Restoratif Materyallerde Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü ile Mikrobiyal Adezyon İlişkisi: Bir Literatür Derlemesi
Özet
Günümüz diş hekimliğinde, en sık karşılaşılan klinik senaryolar arasında mikrobiyal kolonizasyon ile doğrudan ilişkili diş çürükleri ve periodontal hastalıklar yer almaktadır. Bu konu, restoratif açıdan ele alındığında, diş sert dokularının yanı sıra dental materyallerin yüzeylerinde de bakteriyel toplulukların birikmesi, bireylerin çürük riskini artırmakta ve çürük oluşumuna sebep olabilmektedir. Son yıllarda, farklı içeriklere sahip dental restoratif materyallerin yüzey özellikleri ve bakteriyel tutulum parametreleri açısından değerlendirildiği çalışmalarda, restoratif materyallerin yüzey pürüzlülüğünün mikrobiyal tutulum açısından önemli bir etken olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bir restoratif materyaldeki bakteriyel adezyon düzeyini değerlendirirken, dental materyallerin kompozisyonunun yanı sıra uygulanan bitirme ve polisaj işlemlerinin de yüzey özellikleri ve yüzey topografisindeki değişiklikler üzerinde etkili olabileceği göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.
In contemporary dentistry, one of the most common clinical scenarios involves dental caries and periodontal diseases that are directly associated with microbial colonization. When addressed from a restorative perspective, the accumulation of bacterial communities on the surfaces of dental hard tissues as well as dental materials can increase individuals’ risk of caries and contribute to the development of tooth decay. Recent studies assessing the surface properties and bacterial adhesion parameters of dental restorative materials with varying compositions have concluded that the surface roughness of these materials is a significant factor in microbial adherence. When evaluating the level of bacterial adhesion in a restorative material, it should be considered that not only the composition of the dental materials but also the finishing and polishing procedures can significantly influence surface properties and changes in surface topography.
Referanslar
Abu-Bakr NH, Han L, Okamoto A, et al. Effect of alcoholic and low‐pH soft drinks on fluoride release from compomer. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2000; 12(2): 97-104.
Costerton JW. Overview of microbial biofilms. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1995; 15(3):137-40.
Paravina RD, Powers JM. Esthetic color training in dentistry. Michigan : Mosby ; 2004.
Drummond J, Jung H, Savers E, et al. Surface roughness of polished amalgams. Operative Dentistry. 1992; 17(4):129-34.
Carlen A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, et al. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials. 2001; 22(5): 481-487.
Kurt A, Özyurt E, Topcuoğlu N. Effect of different beverages on surface properties and cariogenic biofilm formation of composite resin materials. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2021; 84(12): 2936-2946.
Mulder R, Maboza E, Ahmed R. Streptococcus mutans growth and resultant material surface roughness on modified glass ionomers. Frontiers in Oral Health. 2020; 1: 613384.
Neme A, Frazier KB, Roeder L, et al. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Operative Dentistry. 2002; 27(1): 50-58.
Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, et al. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2007; 18: 155-163.
Bourauel C, Fries T, Drescher D, et al. Surface roughness of orthodontic wires via atomic force microscope, laser specular reflectance, and profilometry. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 1998; 20(1): 79-92.
Chapman SK. Working with a scanning electron microscope: Wellington: Lodgemark Press; 1986.
Verran J, Rowe DL, Boyd RD. Visualization and measurement of nanometer dimension surface features using dental impression materials and atomic force microscopy. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2003; 51(3): 221-228.
Gadegaard N. Atomic force microscopy in biology: technology and techniques. Biotechnic & Histochemistry. 2006; 81(2-3): 87-97.
Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S, et al. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 2004; 25(18): 4457-4463.
Çakır F, Gürgan S, Attar N. Çürük mikrobiyolojisi. Hacettepe Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 34(3-4): 78-91.
García-Godoy F, Hicks MJ. Maintaining the integrity of the enamel surface: the role of dental biofilm, saliva and preventive agents in enamel demineralization and remineralization. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2008; 139: 25S-34S.
Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd E. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management: New Jersey : Wiley-Blackwell ; 2015.
Nield-Gehrig JS, Willmann DE. Foundations of periodontics for the dental hygienist: Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
Gurgan S, Vural UK, Atalay C, et al. Antibacterial activity and biofilm inhibition of new-generation hybrid/fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(5): 2434.
Ccahuana-Vásquez RA, Cury JA. S. mutans biofilm model to evaluate antimicrobial substances and enamel demineralization. Brazilian Oral Research. 2010; 24: 135-41.
Çökük N. Çeşitli full seramik sistemlerde; yüzey pürüzlülüğünün ve polisaj metotlarının bakteri adezyonuna etkisinin incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, 2007.
Chen L, Yang S, Yu P, et al. Comparison of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on zirconia fabricated by two different approaches: an in vitro and in vivo study. Advances in Applied Ceramics. 2020; 119(5-6): 323-331.
Pietrokovski Y, Zeituni D, Schwartz A, et al. Comparison of different finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of resin composite. Materials. 2022; 15(21): 7415.
Kurt A, Cilingir A, Bilmenoglu C, et al. Effect of different polishing techniques for composite resin materials on surface properties and bacterial biofilm formation. Journal of Dentistry. 2019; 90: 103199.
Lee D-H, Mai H-N, Thant PP, et al. Effects of different surface finishing protocols for zirconia on surface roughness and bacterial biofilm formation. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2019; 11(1): 41-47.
Abdalla MM, Ali IA, Khan K, et al. The influence of surface roughening and polishing on microbial biofilm development on different ceramic materials. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2021; 30(5): 447-453.
Özarslan M, Bilgili Can D, Avcioglu NH, et al. Effect of different polishing techniques on surface properties and bacterial adhesion on resin-ceramic CAD/CAM materials. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2022; 26(8): 5289-5299.
Yuan C, Wang X, Gao X, et al. Effects of surface properties of polymer-based restorative materials on early adhesion of Streptococcus mutans in vitro. Journal of Dentistry. 2016; 54: 33-40.
Alqarni D, Nakajima M, Tagami J, et al. Study of Streptococcus mutans in early biofilms at the surfaces of various dental composite resins. Cureus. 2023; 15(4).
Bilgili D, Dündar A, Barutçugil Ç, et al. Surface properties and bacterial adhesion of bulk-fill composite resins. Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 95: 103317.
Bilgili Can D, Dündar A, Barutçugil Ç, et al. Evaluation of surface characteristic and bacterial adhesion of low‐shrinkage resin composites. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2021; 84(8): 1783-1793.
Mokhtar MM, Farahat DS, Eldars W, et al. Physico-mechanical properties and bacterial adhesion of resin composite CAD/CAM blocks: an in vitro study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2022; 14(5): e413.
Eren MM, Ozan G, Erdemir U, et al. Streptococcus Mutans adhesion to dental restorative materials after polishing with various systems: a Confocal Microscopy study. Acta Microscópica. 2021; 30(1): 53-64.
Flausino JS, Soares PBF, Carvalho VF, et al. Biofilm formation on different materials for tooth restoration: analysis of surface characteristics. Journal of Materials Science. 2014; 49: 6820-6829.
Ismail HS, Ali AI, El-Ella MAA,et al. Effect of different polishing techniques on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of three glass ionomer-based restorative materials: in vitro study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2020; 12(7): e620.
Engel A-S, Kranz HT, Schneider M, et al. Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1): 1-10.
Schubert A, Wassmann T, Holtappels M, et al. Predictability of microbial adhesion to dental materials by roughness parameters. Coatings. 2019; 9(7): 456.
Kanzow P, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, et al. Etiology and pathogenesis of dental erosion. Quintessence International. 2016; 47(4): 275-278.
Peumans M, Politano G, Van Meerbeek B. Treatment of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how. International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 2020; 15(1): 16-42.
Guler S, Unal M. The evaluation of color and surface roughness changes in resin based restorative materials with different contents after waiting in various liquids: an SEM and AFM study. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2018; 81(12): 1422-1433.
Escamilla-Gómez G, Sánchez-Vargas O, Escobar-García DM, et al. Surface degradation and biofilm formation on hybrid and nanohybrid composites after immersion in different liquids. Journal of Oral Science. 2022; 64(4): 263-270.
Somacal DC, Bellan MC, Monteiro MSG, et al. Effect of gastric acid on the surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of bulk-fill composite resins. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2022; 33: 94-102.
Bohinc K, Tintor E, Kovačević D, et al. Bacterial adhesion on glass-ionomer cements and micro/nano hybrid composite dental surfaces. Coatings. 2021; 11(2): 235.
Gupta N, Jaiswal S, Nikhil V, et al. Comparison of fluoride ion release and alkalizing potential of a new bulk-fill alkasite. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2019; 22(3): 296-299.
Kozmos M, Virant P, Rojko F, et al. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to dental material surfaces. Molecules. 2021; 26(4): 1152.
Park C, Park H, Lee J, et al. Surface roughness and microbial adhesion after finishing of alkasite restorative material. Journal of the Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2020; 47(2): 188-195.
Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, et al. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2004; 31(3): 278-285.
Daabash R, Alqahtani MQ, Price RB, et al. Surface properties and Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion of ion-releasing resin-based composite materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2023; 134: 104549.
Hahnel S, Ionescu AC, Cazzaniga G, et al. Biofilm formation and release of fluoride from dental restorative materials in relation to their surface properties. Journal of Dentistry. 2017; 60: 14-24.
Wei CX, Leung WK, Burrow MF. Evaluation of in vitro Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii attachment and growth on restorative materials surfaces. Australian Dental Journal. 2019; 64(4): 365-375.
Referanslar
Abu-Bakr NH, Han L, Okamoto A, et al. Effect of alcoholic and low‐pH soft drinks on fluoride release from compomer. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2000; 12(2): 97-104.
Costerton JW. Overview of microbial biofilms. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1995; 15(3):137-40.
Paravina RD, Powers JM. Esthetic color training in dentistry. Michigan : Mosby ; 2004.
Drummond J, Jung H, Savers E, et al. Surface roughness of polished amalgams. Operative Dentistry. 1992; 17(4):129-34.
Carlen A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, et al. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials. 2001; 22(5): 481-487.
Kurt A, Özyurt E, Topcuoğlu N. Effect of different beverages on surface properties and cariogenic biofilm formation of composite resin materials. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2021; 84(12): 2936-2946.
Mulder R, Maboza E, Ahmed R. Streptococcus mutans growth and resultant material surface roughness on modified glass ionomers. Frontiers in Oral Health. 2020; 1: 613384.
Neme A, Frazier KB, Roeder L, et al. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Operative Dentistry. 2002; 27(1): 50-58.
Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, et al. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scanning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2007; 18: 155-163.
Bourauel C, Fries T, Drescher D, et al. Surface roughness of orthodontic wires via atomic force microscope, laser specular reflectance, and profilometry. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 1998; 20(1): 79-92.
Chapman SK. Working with a scanning electron microscope: Wellington: Lodgemark Press; 1986.
Verran J, Rowe DL, Boyd RD. Visualization and measurement of nanometer dimension surface features using dental impression materials and atomic force microscopy. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2003; 51(3): 221-228.
Gadegaard N. Atomic force microscopy in biology: technology and techniques. Biotechnic & Histochemistry. 2006; 81(2-3): 87-97.
Montanaro L, Campoccia D, Rizzi S, et al. Evaluation of bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on dental restorative materials. Biomaterials. 2004; 25(18): 4457-4463.
Çakır F, Gürgan S, Attar N. Çürük mikrobiyolojisi. Hacettepe Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010; 34(3-4): 78-91.
García-Godoy F, Hicks MJ. Maintaining the integrity of the enamel surface: the role of dental biofilm, saliva and preventive agents in enamel demineralization and remineralization. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2008; 139: 25S-34S.
Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd E. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management: New Jersey : Wiley-Blackwell ; 2015.
Nield-Gehrig JS, Willmann DE. Foundations of periodontics for the dental hygienist: Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
Gurgan S, Vural UK, Atalay C, et al. Antibacterial activity and biofilm inhibition of new-generation hybrid/fluoride-releasing restorative materials. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(5): 2434.
Ccahuana-Vásquez RA, Cury JA. S. mutans biofilm model to evaluate antimicrobial substances and enamel demineralization. Brazilian Oral Research. 2010; 24: 135-41.
Çökük N. Çeşitli full seramik sistemlerde; yüzey pürüzlülüğünün ve polisaj metotlarının bakteri adezyonuna etkisinin incelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, 2007.
Chen L, Yang S, Yu P, et al. Comparison of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on zirconia fabricated by two different approaches: an in vitro and in vivo study. Advances in Applied Ceramics. 2020; 119(5-6): 323-331.
Pietrokovski Y, Zeituni D, Schwartz A, et al. Comparison of different finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of resin composite. Materials. 2022; 15(21): 7415.
Kurt A, Cilingir A, Bilmenoglu C, et al. Effect of different polishing techniques for composite resin materials on surface properties and bacterial biofilm formation. Journal of Dentistry. 2019; 90: 103199.
Lee D-H, Mai H-N, Thant PP, et al. Effects of different surface finishing protocols for zirconia on surface roughness and bacterial biofilm formation. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics. 2019; 11(1): 41-47.
Abdalla MM, Ali IA, Khan K, et al. The influence of surface roughening and polishing on microbial biofilm development on different ceramic materials. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2021; 30(5): 447-453.
Özarslan M, Bilgili Can D, Avcioglu NH, et al. Effect of different polishing techniques on surface properties and bacterial adhesion on resin-ceramic CAD/CAM materials. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2022; 26(8): 5289-5299.
Yuan C, Wang X, Gao X, et al. Effects of surface properties of polymer-based restorative materials on early adhesion of Streptococcus mutans in vitro. Journal of Dentistry. 2016; 54: 33-40.
Alqarni D, Nakajima M, Tagami J, et al. Study of Streptococcus mutans in early biofilms at the surfaces of various dental composite resins. Cureus. 2023; 15(4).
Bilgili D, Dündar A, Barutçugil Ç, et al. Surface properties and bacterial adhesion of bulk-fill composite resins. Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 95: 103317.
Bilgili Can D, Dündar A, Barutçugil Ç, et al. Evaluation of surface characteristic and bacterial adhesion of low‐shrinkage resin composites. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2021; 84(8): 1783-1793.
Mokhtar MM, Farahat DS, Eldars W, et al. Physico-mechanical properties and bacterial adhesion of resin composite CAD/CAM blocks: an in vitro study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2022; 14(5): e413.
Eren MM, Ozan G, Erdemir U, et al. Streptococcus Mutans adhesion to dental restorative materials after polishing with various systems: a Confocal Microscopy study. Acta Microscópica. 2021; 30(1): 53-64.
Flausino JS, Soares PBF, Carvalho VF, et al. Biofilm formation on different materials for tooth restoration: analysis of surface characteristics. Journal of Materials Science. 2014; 49: 6820-6829.
Ismail HS, Ali AI, El-Ella MAA,et al. Effect of different polishing techniques on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of three glass ionomer-based restorative materials: in vitro study. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2020; 12(7): e620.
Engel A-S, Kranz HT, Schneider M, et al. Biofilm formation on different dental restorative materials in the oral cavity. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1): 1-10.
Schubert A, Wassmann T, Holtappels M, et al. Predictability of microbial adhesion to dental materials by roughness parameters. Coatings. 2019; 9(7): 456.
Kanzow P, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, et al. Etiology and pathogenesis of dental erosion. Quintessence International. 2016; 47(4): 275-278.
Peumans M, Politano G, Van Meerbeek B. Treatment of noncarious cervical lesions: when, why, and how. International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 2020; 15(1): 16-42.
Guler S, Unal M. The evaluation of color and surface roughness changes in resin based restorative materials with different contents after waiting in various liquids: an SEM and AFM study. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2018; 81(12): 1422-1433.
Escamilla-Gómez G, Sánchez-Vargas O, Escobar-García DM, et al. Surface degradation and biofilm formation on hybrid and nanohybrid composites after immersion in different liquids. Journal of Oral Science. 2022; 64(4): 263-270.
Somacal DC, Bellan MC, Monteiro MSG, et al. Effect of gastric acid on the surface roughness and bacterial adhesion of bulk-fill composite resins. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2022; 33: 94-102.
Bohinc K, Tintor E, Kovačević D, et al. Bacterial adhesion on glass-ionomer cements and micro/nano hybrid composite dental surfaces. Coatings. 2021; 11(2): 235.
Gupta N, Jaiswal S, Nikhil V, et al. Comparison of fluoride ion release and alkalizing potential of a new bulk-fill alkasite. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2019; 22(3): 296-299.
Kozmos M, Virant P, Rojko F, et al. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to dental material surfaces. Molecules. 2021; 26(4): 1152.
Park C, Park H, Lee J, et al. Surface roughness and microbial adhesion after finishing of alkasite restorative material. Journal of the Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. 2020; 47(2): 188-195.
Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, et al. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2004; 31(3): 278-285.
Daabash R, Alqahtani MQ, Price RB, et al. Surface properties and Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion of ion-releasing resin-based composite materials. Journal of Dentistry. 2023; 134: 104549.
Hahnel S, Ionescu AC, Cazzaniga G, et al. Biofilm formation and release of fluoride from dental restorative materials in relation to their surface properties. Journal of Dentistry. 2017; 60: 14-24.
Wei CX, Leung WK, Burrow MF. Evaluation of in vitro Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii attachment and growth on restorative materials surfaces. Australian Dental Journal. 2019; 64(4): 365-375.
