Uterin Görüntülemede Ultrason Elastografi Kullanımı

Sezer Nil Yılmazer Zorlu; Uğurcan Zorlu

doi:10.37609/akya.3336

Yazarlar

Sezer Nil Yılmazer Zorlu

https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7162-4668

Uğurcan Zorlu

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8912-0812

DOI: https://doi.org/10.37609/akya.3336.c11705

Özet

Referanslar

Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Gilja OH, Saftoiu A, Bartels E, Bertolotto M, Calliada F, Clevert DA, Cosgrove D, Deganello A, D'Onofrio M, Drudi FM, Freeman S, Harvey C, Jenssen C, Jung EM, Klauser AS, Lassau N, Meloni MF, Leen E, Nicolau C, Nolsoe C, Piscaglia F, Prada F, Prosch H, Radzina M, Savelli L, Weskott HP, Wijkstra H. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall Med. 2018 Apr;39(2):e2-e44. English. doi: 10.1055/a-0586-1107. Epub 2018 Mar 6. PMID: 29510439.

Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound Elastography: Review of Techniques and Clinical Applications. Theranostics. 2017 Mar 7;7(5):1303-1329. doi: 10.7150/thno.18650. PMID: 28435467; PMCID: PMC5399595.

Vora Z, Manchanda S, Sharma R, Das CJ, Hari S, Mathur S, Kumar S, Kachhawa G, Khan MA. Transvaginal Shear Wave Elastography for Assessment of Endometrial and Subendometrial Pathologies: A Prospective Pilot Study. J Ultrasound Med. 2022 Jan;41(1):61-70. doi: 10.1002/jum.15679. Epub 2021 Mar 1. PMID: 33645765.

Manchanda S, Vora Z, Sharma R, Hari S, Das CJ, Kumar S, Kachhawa G, Khan MA. Quantitative Sonoelastographic Assessment of the Normal Uterus Using Shear Wave Elastography: An Initial Experience. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Dec;38(12):3183-3189. doi: 10.1002/jum.15019. Epub 2019 May 11. PMID: 31077426.

Dudea-Simon M, Dudea SM, Ciortea R, Malutan A, Mihu D. Elastography of the uterine cervix in gynecology: normal appearance, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer. A systematic review. Med Ultrason. 2021 Feb 18;23(1):74-82. doi: 10.11152/mu-2646. Epub 2020 Aug 18. PMID: 32905569.

Czuczwar P, Wozniak S, Szkodziak P, Kudla MJ, Pyra K, Paszkowski T. Elastography Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography in Differentiating Endometrial Polyps and Submucosal Fibroids. J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Nov;35(11):2389-2395. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.12017. Epub 2016 Sep 14. PMID: 27629761.

Du YY, Yan XJ, Guo YJ, Wang J, Wen XD, Wang N, Yang Y. Transvaginal Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography in the Diagnosis of Endometrial Lesions. Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jun 25;14:2849-2856. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S312292. PMID: 34211293; PMCID: PMC8242144.

Ma H, Yang Z, Wang Y, Song H, Zhang F, Yang L, Yan N, Zhang S, Cai Y, Li J. The Value of Shear Wave Elastography in Predicting the Risk of Endometrial Cancer and Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia. J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Nov;40(11):2441-2448. doi: 10.1002/jum.15630. Epub 2021 Jan 12. PMID: 33433027.

Zhao HX, Du YY, Guo YJ, Zhou JH, Sun CQ, Wen XD, Wang J, Wang N, Yang Y, Yan XJ. Application Value of Real-Time Shear Wave Elastography in Diagnosing the Depth of Infiltrating Muscular Layer of Endometrial Cancer. J Ultrasound Med. 2021 Sep;40(9):1851-1861. doi: 10.1002/jum.15568. Epub 2020 Nov 20. PMID: 33216384.

Frank ML, Schäfer SD, Möllers M, Falkenberg MK, Braun J, Möllmann U, Strube F, Fruscalzo A, Amler S, Klockenbusch W, Schmitz R. Importance of Transvaginal Elastography in the Diagnosis of Uterine Fibroids and Adenomyosis. Ultraschall Med. 2016 Aug;37(4):373-8. English. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1553266. Epub 2015 Aug 14. PMID: 26274380.

Liu X, Ding D, Ren Y, Guo SW. Transvaginal Elastosonography as an Imaging Technique for Diagnosing Adenomyosis. Reprod Sci. 2018 Apr;25(4):498-514. doi: 10.1177/1933719117750752. Epub 2018 Jan 10. PMID: 29320956.

Xie M, Yu H, Zhang X, Wang W, Ren Y. Elasticity of adenomyosis is increased after GnRHa therapy and is associated with spontaneous pregnancy in infertile patents. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec;48(10):849-853. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 5. PMID: 31067498.

Samanci C, Önal Y. Shearwave elastographic evaluation of uterine leiomyomas after uterine artery embolization: preliminary results. Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 9;50(2):426-432. doi: 10.3906/sag-1908-171. PMID: 32093446; PMCID: PMC7164750.

Munro MG. Adenomyosis: a riddle, wrapped in mystery, inside an enigma. Fertil Steril. 2021 Jul;116(1):89-90. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.037. Epub 2021 Jun 3. PMID: 34092408.

Chapron C, Vannuccini S, Santulli P, Abrão MS, Carmona F, Fraser IS, Gordts S, Guo SW, Just PA, Noël JC, Pistofidis G, Van den Bosch T, Petraglia F. Diagnosing adenomyosis: an integrated clinical and imaging approach. Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Apr 15;26(3):392-411. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz049. PMID: 32097456.

Soliman AA, Wojcinski S, Degenhardt F. Ultrasonographic examination of the endometrium and myometrium using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging technology: An initial experience with a new method. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2015;59(3):235-43. doi: 10.3233/CH-141842. PMID: 24840338.

Manchanda S, Vora Z, Sharma R, Hari S, Das CJ, Kumar S, Kachhawa G, Khan MA. Quantitative Sonoelastographic Assessment of the Normal Uterus Using Shear Wave Elastography: An Initial Experience. J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Dec;38(12):3183-3189. doi: 10.1002/jum.15019. Epub 2019 May 11. PMID: 31077426.

Swierkowski-Blanchard N, Boitrelle F, Alter L, Selva J, Quibel T, Torre A. Uterine contractility and elastography as prognostic factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):961-968.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 7. PMID: 28283264.

Kabukçu C, Çabuş Ü, Öztekin Ö, Fenkçi V. The strain rate of endometrium measured by real-time sonoelastography as a predictive marker for pregnancy in gonadotropin stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Oct;47(10):3561-3570. doi: 10.1111/jog.14921. Epub 2021 Jul 12. PMID: 34254413.

Shui X, Yu C, Li J, Jiao Y. Development and validation of a pregnancy prediction model based on ultrasonographic features related to endometrial receptivity. Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jun 15;13(6):6156-6165. PMID: 34306354; PMCID: PMC8290803.

Wang B, Zhang Y, Chen S, Xiang X, Wen J, Yi M, He B, Hu B. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting preterm delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(29):e16449. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016449. PMID: 31335700; PMCID: PMC6708731.

Gultekin S, Gultekin IB, Icer B, Yilmaz E, Alkan A, Kucukozkan T. Comparison of elastosonography and digital examination of cervix for consistency to predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labor with oxytocin. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Dec;30(23):2795-2799. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1263296. Epub 2016 Dec 1. PMID: 27868465.

Strobel MK, Eveslage M, Köster HA, Möllers M, Braun J, de Santis C, Oelmeier K, Klockenbusch W, Schmitz R. Cervical elastography strain ratio and strain pattern for the prediction of a successful induction of labour. J Perinat Med. 2020 Oct 2;49(2):195-202. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0189. PMID: 33001854.

Kwak DW, Kim M, Oh SY, Park HS, Kim SJ, Kim MY, Hwang HS. Reliability of strain elastography using in vivo compression in the assessment of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2020 Mar 26;48(3):256-265. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2019-0370. PMID: 32083451.

Lu J, Cheng YKY, Ho SYS, Sahota DS, Hui LL, Poon LC, Leung TY. The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jan;99(1):59-68. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13706. Epub 2019 Nov 5. PMID: 31691266; PMCID: PMC6973099.

Thomsen CR, Jensen MSS, Leonhard AK, Mortensen TØ, Bor P, Sandager P, Hinge M, Uldbjerg N. A force-measuring device combined with ultrasound-based elastography for assessment of the uterine cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Feb;101(2):241-247. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14309. Epub 2022 Jan 20. PMID: 35049047; PMCID: PMC9564675.

Hamza A, Radosa J, Gerlinger C, Solomayer EF, Ströder R, Meyberg-Solomayer G. Cervical and Lower Uterine Parameter Ultrasound and Elastographic Parameters for the Prediction of a Successful Induction of Labor. Ultraschall Med. 2021 Oct;42(5):520-528. English. doi: 10.1055/a-1131-7736. Epub 2020 Mar 20. PMID: 32198732.

Albayrak E, Dogru HY, Ozmen Z, Altunkas A, Kalayci TO, Inci MF, Server S, Sonmezgoz F, Aktas F, Demir O. Is evaluation of placenta with real-time sonoelastography during the second trimester of pregnancy an effective method for the assessment of spontaneous preterm birth risk? Clin Imaging. 2016 Sep-Oct;40(5):926-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 26. PMID: 27183142.

Mwita S, Jande M, Katabalo D, Kamala B, Dewey D. Reducing neonatal mortality and respiratory distress syndrome associated with preterm birth: a scoping review on the impact of antenatal corticosteroids in low- and middle-income countries. World J Pediatr. 2021 Apr;17(2):131-140. doi: 10.1007/s12519-020-00398-6. Epub 2021 Jan 3. Erratum in: World J Pediatr. 2021 Dec;17(6):680. doi: 10.1007/s12519-021-00414-3. PMID: 33389692.