Bifurkasyon Lezyonlarında Anatomik ve Fonksiyonel Değerlendirme
Özet
Girişimsel kardiyolojideki ilerlemelere rağmen, bifurkasyon lezyonları yüksek komplikasyon oranları nedeniyle terapötik bir zorluk olmayı sürdürmektedir. Avrupa Bifurkasyon Kulübü (EBC), bu lezyonlar için öncelikle provizyonel tek stent tekniğini önermektedir. İki boyutlu koroner anjiyografi, hapsedilen (jailed) yan dalların anatomik ve fonksiyonel önemini tam olarak değerlendiremediğinden, revaskülarizasyon kararında fraksiyonel akım rezervi (FFR), optik koherens tomografi (OCT) ve intravasküler ultrason (IVUS) gibi invaziv yöntemler kritik rol oynar. FFR, lezyonun fonksiyonel ve fizyolojik şiddetini belirleyerek gereksiz müdahaleleri azaltır ve klinik sonuçları iyileştirir. Yüksek çözünürlüklü bir görüntüleme teknolojisi olan OCT; lümen alanı, plak yapısı ve stent yerleşimi için ideal bir kılavuzdur, ancak düşük doku penetrasyonu ve kontrast madde gereksinimi gibi kısıtlılıkları vardır. IVUS ise daha düşük çözünürlüğe sahip olmasına rağmen, derin doku penetrasyonu sayesinde damar boyutu, plak yükü ve sol ana koroner arter (LMCA) lezyonlarının değerlendirilmesinde üstündür. Sonuç olarak, bifurkasyon lezyonlarının yönetiminde hastaya ve lezyona özgü anatomik ve fonksiyonel değerlendirmelerin laboratuvar imkanları dahilinde entegre edilmesi, perkütan koroner girişimlerin başarısını artırmak ve olumsuz kardiyak olayları minimize etmek açısından güvenli ve etkin bir strateji sunmaktadır.
Despite advancements in interventional cardiology, bifurcation lesions remain a significant therapeutic challenge due to high complication rates. The European Bifurcation Club (EBC) recommends the provisional single-stenting technique as the preferred strategy for most cases. Since two-dimensional coronary angiography is limited in accurately predicting the anatomical and functional significance of jailed side branches, invasive imaging modalities such as fractional flow reserve (FFR), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are crucial. FFR evaluates the physiological severity of the stenosis, thereby preventing unnecessary side-branch interventions and optimizing clinical outcomes. OCT provides ultra-high-resolution cross-sectional images that are excellent for assessing lumen area, plaque composition, and wire positions, though it is limited by low tissue penetration and contrast requirements. Conversely, IVUS features greater penetration depth, making it highly effective for quantifying plaque burden, vessel size, and evaluating complex left main coronary artery (LMCA) lesions without requiring blood clearance. Consequently, combining patient-specific anatomical and functional assessments during percutaneous coronary interventions facilitates optimal stent expansion, reduces procedural complications, and establishes a safe, evidence-based approach for managing complex bifurcations.
Referanslar
Burzotta F, Lassen JF, Lefèvre T, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions: the 15th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2021 Mar 19;16(16):1307-1317. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00169. PMID: 33074152; PMCID: PMC8919527.
N.G. Bellenger, R. Swallow, D.S. Wald, et al. Haemodynamic significance of ostial side branch nipping following percutaneous intervention at bifurcations: A pressure wire pilot study, Heart 93 (2) (2007) 249–250.
Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, et al. Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 1995; 92: 3183–3193
Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, et al. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1993;87(4):1354–67.
De Bruyne B, Fearon WF, Pijls NH, et al; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371: 1208-17.
Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:177-84. 5.
Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2105-11.
F.M. Zimmermann, A. Ferrara, N.P. Johnson, et al. Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial, Eur. Heart J. 36 (45) (2015) 3182–3188.
Kim HY, Doh JH, Lim HS, et al. Identification of coronary artery side branch supplying myocardial mass that may benefit from revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10:571–581.
Lassen J, Burzotta F, Banning A, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention 2018; 13:1540–1553.
Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Kim WJ, et al. Functional and morphological assessment of side branch after left main coronary artery bifurcation stenting with cross-over technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 83:545–52.
Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, et al. Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 2004; 110:2831–2836.
Lee CH, Choi SW, Hwang J, et al. 5-Year outcomes according to FFR of left circumflex coronary artery after left main crossover stenting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 12:847–855.
Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Bech GJ, et al. Coronary pressure measurement to assess the hemodynamic significance of serial stenoses within one coronary artery: Validation in humans. Circulation 2000; 102: 2371–2377.
Poerner TC, Kralev S, Voelker W, et al. Natural history of small and medium-sized side branches after coronary stent implantation. Am Heart J 2002; 143: 627–635.
Kralev S, Poerner TC, Basorth D, et al. Side branch occlusion after coronary stent implantation in patients presenting with st-elevation myocardial infarction: Clinical impact and angiographic predictors. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 153–157.
Escaned J, Koo BK. Functional guidance with ffr: An effective and safe way to simplify percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcations. EuroIntervention 2012; 7: 1129–1131.
Park SH, Koo BK. Clinical applications of fractional flow reserve in bifurcation lesions. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2012 Sep;9(3):278-84.
Koo BK, Park KW, Kang HJ, et al. Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 726–732.
Kumsars I, Narbute I, Thuesen L, et al. Side branch fractional flow reserve measurements after main vessel stenting: A nordic-baltic bifurcation study iii substudy. EuroIntervention 2012; 7: 1155–1161.
Williams AR, Koo BK, Gundert TJ, et al. Local hemodynamic changes caused by main branch stent implantation and subsequent virtual side branch balloon angioplasty in a representative coronary bifurcation. J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 532–540.
Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 2005; 293: 2126–2130.
Richter Y, Groothuis A, Seifert P, et al. Dynamic flow alterations dictate leukocyte adhesion and response to endovascular interventions. J Clin Invest 2004; 113: 1607– 1614.
Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, et al. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 16;46(4):633-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.054. PMID: 16098427.
Chen SL, Ye F, Zhang JJ, et al. Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):536-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.221. Epub 2015 Mar 26. PMID: 25819187.
Lee JM, Koo BK, Kumsars I, et al. Escaned J. Coronary fractional flow reserve in bifurcation stenoses: what have we learned? EuroIntervention. 2015;11 Suppl V:V59-63. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11SVA13. PMID: 25983173.
Kini AS, Okamoto N, Barman N, et al. Side branch fractional flow reserve after provisional stenting of calcified bifurcation lesions: The ORBID-FFR study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct;98(4):658-668. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29307. Epub 2020 Oct 9. PMID: 33034419.
Götberg M, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, et al. Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. New Engl J Med. 2017;376:1813– 1823.
Davies JE, Dehbi H-M, Al-Lamee R, et al. Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. New Engl J Med. 2017;376:1824–1834.
Onuma Y, Katagiri Y, Burzotta F, et al. Joint consensus on the use of OCT in coronary bifurcation lesions by the European and Japanese bifurcation clubs. EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 8;14(15):e1568-e1577. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00391. PMID: 30479307.
Hebsgaard L, Nielsen TM, Tu S, et al. Co-registration of optical coherence tomography and X-ray angiography in percutaneous coronary intervention. the Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Revascularization (DOCTOR) fusion study. Int J Cardiol. 2015;182:272-8.
Karanasos A, Tu S, van Ditzhuijzen NS, et al. A novel method to assess coronary artery bifurcations by OCT: cut-plane analysis for side-branch ostial assessment from a main-vessel pullback. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:177-89.
Watanabe M, Uemura S, Kita Y, et al. Impact of branching angle on neointimal coverage of drug-eluting stents implanted in bifurcation lesions. Coron Artery Dis. 2016;27:682-9.
Watanabe M, Uemura S, Sugawara Y, et al. Side branch complication after a single-stent crossover technique: prediction with frequency domain optical coherence tomography. Coron Artery Dis. 2014;25:321-9.
Liu S, Sotomi Y, Eggermont J, et al. Tissue characterization with depth-resolved attenuation coefficient and backscatter term in intravascular optical coherence tomography images. J Biomed Opt. 2017;22:1-16.
Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, et al; ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI Investigators. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2618-28.
Otake H, Kubo T, Takahashi H, et al; OPINION Investigators. Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial): Results From the OPINION Imaging Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:111-23.
Ramsing N, Lene H, Andreasena N, et al. Rational and design of the european randomized optical coherence tomography optimized bifurcation event reduction trial (OCTOBER). Am Heart J 2018; 205: 97–109.
Okamura T, Onuma Y, Yamada J, et al. 3D optical coherence tomography: new insights into the process of optimal rewiring of side branches during bifurcational stenting. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:907-15.
Miyazaki Y, Muramatsu T, Asano T, et al. Online three-dimensional OFDI-guided versus angiography-guided PCI in bifurcation lesions: design and rationale of the randomised OPTIMUM trial. EuroIntervention. 2021 Mar 19;16(16):1333-1341. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00902. PMID: 31289018.
Prati F, Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, et al. Clinical Impact of OCT Findings During PCI: The CLI-OPCI II Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1297- 305.
Kang SJ, Ahn JM, Song H, et al. Comprehensive intravascular ultrasound assessment of stent area and its impact on restenosis and adverse cardiac events in 403 patients with unprotected left main disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:562-9.
Holm NR, Adriaenssens T, Motreff P, et al. OCT for bifurcation stenting: what have we learned? EuroIntervention. 2015;11 Suppl V:V64-70.
Ferrante G, Kaplan AV, Di Mario C. Assessment with optical coherence tomography of a new strategy for bifurcational lesion treatment: The tryton side-branch stent. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:69–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ ccd.21803; PMID: 19089962.
Genereux P, Kumsars I, Lesiak M, et al. A randomized trial of a dedicated bifurcation stent versus provisional stenting in the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:533–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.031; PMID: 25677311.
Verheye S, Grube E, Ramcharitar S, et al. First-in-man (FIM) study of the Stentys bifurcation stent – 30 days results. EuroIntervention 2009;4:566–71. https://doi.org/10.4244/ EIJV4I5A96; PMID: 19378675.
Malaiapan Y, Leung M, White AJ. The role of intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention of complex coronary lesions. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020 Oct;10(5):1371-1388. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-189. PMID: 33224763; PMCID: PMC7666921.
Takano M, Mizuno K, Okamatsu K, et al. Mechanical and structural characteristics of vulnerable plaques: analysis by coronary angioscopy and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:99-104.
de la Torre Hernandez JM, Baz Alonso JA, Gomez Hospital JA, et al. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary disease: pooled analysis at the patient-level of 4 registries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:244-54.
Yang RR, Lv YH, Guo C, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 11;99(37):e20798. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020798. PMID: 32925709; PMCID: PMC7489634.
Legutko J, Yamawaki M, Costa RA, Costa MA. IVUS in bifurcation stenting: what have we learned? EuroIntervention. 2015;11 Suppl V:V55-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11SVA12. PMID: 25983172.
McDaniel MC, Eshtehardi P, Sawaya FJ, et al. Contemporary clinical applications of coronaryintravascular ultrasound. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:1155-67.
Ge Z, Kan J, Gao XF, et al. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound-guided with angiography-guided double kissing crush stenting for patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions: Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, and multicenter DKCRUSH VIII trial. Am Heart J. 2021 Apr;234:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 16. PMID: 33465369.
de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernandez F, Alfonso F. The optimal cutoff value for left main minimal lumen area of 4.5 mm(2): a word of caution. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:122-3.
de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernandez Hernandez F, Alfonso F, et al; LITRO Study Group (Spanish Working Group on Interventional Cardiology). Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:351-8
Johnson TW, Räber L, Mario C, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging, part 2: acute coronary syndromes, ambiguous coronary angiography findings, and guiding interventional decision-making: an expert consensus document of the european association of percutaneous cardiovascular interventions. Eur Heart J 2019; 40: 2566–2584.
Kim SH, Kim YH, Kang SJ, et al. Long-term outcomes of intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:612-8.
Kim JS, Hong MK, Ko YG, et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with drug-eluting stent for bifurcation lesions: data from a Korean multicenter bifurcation registry. Am Heart J. 2011;161:180-7.
Chen SL, Ye F, Zhang JJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided systematic two-stent techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions and reduced late stent thrombosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81: 456-63.
