Uterus Sarkomları

Yazarlar

Özgecan Dülgar
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0678-4024

Özet

Uterus sarkomları, tüm uterin malignitelerinin %8’inden azını oluşturan, nadir görülen ve preoperatif tanısı sıklıkla net olmayan malign mezenkimal tümörlerdir. En yaygın histolojik alt tipleri leiomyosarkom (LMS) ve endometrial stromal sarkom (ESS) iken, undiferansiye uterin sarkomlar ve adenosarkomlar daha nadir izlenir. Sarkom vakalarının çoğunluğu sporadik olmakla birlikte, pelvik bölgeye radyoterapi öyküsü ve tamoksifen kullanımı risk faktörleri arasında yer almaktadır. Hastalığın evrelemesi histolojik alt tiplere göre değişiklik gösteren 2009 FIGO sistemine göre gerçekleştirilir. Erken evre LMS ve ESS vakalarında temel tedavi yaklaşımı total abdominal histerektomidir; hormonal duyarlılığı nedeniyle ESS olgularında bilateral salpingo-ooferektomi de sürece dahil edilir. Tüm alt tiplerde primer cerrahi sonrasında rezidü tümör kalmaması en önemli prognostik faktör olup, nüks riskini artırmamak adına uterus blok halinde çıkarılmalı ve morselasyondan kaçınılmalıdır. Güncel klinik veriler ışığında, erken evre hastalıkta adjuvan radyoterapi, kemoterapi veya hormonoterapinin sağkalım üzerinde kanıtlanmış standart bir faydası bulunmamaktadır. İleri evre, metastatik veya tekrarlayan hastalıklarda tedavi palyatif olup; tek ajan doksorubisin kemoterapisi, hedefe yönelik ajanlar (pazopanib, trabektedin) veya hormon reseptörü pozitif olgularda aromataz inhibitörleri gibi sistemik seçenekler yaşam kalitesini optimize etmek amacıyla kişiselleştirilerek tercih edilmektedir.

Uterine sarcomas are rare malignant mesenchymal tumors accounting for less than 8% of all uterine malignancies, often presenting without a definitive preoperative diagnosis. The most common histological subtypes are leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), while undifferentiated uterine sarcomas and adenosarcomas are much less frequent. Although most cases are sporadic, a history of pelvic radiotherapy and tamoxifen use are identified as potential etiological risk faktors. Staging is performed according to the 2009 FIGO system, which varies based on the specific mesenchymal subtype. Total abdominal hysterectomy remains the cornerstone of standard treatment for early-stage LMS and ESS, with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy typically added for ESS due to its distinct hormonal sensitivity. Achieving complete resection without residual tumor during primary surgery is the primary prognostic faktor; thus, the uterus must be removed en bloc, avoiding intraperitoneal morcellation to prevent disease recurrence. Currently, there is no proven survival benefit for routine adjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or hormone therapy in early-stage disease. In advanced, metastatic, or recurrent cases, treatment is strictly palliative; systemic options including single-agent doxorubicin, targeted therapies (pazopanib, trabectedin), or aromatase inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive tumors are personalized to maintain quality of life.

Referanslar

Hosh M, Antar S, Nazzal A, et al. Uterine Sarcoma: Analysis of 13,089 Cases Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database. International journal of gynecological cancer. 2016 Jul;26(6):1098-104. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000720.

Tropé CG, Abeler VM, Kristensen GB. Diagnosis and treatment of sarcoma of the uterus. A review. Acta oncologica. 2012 Jul;51(6):694-705. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.689111.

Novetsky AP, Powell MA. Management of sarcomas of the uterus. Current opinion in oncology. 2013 Sep;25(5):546-52. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e328363e0ef.

Helman LJ, Meltzer P. Mechanisms of sarcoma development. Nature reviews Cancer. 2003 Sep;3(9):685-94. doi: 10.1038/nrc1168.

Mark RJ, Poen J, Tran LM et al. Postirradiation sarcoma of the gynecologic tract. A report of 13 cases and a discussion of the risk of radiation-induced gynecologic malignancies. American journal of clinical oncology. 1996 Feb;19(1):59-64. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199602000-00013.

Wysowski DK, Honig SF, Beitz J. Uterine sarcoma associated with tamoxifen use. The New England journal of medicine. 2002 Jun 6;346(23):1832-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200206063462319.

Gottlieb S. Tamoxifen may increase risk of uterine sarcoma. BMJ : British medical journal. 2002 Jul 6;325(7354):7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7354.7/a.

Prat J. FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics. 2009 Mar;104(3):177-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Jan 9. Erratum in: Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Sep;106(3):277.

Bell SW, Kempson RL, Hendrickson MR. Problematic uterine smooth muscle neoplasms. A clinicopathologic study of 213 cases. The American journal of surgical pathology. 1994 Jun;18(6):535-58.

Cho YL, Bae S, Koo MS, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of uterine leiomyosarcoma. Gynecologic oncology. 2005 Dec;99(3):545-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.017.

Nielsen TO, West RB, Linn SC, et al. Molecular characterisation of soft tissue tumours: a gene expression study. Lancet. 2002 Apr 13;359(9314):1301-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08270-3.

Yang J, Du X, Chen K, et al. Genetic aberrations in soft tissue leiomyosarcoma. Cancer Letters. 2009 Mar 8;275(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.06.013.

Leitao MM, Soslow RA, Nonaka D, et al. Tissue microarray immunohistochemical expression of estrogen, progesterone, and androgen receptors in uterine leiomyomata and leiomyosarcoma. Cancer. 2004 Sep 15;101(6):1455-62. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20521.

Amant F, Vloeberghs V, Woestenborghs H, et al. ERBB-2 gene overexpression and amplification in uterine sarcomas. Gynecologic oncology. 2004 Dec;95(3):583-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.041.

Gadducci A, Cosio S, Romanini A, et al. The management of patients with uterine sarcoma: a debated clinical challenge. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.2008Feb;65(2):129-42. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.06.011.

Bogani G, Cliby WA, Aletti GD. Impact of morcellation on survival outcomes of patients with unexpected uterine leiomyosarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecologic oncology. 2015 Apr;137(1):167-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.011.

Amant F, Coosemans A, Debiec-Rychter M, Timmerman D, Vergote I. Clinical management of uterine sarcomas. The Lancet Oncology. 2009 Dec;10(12):1188-98. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70226-8.

ESMO / European Sarcoma Network Working Group. Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 7:vii92-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds253.

Reed NS, Mangioni C, Malmström H, et al; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group. Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: an European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study (protocol 55874). European journal of cancer. 2008 Apr;44(6):808-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.01.019.

Omura GA, Blessing JA, Major F, et al. A randomized clinical trial of adjuvant adriamycin in uterine sarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Journal of clinical oncology. 1985 Sep;3(9):1240-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1985.3.9.1240.

Hensley ML, Ishill N, Soslow R, et al. Adjuvant gemcitabine plus docetaxel for completely resected stages I-IV high grade uterine leiomyosarcoma: Results of a prospective study. Gynecologic oncology. 2009 Mar;112(3):563-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.11.027.

Hensley ML, Wathen JK, Maki RG, et al Adjuvant therapy for high-grade, uterus-limited leiomyosarcoma: results of a phase 2 trial (SARC 005). Cancer. 2013 Apr 15;119(8):1555-61. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27942.

Karavasilis V, Seddon BM, Ashley S, et al. Significant clinical benefit of first-line palliative chemotherapy in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma: retrospective analysis and identification of prognostic factors in 488 patients. Cancer. 2008 Apr 1;112(7):1585-91. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23332.

Maki RG, Wathen JK, Patel SR, et al. Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas: results of sarcoma alliance for research through collaboration study 002 [corrected]. Journal of clinical oncology. 2007 Jul 1;25(19):2755-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.4117. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3790.

Judson I, Verweij J, Gelderblom H, et al; European Organisation and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Doxorubicin alone versus intensified doxorubicin plus ifosfamide for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2014 Apr;15(4):415-23. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70063-4.

Van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP, et al; EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group; PALETTE study group. Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1879-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60651-5.

Hensley ML, Patel SR, von Mehren M, et al. Efficacy and safety of trabectedin or dacarbazine in patients with advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma after failure of anthracycline-based chemotherapy: Subgroup analysis of a phase 3, randomized clinical trial Gynecologic oncology. 2017 Sep;146(3):531-537. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.018.

George S, Feng Y, Manola J, et al. Phase 2 trial of aromatase inhibition with letrozole in patients with uterine leiomyosarcomas expressing estrogen and/or progesterone receptors. Cancer. 2014 Mar 1;120(5):738-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28476.

Oliva E, Clement PB, Young RH. Endometrial stromal tumors: an update on a group of tumors with a protean phenotype. Advances in anatomic pathology. 2000 Sep;7(5):257-81. doi: 10.1097/00125480-200007050-00001.

Huang HY, Ladanyi M, Soslow RA. Molecular detection of JAZF1-JJAZ1 gene fusion in endometrial stromal neoplasms with classic and variant histology: evidence for genetic heterogeneity. The American journal of surgical pathology. 2004 Feb;28(2):224-32. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200402000-00010.

Lee CH, Mariño-Enriquez A, Ou W, et al. The clinicopathologic features of YWHAE-FAM22 endometrial stromal sarcomas: a histologically high-grade and clinically aggressive tumor. The American journal of surgical pathology. 2012 May;36(5):641-53. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31824a7b1a.

Tavassoli, F.A. and Devilee, P., Eds. (2003) World Health Organization Classfication of Tumors. Pathology & Genetics of Tumours of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) Press, Lyon, 153-158.

Chan JK, Kawar NM, Shin JY, et al.Endometrial stromal sarcoma: a population-based analysis. British journal of cancer. 2008 Oct 21;99(8):1210-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604527.

Chu MC, Mor G, Lim C, et al. Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: hormonal aspects. Gynecologic oncology. 2003 Jul;90(1):170-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00258-0.

Amant F, De Knijf A, Van Calster B, et al. Clinical study investigating the role of lymphadenectomy, surgical castration and adjuvant hormonal treatment in endometrial stromal sarcoma. British journal of cancer. 2007 Nov 5;97(9):1194-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603986. Epub 2007 Sep 25.

Maluf FC, Sabbatini P, Schwartz L, et al. Endometrial stromal sarcoma: objective response to letrozole. Gynecologic oncology. 2001 Aug;82(2):384-8. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6238.

Clement PB, Scully RE. Mullerian adenosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathologic analysis of 100 cases with a review of the literature. Human pathology. 1990 Apr;21(4):363-81. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(90)90198-e.

Amant F, Schurmans K, Steenkiste E, et al. Immunohistochemical determination of estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity in uterine adenosarcoma. Gynecologic oncology. 2004 Jun;93(3):680-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.03.021.

Sayfalar

361-368

Gelecek

18 Kasım 2022

Lisans

Lisans