Zor Anatomilerde Bifurkasyon Lezyonlarına Yaklaşım
Özet
Koroner bifurkasyon lezyonları (KBL), yüksek işlem komplikasyonu riski, teknik karmaşıklıkları ve olumsuz klinik çıktıları nedeniyle girişimsel kardiyolojide en zorlu lezyon gruplarından birini temsil etmektedir. Bu anatomilerde gerçekleştirilen perkütan koroner girişimlerde (PKG) temel zorluk, ana dal stentlemesi esnasında yan dal akımının kesilmesi riskidir; bu durum lezyonun yapısına, Medina sınıflamasına ve yan dal plak tutulumunun uzunluğuna göre tek stent (provizyonel) veya sistematik çift stent stratejilerinin seçilmesini gerektirir. Dik açılı, tortiyöz veya ciddi darlık barındıran zor bifurkasyonlarda yan dala erişim sağlamak için klasik telleme yöntemleri yetersiz kaldığında; Pull-Back, Long U-Shape "Reverse Wire" (RWT), çift lümenli mikrokateter destekli kolaylaştırılmış RWT ve streamlined RWT (SRWT) gibi ileri tel geçiş teknikleri devreye girmektedir. Diğer taraftan, kalsifik bifurkasyon lezyonlarında plağın hazırlanması, stent yetersiz genişlemesini ve yan dal oklüzyonunu önlemek adına kritik öneme sahiptir. Plak modifikasyonu sağlamak için cutting ve scoring balonlar, rotasyonel ve orbital aterektomi sistemleri, Excimer lazer teknolojisi ve sonik dalgalarla kalsiyumu kıran bir yöntem olan intravasküler litotripsi (IVL) başarıyla kullanılmaktadır. Son olarak, kronik total oklüzyon (KTO) içeren karmaşık bifurkasyon lezyonları, düşük teknik başarı ve yüksek periprosedürel komplikasyon oranları sergilemekte olup, yönetimlerinde Double Barrel Crush ve Slender bi-radial ping-pong gibi özelleşmiş çift stentleme yaklaşımları ile provizyonel teknikler tercih edilmektedir.
Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL) constitute one of the most challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology due to their unique technical complexities, heightened risks of procedural complications, and worse long-term clinical outcomes compared to simpler lesions. The primary difficulty during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) lies in preserving side-branch (SB) patency during main vessel stenting, which dictates whether operators choose a provisional single-stent approach or a well-planned systematic two-stent strategy based on lesion anatomy, Medina classification, and the length of side-branch disease. In highly angulated, tortuous, or severely stenosed bifurcations where conventional wiring fails, advanced re-wiring methods such as the Pull-Back technique, Long U-Shape "Reverse Wire" Technique (RWT), dual-lumen microcatheter-facilitated RWT, and streamlined RWT (SRWT) are essential for gaining difficult vessel access. Furthermore, heavy calcification within bifurcation segments drastically escalates the likelihood of stent underexpansion and plaque shifting, necessitating dedicated lesion preparation. Specialized devices like cutting and scoring balloons, rotational or orbital atherectomy systems for tissue debulking, Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty (ELCA), and Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL) utilizing acoustic shockwaves are mandatory to modify calcified plaques. Finally, bifurcation lesions involving chronic total occlusions (CTO) carry significantly lower success rates, frequently requiring innovative deployment techniques such as the Double Barrel Crush, mini-crush, or slender bi-radial ping-pong configurations.
Referanslar
Grundeken MJ, Wykrzykowska JJ, Ishibashi Y, et al. First generation versus second generation drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcations: 5-year follow-up of the LEADERS all-comers randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(7): E248-E260.
Zimarino M, Curzen N, Cicchitti V, et al. The adequacy of myocardial revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(3):1748-1757.
Albiero R, Burzotta F, Lassen JF, et al. Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, part I: implanting the first stent in the provisional pathway. The 16th expert consensus document of the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2022 Aug 5;18(5):e362-e376. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00165. PMID: 35570748.
Burzotta F, Lassen JF, Louvard Y, et al. European Bifurcation Club white paper on stenting techniques for patients with bifurcated coronary artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Intervention 2020;96:1067-79.
Zhang JJ, Gao XF, Han YL, et al. Treatment effects of systematic two-stent and provisional stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: rationale and design of a prospective, randomised and multicentre DEFINITION II trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 4;8(12):e020019corr1. PMID: 29511018; PMCID: PMC5855162.
Kim HY, Doh JH, Lim HS, et al. Identification of Coronary Artery Side Branch Supplying Myocardial Mass That May Benefit From Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(6):571-581.
Louvard Y, Medina A, Stankovic G. Definition and classification of bifurcation lesions and treatments. EuroIntervention. 2010;6 Suppl J:J31-J35.
Lunardi M, Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, et al. Bifurcation Academic Research Consortium and European Bifurcation Club. Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 5;80(1):63-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.024. Epub 2022 May 18. PMID: 35597684.
Zimarino M, Briguori C, Amat-Santos IJ, et al. Mid-term outcomes after percutaneous interventions in coronary bifurcations. Int J Cardiol. 2019;283:78-83.
Kočka V, Thériault-Lauzier P, Xiong TY, et al. Optimal Fluoroscopic Projections of Coronary Ostia and Bifurcations Defined by Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 9;13(21):2560-2570. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.042. Epub 2020 Jul 20. PMID: 33153569.
Chatterjee A, Brott BC, Foley R, et al. Safety of hydrophilic guidewires used for side-branch protection during stenting and proximal optimization technique in coronary bifurcation lesions. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2016; 17: 456-462 [PMID: 27210866 DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.04.006]
Chatterjee A, Brott B, Foley F, et al. Electron microscopic examination of polymer coated hydrophilic guidewires used for side-branch protection during bifurcation coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: A1916 [DOI:10.1016/s0735-1097(14)61919-7]
Zhang D, Xu B, Yin D, et al. How bifurcation angle impacts the fate of side branch after main vessel stent- ing: a retrospective analysis of 1,200 consecutive bifurcation lesions in a single center. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85:706-15.
Yang JH, Song YB, Song PS, et al. Impact of coronary bifurcation angle on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in real-world practice: results from the COBIS registry. Cardiol. 2012;122:216-24.
Burzotta F, De Vita M, Sgueglia G, et al. How to solve difficult side branch access? EuroIntervention. 2010 Dec;6 Suppl J:J72-80. doi: 10.4244/EIJV6SUPJA12. PMID: 21930495.
Panwar SR, Rajamanickam A, Kini A, Bifurcation Lesions. Practical Manual of Interventional Cardiology. London, Springer, 2014: 139-159 [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-6581-1_16]
Kawasaki T, Koga H, Serikawa T. New bifurcation guidewire technique: a reversed guidewire technique for extremely angulated bifurcation--a case report. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Jan 1;71(1):73-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21297. PMID: 17932888.
Watanabe S, Saito N, Bao B, et al. Microcatheter-facilitated reverse wire technique for side branch wiring in bifurcated vessels: an in vitro evaluation. EuroIntervention. 2013;9:870-877. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I7A141
Nomura T, Kikai M, Hori Y, et al. Tips of the dual-lumen microcatheter-facilitated reverse wire technique in percutaneous coronary interventions for markedly angulated bifurcated lesions. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2018;33:146-153. doi: 10.1007/s12928-017-0462-0
Hasegawa K, Yamamoto W, Nakabayashi S, et al. Streamlined reverse wire technique for the treatment of complex bifurcated lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;96:E287-E291. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28656
Bourantas CV, Zhang YJ, Garg S, et al. Prognostic implications of coronary calcification in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: a patient-level pooled analysis of 7 contemporary stent trials. Heart. 2014;100(15):1158-1164.
Mintz GS, Lefèvre T, Lassen JF, et al. Intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation and treatment of left main coronary artery disease: a consensus statement from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(4):e467-e474.
Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization [2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization]. Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(12):1585-1664.
Fujino Y, Attizzani GF, Tahara S, et al. Impact of main-branch calcified plaque on side-branch stenosis in bifurcation stenting: an optical coherence tomography study. Int J Cardiol. 2014;176(3):1056-1060.
De Maria GL, Scarsini R, Banning AP. Management of Calcific Coronary Artery Lesions: Is it Time to Change Our Interventional Therapeutic Approach? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Aug 12;12(15):1465-1478. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.038. PMID: 31395217.
Pescetelli I, Zimarino M, Ghirarduzzi A et al. Localizing factors in atherosclerosis. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015;16(12):824-830.
Barath P, Fishbein MC, Vari S, et al. Cutting balloon: a novel approach to percutaneous angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68(11):1249-1252.
Mauri L, Bonan R, Weiner BH, et al. Cutting balloon angioplasty for the prevention of restenosis: results of the Cutting Balloon Global Randomized Trial. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90(10):1079-1083.
Dahm JB, Dörr M, Scholz E, et al. Cutting-balloon angioplasty effectively facilitates the interventional procedure and leads to a low rate of recurrent stenosis in ostial bifurcation coronary lesions: A subgroup analysis of the NICECUT multicenter registry. Int J Cardiol. 2008;124(3):345-350.
Hussain F, Kashour T, Rajaram M. Ostial RCA intervention: guiding catheter challenges and use of a buddy wire to perform focused-force angioplasty on a severely calcific ostial right coronary lesion. J Invasive Cardiol. 2006;18(12):E298-E301.
Jujo K, Saito K, Ishida I, et al. Intimal disruption affects drug-eluting cobalt-chromium stent expansion: A randomized trial comparing scoring and conventional balloon predilation. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:23-31.
Otsuka Y, Koyama T, Imoto Y, et al. Prolonged Inflation Technique Using a Scoring Balloon for Severe Calcified Lesion. Int Heart J. 2017;58(6):982-987.
Weisz G, Metzger DC, Liberman HA, et al. A provisional strategy for treating true bifurcation lesions employing a scoring balloon for the side branch: final results of the AGILITY trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(3):352-359
Ritchie JL, Hansen DD, Intlekofer MJ, et al. Rotational approaches to atherectomy and thrombectomy. Z Kardiol. 1987;76 Suppl 6:59-65.
Zimarino M, Corcos T, Favereau X, et al. Rotational coronary atherectomy with adjunctive balloon angioplasty for the treatment of ostial lesions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994;33(1):22-27.
Dai Y, Takagi A, Konishi H, et al. Long-term outcomes of rotational atherectomy in coronary bifurcation lesions. Experimentak abd Therapeutic Medicine. 2015 Dec;10(6):2375-2383. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2817. Epub 2015 Oct 19. PMID: 26668644; PMCID: PMC4665993.
Barbato E, Carrié D, Dardas P, et al. European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy. EuroIntervention. 2015;11(1):30-36.
Cohen BM, Weber VJ, Blum RR, et al. Cocktail attenuation of rotational ablation flow effects (CARAFE) study: pilot. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;Suppl 3:69-72.
Andò G, Cortese B, Russo F, et al. Acute Kidney Injury After Radial or Femoral Access for Invasive Acute Coronary Syndrome Management: AKI-MATRIX J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;S0735-1097(17)36897-3.
Kini AS, Vengrenyuk Y, Pena J, et al. Optical coherence tomography assessment of the mechanistic effects of rotational and orbital atherectomy in severely calcified coronary lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 86(6): 1024–1032, doi: 10.1002//ccd.26000, indexed in Pubmed: 25964009.
Chambers JW, Feldman RL, Himmelstein SI, et al. Pivotal trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the orbital atherectomy system in treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions (ORBIT II). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7(5): 510–518, doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.01.158, indexed in Pubmed: 24852804.
Bhatt P, Parikh P, Patel A, et al. Long-term safety and performance of the orbital atherectomy system for treating calcified coronary artery lesions: 5-Year follow-up in the ORBIT I trial. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015; 16(4): 213–216, doi: 10.1016/j. carrev.2015.03.007, indexed in Pubmed: 25866032.
Hildick-Smith D, Egred M, Banning A, et al. The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN). Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3829-39.
Choi YJ, Lee SJ, Kim BK, et al. Effect of Wire Jailing at Side Branch in 1-Stent Strategy for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:443-55.
Ito H, Piel S, Das P, et al. Long-term outcomes of plaque debulking with rotational atherectomy in side-branch ostial lesions to treat bifurcation coronary disease. J Invasive Cardiol. 2009;21(11):598-601.
Iannaccone M, Barbero U, D'ascenzo F, et al. Rotational atherectomy in very long lesions: Results for the ROTATE registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88(6):E164-E172.
Iannaccone M, Colangelo S, Di Mario C, et al. Double wire rotational atherectomy technique in a heavily calcified coronary bifurcation. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(2):204-205.
Dai Y, Takagi A, Konishi H, et al. Long-term outcomes of rotational atherectomy in coronary bifurcation lesions. . Experimentak abd Therapeutic Medicine 2015 Dec;10(6):2375-2383. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2817. Epub 2015 Oct 19. PMID: 26668644; PMCID: PMC4665993.
Chambers JW, Warner C, Cortez J, et al. Outcomes after Atherectomy Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Single Center Experience. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Jul;20(7):569-572. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.08.017. Epub 2018 Aug 23. PMID: 30201481.
Sturm R, Armstrong EJ, Benhuri B, et al. Orbital Atherectomy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: A Multicenter Analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021 May;26:34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.10.023. Epub 2020 Nov 1. PMID: 33168436.
Jorge Palazuelos, David Martí Sánchez, Carlos Gutiérrez-Ortega, et al. Rotational atherectomy for the management of bifurcation lesions: a pilot randomized study REC Interv Cardiol. 2020;2(4):256-263 doi.org/10.24875/RECICE.M20000138
Abdel-Wahab M, Toelg R, Byrne RA, et al. High-Speed Rotational Atherectomy Versus Modified Balloons Prior to Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(10):e007415.
Goldberg SL, Colombo A, Akiyama T. Stent Under-Expansion Refractory to Balloon Dilatation: A Novel Solution with Excimer Laser. J Invasive Cardiol. 1998 Jun;10(5):269-273. PMID: 10762799.
Bilodeau L, Fretz EB, Taeymans Y, et al. Novel use of a high-energy excimer laser catheter for calcified and complex coronary artery lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004 Jun;62(2):155-61. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20053. PMID: 15170703.
Bittl JA. Clinical results with excimer laser coronary angioplasty. Semin Interv Cardiol. 1996 Jun;1(2):129-34. PMID: 9552503.
Mintz GS, Kovach JA, Javier SP, et al. Mechanisms of lumen enlargement after excimer laser coronary angioplasty. An intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1995 Dec 15;92(12):3408-14. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.12.3408. PMID: 8521561.
Fernandez JP, Hobson AR, McKenzie D, et al. Beyond the balloon: excimer coronary laser atherectomy used alone or in combination with rotational atherectomy in the treatment of chronic total occlusions, non-crossable and non-expansible coronary lesions. EuroIntervention. 2013 Jun 22;9(2):243-50. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I2A40. PMID: 23454891.
Badr S, Ben-Dor I, Dvir D, et al. The state of the excimer laser for coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;14(2):93-8. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2012.12.008. Epub 2013 Jan 16. PMID: 23332778.
Egred M, Brilakis ES. Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty (ELCA): Fundamentals, Mechanism of Action, and Clinical Applications. J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Feb;32(2):E27-E35. PMID: 32005787.
Tovar Forero MN, Wilschut J, Van Mieghem NM, et al. Coronary lithoplasty: a novel treatment for stent underexpansion. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):221.
Tovar Forero MN, Sardella G, Salvi N, et al. Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents; the international multicentre CRUNCH registry. EuroIntervention. 2022 Mar 23:EIJ-D-21-00545. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00545. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35318955.
Ali ZA, Brinton TJ, Hill JM, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Characterization of Coronary Lithoplasty for Treatment of Calcified Lesions: First Description. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(8):897-906.
Brinton TJ, Ali ZA, Hill JM, et al. Feasibility of Shockwave coronary intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of calcified coronary stenoses. Circulation. 2019;139:834- 836.
Ali ZA, Nef H, Escaned J, et al. Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary stenoses: the Disrupt CAD II study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e008434.
Hill JM, Kereiakes DJ, Shlofmitz RA, et al. Intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2635-2646.
Szolc P, Guzik B, Wiewiórka Ł, et al. Intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of a heavily calcified recurrent in-stent restenosis in patient with chronic coronary syndrome. Kardiol Pol. 2021;79(10):1159-1160. doi: 10.33963/KP.a2021.0079. Epub 2021 Aug 5. PMID: 34350971.
Russo F, Chieffo A, Carlino M, et al. Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Coronary Lithotripsy Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Saphenous Venous Graft. J Invasive Cardiol. 2021 Feb;33(2):E141-E142. PMID: 33531446.
Kuzemczak M, Pawłowski T, Gil R. Shockwave intracoronary lithotripsy for the treatment of calcium-mediated undilatable in-stent restenosis. Cardiol J. 2022;29(3):521-522. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2022.0039. PMID: 35652139; PMCID: PMC9170324.
Perfetti M, Fulgenzi F, Radico F, et al. Calcific lesion preparation for coronary bifurcation stenting. Cardiol J. 2019;26(5):429-437. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0094. Epub 2019 Sep 30. PMID: 31565792; PMCID: PMC8084380.
Shah M, Najam O, Bhindi R, et al. Calcium Modification Techniques in Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May;14(5):e009870. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009870. Epub 2021 Jan 14. PMID: 33441017.
Galassi AR, Boukhris M, Tomasello SD, et al. Incidence, treatment, and in-hospital outcome of bifurcation lesions in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions. Coron Artery Dis. 2015;26(2):142e149.
Chen SL, Ye F, Zhang JJ, et al. Clinical outcomes after recanalization of a chronic total occluded vessel with bifurcation lesions: results from single-center, prospective, chronic total occlusion registry study. Chin Med J. 2012;125:1035-1040.
Nikolakopoulos I, Vemmou E, Karacsonyi J, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions involving a bifurcation: Insights from the PROGRESS-CTO registry. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2022 Jul-Aug;66:80-83. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Mar 3. PMID: 35247542.
Sandesara PB, Shekiladze N, Raj L, et al. Double Barrel Crush Stenting Technique for Chronic Total Occlusion Bifurcation Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jul 11;15(13):1382-1383. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.042. Epub 2022 Jun 15. PMID: 35798482.
Khan SR, Cader FA. Slender bi-radial ping-pong technique for complete revascularisation of concomitant CTO and non-LM bifurcation lesions: A report of two cases. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Apr 25:S1553-8389(22)00210-X. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.04.010. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35508441.
Baystrukov VI, Kretov EI, Boukhris M, et al. A randomized trial of bifurcation stenting technique in chronic total occlusions percutaneous coronary intervention. Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Jan;29(1):30-38. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000551. PMID: 29220345.
Ojeda S, Pan M, Guti_errez A, et al. Bifurcation lesions involved in the recanalization process of coronary chronic total occlusions: Incidence, treatment and clinical implications. Int J Cardiol. 2017;230:432e438.
