Relative Clauses and Passive Constructions in Turkish: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach

Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

Çiçek, M. (2008). Türkçede çifte edilgenlik kavrami üzerine bir araştirma. Journal of Turkish Linguistics, 2(1), 7-24.

De Vries, M. (2002). The syntax of relativization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Utrecht, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics

Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Diessel, H. (2007). Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New ideas in psychology, 25(2), 108-127.

Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 81(4), 882-906. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0169.

Ekmekçi, Ö. (1990). Acquisition of relativization in Turkish. Fifth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, SAOS, London University, England.

Evans, V. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.

Goldberg, A. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Hamilton, R. (1994). Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Evidence from relativization instruction in a second language. Language Learning, 44, 123-157.

Hamilton, R. (1995). The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy in SLA: Determining the basis for its developmental effects. In W. O’Grady (1999). Toward a new nativism. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 621-633.

Hawkins, J. (1999). Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language, 75, 244-285.

Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Keenan, E.., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-100.

Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London: Routledge.

Kornfilt, J. (2000). Some syntactic and morphological properties of relative clauses in Turkish. In The Syntax of Relative Clauses 121-159. (Eds) Alexiadou, A, P. Law, A. Meinenger, C. Wilder. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Labov, William (1973), ‘The boundaries of words and their meaning’ in Charles-James N. Bailey and Roger W. Shuy, eds, New ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 340–73

O’Grady, W. (2011). Relative clauses: Processing and acquisition. In E. Kidd (Ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses: Processing, typology, and function (pp. 13–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Özçelik, Ö. (2006). Processing relative clauses in Turkish as a second language (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).

Özkaragöz, İ. (1986). Monoclausal double passives in Turkish. Studies in Turkish linguistics, 8, 77-91.

Taneri, M. (1993). The morpheme-Il/(I) n: The syntax of personal passives, impersonal passives and middles in Turkish. University of Kansas.

Sebzecioğlu, T. (2008). Türkçede edilgenlik. PhD diss., DEÜ Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2008.

Slobin, D. I., & Zimmer, K. (Eds.). (1986). Studies in Turkish linguistics (Vol. 8). John Benjamins Publishing.

Tarollo, F., & Myhill, J. (1983). Interference and natural language processing in relative clauses and wh-questions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 39-70.

Underhill, R. (1976) Turkish grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press.

Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. J. (2013). An introduction to cognitive linguistics. Routledge.

Wiechmann, D. (2015). Understanding relative clauses: A usage-based view on the processing of complex constructions (Vol. 268).Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110339581.

Yilmaz, Engin. Türkiye Türkçesinde ikili çatı sorunu ve bunun öğretimi ile ilgili meseleler. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı-Belleten 49, 250-289.

Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

Çiçek, M. (2008). Türkçede çifte edilgenlik kavrami üzerine bir araştirma. Journal of Turkish Linguistics, 2(1), 7-24.

De Vries, M. (2002). The syntax of relativization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Utrecht, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics

Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Diessel, H. (2007). Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change. New ideas in psychology, 25(2), 108-127.

Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2005). A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 81(4), 882-906. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0169.

Ekmekçi, Ö. (1990). Acquisition of relativization in Turkish. Fifth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, SAOS, London University, England.

Evans, V. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. Edinburgh : Edinburgh University Press.

Goldberg, A. (1995) Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Hamilton, R. (1994). Is implicational generalization unidirectional and maximal? Evidence from relativization instruction in a second language. Language Learning, 44, 123-157.

Hamilton, R. (1995). The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy in SLA: Determining the basis for its developmental effects. In W. O’Grady (1999). Toward a new nativism. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 621-633.

Hawkins, J. (1999). Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language, 75, 244-285.

Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Keenan, E.., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun phrase accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63-100.

Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London: Routledge.

Kornfilt, J. (2000). Some syntactic and morphological properties of relative clauses in Turkish. In The Syntax of Relative Clauses 121-159. (Eds) Alexiadou, A, P. Law, A. Meinenger, C. Wilder. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Labov, William (1973), ‘The boundaries of words and their meaning’ in Charles-James N. Bailey and Roger W. Shuy, eds, New ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 340–73

O’Grady, W. (2011). Relative clauses: Processing and acquisition. In E. Kidd (Ed.), The acquisition of relative clauses: Processing, typology, and function (pp. 13–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Özçelik, Ö. (2006). Processing relative clauses in Turkish as a second language (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh).

Özkaragöz, İ. (1986). Monoclausal double passives in Turkish. Studies in Turkish linguistics, 8, 77-91.

Taneri, M. (1993). The morpheme-Il/(I) n: The syntax of personal passives, impersonal passives and middles in Turkish. University of Kansas.

Sebzecioğlu, T. (2008). Türkçede edilgenlik. PhD diss., DEÜ Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2008.

Slobin, D. I., & Zimmer, K. (Eds.). (1986). Studies in Turkish linguistics (Vol. 8). John Benjamins Publishing.

Tarollo, F., & Myhill, J. (1983). Interference and natural language processing in relative clauses and wh-questions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 39-70.

Underhill, R. (1976) Turkish grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press.

Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. J. (2013). An introduction to cognitive linguistics. Routledge.

Wiechmann, D. (2015). Understanding relative clauses: A usage-based view on the processing of complex constructions (Vol. 268).Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110339581.

Yilmaz, Engin. Türkiye Türkçesinde ikili çatı sorunu ve bunun öğretimi ile ilgili meseleler. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı-Belleten 49, 250-289.