Penil Kanserler
Özet
Penis kanseri, gelişmiş ülkelerde nadir görülen bir malignite olmasına rağmen, insan papilloma virüsü (HPV) enfeksiyonu, fimozis, kötü hijyen, obezite ve sigara kullanımı gibi risk faktörlerinin yaygın olduğu bazı Afrika, Asya ve Güney Amerika bölgelerinde erkek kanserlerinin %10'unu oluşturabilmektedir. Ortalama tanı yaşı 60 olan bu hastalıkta, tümörlerin %95'i skuamöz hücreli karsinom (SCC) morfolojisine sahiptir ve çoğunlukla glans veya sünnet derisinde ağrısız lezyonlar olarak ortaya çıkar. Kesin tanı, lezyonların fizik muayenesi ve histolojik biyopsi ile konulurken; evreleme işleminde güncel TNM sistemi kullanılmaktadır. Hastalığın yönetiminde, erken evre tümörler için organ koruyucu cerrahi yaklaşımlar tercih edilebilirken, uzun dönem sağkalımı belirleyen en önemli prognostik faktör bölgesel inguinal lenf nodu metastazının varlığıdır. Lenf nodu yönetiminde dinamik sentinel nod biyopsisi ve inguinal lenfadenektomi uygulanmakta; lokal ileri veya unrezektabl olgularda paklitaksel, ifosfamid ve sisplatin içeren neoadjuvan TIP rejimi standart tedavi olarak kabul görmektedir. Tedavi sonrasındaki nükslerin %92'si ilk 5 yıl içinde gerçekleştığinden, hastaların risk sınıflamalarına uygun olarak ilk yıllarda 3 ila 6 ayda bir yakın takibi ve görüntüleme yöntemleriyle izlemi kritik önem taşımaktadır.
Penile cancer is a rare malignancy in developed nations, yet it can constitute up to 10% of male malignancies in parts of Africa, Asia, and South America due to prevalent risk factors such as human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, phimosis, poor hygiene, obesity, and smoking. Characterized by a median diagnosis age of 60, approximately 95% of these tumors are squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) that typically manifest as painless, exophytic, or ulcerative lesions on the glans or inner foreskin. Diagnosis relies on thorough physical examination and histological biopsy, while staging follows the standard TNM classification system. For early-stage disease (Tis, Ta, T1), organ-sparing conservative techniques offer comparable survival outcomes to radical surgeries. Crucially, the presence and extent of regional inguinal lymph node metastasis serve as the single most critical prognostic indicator for long-term survival. Management of lymph nodes involves dynamic sentinel node biopsy or inguinal lymphadenectomy, whereas locally advanced or unresectable cases require neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy using the paclitaxel, ifosfamid, and cisplatin (TIP) regimen. Given that 92% of recurrences manifest within the first five years, structured and intensive post-treatment surveillance remains imperative.
Referanslar
Douglawi, A. & Masterson, T. A. Penile cancer epidemiology and risk factors: a contemporary review. Curr. Opin. Urol. 29, 145–149 (2019).
Olesen, T. B. et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA and p16(INK4a) in penile cancer and penile intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 20, 145–158 (2019).
Hernandez BY, Barnholtz-Sloan J, German RR, et al. Burden of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in the United States, 1998-2003. Cancer 2008; 113:2883.
Hegarty PK, Kayes O, Freeman A, et al. A prospective study of 100 cases of penile cancer managed according to European Association of Urology guidelines. BJU Int 2006; 98:526.
Favorito LA, Nardi AC, Ronalsa M, et al. Epidemiologic study on penile cancer in Brazil. Int Braz J Urol 2008; 34:587.
Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Johnson LG, et al. Penile cancer: importance of circumcision, human papillomavirus and smoking in in situ and invasive disease. Int J Cancer 2005; 116:606.
Maden C, Sherman KJ, Beckmann AM, et al. History of circumcision, medical conditions, and sexual activity and risk of penile cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:19.
Zequi Sde C, Guimarães GC, da Fonseca FP, et al. Sex with animals (SWA): behavioral characteristics and possible association with penile cancer. A multicenter study. J Sex Med 2012; 9:1860.
Barnes KT, McDowell BD, Button A, et al. Obesity is associated with increased risk of invasive penile cancer. BMC Urol 2016; 16:42.
Bezerra AL, Lopes A, Santiago GH, et al. Human papillomavirus as a prognostic factor in carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 82 patients treated with amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy. Cancer 2001; 91:2315.
Olesen TB, Sand FL, Rasmussen CL, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA and p16INK4a in penile cancer and penile intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:145.
Afonso LA, Cordeiro TI, Carestiato FN, et al. High Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection of the Foreskin in Asymptomatic Men and Patients with Phimosis. J Urol 2016; 195:1784.
Djajadiningrat RS, Jordanova ES, Kroon BK, et al. Human papillomavirus prevalence in invasive penile cancer and association with clinical outcome. J Urol 2015; 193:526.
Gunia S, Erbersdobler A, Hakenberg OW, et al. p16(INK4a) is a marker of good prognosis for primary invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. J Urol 2012; 187:899.
Minhas S, Manseck A, Watya S, et al. Penile cancer--prevention and premalignant conditions. Urology 2010;76:S24-35. 10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.007 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Viens LJ, Henley SJ, Watson M, et al. Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancers - United States, 2008-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:661-6. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6526a1 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Christodoulidou M, Sahdev V, Houssein S, et al. Epidemiology of penile cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 2015;39:126-36. 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2015.03.010 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Misra S, Chaturvedi A, Misra NC. Penile carcinoma: a challenge for the developing world. Lancet Oncol 2004;5:240-7. 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01427-5 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Moore TO, Moore AY, Carrasco D, et al. Human papillomavirus, smoking, and cancer. J Cutan Med Surg 2001;5:323-8. 10.1007/s102270000029 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Aubin F, Puzenat E, Arveux P, et al. Genital squamous cell carcinoma in men treated by photochemotherapy. A cancer registry-based study from 1978 to 1998. Br J Dermatol 2001;144:1204-6. 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04231.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Stern RS. Genital tumors among men with psoriasis exposed to psoralens and ultraviolet A radiation (PUVA) and ultraviolet B radiation. The Photochemotherapy Follow-up Study. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1093-7. 10.1056/NEJM199004193221601 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar
Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours Union for International Cancer Control; Oxford. John Wiley & Sons. 2017 [Google Scholar]
Erbersdobler A. [Pathology and histopathological evaluation of penile cancer] Urologe. 2018;57:391–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dickstein RJ, Munsell MF, Pagliaro LC, et al. Prognostic factors influencing survival from regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the penis after preoperative chemotherapy. BJU Int. 2016;117:118–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar
Hoekstra, R. J., Trip, E. J., Ten Kate, F. J., Horenblas, S. & Lock, M. T. Penile intraepithelial neoplasia: nomenclature, incidence and progression to malignancy in the Netherlands. Int. J. Urol. 26, 353–357 (2019)
Ingles, D. J. et al. Human papillomavirus virus (HPV) genotype- and age-specific analyses of external genital lesions among men in the HPV Infection in Men (HIM) study. J. Infect. Dis. 211, 1060–1067 (2015).
Sudenga, S. L. et al. Genital human papillomavirus infection progression to external genital lesions: the HIM study. Eur. Urol. 69, 166–173 (2016).
Akogbe, G. O. et al. Race and prevalence of human papillomavirus infection among men residing in Brazil, Mexico and the United States. Int. J. Cancer 131, E282–E291 (2012).
Yoon, C. S., Kim, K. D., Park, S. N. & Cheong, S. W. alpha(6) Integrin is the main receptor of human papillomavirus type 16 VLP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 283, 668–673 (2001).
Yugawa, T. & Kiyono, T. Molecular mechanisms of cervical carcinogenesis by high-risk human papillomaviruses: novel functions of E6 and E7 oncoproteins. Rev. Med. Virol. 19, 97–113 (2009).
Emmanuel, A., Nettleton, J., Watkin, N. & Berney, D. M. The molecular pathogenesis of penile carcinoma-current developments and understanding. Virchows Archiv. 475, 397–405 (2019).
Ferreux, E. et al. Evidence for at least three alternative mechanisms targeting the p16INK4A/cyclin D/Rb pathway in penile carcinoma, one of which is mediated by high-risk human papillomavirus. J. Pathol. 201, 109–118 (2003).
Steinestel, J. et al. The role of histologic subtype, p16(INK4a) expression, and presence of human papillomavirus DNA in penile squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 15, 220 (2015)
Klingelhutz, A. J., Foster, S. A. & McDougall, J. K. Telomerase activation by the E6 gene product of human papillomavirus type 16. Nature 380, 79–82 (1996).
Gewin, L., Myers, H., Kiyono, T. & Galloway, D. A. Identification of a novel telomerase repressor that interacts with the human papillomavirus type-16 E6/ E6-AP complex. Genes Dev. 18, 2269–2282 (2004).
Hakenberg, O. W. et al. EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update. Eur. Urol. 67, 142–150 (2015).
Hernandez, B. Y. et al. Burden of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in the United States, 1998–2003. Cancer 113, 2883–2891 (2008).
Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S., Maldonado, J. L., Pow-sang, J. & Giuliano, A. R. Incidence trends in primary malignant penile cancer. Urol. Oncol. 25, 361–367 (2007).
Favorito, L. A. et al. Epidemiologic study on penile cancer in Brazil. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 34, 587–591 (2008).
Dufour, J. F. et al. Urogenital manifestations in Wegener granulomatosis: a study of 11 cases and review of the literature. Medicine 91, 67–74 (2012).
Lee, D. K., Hinshaw, M., Cripps, D. & Jarrard, D. F. Pyoderma gangrenosum of penis. J. Urol. 170, 185–186 (2003).
Khan, D., Choudhary, A., Dutta, A. & Khan, I. Tuberculosis of the glans penis mimicking as carcinoma. Int. J. Mycobacteriol. 5, 341–342 (2016).
Tsaur, I., Ochsendorf, F. R., Bug, R. & Jonas, D. Primary syphilitic lesion mimicking penile cancer. Atypical manifestation with an unconventional diagnostic approach. Urologe A 48, 1210–1213 (2009).
Li Z, Li X, Lam W, et al. Corpora Cavernos invasion vs. Corpus Spongiosum invasion in Penile Cancer: A systematic review and meta- analysis. J Cancer 2021;12:1960-1966.
Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene F, et al., eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th ed. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines Penile Cancer. 2018.Accessed January 4, 2022.
Olesen TB, Sand FL, Rasmussen CL, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA and p16(INK4a) in penile cancer and penile intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2019;20:145-158.
Sand FL, Rasmussen CL, Frederiksen MH, et al. Prognostic Significance of HPV and p16 Status in Men Diagnosed with Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27:1123-1132.
Lont AP, Besnard AP, Gallee MP, et al. A comparison of physical examination and imaging in determining the extent of primary penile carcinoma. BJU Int 2003;91:493-495.
Kamel MH, Tao J, Su J, et al. Survival outcomes of organ sparing surgery, partial penectomy, and total penectomy in pathological T1/T2 penile cancer: Report from the National Cancer Data Base. Urol Oncol 2018;36: 82.e7-82.e15.
Ficarra V, Akduman B, Bouchot O, et al. Prognostic factors in penile cancer. Urology 2010;76:S66-73.
Heyns CF, Fleshner N, Sangar V, et al. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer. Urology 2010;76:S43-57.
de Vries HM, Brouwer OR, Heijmink S, et al. Recent developments in penile cancer imaging. Curr Opin Urol 2019;29:150-155.
Ottenhof SR, Leone AR, Horenblas S, et al. Advancements in staging and imaging for penile cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2017;27:612-620.
Hughes B, Leijte J, Shabbir M, et al. Non-invasive and minimally invasive staging of regional lymph nodes in penile cancer. World J Urol 2009;27:197-203.
Caso JR, Rodriguez AR, Correa J, Spiess PE. Update in the management of penile cancer. Int Braz J Urol 2009;35:406-415.
Mueller-Lisse UG, Scher B, Scherr MK, Seitz M. Functional imaging in penile cancer: PET/computed tomography, MRI, and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Curr Opin Urol 2008;18:105-110
Hedgire SS, Pargaonkar VK, Elmi A, et al. Pelvic nodal imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2012;50:1111-1125.
Scher B, Seitz M, Reiser M, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of penile cancer. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1460-1465
Scher B, Seitz M, Albinger W, et al. Value of PET and PET/CT in the diagnostics of prostate and penile cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 2008;170:159-179.
Salazar A, Junior EP, Salles PGO, et al. (18)F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor in penile cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019;46:855-863.
Ottenhof SR, Vegt E. The role of PET/CT imaging in penile cancer. Transl Androl Urol 2017;6:833-838.
Graafland NM, Leijte JA, Valdes Olmos RA, et al. Scanning with 18F-FDG-PET/CT for detection of pelvic nodal involvement in inguinal node-positive penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 2009;56:339-345.
Drager DL, Heuschkel M, Protzel C, et al. [18F]FDG PET/CT for assessing inguinal lymph nodes in patients with penile cancer - correlation with histopathology after inguinal lymphadenectomy. Nuklearmedizin 2018;57:26-30
112. Stancik I, Holtl W. Penile cancer: review of the recent literature. Curr Opin Urol 2003;13:467-472.
Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Lont AP, et al. Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases. J Urol 2005;173:816-819.
McDougal WS. Preemptive lymphadenectomy markedly improves survival in patients with cancer of the penis who harbor occult metastases. J Urol 2005;173:681
Sharp DS, Angermeier KW. Surgery of penile and urethral carcinoma. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi L, Novick AC, et al., eds. Campbell- Walsh Urology (ed 9). Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007:993-1022.
Catalona WJ. Re: Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of saphenous veins: technique and preliminary results. J Urol 1988;140:836
Soria JC, Fizazi K, Piron D, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors and natural history in monocentric study with a conservative policy. Ann Oncol 1997;8:1089- 1098.
Theodorescu D, Russo P, Zhang ZF, et al. Outcomes of initial surveillance of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and negative nodes. J Urol 1996;155:1626-1631.
Leijte JA, Kirrander P, Antonini N, et al. Recurrence patterns of squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: recommendations for follow-up based on a two-centre analysis of 700 patients. Eur Urol 2008;54:161- 168
Horenblas S. Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: the role and technique of lymph node dissection. BJU Int 2001;88:473-483
Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 1977;39:456-466.
Lughezzani G, Catanzaro M, Torelli T, et al. The relationship between characteristics of inguinal lymph nodes and pelvic lymph node involvement in penile squamous cell carcinoma: a single institution experience. J Urol 2014;191:977-982
Lont AP, Kroon BK, Gallee MP, et al. Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival. J Urol 2007;177:947-952; discussion 952.
Pagliaro LC, Williams DL, Daliani D, et al. Neoadjuvant paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic penile cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:3851.
Dickstein RJ, Munsell MF, Pagliaro LC, Pettaway CA. Prognostic factors influencing survival from regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the penis after preoperative chemotherapy. BJU Int 2016; 117:118.
Djajadiningrat RS, Bergman AM, van Werkhoven E, et al. Neoadjuvant taxane-based combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced penile cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2015; 13:44.
NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2012: Penile Cancer. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/penile.pdf (Accessed on June 14, 2012).
Sharma P, Djajadiningrat R, Zargar-Shoshtari K, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival in pelvic node-positive penile cancer after lymph node dissection: a multi-institutional study. Urol Oncol 2015; 33:496.e17.
Robinson R, Marconi L, MacPepple E, et al. Risks and benefits of adjuvant radiotherapy after inguinal lymphadenectomy and node-positive penile cancer: a systematic review by the European Association of Urology Penile Cancer Guidelines panel. Eur Urol 2018.
Chakiryan NH, Dahmen A, Bandini M, et al. Patterns of Recurrence following Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Penile Cancer: Optimizing Surveillance Strategies. J Urol 2021;206:960-969.
Hakenberg OW, Compérat EM, Minhas S, et al. EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update. Eur Urol 2015; 67:142.
National Comoprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Penile cancer. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/penile.pdf (Accessed on April 18, 2020).
Chaux A, Reuter V, Lezcano C, et al. Comparison of morphologic features and outcome of resected recurrent and nonrecurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a study of 81 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2009;33:1299-1306.
Ornellas AA, Nobrega BL, Wei Kin Chin E, et al. Prognostic factors in invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: analysis of 196 patients treated at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute. J Urol 2008;180:1354-1359
Baumgarten AS, Alhammali E, Hakky TS, et al. Salvage surgical resection for isolated locally recurrent inguinal lymph node metastasis of penile cancer: international study collaboration. J Urol 2014;192:760- 764.
Connell CF, Berger NA. Management of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Urol Clin North Am 1994; 21:745.
Haas GP, Blumenstein BA, Gagliano RG, et al. Cisplatin, methotrexate and bleomycin for the treatment of carcinoma of the penis: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J Urol 1999; 161:1823.
