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2006;32(3):657–67. Doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-9027-2
Melathopoulos A.P, Winston M.L, Pettis J.S, Pankiw T. Effect of queen mandibular pheromone on initiation and maintenance of queen cells in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Canadian Entomologist. 1996; 128 (2):263-272. Doi:10.4039/ent128263-2
Le Conte Y, Arnold G, Trouiller J, Masson C. Identification of a brood pheromone in honey bees. Naturwissenschaften. 1990; 77:334-336. DOI:10.1007/BF01138390
Arnold G, Masson C, Budharugsa S. Comparative study of the antennal lobes and their afferent pathways in the worker bee and the drone (Apis mellifera). Cell Tissue Res. 1985; 242:593-605
Huang ZY, Robinson GE, Tobe SS, et al., Hormonal regulation of behavioural development in the honey bee is based on changes in the rate of juvenile hormone biosynthesis. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1991; 37: 733-741. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(91)90107-B
Huang Z.-Y, Robinson G.E. Honey bee colony integration: Worker-worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1992; 89:11726-11729. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.11726
Gervan N, Winston M, Higo H, Hoover S. The effects of honey bee (Apis mellifera) queen mandibular pheromone on colony defensive behaviour. Journal of Apicultural Research. 2005; 44:175-179. doi: 10.1080/00218839.2005.11101175
Carroll MJ, Brown NJ, Ruetz Z, et al., Honey bee retinue workers respond similarly to queens despite seasonal differences in Queen Mandibular Pheromone (QMP) signaling. PLoS ONE. 2023; 18(9): e0291710.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291710
Callow RK, Johnston NC. The chemical constitution and synthesis of queen substance of honey bees (Apis mellifera). Bee World. 1960; 41:152-153.
Plettner E, Slessor KN, Winston ML, et al. Caste-selective pheromone biosynthesis in honey bees. Science. 1996; 271:1851-1853.
Slessor KN, Kaminski LA, King GGS, et al. Semiochemicals of the honey bee queen mandibular glands. Journal of Chemical Ecology 1990; 16:851-860. Doi: 10.1007/BF01016495
Yusuf AA, Pirk CWW, Crewe RM. 2015. Mandibular gland pheromone contents in workers and queens of Apis mellifera adansonii. Apidologie. 2015; 46:559-572. Doi:10.1007/s13592-014-0346-6.
Beggs KT, Glendining KA, Marechal NM, et al.Vergoz V, Nakamura I, Slessor K.N, Mercer A.R. Queen pheromone modulates brain dopamine function in worker honey bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007; 104:2460-2464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608224104
Vergoz V, Schreurs HA, Mercer AR: Queen pheromone blocks aversive learning in young worker bees. Science. 2007; 317: 384-386. 10.1126/science.1142448.
Engels W, Rosenkranz P, Adler A, Taghizadeh T, Lübke G, Francke W. Mandibular gland volatiles and their ontogenetic patterns in queen honey bees, Apis mellifera carnica. Journal of Insect Physiology 1997; 43(4):307-313. Doi: 10.1016/S0022-1910(96)00110-2
Rhodes JW, Lacey MJ, Harden S. Changes with age in queen honey bee (Apis mellifera) head chemical constituents (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology. 2007; 50:11-22
Strauss K, Scharpenberg H, Crewe R.M, et al. The role of the queen mandibular gland pheromone in honey bees (Apis mellifera): Honest signal or suppressive agent? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2008; 62:1523-1531. Doi: 10.1007/s00265-008-0581-9
Keeling CI, Otis GW, Hadisoesilo S, et al. Slessor KN. Mandibular gland component analysis in the head extracts of Apis cerana and Apis nigrocincta. Apidologie. 2001; 32(3): 243-252. doi:10.1051/apido:2001126
Keeling CI, Lessor KN, Koeniger N, et al. Quantitative analysis of the mandibular gland components of the dwarf honey bee (Apis florea Fabricius). Apidologie. 2000; 31:293-299. Doi: 10.1051/apido:2000123
Fischer P, Grozinger CM. Pheromonal regulation of starvation resistance in honey bee workers (Apis mellifera). Naturwissenschaften. 2008, 95: 723-729. Doi:10.1007/s00114-008-0378-8.
Wossler TC, Crewe RM. The releaser effects of the tergal gland secretion of queens honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Insect Behavior 12(3): 343-351. 1999b; 12(3):343-351. Doi: 10.1023/a:1020839505622
Wossler TC, Crewe RM. Mass spectral identification of the tergal gland secretions of female castes of two African honey bee races (Apis mellifera). Journal of Apicultural Research. 1999a; 38(3-4):137 48. Doi: 10.1080/00218839.1999.11101004
Moritz RFA, Crewe RM. Chemical signals of queens in kin recognition of honey bees, Apis mellifera L. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 1988; 164:83–89.
Wossler TC, Crewe RM. Honey bee queen tergal gland secretion affects ovarian development in caged workers. Apidologie. 1999c; 30:311-320.
Katzav-Gozansky T, Boulay R, Soroker V, Hefetz A. Queen-signal modulation of worker pheromonal composition in honey bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2004; 271:2065-2069. Doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2839
Ratnieks FLW. Evidence for a queen-produced egg-marking pheromone and its use in worker policing in the honey bee. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1995; 34:31–37. Doi: 10.1080/00218839.1995.11100883
Ratnieks FLW, Visscher PK. Worker policing in honey bees. Nature. 1989; 342:796–797.
Dor R, Katzav-Gozansky T, Hefetz A. Dufour’s gland pheromone as a reliable fertility signal among honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2005; 58:270–276. Doi: 10.1007/s00265-005-0923-9
Katzav-Gozansky T, Soroker V, Hefetz A. Plasticity in caste related exocrine secretion biosynthesis in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Journal of Insect Physiology. 2000; 46:993–998. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(99)00209-7
Katzav-Gozansky T, Soroker V, Hefetz A. Honey bees Dufour’s gland: Idiosyncrasy of a new queen signal. Apidologie. 2002; 33:525-537. Doi: 10.1051/apido:2002035
Katzav-Gozansky T, Soroker V, Hefetz A. Honey bee egglaying workers mimic a queen signal. Insectes Sociaux. 2003; 50(1):20–23. Doi: 10.1007/s000400300003
Arnhart L. Das krallenglied der honigbiene. Arch Bienenk. 1923; 5:37–86.
Lensky Y, Cassier P, Finkel A, et al. Delorme-Joulie C, Levinsohn M. The fine structure of the tarsal glands of the honey bee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera). Cell Tissue Res. 1985; 240:153-158.
Lensky Y, Slabezki Y. The inhibiting effect of the queen bee (Apis mellifera L.) foot-print pheromone on the construction of swarming queen cups. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1981; 27(5), 313-323
Lensky Y, Cassier P, Rosa S, Grandperrin D. Induction of balling in worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) by “stress” pheromone from Koschewnikow glands of queen bees: Behavioural, structural and chemical study. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1991; 100A:585–594.
Koeniger G, Koeniger N, Ellis J, et al. Mating biology of honey bees. Wicwas Press LLC, Kalamazoo, MI. 2014.
Villar, Gabriel, Wolfson MD, Hefetz A et al. Evaluating the role of drone-produced chemical signals in mediating social interactions in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Journal of chemical ecology. 2018; 44: 1-8. Doi: 10.1007/s10886-017-0912-2
Le Conte Y, Mohammedi A, Robinson G.E. Primer effects of a brood pheromone on honey bee behavioural development. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2001; 268:163–168. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1345
Pankiw T. Cued in: Honey bee pheromones as information flow and collective decision-making. Apidologie. 2004a; 35(2): 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2004009
Mohammedi A, Crauser D, Paris A, et al. Effect of a brood pheromone on honey bee hypopharyngeal glands. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences- Series III. 1996; 319:769-772.
Mohammedi A, Paris A, Crauser D, et al. Effect of aliphatic esters on ovary development of queenless bees (Apis mellifera L.). Naturwissenschaften. 1998; 85:455–458.
Tarpy DR, Talley E, Metz BN. Influence of brood pheromone on honey bee colony establishment and queen replacement. Journal of Apicultural Research. 2020; 60(2): 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2020.1867336
Metz BN, Pankiw T, Tichy SE, et al. Variation in and responses to brood pheromone of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2010; 36(4):432-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9775-5
Pankiw T. Brood pheromone modulation of pollen forager turn around time in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Insect Behavior. 2007; 20(2):173–180. Doi: 10.1007/s10905-007-9071-6
Pankiw T, Roman R, Sagili RR, et al. Pheromone-modulated behavioral suites influence colony growth in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Die Naturwissenschaften. 2004; 91(12):575-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0568-y
Maisonnasse A, Lenoir JC, Costagliola G, et al. A scientific note on E-β-ocimene, a new volatile primer pheromone that inhibits worker ovary development in honey bees. Apidologie. 2009; 40 (5):562–564. Doi: 10.1051/apido/2009024
Maisonnasse, A, Lenoir JC, Beslay D,et al. E-β-Ocimene, a Volatile Brood Pheromone Involved in Social Regulation in the Honey Bee Colony (Apis mellifera). PLoS One. 2010; 5 (10): e13531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013531
Noël A, Dumas C, Rottier E, et al. Detailed chemical analysis of honey bee (Apis mellifera) worker brood volatile profile from egg to emergence. PLoS ONE. 2023; 18(2): e0282120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282120
Sagili RR., Pankiw T. Effects of brood pheromone modulated brood rearing behaviors on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colony growth. Journal of Insect Behavior. 2009; 22(5): 339–349. doi:10.1007/s10905-009-9176-1
Castillo C, Chen H, Graves C, et al. Biosynthesis of ethyl oleate, a primer pheromone, in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2012; 42:404-416. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.02.002
Ma R, Rangel J, Grozinger CM. Honey bee (Apis mellifera) larval pheromones may regulate gene expression related to foraging task specialization. BMC Genomics. 2019; 20(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5923-7.
Robinson GE. Genomics and integrative analyses of division of labor in honeybee colonies. The American Naturalist. 2002; 160(6): 160-172. doi: 10.1086/342901.
Crewe RM, Moritz RFA. Variation in the components of head extraxts of workers and queens of Apis mellifera intermissa Buttel-Reepen. Z. Naturforsch. C Biosci. 1989; 44: 590–596. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1989-7-809.
Plettner E, Sutherland GRJ, Slessor KN, et al. Winston M.L. Why not be a queen? Regioselectivity in mandibular secretions of honey bee castes. Journal of Chemical Ecology 1995; 21:1017–1029.
Simon UE, Moritz RFA, Crewe RM. The ontogenetic pattern of mandibular gland components in queenless worker bees (Apis mellifera capensis Esch.). Journal of Insect Physiology. 2001; 47(7): 735–738. doi:10.1016/S0022-1910(00)00167-0.
Zheng HQ, Dietemann V, Crewe RM, et al. Pheromonal predisposition to social parasitism in the honeybee Apis mellifera capensis. Behavioral Ecology. 2010; 21, 1221–1226. doi:10.1093/beheco/ arq131
Sakagami SF. The false queen: fourth adjustive response in dequeened colonies. Behaviour. 1958; 8:280-296
Plettner E, Slessor KN, Winston ML, et al. Mandibular gland components and ovarian development as measures of caste differentiation in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Insect Physiology. 1993; 39, 235-240. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0022-1910(93)90094-8
Moritz RFA, Simon UE, Crewe RM. Pheromonal contest between honey bee workers (Apis mellifera capensis). Naturwissenschaften. 2000; 87:395-397. Doi: 10.1007/s001140050748
Makert GR, Paxton RJ, Hartfelder K. Ovariole number-A predictor of differential reproductive success among worker subfamilies in queenless honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2006; 60:815–825. Doi: 10.1007/s00265-006-0225-x
Tan K, Yang M, Wang Z, et al. The pheromones of laying workers in two honey bee sister species: Apis cerana and Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol A. 2012; 198:319–323 10.1007/s00359-012-0710-9
Pickett JA, Williams IH, Martin AP, et al. Nasonov pheromone of the honey bee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera:Apidae). I. Chemical characterization. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1980; 6:425-434.
Williams IH, Pickett JA, Martin AP. The Nasonov pheromone of the honeybee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Part II. Bioassay of the components using foragers. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1981; 7:225-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995745
Strachecka A, Chobotow J, Kuszewska K, et al. Morphology of Nasonov and Tergal Glands in Apis mellifera Rebels. Insects. 2022; 13(5):401. doi: 10.3390/insects13050401.
Cassier P, Lensky Y. The Nassanov gland of the workers of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.): Ultrastructure and behavioural function of the terpenoid and protein component. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1994; 40:577-584. Doi:10.1016/0022-1910(94)90144-9
Güler A. Bal Arısı (Apis mellifera L.) Yetiştiriciliği, Hastalıkları ve Ürünleri Kitabı. Bereket Akademi Yayınları, Azim Matbaacılık, Büyük San. 1. Cad. Alibey İşhanı, 99/33, İskitler/Ankara, 419s. 2017.
Free JB, Ferguson AW, Pickett JA. Evaluation of the various components of the Nasonov pheromone used by clustering honey bees. Physiol Entomol. 1981a; 6(3):263–268.
Free J.B, Pickett J.A, Ferguson A.W, Smith M.C. Synthetic pheromones to attract honey bee (Apismellifera) swarms. J Agr Sci. 1981b; 97: 427-431.
Seeley TD. Honeybee democracy. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press. 2010.
Al-Kahtani S.N, Bienefeld K. The Nasonov gland pheromone is involved in recruiting honey bee workers for individual larvae to be reared as queens. Journal of Insect Behavior. 2011; 25:392–400. Doi: 10.1007/s10905-011-9307-3
Thom C, Gilley DC, Hooper J, et al. The scent of the waggle dance. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(9): e228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050228
Gilley DC, Kuzora JM, Thom C. Hydrocarbons emitted by waggle-dancing honey bees stimulate colony foraging activity by causing experienced foragers to exploit known food sources. Apidologie. 2012; 43(1): 85–94. 10.1007/s13592-011-0080-2https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105671
Gilley DC. Hydrocarbons emitted by waggle-dancing honey bees increase forager recruitment by stimulating dancing. PLoS One. 2014; 9(8): e105671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105671.
Butler C. Mandibular Gland Pheromone of Worker Honeybees. Nature. 1966; 212: 530. https://doi.org/10.1038/212530a0
Boch R, Shearer D.A. Iso-pentyl acetate in stings of honey bees of different ages. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1966; 5:65–70.
Muenz T.S, Maisonnasse A, Plettner E, Le Conte Y, Rössler W. Sensory reception of the primer pheromone ethyl oleate. Naturwissenschaften. 2012; 99:421-425.
Breed MD, Guzman-Novoa E, Hunt GJ. Defensive behavior of honey bees: Organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees. Annual review of entomology. 2004; 49:271-98. doi: 0.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123155.
Wang S, Sato K, Giurfa M,et al. Processing of sting pheromone and its components in the antennal lobe of the worker honeybee, Journal of Insect Physiology. 2008; 54 (5): 833-841, //doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.03.004.
Boch R, Shearer DA, Stone BC. Identification of iso-amyl acetate as an active component in the sting pheromone of the honey bees. Nature. 1962; 195:1018-1020. doi: 10.1038/1951018b0.
Blum MS, Fales HM, Tucker KW,et al. Chemistry of the sting apparatus of the worker honey bee. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1978; 17:218–21
Pickett J., Williams I., Martin AP. (Z)-11-Eicosen-1-ol, an important new pheromonal component from the sting of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1982; 8(1):163–175. Doi:10.1007/BF00984013
Shearer D, Boch R. 2-Heptanone in the mandibular gland secretion of the honey-bee. Nature 1965, 2065:530.
Collins, A.M.; Blum, M.S. Bioassay of compounds derived from the honeybee sting. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1982, 8(2):463-470. doi: 10.1007/BF00987794.
Millor J, Pham-Delègue M, Deneubourg JL, et al. Self-organized defensive behavior in honey bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999. 96(22): 12611–12615. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12611
Wang Z, Tan K. Honey Bee Alarm Pheromone Mediates Communication in Plant-Pollinator-Predator Interactions. Insects. 2019; 10(10):366. doi: 10.3390/insects10100366.
Page R.E Jr, Metcalf R.A, Metcalf R.L, Erickson E.H Jr, Lampman R.L. Extractable hydrocarbons and kin recognition in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1991;17(4):745–756 doi: 10.1007/BF00994197.
Brockmann A, Robinson GE. Central projections of sensory systems involved in honey bee dance language communication. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 2007; 70(2): 125-136.doi: 10.1159/000102974
Kilpinen O, Storm J. Biophysics of the subgenual organ of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 1997; 181(4): 309-318. 10.1007/s003590050117
Hunt JH, Richard FJ. Intracolony vibroacoustic communication in social insects. Insectes Sociaux. 2013; 60:403–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-013-0311-9.
Michelsen A, Kirchner WH, Lindauer M. Sound and vibrational signals in the dance language of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 1986; 18: 207-212. DOI:10.1007/BF00290824
Hrncir M, Barth FG, Tautz J. Vibratory and airborne sound signals in bee communication (Hymenoptera). In: Insect Sounds and Communication (Drosopoulos S. and Claridge M.F., Eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 421-436.2006.
Kirchner WH. Acoustical communication in honeybees. Apidologie, 1993; 24 (3):297-307. 10.1051/apido:19930309
McNeil MEA. Sounds of the hive Part 1. American Bee Journal, 2015; 155(9): 985-989.
Collison C. A closer look: Sound generation and hearing. Bee Culture The Magazine of American Beekeeping. 2016. https://www.beeculture.com/a-closer-look-sound-generation-and-hearing/.
Wenner AM. Sound Communication in Honeybees. Scientific American, 1964; 210 (4), 116-125.
Kirchner WH, Lindauer M. The causes of the tremble dance of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 1994; 35: 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184419
Ramsey MT, Bencsik M, Newton M I, et al. The prediction of swarming in honeybee colonies using vibrational spectra. Scientific reports, 2020; 10(1): 9798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66115-5
Visscher PK, Shepardson J, McCart L, et al. Vibration signal modulates the behavior of house-hunting honey bees (Apis mellifera). Ethology. 1999; 105: 759-769. 10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00462.x
Schneider, SS, Lewis LA. The vibration signal, modulatory communication and the organization of labor in honey bees, Apis mellifera. Apidologie. 2004; 35(2): 117-131. doi: 10.1051/apido:2004006
Grozinger CM, Richards J, Mattila HR. From molecules to societies: mechanisms regulating swarming behavior in honey bees (Apis spp.). Apidologie, 2014; 45(3):327-346. Doi:10.1007/s13592-013-0253-2
Boucher M, Schneider SS. Communication signals used in worker-drone interactions in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Animal Behaviour. 2009; 78: 247-254.doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.04.019
Schneider SS. Dance behaviour of successful foragers of the African honeybee, Apis mellifera scutellata (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Journal of Apicultural Research. 1989; 28: 150-154.
Seeley TD, Kühnholz S, Weidenmüller A. The honey bee’s tremble dance stimulates additional bees to function as nectar receivers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1996; 39(6): 419-427. doi: 10.1007/s002650050309
Painter‐Kurt S, Schneider SS. Age and behavior of honey bees, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae), that perform vibration signals on workers. Ethology, 1998; 104(6): 457-473. Doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00083.x
Nürnberger F, Keller A, Härtel, S.,et al. Honey bee waggle dance communication increases diversity of pollen diets in intensively managed agricultural landscapes. Molecular ecology. 2019; 28(15), 3602-3611.doi: 10.1111/mec.15156
Seeley TD. The tremble dance of the honey bee: message and meanings. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1992; 31: 375-383. doi: 10.1007/BF00170604
Kirchner WH, Lindauer M, Michelsen A. Honeybee dance communication: acoustical indication of direction in round dances. Naturwissenschaften., 1988; 75: 629-630.
Spangler HG. Do honeybees encode distance information into wing vibrations of the waggle dance? Journal of Insect Behavior. 1991; 1: 15-20. doi:10.1007/bf01092547 ·
Seeley TD, Towne WF. Tactics of dance choice in honey bees: do foragers compare dances? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1992; 30:59-69.
Seeley TD, Mikheyev AS, Pagano GJ. Dancing bees tune both duration and rate of waggle-run production in relation to nectar-source profitability. Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology. 2000; 186: 813-819. Doi:10.1007/s003590000134
Gardner KE, Seeley TD, Calderone NW. Do honeybees have two discrete dances to advertise food sources? Animal Behaviour. 2008; 75:1291e1300 doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.032.
De Hazan M, Lensky Y, Cassier P. Effect of queen honey bee (Apis mellifera) ageing on her attractiveness to workers. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology. 1989; 93A:777–783. Doi: 10.1016/0300-9629(89)90501-X
Referanslar
Winston ML.The biology of the honeybee. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1987
Seeley TD. The honey bee colony as a superorganism. American Scientist. 1989a; 77: 546-553. doi: 10.2307/27856005
Keller L. Behavioral plasticity: levels of sociality in bees. Current Biology. 2003; 13(16): R644-R645. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00571-2
Seeley TD. Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1982; 11: 287-293. doi:10.1007/BF00299306
Seeley TD. The Wisdom of the Hive: the Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies. Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press. 1995
Wilson EO, Hölldobler. Eusociality: origin and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2005; 102(38):13367-13371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505858102
Crailsheim K. The protein balance of the honey bee worker. Apidologie. 1990; 21(5):417-429
Wharton KE, Dyer FC., Huang ZY, Getty, T. The honeybee queen influences the regulation of colony drone production. Behavioral Ecology. 2007; 18(6):1092-1099. doi:10.1093/beheco/arm086.
Smith ML, Koenig PA, Peters JM. The cues of colony size: how honey bees sense that their colony is large enough to begin to invest in reproduction. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2017; 220(9):1597-1605. doi: 10.1242/jeb.150342
Haydak MH. Honey bee nutrition. Annual review of entomology. 1970; 15(1), 143-156. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.15.010170.001043
Beetsma J. The Process of Queen-Worker Differentiation in the Honeybee. Bee World. 1979; 60(1):24–39. doi:10.1080/0005772X.1979.1109772
Crailsheim K. The flow of jelly within a honeybee colony. Journal of Comparative Physiology B. 1992; 162: 681-689.
Page Jr RE, Peng CYS. Aging and development in social insects with emphasis on the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Experimental gerontology. 2001; 36(4-6):695-711. doi:10.1016/S0531-5565(00)00236-9
Wang Y, Ma LT, Xu BH. Diversity in life history of queen and worker honey bees, Apis mellifera L. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology. 2014; 18(2): 145-149. doi:10.1016/j.aspen.2014.11.005
Sieber KR, Dorman T, Newell N, Yan H. (Epi)Genetic Mechanisms Underlying the Evolutionary Success of Eusocial Insects. Insects. 2021; 12(6):498. doi.org/10.3390/insects12060498
Estoup A, Solignac M, Cornuet JM. Precise assessment of the number of patrilines and of genetic relatedness in honeybee colonies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 1994; 258:1-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0133.
Ruttner F. (Ed.). Queen rearing: Biological basis and technical instruction (pp. 358). Apimondia Publishing House.1983.
Koeniger N, Koeniger G. Reproductive isolation among species of the genus apis. Apidologie. 2000; 31:313-339. doi: 10.1051/apido:2000125.
Schlüns H, Moritz RFA, Neumann P, et al. Multiple nuptial flights, sperm transfer and the evolution of extreme polyandry in honeybee queens. Animal Behavior. 2005; 70:125-131. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.11.005
Ratnieks FLW, Foster KR, Wenseleers T. Conflict resolution in insect societies. Annual Review of Entomology. 2006; 51:581-608. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151003.
Koeniger N., Koeniger G. Mating flight duration of Apis mellifera queens: As short as possible, as long as necessary. Apidologie. 2007; 38:606-611. doi: 10.1051/apido:2007060
Koeniger N., Koeniger G., Gries M., Tingek S. Drone competition at drone congregation areas in four Apis species. Apidologie. 2005; 36:211-221. doi: 10.1051/apido:2005011
Johnson BR. Division of labor in honeybees: form, function, and proximate mechanisms. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology. 2010; 64:305-316. doi:10.1007/s00265-009-0874-7
Johnson BR. Honey Bee Biology; Seeley, T.D., Ed.; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA; Oxford, UK. 2023.
Calderone NW. Proximate mechanisms of age polyethism in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. Apidologie. 1998; 29:127-158.
Johnson BR. Organization of work in the honeybee: a compromise between division of labour and behavioural flexibility. Prob R Soc Lond B. 2003; 270:147-152. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2207
Johnson BR. Limited flexibility in the temporal caste system of the honey bee. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2005; 58:219-226. doi:10.1007/s00265-005-0949-z
Johnson BR. Within-nest temporal polyethism in the honey bee. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2008; 62:777-784. doi: 10.1007/s00265-007-0503-2
Robinson GE. Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annual Review of Entomology. 1992; 37:637-65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.003225
Velthuis HH. Observations on transmission of queen substance in honey bee colony by attendants of queen. Behaviour. 1972; 41:105-129
Crailsheim K, Schneider LHW, Hrassnigg N, et al. Pollen consumption and utilization in worker honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica): dependence on individual age and function. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1992; 38: 409-419. doi:10.1016/0022-1910(92)90117-V
Seeley TD. Social foraging in honeybees-how nectar foragers assess their colony nutritional status. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1989b; 24:181-189
Robinson GE, Page RE. Genetic determination of nectar foraging, pollen foraging, and nest-site scouting in honey bee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1989; 24:317-323.
Pankiw T, Tarpy DR, Page RE. Genotype and rearing environment affect honeybee perception and foraging behaviour. Animal Behaviour. 2002; 64: 663-672. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.3096
Elekonich, M. M., Schulz, D. J., Bloch, G., & Robinson, G. E. Juvenile hormone levels in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) foragers: foraging experience and diurnal variation. Journal of Insect Physiology, 2001; 47(10), 1119-1125.
Schulz DJ, Sullivan JP, Robinson GE. Juvenile hormone and octopamine in the regulation of division of labor in honey bee colonies. Hormones and Behavior. 2002; 42(2): 222-231. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1806
Schilcher F, Scheiner R. New insight into molecular mechanisms underlying division of labor in honeybees. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 2023; 59:101080. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2023.101080
Pankiw T, Page RE. Response Thresholds to Sucrose Predict Foraging Division of Labor in Honeybees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2000. 47 (4): 265-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050664
Simone-Finstrom M, Gardner J, Spivak M. Tactile learning in resin foraging honeybees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2010; 64:1609-1617. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-0974-4
Kühnholz S, Seeley T. The control of water collection in honey bee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1997; 41:407-422. doi:10.1007/s002650050402
Nicolson SW. Water homeostasis in bees, with the emphasis on sociality. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2009; 212(3): 429-434. doi: 10.1242/jeb.022343
Ostwald MM, Smith ML, Seeley TD. The behavioral regulation of thirst, water collection and water storage in honey bee colonies. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2016; 219(14): 2156-2165. Doi: 10.1242/jeb.139824
Nakamura J, Seeley TD. The functional organization of resin work in honeybee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2006; 60: 339-349. Doi:10.1007/S00265-006-0170-8
Free J.B. Pheromones of Social Bees. London: Chapman and Hall; 1987.
Leoncini I, Le Conte Y, Costagliola G, Plettner E, Toth AL, Wang M, Huang Z, Bécard JM, Crauser D, Slessor KN, Robinson GE. Regulation of behavioral maturation by a primer pheromone produced by adult worker honey bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(50):17559-17564. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407652101.
Trhlin M, Rajchard J. Chemical communication in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.): A review. Vet Med-Czech. 2011; 56(6):265-273. doi: 10.17221/1543-VETMED.
Bortolotti L, Costa C. Chemical Communication in the Honey Bee Society. In: Mucignat-Caretta C, editor. Neurobiology of Chemical Communication. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2014. Chapter 5. PMID: 24830041.
Wyatt TD. Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.). 2003.
Slessor KN, Foster LJ, Winston ML. in Pheromone Communication in Social Insects, eds. Vander Meer, R. K., Breed, M. D., Winston, M. L. & Espelie, K. E. (Westview, Boulder, CO), pp. 331-343.1988
Ali M.F, Morgan E.D. Chemical communication in insect communities: A guide to insect pheromones with special emphasis on social insects. Biological Reviews Camb Philos. 1990; 65(3):227-247.
Slessor KN, Winston ML, Le Conte Y. Pheromone communication in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2005; 31(11):2731-2745. Doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-7623-9
Le Conte Y, Hefetz A. Primer pheromones in social Hymenoptera. Annual review of entomology. 2008; 53:523-542.
Mumoki, F.N., Crewe, R.M. Pheromone communication in honey bees (Apis mellifera) G.J. Blomquist, R.G. Vogt (Eds.), Insect Pheromone Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (second ed.), Academic Press, Elsevier, London, San Diego, Cambridge (MA), Oxford (2021), pp. 183-236, 10.1016/B978-0-12-819628-1.00006-7
Pankiw T, Winston ML, Slessor KN. Queen attendance behavior of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) that are high and low responding to queen mandibular pheromone Insectes Sociaux, 1995; 41:371-378. doi: 10.1007/BF01242165
Pankiw T, Page REJr, Fondrk MK. Brood pheromone stimulates pollen foraging in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1998; 44:193–198. Doi: 10.1007/s002650050531
Villar G, Baker TC, Patch HM, et al. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying sex- and maturation-related variation in pheromone responses in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology. 2015; 201(7):731-739. Doi: 10.1007/s00359-015-1006-7
Villar G, Grozinger CM. Primer effects of the honeybee, Apis mellifera, queen pheromone 9-ODA on drones. Animal Behaviour. 2017; 127(1):271-279. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.03.023
Winston ML, Slessor KN. Honey bee primer pheromones and colony organization: Gaps in our knowledge. Apidologie. 1998; 29:81-95. doi: 10.1051/apido:19980105
Hoover, S.E.R., Winston, M.L. & Oldroyd, B.P. Retinue attraction and ovary activation: responses of wild type and anarchistic honey bees (Apis mellifera) to queen and brood pheromones. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2005; 59: 278-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0039-2
Keeling CI, Slessor KN, Higo HA, Winston ML. New components of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen retinue pheromone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003;100(8):4486-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0836984100. E
Butler CG, Fairey EM. Pheromones of the honeybee: biological studies of the mandibular gland secretion of the queen. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1964; 3(2):65-76.
Gary NE, Marston J. Mating behavior of drone honey bees with queen models (Apis mellifera L.). Animal Behaviour. 1971; 19:299–304.
Loper GM, Taylor OR Jr, Foster LJ, et al., Relative attractiveness of queen mandibular pheromone components to honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) drones. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1996; 35: 122-123. Doi: 10.1080/00218839.1996.11100923
Plettner E, Otis GW, Wimalaratne PDC, et al., Species- and caste-determined mandibular gland signals in honey bees (Apis). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1997; 23:363-377. doi:10.1023/B: JOEC.0000006365.20996.a2
Brockmann A, Dietz D, Spaethe J, et al., Beyond 9-ODA: Sex pheromone communication in the European honey bee Apis mellifera L. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2006;32(3):657–67. Doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-9027-2
Melathopoulos A.P, Winston M.L, Pettis J.S, Pankiw T. Effect of queen mandibular pheromone on initiation and maintenance of queen cells in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Canadian Entomologist. 1996; 128 (2):263-272. Doi:10.4039/ent128263-2
Le Conte Y, Arnold G, Trouiller J, Masson C. Identification of a brood pheromone in honey bees. Naturwissenschaften. 1990; 77:334-336. DOI:10.1007/BF01138390
Arnold G, Masson C, Budharugsa S. Comparative study of the antennal lobes and their afferent pathways in the worker bee and the drone (Apis mellifera). Cell Tissue Res. 1985; 242:593-605
Huang ZY, Robinson GE, Tobe SS, et al., Hormonal regulation of behavioural development in the honey bee is based on changes in the rate of juvenile hormone biosynthesis. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1991; 37: 733-741. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(91)90107-B
Huang Z.-Y, Robinson G.E. Honey bee colony integration: Worker-worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1992; 89:11726-11729. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.11726
Gervan N, Winston M, Higo H, Hoover S. The effects of honey bee (Apis mellifera) queen mandibular pheromone on colony defensive behaviour. Journal of Apicultural Research. 2005; 44:175-179. doi: 10.1080/00218839.2005.11101175
Carroll MJ, Brown NJ, Ruetz Z, et al., Honey bee retinue workers respond similarly to queens despite seasonal differences in Queen Mandibular Pheromone (QMP) signaling. PLoS ONE. 2023; 18(9): e0291710.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291710
Callow RK, Johnston NC. The chemical constitution and synthesis of queen substance of honey bees (Apis mellifera). Bee World. 1960; 41:152-153.
Plettner E, Slessor KN, Winston ML, et al. Caste-selective pheromone biosynthesis in honey bees. Science. 1996; 271:1851-1853.
Slessor KN, Kaminski LA, King GGS, et al. Semiochemicals of the honey bee queen mandibular glands. Journal of Chemical Ecology 1990; 16:851-860. Doi: 10.1007/BF01016495
Yusuf AA, Pirk CWW, Crewe RM. 2015. Mandibular gland pheromone contents in workers and queens of Apis mellifera adansonii. Apidologie. 2015; 46:559-572. Doi:10.1007/s13592-014-0346-6.
Beggs KT, Glendining KA, Marechal NM, et al.Vergoz V, Nakamura I, Slessor K.N, Mercer A.R. Queen pheromone modulates brain dopamine function in worker honey bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2007; 104:2460-2464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608224104
Vergoz V, Schreurs HA, Mercer AR: Queen pheromone blocks aversive learning in young worker bees. Science. 2007; 317: 384-386. 10.1126/science.1142448.
Engels W, Rosenkranz P, Adler A, Taghizadeh T, Lübke G, Francke W. Mandibular gland volatiles and their ontogenetic patterns in queen honey bees, Apis mellifera carnica. Journal of Insect Physiology 1997; 43(4):307-313. Doi: 10.1016/S0022-1910(96)00110-2
Rhodes JW, Lacey MJ, Harden S. Changes with age in queen honey bee (Apis mellifera) head chemical constituents (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology. 2007; 50:11-22
Strauss K, Scharpenberg H, Crewe R.M, et al. The role of the queen mandibular gland pheromone in honey bees (Apis mellifera): Honest signal or suppressive agent? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2008; 62:1523-1531. Doi: 10.1007/s00265-008-0581-9
Keeling CI, Otis GW, Hadisoesilo S, et al. Slessor KN. Mandibular gland component analysis in the head extracts of Apis cerana and Apis nigrocincta. Apidologie. 2001; 32(3): 243-252. doi:10.1051/apido:2001126
Keeling CI, Lessor KN, Koeniger N, et al. Quantitative analysis of the mandibular gland components of the dwarf honey bee (Apis florea Fabricius). Apidologie. 2000; 31:293-299. Doi: 10.1051/apido:2000123
Fischer P, Grozinger CM. Pheromonal regulation of starvation resistance in honey bee workers (Apis mellifera). Naturwissenschaften. 2008, 95: 723-729. Doi:10.1007/s00114-008-0378-8.
Wossler TC, Crewe RM. The releaser effects of the tergal gland secretion of queens honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Insect Behavior 12(3): 343-351. 1999b; 12(3):343-351. Doi: 10.1023/a:1020839505622
Wossler TC, Crewe RM. Mass spectral identification of the tergal gland secretions of female castes of two African honey bee races (Apis mellifera). Journal of Apicultural Research. 1999a; 38(3-4):137 48. Doi: 10.1080/00218839.1999.11101004
Moritz RFA, Crewe RM. Chemical signals of queens in kin recognition of honey bees, Apis mellifera L. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 1988; 164:83–89.
Wossler TC, Crewe RM. Honey bee queen tergal gland secretion affects ovarian development in caged workers. Apidologie. 1999c; 30:311-320.
Katzav-Gozansky T, Boulay R, Soroker V, Hefetz A. Queen-signal modulation of worker pheromonal composition in honey bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2004; 271:2065-2069. Doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2839
Ratnieks FLW. Evidence for a queen-produced egg-marking pheromone and its use in worker policing in the honey bee. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1995; 34:31–37. Doi: 10.1080/00218839.1995.11100883
Ratnieks FLW, Visscher PK. Worker policing in honey bees. Nature. 1989; 342:796–797.
Dor R, Katzav-Gozansky T, Hefetz A. Dufour’s gland pheromone as a reliable fertility signal among honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2005; 58:270–276. Doi: 10.1007/s00265-005-0923-9
Katzav-Gozansky T, Soroker V, Hefetz A. Plasticity in caste related exocrine secretion biosynthesis in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Journal of Insect Physiology. 2000; 46:993–998. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(99)00209-7
Katzav-Gozansky T, Soroker V, Hefetz A. Honey bees Dufour’s gland: Idiosyncrasy of a new queen signal. Apidologie. 2002; 33:525-537. Doi: 10.1051/apido:2002035
Katzav-Gozansky T, Soroker V, Hefetz A. Honey bee egglaying workers mimic a queen signal. Insectes Sociaux. 2003; 50(1):20–23. Doi: 10.1007/s000400300003
Arnhart L. Das krallenglied der honigbiene. Arch Bienenk. 1923; 5:37–86.
Lensky Y, Cassier P, Finkel A, et al. Delorme-Joulie C, Levinsohn M. The fine structure of the tarsal glands of the honey bee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera). Cell Tissue Res. 1985; 240:153-158.
Lensky Y, Slabezki Y. The inhibiting effect of the queen bee (Apis mellifera L.) foot-print pheromone on the construction of swarming queen cups. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1981; 27(5), 313-323
Lensky Y, Cassier P, Rosa S, Grandperrin D. Induction of balling in worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) by “stress” pheromone from Koschewnikow glands of queen bees: Behavioural, structural and chemical study. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1991; 100A:585–594.
Koeniger G, Koeniger N, Ellis J, et al. Mating biology of honey bees. Wicwas Press LLC, Kalamazoo, MI. 2014.
Villar, Gabriel, Wolfson MD, Hefetz A et al. Evaluating the role of drone-produced chemical signals in mediating social interactions in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Journal of chemical ecology. 2018; 44: 1-8. Doi: 10.1007/s10886-017-0912-2
Le Conte Y, Mohammedi A, Robinson G.E. Primer effects of a brood pheromone on honey bee behavioural development. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2001; 268:163–168. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1345
Pankiw T. Cued in: Honey bee pheromones as information flow and collective decision-making. Apidologie. 2004a; 35(2): 217-226. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2004009
Mohammedi A, Crauser D, Paris A, et al. Effect of a brood pheromone on honey bee hypopharyngeal glands. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences- Series III. 1996; 319:769-772.
Mohammedi A, Paris A, Crauser D, et al. Effect of aliphatic esters on ovary development of queenless bees (Apis mellifera L.). Naturwissenschaften. 1998; 85:455–458.
Tarpy DR, Talley E, Metz BN. Influence of brood pheromone on honey bee colony establishment and queen replacement. Journal of Apicultural Research. 2020; 60(2): 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2020.1867336
Metz BN, Pankiw T, Tichy SE, et al. Variation in and responses to brood pheromone of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2010; 36(4):432-440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9775-5
Pankiw T. Brood pheromone modulation of pollen forager turn around time in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Insect Behavior. 2007; 20(2):173–180. Doi: 10.1007/s10905-007-9071-6
Pankiw T, Roman R, Sagili RR, et al. Pheromone-modulated behavioral suites influence colony growth in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Die Naturwissenschaften. 2004; 91(12):575-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-004-0568-y
Maisonnasse A, Lenoir JC, Costagliola G, et al. A scientific note on E-β-ocimene, a new volatile primer pheromone that inhibits worker ovary development in honey bees. Apidologie. 2009; 40 (5):562–564. Doi: 10.1051/apido/2009024
Maisonnasse, A, Lenoir JC, Beslay D,et al. E-β-Ocimene, a Volatile Brood Pheromone Involved in Social Regulation in the Honey Bee Colony (Apis mellifera). PLoS One. 2010; 5 (10): e13531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013531
Noël A, Dumas C, Rottier E, et al. Detailed chemical analysis of honey bee (Apis mellifera) worker brood volatile profile from egg to emergence. PLoS ONE. 2023; 18(2): e0282120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282120
Sagili RR., Pankiw T. Effects of brood pheromone modulated brood rearing behaviors on honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colony growth. Journal of Insect Behavior. 2009; 22(5): 339–349. doi:10.1007/s10905-009-9176-1
Castillo C, Chen H, Graves C, et al. Biosynthesis of ethyl oleate, a primer pheromone, in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2012; 42:404-416. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.02.002
Ma R, Rangel J, Grozinger CM. Honey bee (Apis mellifera) larval pheromones may regulate gene expression related to foraging task specialization. BMC Genomics. 2019; 20(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5923-7.
Robinson GE. Genomics and integrative analyses of division of labor in honeybee colonies. The American Naturalist. 2002; 160(6): 160-172. doi: 10.1086/342901.
Crewe RM, Moritz RFA. Variation in the components of head extraxts of workers and queens of Apis mellifera intermissa Buttel-Reepen. Z. Naturforsch. C Biosci. 1989; 44: 590–596. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1989-7-809.
Plettner E, Sutherland GRJ, Slessor KN, et al. Winston M.L. Why not be a queen? Regioselectivity in mandibular secretions of honey bee castes. Journal of Chemical Ecology 1995; 21:1017–1029.
Simon UE, Moritz RFA, Crewe RM. The ontogenetic pattern of mandibular gland components in queenless worker bees (Apis mellifera capensis Esch.). Journal of Insect Physiology. 2001; 47(7): 735–738. doi:10.1016/S0022-1910(00)00167-0.
Zheng HQ, Dietemann V, Crewe RM, et al. Pheromonal predisposition to social parasitism in the honeybee Apis mellifera capensis. Behavioral Ecology. 2010; 21, 1221–1226. doi:10.1093/beheco/ arq131
Sakagami SF. The false queen: fourth adjustive response in dequeened colonies. Behaviour. 1958; 8:280-296
Plettner E, Slessor KN, Winston ML, et al. Mandibular gland components and ovarian development as measures of caste differentiation in the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Insect Physiology. 1993; 39, 235-240. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0022-1910(93)90094-8
Moritz RFA, Simon UE, Crewe RM. Pheromonal contest between honey bee workers (Apis mellifera capensis). Naturwissenschaften. 2000; 87:395-397. Doi: 10.1007/s001140050748
Makert GR, Paxton RJ, Hartfelder K. Ovariole number-A predictor of differential reproductive success among worker subfamilies in queenless honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2006; 60:815–825. Doi: 10.1007/s00265-006-0225-x
Tan K, Yang M, Wang Z, et al. The pheromones of laying workers in two honey bee sister species: Apis cerana and Apis mellifera. J Comp Physiol A. 2012; 198:319–323 10.1007/s00359-012-0710-9
Pickett JA, Williams IH, Martin AP, et al. Nasonov pheromone of the honey bee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera:Apidae). I. Chemical characterization. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1980; 6:425-434.
Williams IH, Pickett JA, Martin AP. The Nasonov pheromone of the honeybee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Part II. Bioassay of the components using foragers. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1981; 7:225-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995745
Strachecka A, Chobotow J, Kuszewska K, et al. Morphology of Nasonov and Tergal Glands in Apis mellifera Rebels. Insects. 2022; 13(5):401. doi: 10.3390/insects13050401.
Cassier P, Lensky Y. The Nassanov gland of the workers of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.): Ultrastructure and behavioural function of the terpenoid and protein component. Journal of Insect Physiology. 1994; 40:577-584. Doi:10.1016/0022-1910(94)90144-9
Güler A. Bal Arısı (Apis mellifera L.) Yetiştiriciliği, Hastalıkları ve Ürünleri Kitabı. Bereket Akademi Yayınları, Azim Matbaacılık, Büyük San. 1. Cad. Alibey İşhanı, 99/33, İskitler/Ankara, 419s. 2017.
Free JB, Ferguson AW, Pickett JA. Evaluation of the various components of the Nasonov pheromone used by clustering honey bees. Physiol Entomol. 1981a; 6(3):263–268.
Free J.B, Pickett J.A, Ferguson A.W, Smith M.C. Synthetic pheromones to attract honey bee (Apismellifera) swarms. J Agr Sci. 1981b; 97: 427-431.
Seeley TD. Honeybee democracy. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press. 2010.
Al-Kahtani S.N, Bienefeld K. The Nasonov gland pheromone is involved in recruiting honey bee workers for individual larvae to be reared as queens. Journal of Insect Behavior. 2011; 25:392–400. Doi: 10.1007/s10905-011-9307-3
Thom C, Gilley DC, Hooper J, et al. The scent of the waggle dance. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(9): e228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050228
Gilley DC, Kuzora JM, Thom C. Hydrocarbons emitted by waggle-dancing honey bees stimulate colony foraging activity by causing experienced foragers to exploit known food sources. Apidologie. 2012; 43(1): 85–94. 10.1007/s13592-011-0080-2https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105671
Gilley DC. Hydrocarbons emitted by waggle-dancing honey bees increase forager recruitment by stimulating dancing. PLoS One. 2014; 9(8): e105671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105671.
Butler C. Mandibular Gland Pheromone of Worker Honeybees. Nature. 1966; 212: 530. https://doi.org/10.1038/212530a0
Boch R, Shearer D.A. Iso-pentyl acetate in stings of honey bees of different ages. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1966; 5:65–70.
Muenz T.S, Maisonnasse A, Plettner E, Le Conte Y, Rössler W. Sensory reception of the primer pheromone ethyl oleate. Naturwissenschaften. 2012; 99:421-425.
Breed MD, Guzman-Novoa E, Hunt GJ. Defensive behavior of honey bees: Organization, genetics, and comparisons with other bees. Annual review of entomology. 2004; 49:271-98. doi: 0.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123155.
Wang S, Sato K, Giurfa M,et al. Processing of sting pheromone and its components in the antennal lobe of the worker honeybee, Journal of Insect Physiology. 2008; 54 (5): 833-841, //doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2008.03.004.
Boch R, Shearer DA, Stone BC. Identification of iso-amyl acetate as an active component in the sting pheromone of the honey bees. Nature. 1962; 195:1018-1020. doi: 10.1038/1951018b0.
Blum MS, Fales HM, Tucker KW,et al. Chemistry of the sting apparatus of the worker honey bee. Journal of Apicultural Research. 1978; 17:218–21
Pickett J., Williams I., Martin AP. (Z)-11-Eicosen-1-ol, an important new pheromonal component from the sting of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1982; 8(1):163–175. Doi:10.1007/BF00984013
Shearer D, Boch R. 2-Heptanone in the mandibular gland secretion of the honey-bee. Nature 1965, 2065:530.
Collins, A.M.; Blum, M.S. Bioassay of compounds derived from the honeybee sting. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1982, 8(2):463-470. doi: 10.1007/BF00987794.
Millor J, Pham-Delègue M, Deneubourg JL, et al. Self-organized defensive behavior in honey bees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999. 96(22): 12611–12615. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12611
Wang Z, Tan K. Honey Bee Alarm Pheromone Mediates Communication in Plant-Pollinator-Predator Interactions. Insects. 2019; 10(10):366. doi: 10.3390/insects10100366.
Page R.E Jr, Metcalf R.A, Metcalf R.L, Erickson E.H Jr, Lampman R.L. Extractable hydrocarbons and kin recognition in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1991;17(4):745–756 doi: 10.1007/BF00994197.
Brockmann A, Robinson GE. Central projections of sensory systems involved in honey bee dance language communication. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 2007; 70(2): 125-136.doi: 10.1159/000102974
Kilpinen O, Storm J. Biophysics of the subgenual organ of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 1997; 181(4): 309-318. 10.1007/s003590050117
Hunt JH, Richard FJ. Intracolony vibroacoustic communication in social insects. Insectes Sociaux. 2013; 60:403–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-013-0311-9.
Michelsen A, Kirchner WH, Lindauer M. Sound and vibrational signals in the dance language of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 1986; 18: 207-212. DOI:10.1007/BF00290824
Hrncir M, Barth FG, Tautz J. Vibratory and airborne sound signals in bee communication (Hymenoptera). In: Insect Sounds and Communication (Drosopoulos S. and Claridge M.F., Eds). CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 421-436.2006.
Kirchner WH. Acoustical communication in honeybees. Apidologie, 1993; 24 (3):297-307. 10.1051/apido:19930309
McNeil MEA. Sounds of the hive Part 1. American Bee Journal, 2015; 155(9): 985-989.
Collison C. A closer look: Sound generation and hearing. Bee Culture The Magazine of American Beekeeping. 2016. https://www.beeculture.com/a-closer-look-sound-generation-and-hearing/.
Wenner AM. Sound Communication in Honeybees. Scientific American, 1964; 210 (4), 116-125.
Kirchner WH, Lindauer M. The causes of the tremble dance of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 1994; 35: 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00184419
Ramsey MT, Bencsik M, Newton M I, et al. The prediction of swarming in honeybee colonies using vibrational spectra. Scientific reports, 2020; 10(1): 9798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66115-5
Visscher PK, Shepardson J, McCart L, et al. Vibration signal modulates the behavior of house-hunting honey bees (Apis mellifera). Ethology. 1999; 105: 759-769. 10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00462.x
Schneider, SS, Lewis LA. The vibration signal, modulatory communication and the organization of labor in honey bees, Apis mellifera. Apidologie. 2004; 35(2): 117-131. doi: 10.1051/apido:2004006
Grozinger CM, Richards J, Mattila HR. From molecules to societies: mechanisms regulating swarming behavior in honey bees (Apis spp.). Apidologie, 2014; 45(3):327-346. Doi:10.1007/s13592-013-0253-2
Boucher M, Schneider SS. Communication signals used in worker-drone interactions in the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Animal Behaviour. 2009; 78: 247-254.doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.04.019
Schneider SS. Dance behaviour of successful foragers of the African honeybee, Apis mellifera scutellata (Hymenoptera: Apidae), Journal of Apicultural Research. 1989; 28: 150-154.
Seeley TD, Kühnholz S, Weidenmüller A. The honey bee’s tremble dance stimulates additional bees to function as nectar receivers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1996; 39(6): 419-427. doi: 10.1007/s002650050309
Painter‐Kurt S, Schneider SS. Age and behavior of honey bees, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae), that perform vibration signals on workers. Ethology, 1998; 104(6): 457-473. Doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1998.tb00083.x
Nürnberger F, Keller A, Härtel, S.,et al. Honey bee waggle dance communication increases diversity of pollen diets in intensively managed agricultural landscapes. Molecular ecology. 2019; 28(15), 3602-3611.doi: 10.1111/mec.15156
Seeley TD. The tremble dance of the honey bee: message and meanings. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1992; 31: 375-383. doi: 10.1007/BF00170604
Kirchner WH, Lindauer M, Michelsen A. Honeybee dance communication: acoustical indication of direction in round dances. Naturwissenschaften., 1988; 75: 629-630.
Spangler HG. Do honeybees encode distance information into wing vibrations of the waggle dance? Journal of Insect Behavior. 1991; 1: 15-20. doi:10.1007/bf01092547 ·
Seeley TD, Towne WF. Tactics of dance choice in honey bees: do foragers compare dances? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 1992; 30:59-69.
Seeley TD, Mikheyev AS, Pagano GJ. Dancing bees tune both duration and rate of waggle-run production in relation to nectar-source profitability. Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology. 2000; 186: 813-819. Doi:10.1007/s003590000134
Gardner KE, Seeley TD, Calderone NW. Do honeybees have two discrete dances to advertise food sources? Animal Behaviour. 2008; 75:1291e1300 doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.032.
De Hazan M, Lensky Y, Cassier P. Effect of queen honey bee (Apis mellifera) ageing on her attractiveness to workers. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology. 1989; 93A:777–783. Doi: 10.1016/0300-9629(89)90501-X