İşitmenin Değerlendirilmesi

Balaban, A. N., Öymez, H., Mehmet, Y. U. V. A., Batuk, M., & Sennaroğlu, G. (2019). Ko- nuşma Bozukluğu Şikâyeti ile Başvuran Pediatrik Hastalarda İşitme Kaybı İnsidansı. Türk Odyoloji ve İşitme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 18-23.

Bluestone, C. D., & Nozza, R. J. (1992). Disorders of the eye and ear. Nelson textbook of pedi- atrics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1600-20.

Giolas T.G. (1990). The Measurement of Hearing Handicap Revisted: A 20 Year Perspective. Ear and Hearing, 11(5),2s-5s.

Moore B.C.J. (1997). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, London, 272- 310.

Wever E.G., Lawrence M. (1954). Physiological Acoustics. Prenceton University Press, New Jersey, 400- 410.

Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D. ve Sullivan, J.A. (1994). Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of Acousti- cal Society of America., 95(2), S1085-1099.

Wilson R.H., Stouse A.L. (1998). Auditory Measures with Speech Signals In Contemporary Perspectives in Hearing Assessment. Musiek F.E., Rintelman W.F.(eds) Ch. 2

Silman S., Silverman C.A. (1997). Basic Audiologic Testing “Auditory Diagnosis Principles and Applications” da, II. Baskı, Singular Publishing Group, Inc., San Diego- London, 29- 36.

American Speech, Language and Hearing Association. (1988). Determining Threshold Level for Speech (Guidelines). Available from www.asha.org/policy

Lieberman P., Blumstein S.E. (1988). Speech Physiology, Speech Perception and Phonetics, Sydney, 140- 208.

Lehista, I., Peterson, G.E. (1959). Linguistic considerations in the study of speech ıntelligi- bility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 31, S280-286.

Sanders JW., Rintelmann W.F. Masking in audiometry: A clinical evaluation of theree met- hods. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1964; 80: 541- 556.

Martin F.N., Jansen R.M. (1985). Speech Reception Thresholds Using Convenional vs Hi- gh-Frequency Spondees in Normals and in Subjects with Marked High-Frequency Senso- rineural Loss. J Audit. Res, 25: 133-142.

Kılıçarslan, A.S. (1986). Türk dili için geliştirilmiş fonetik dengeli tek heceli sözcük listele- rinin standardizasyonu. Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi.

Wilson R.H., Stouse A.L. (1998). Auditory Measures with Speech Signals In Contemporary Perspectives in Hearing Assessment. Musiek F.E., Rintelman W.F.(eds) Ch. 2.

Wilson R.H., Strouse A. (2002). Northwestern University Auditory Test No.6 in Multi-Tal- ker Babble: A Prelaminary Report. J Rehabil Res Dev, 39 (1): 105- 113.

Soorenburg, G.F., Bosman, A. (1992). Choosing speech materials to assesshearing impair- ment. Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. 282-292.,St Louis.

Letowski T, Hergenreder P, Tang H. (1992). Relationship between Speech Recognition Th- reshold, Average Hearing Level and Speech Importance Noise Detection Threshold. J Spe- ech Hear Res, 35(5):1131- 6.

Bilger R.C., Matthies M.L., Meyer T.A., Griffiths S.K. (1998). Psychometric Equivalence of Recorded Spondaic Words as Test Items. J Speech Hear Res, 41(3):516-526.

Bosman A.J, Smorenburg G.F.(1995) Intelligibility of Dutch Syllables and Sentences for Lis- teners with Normal Hearing and with Three Types of Hearing Impairment. Audiol.34(5): 6-84.

Gardner M.K., Rothkopf E.Z., Lapan R. ve Laffetry T. (1987). The Word Frequency Effect in Lexical Decision: Finding a Frequency-based Component. Mem&Cognit, 15(1):24-28

Gardner, H. J. (1971). Application of a high-frequency consonant discrimination word list in hearing-aid evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 36(3), 354-355.

Cekic, S., & Sennaroglu, G. (2008). The Turkish hearing in noise test. International journal of audiology, 47(6), 366-368.

Punch, J., Joseph, A., & Rakerd, B. (2004). Most Comfortable and Uncomfortable Loudness Levels.

Balaban, A. N., Öymez, H., Mehmet, Y. U. V. A., Batuk, M., & Sennaroğlu, G. (2019). Ko- nuşma Bozukluğu Şikâyeti ile Başvuran Pediatrik Hastalarda İşitme Kaybı İnsidansı. Türk Odyoloji ve İşitme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 18-23.

Bluestone, C. D., & Nozza, R. J. (1992). Disorders of the eye and ear. Nelson textbook of pedi- atrics. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1600-20.

Giolas T.G. (1990). The Measurement of Hearing Handicap Revisted: A 20 Year Perspective. Ear and Hearing, 11(5),2s-5s.

Moore B.C.J. (1997). An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, London, 272- 310.

Wever E.G., Lawrence M. (1954). Physiological Acoustics. Prenceton University Press, New Jersey, 400- 410.

Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D. ve Sullivan, J.A. (1994). Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. Journal of Acousti- cal Society of America., 95(2), S1085-1099.

Wilson R.H., Stouse A.L. (1998). Auditory Measures with Speech Signals In Contemporary Perspectives in Hearing Assessment. Musiek F.E., Rintelman W.F.(eds) Ch. 2

Silman S., Silverman C.A. (1997). Basic Audiologic Testing “Auditory Diagnosis Principles and Applications” da, II. Baskı, Singular Publishing Group, Inc., San Diego- London, 29- 36.

American Speech, Language and Hearing Association. (1988). Determining Threshold Level for Speech (Guidelines). Available from www.asha.org/policy

Lieberman P., Blumstein S.E. (1988). Speech Physiology, Speech Perception and Phonetics, Sydney, 140- 208.

Lehista, I., Peterson, G.E. (1959). Linguistic considerations in the study of speech ıntelligi- bility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 31, S280-286.

Sanders JW., Rintelmann W.F. Masking in audiometry: A clinical evaluation of theree met- hods. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1964; 80: 541- 556.

Martin F.N., Jansen R.M. (1985). Speech Reception Thresholds Using Convenional vs Hi- gh-Frequency Spondees in Normals and in Subjects with Marked High-Frequency Senso- rineural Loss. J Audit. Res, 25: 133-142.

Kılıçarslan, A.S. (1986). Türk dili için geliştirilmiş fonetik dengeli tek heceli sözcük listele- rinin standardizasyonu. Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi.

Wilson R.H., Stouse A.L. (1998). Auditory Measures with Speech Signals In Contemporary Perspectives in Hearing Assessment. Musiek F.E., Rintelman W.F.(eds) Ch. 2.

Wilson R.H., Strouse A. (2002). Northwestern University Auditory Test No.6 in Multi-Tal- ker Babble: A Prelaminary Report. J Rehabil Res Dev, 39 (1): 105- 113.

Soorenburg, G.F., Bosman, A. (1992). Choosing speech materials to assesshearing impair- ment. Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. 282-292.,St Louis.

Letowski T, Hergenreder P, Tang H. (1992). Relationship between Speech Recognition Th- reshold, Average Hearing Level and Speech Importance Noise Detection Threshold. J Spe- ech Hear Res, 35(5):1131- 6.

Bilger R.C., Matthies M.L., Meyer T.A., Griffiths S.K. (1998). Psychometric Equivalence of Recorded Spondaic Words as Test Items. J Speech Hear Res, 41(3):516-526.

Bosman A.J, Smorenburg G.F.(1995) Intelligibility of Dutch Syllables and Sentences for Lis- teners with Normal Hearing and with Three Types of Hearing Impairment. Audiol.34(5): 6-84.

Gardner M.K., Rothkopf E.Z., Lapan R. ve Laffetry T. (1987). The Word Frequency Effect in Lexical Decision: Finding a Frequency-based Component. Mem&Cognit, 15(1):24-28

Gardner, H. J. (1971). Application of a high-frequency consonant discrimination word list in hearing-aid evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 36(3), 354-355.

Cekic, S., & Sennaroglu, G. (2008). The Turkish hearing in noise test. International journal of audiology, 47(6), 366-368.

Punch, J., Joseph, A., & Rakerd, B. (2004). Most Comfortable and Uncomfortable Loudness Levels.