Koroner Bifurkasyon Lezyonlarında Optimal Anjiografik Görüntüleme
Özet
Koroner bifurkasyon lezyonları (KBL), kompleks anatomik ve fraktal yapıları nedeniyle girişimsel kardiyolojide değerlendirilmesi ve tedavisi en zor lezyon gruplarındandır. Finet, Murray ve Huo-Kassab kanunlarına göre proksimal ana damar, distal ana damar ve yan damar çapları arasında oransal bir denge bulunmaktadır. Bu lezyonların yönetiminde bifurkasyon açısı (BA); plak dağılımı, shear stress, ostial geometri ve restenoz riskinin belirlenmesinde kritik bir rol oynar. Konvansiyonel koroner anjiyografi, damar üst üste binmesi ve kısalma nedeniyle BA ve lezyon ciddiyetini değerlendirmede yetersiz kalabilir; bu nedenle iki/üç boyutlu kantitatif koroner anjiyografi (QCA) ve kardiyak bilgisayarlı tomografi (KBTA) gibi ileri üç boyutlu görüntüleme yöntemleri tercih edilmektedir. Avrupa Bifurkasyon Kulübü (EBC), anatomik yapıya göre optimal stentleme tekniğinin seçilmesini önermektedir. Dar açılı Y-şekilli lezyonlarda culotte veya crush teknikleri uygunken, T-şekilli lezyonlarda T ve TAP teknikleri idealdir. Perkütan koroner girişim (PKG) esnasında telleme, kissing balon dilatasyonu ve proksimal optimizasyon (POT) gibi aşamaların başarısı, neokarinaya dik optimal anjiyografik projeksiyonların (LAO-CRA, RAO-CAU vb.) en az iki farklı ortogonal açıdan izlenmesine bağlıdır. Doğru görüntüleme açılarının seçimi, yan dal oklüzyonu gibi peri-prosedürel komplikasyonları azaltarak klinik başarıyı artırır.
Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL) represent a challenging subset in interventional cardiology due to their complex anatomy and fractal geometry. According to Finet, Murray, and Huo-Kassab laws, a proportional balance exists among the diameters of the proximal main vessel, distal main vessel, and side branch. The bifurcation angle (BA) serves as a critical determinant affecting plaque distribution, shear stress, ostial geometry, and restenosis risk. Conventional coronary angiography often falls short in evaluating BA and lesion severity due to vessel overlap and foreshortening; hence, advanced imaging modalities like two/three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) are preferred for precise measurements. The European Bifurcation Club (EBC) recommends tailoring stenting techniques to the lesion geometry. For narrow-angled Y-shaped bifurcations, culotte or crush techniques are more suitable, whereas T or TAP techniques are ideal for T-shaped bifurcations. During percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), successful execution of wiring, kissing balloon dilatation, and proximal optimization technique (POT) requires viewing optimal radiographic projections (such as LAO-CRA or RAO-CAU) perpendicular to the neocarina from at least two orthogonal views. Selecting appropriate angiographic windows enhances procedural success and minimizes complications like side branch occlusion.
Referanslar
Bassingthwaighte JB, Van Beek JH, King RB. Fractal branch- ings: the basis of myocardial flow heterogeneities? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1990;591:392-401.
Finet G, Huo Y, Rioufol G, Ohayon J, Guerin P, Kassab GS. Structure-function relation in the coronary artery tree: from fluid dynamics to arterial bifurcations. EuroIntervention. 2010;6 Suppl J:J10-5.
Finet G, Gilard M, Perrenot B, Rioufol G, Motreff P, Gavit L, Prost R. Fractal geometry of arterial coronary bifurcations: a quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound analysis. EuroIntervention. 2008;3:490-8.
Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2233-41.
van der Giessen AG, Groen HC, Doriot PA, de Feyter PJ, van der Steen AF, van de Vosse FN, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJ. The influence of boundary conditions on wall smear stress distribution in patients specific coronary trees. J Biomech. 2011;44:1089-95.
Huo Y, Finet G, Lefèvre T, Louvard Y, Moussa I, Kassab GS. Optimal diameter of diseased bifurcation segment: a practical rule for percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention. 2012;7: 1310-6.
Zhou Y, Kassab GS, Molloi S. On the design of the coronary arterial tree: a generalization of Murray's law. Phys Med Biol. 1999; 44:2929-45.
Ellwein L, Marks DS, Migrino RQ, Foley WD, Sherman S, LaDisa JF Jr. Image-based quantification of 3D morphology for bifurcations in the left coronary artery: Application to stent design. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87:1244-55.
Tu S, Jing J, Holm NR, Onsea K, Zhang T, Adriaenssens T, Dubois C, Desmet W, Thuesen L, Chen Y, Reiber JH. In vivo assessment of bifurcation optimal viewing angles and bifurcation angles by three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:1617-25.
Saltzman AJ, Mehran R, Dangas GD. Safety issues related to treating bifurcation lesions. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2010;11 Suppl 1:S3-10.
Lunardi M, Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Stankovic G, Burzotta F, Kassab GS, Lassen JF, Darremont O, Garg S, Koo BK, Holm NR, Johnson TW, Pan M, Chatzizisis YS, Banning AP, Chieffo A, Dudek D, Hildick-Smith D, Garot J, Henry TD, Dangas G, Stone G, Krucoff MW, Cutlip D, Mehran R, Wijns W, Sharif F, Serruys PW, Onuma Y. Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations. EuroIntervention. 2022 May 18:EIJ-E-22-00018. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018. Online ahead of print.
Kovacevic M, Burzotta F, Elharty S, Besis G, Aurigemma C, Romagnoli E, Trani C. Left Main Trifurcation and Its Percutaneous Treatment: What Is Known So Far? Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar;14(3):e009872.
Pejković B, Krajnc I, Anderhuber F. Anatomical variations of coronary ostia, aortocoronary angles and angles of division of the left coronary artery of the human heart. J Int Med Res. 2008; 36(5):914-22.
Girasis C, Schuurbiers JC, Muramatsu T, Aben JP, Onuma Y, Soekhradj S, Morel MA, van Geuns RJ, Wentzel JJ, Serruys PW. Advanced three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: methodology and phantom validation. EuroIntervention. 2013; 8(12):1451-60.
Girasis C, Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Colombo A, Holmes DR Jr, Feldman TE, Bass EJ, Leadley K, Dawkins KD, Morice MC. 3-Dimensional bifurcation angle analysis in patients with left main disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (SYNergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXus and Cardiac Surgery). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 3(1):41-8.
Ishibashi Y, Grundeken MJ, Nakatani S, Iqbal J, Morel MA, Généreux P, Girasis C, Wentzel JJ, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. In vitro validation and comparison of different software packages or algorithms for coronary bifurcation analysis using calibrated phantoms: implications for clinical practice and research of bifurcation stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85:554-63.
Grundeken MJ, Ishibashi Y, Ramcharitar S, Tuinenburg JC, Reiber JH, Tu S, Aben JP, Girasis C, Wykrzykowska JJ, Onuma Y, Serruys PW. The need for dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) software algorithms to evaluate bifurcation lesions. EuroIntervention. 2015;11 Suppl V:V44-9.
Gradaus R, Mathies K, Breithardt G, Böcker D. Clinical assessment of a new real time 3D quantitative coronary angiography system: evaluation in stented vessel segments. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;68:44-9.
Ramcharitar S, Daeman J, Patterson M, van Guens RJ, Boersma E, Serruys PW, van der Giessen WJ. First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;71:44-50.
Grundeken MJ, Ishibashi Y, Généreux P, LaSalle L, Iqbal J, Wykrzykowska JJ, Morel MA, Tijssen JG, de Winter RJ, Girasis C, Garcia-Garcia HM, Onuma Y, Leon MB, Serruys PW. Inter-core lab variability in analyzing quantitative coronary angiography for bifurcation lesions: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:305-14.
Girasis C, Schuurbiers JC, Muramatsu T, Aben JP, Onuma Y, Soekhradj S, Morel MA, van Geuns RJ, Wentzel JJ, Serruys PW. Advanced three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic assessment of bifurcation lesions: methodology and phantom validation. EuroIntervention. 2013;8:1451-60.
Girasis C, Farooq V, Diletti R, Muramatsu T, Bourantas CV, Onuma Y, Holmes DR, Feldman TE, Morel MA, van Es GA, Dawkins KD, Morice MC, Serruys PW. Impact of 3-dimensional bifurcation angle on 5-year outcome of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: a sub-study of the SYNTAX trial (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:1250-60.
Handran CB, Garberich RF, Lesser JR, Henry TD, Gilmore M, Schwartz RB. The Left Main Bifurcation Angle and Changes Throughout the Cardiac Cycle: Quantitative Implications for Left Main Bifurcation Stenting and Stents. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015; 27(9):401–4.
Ellwein L, Marks DS, Migrino RQ, Foley WD, Sherman S, LaDisa JF Jr. Image-based quantification of 3D morphology for bifurcations in the left coronary artery: Application to stent design. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 87(7):1244–55.
Kawasaki T, Koga H, Serikawa T, Orita Y, Ikeda S, Mito T, Gotou Y, Shintani Y, Tanaka A, Tanaka H, Fukuyama T, Koga N. The bifurcation study using 64 multislice computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 73(5):653-8.
Watanabe M, Uemura S, Sugawara Y, Ueda T, Soeda T, Takeda Y, Kawata H, Kawakami R, Saito Y. Side branch complication after a single-stent crossover technique: prediction with frequency domain optical coherence tomography. Coron Artery Dis. 2014; 25(4):321-9.
Mortier P, Van Loo D, De Beule M, Segers P, Taeymans Y, Verdonck P, Verhegghe B. Comparison of drug-eluting stent cell size using micro-CT: important data for bifurcation stent selection. EuroIntervention. 2008; 4(3):391-6.
Zhang D, Xu B, Yin D, Li Y, He Y, You S, Qiao S, Wu Y, Yan H, Yang Y, Gao R, Dou K. How bifurcation angle impacts the fate of side branch after main vessel stenting: a retrospective analysis of 1,200 consecutive bifurcation lesions in a single center. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 85 Suppl 1:706-15.
Nakazawa G, Yazdani SK, Finn AV, Vorpahl M, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Pathological findings at bifurcation lesions: the impact of flow distribution on atherosclerosis and arterial healing after stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55(16):1679-87.
Baharoglu MI, Lauric A, Safain MG, Hippelheuser J, Wu C, Malek AM. Widening, and high inclination of the middle cerebral artery bifurcation are associated with presence of aneurysms. Stroke. 2014; 45 (9):2649–55.
Murasato Y, Kinoshita Y, Yamawaki M, Shinke T, Takeda Y, Fujii K, Yamada SI, Shimada Y, Yamashita T, Yumoto K; J-REVERSE investigators. Effect of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on the geometry of coronary bifurcation lesions and clinical outcomes of coronary interventions in the J-REVERSE registry. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2018; 33(4):360-371.
Lassen JF, Albiero R, Johnson TW, Burzotta F, Lefèvre T, Iles TL, Pan M, Banning AP, Chatzizisis YS, Ferenc M, Dzavik V, Milasinovic D, Darremont O, Hildick-Smith D, Louvard Y, Stankovic G. Treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions, part II: implanting two stents. The 16th expert consensus document of the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2022; 18(6):457-470.
Murasato Y. Impact of three-dimensional characteristics of the left main coronary artery bifurcation on outcome of crush stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007; 69(2):248–56.
Rathore S, Ball T, Nakano M, Kaplan A, Virmani R, Foerst J. Circumferential strut fracture as a mechanism of "crush" bifurcation restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2013; 111(5):770–3.
Adriaenssens T, Byrne RA, Dibra A, Iijima R, Mehilli J, Bruskina O, Schömig A, Kastrati A. Culotte stenting technique in coronary bifurcation disease: angiographic follow-up using dedicated quantitative coronary angiographic analysis and 12-month clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29(23):2868-76.
Chang CF, Chang KH, Lai CH, Lin TH, Liu TJ, Lee WL, Su CS. Clinical outcomes of coronary artery bifurcation disease patients underwent Culotte two-stent technique: a single center experience. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019; 19(1):208.
Chen SL, Xu B, Han YL, Sheiban I, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Kwan TW, Paiboon C, Zhou YJ, Lv SZ, Dangas GD, Xu YW, Wen SY, Hong L, Zhang RY, Wang HC, Jiang TM, Wang Y, Chen F, Yuan ZY, Li WM, Leon MB. Comparison of double kissing crush versus Culotte stenting for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions: results from a multicenter, randomized, prospective DKCRUSH-III study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61(14):1482-8.
Grundeken MJ, Lesiak M, Asgedom S, Garcia E, Bethencourt A, Norell MS, Damman P, Woudstra P, Koch KT, Vis MM, Henriques JP, Tijssen JG, Onuma Y, Foley DP, Bartorelli AL, Stella PR, de Winter RJ, Wykrzykowska JJ. Clinical outcomes after final kissing balloon inflation compared with no final kissing balloon inflation in bifurcation lesions treated with a dedicated coronary bifurcation stent. Heart. 2014; 100(6):479-86.
Ki YJ, Jung JH, Han JK, Hong S, Cho JH, Gwon HC et al. Clinical Implications of Bifurcation Angles in Left Main Bifurcation Intervention Using a Two-Stent Technique. J Interv Cardiol. 2020; 2020:2475930
Toyofuku M, Kimura T, Morimoto T, Hayashi Y, Shiode N, Okimoto T et al. Comparison of target-lesion revascularisation between left main coronary artery bifurcations and left anterior descending coronary artery bifurcations using the one and two stent approach with sirolimus-eluting stents. EuroIntervention. 2011; 7(7):796–804.
Amemiya K, Domei T, Iwabuchi M, Shirai S, Ando K, Goya M et al. Impact of the bifurcation angle on major cardiac events after cross-over single stent strategy in unprotected left main bifurcation lesions: 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2014; 4(4):168–76.
Konishi T, Yamamoto T, Funayama N, Nishihara H, Hotta D. Relationship between left coronary artery bifurcation angle and restenosis after stenting of the proximal left anterior descending artery. Coron Artery Dis. 2016; 27(6):449–59.
Watanabe Y, Mitomo S, Naganuma T, Takagi K, Obata H, Chieffo A et al. Clinical impact of bifurcation angle change between diastole and systole in complex stenting for left main distal bifurcation: The Milan and New-Tokyo (MITO) Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 98(1):E24–E34.
Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Chen YD, Fang WY, Wei M et al. Effect of coronary bifurcation angle on clinical outcomes in Chinese patients treated with crush stenting: a subgroup analysis from DKCRUSH-1 bifurcation study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009; 122(4):396–402.
Yang JH, Song YB, Song PS, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Choi JH et al. Impact of coronary bifurcation angle on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in real-world practice: results from the COBIS registry. Cardiology. 2012; 122(4):216–24.
Hahn JY, Chun WJ, Kim JH, Song YB, Oh JH, Koo BK et al. Predictors and outcomes of side branch occlusion after main vessel stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions: results from the COBIS II Registry (COronary BIfurcation Stenting). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62(18):1654–9
Vassilev D, Gil R. Clinical verification of a theory for predicting side branch stenosis after main vessel stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions. J Interv Cardiol. 2008; 21(6):493–503.
Gil RJ, Vassilev D, Formuszewicz R, Rusicka-Piekarz T, Doganov A. The carina angle-new geometrical parameter associated with periprocedural side branch compromise and the long-term results in coronary bifurcation lesions with main vessel stenting only. J Interv Cardiol. 2009; 22(6):E1–E10.
Kočka V, Thériault-Lauzier P, Xiong TY, Ben-Shoshan J, Petr R, Laboš M, Buithieu J, Mousavi N, Pilgrim T, Praz F, Overtchouk P, Beaudry JP, Spaziano M, Pelletier JP, Martucci G, Dandona S, Rinfret S, Windecker S, Leipsic J, Piazza N. Optimal Fluoroscopic Projections of Coronary Ostia and Bifurcations Defined by Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov 9;13(21):2560-70.
