Zirkonyum Abutmentler
Özet
Zirkonya abutmentler, doğal diş görünümü, yüksek mekanik direnci, biyouyumluluğu ve düşük plak akümülasyonu sayesinde implant destekli dental restorasyonlarda titanyuma estetik bir alternatif sunar. Özellikle bukkal yumuşak doku kalınlığının 2 mm’den az olduğu vakalarda ve yüksek gülme hattına sahip hastalarda gri yansımayı önleyerek estetik başarıyı artırır. Yapısal olarak tek parçalı veya titanyum tabanlı (hibrit) iki parçalı tasarımlarla üretilebilen bu dayanaklar, CAD/CAM teknolojisiyle kişiye özel hazırlanarak marjinal dokulara optimum destek ve daha hassas uyum sağlar. Klinik çalışmalar internal ve konik bağlantılı sistemlerin kuvvet dağılımında daha kararlı olduğunu, mekanik yüklemelere karşı direnç için duvar kalınlığının 0.5 mm'nin altına düşmemesi gerektiğini göstermektedir. Materyalin inert yapısı nedeniyle simantasyon öncesi alümina parçacıklarıyla kumlama ve fosfat monomerli (MDP) adezivlerin kullanımı klinik bağlantı başarısını optimize eder. Uzun dönemli takiplerde zirkonyanın yumuşak doku iyileşmesini hızlandırdığı, peri-implant sağlığını koruduğu ve krestal kemik kaybını titanyuma kıyasla önemli ölçüde azalttığı saptanmıştır.
Zirconia abutments offer an aesthetic alternative to titanium in implant-supported dental restorations due to their natural tooth appearance, high mechanical resistance, biocompatibility, and low plaque accumulation. Especially in cases where buccal soft tissue thickness is less than 2 mm and in patients with a high smile line, they enhance aesthetic success by preventing gray discoloration. Manufactured as one-piece or titanium-based (hybrid) two-piece designs, these abutments can be customized via CAD/CAM technology to provide optimum support to marginal tissues and a more precise fit. Clinical studies indicate that internal and conical connection systems are more stable in load distribution, and the wall thickness must not fall below 0.5 mm to resist mechanical loads. Due to the inert nature of the material, alumina particle airborne-particle abrasion and the use of phosphate monomer-containing (MDP) adhesives prior to cementation optimize clinical bonding success. Long-term follow-ups have revealed that zirconia accelerates soft tissue healing, preserves peri-implant health, and significantly reduces crestal bone loss compared to titanium.
Referanslar
Block, M. S., & Kent, J. N. (1997). Sinus augmentation for dental implants: the use of autogenous bone. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 55(11), 1281-1286.
Han, J., Zhao, J., & Shen, Z. (2017). Zirconia ceramics in metal-free implant dentistry. Advances in Applied Ceramics, 116(3), 138-150.
Özgür, E., & Alaaddinoplu, E. E. Dental İmplantlar etrafında erken dönem marjınal kemık rezorpsıyonunu etkıleyen faktörler. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(4), 639-651.
Şeşen Uslu Y, Ulukapı H. İndirekt restorasyonlarda kullanılan materyaller ve üretim yöntemleri. Ulukapı H , edit ör. Posterior Bölge Estetik Restorasyonlar. 1. Baskı. Ankara:Türkiye Klinikleri; 2019. p.17-27.
Denry, I., & Kelly, J. R. (2008). State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dental materials, 24(3), 299-307.
Bağrıvatan, G. N., Çelik, M., Çilingir, A., & Bayraktar, G. Estetik İmplant Dayanaklar. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(2), 60-66.
Doğan, M. F., & Röhlig, D. B. G. İmplantüstü protezlerde dayanak seçimi.
Thalji, G., Bryington, M., De Kok, I. J., & Cooper, L. F. (2014). Prosthodontic management of implant therapy. Dental Clinics, 58(1), 207-225.
Kurbad, A., & Kurbad, S. (2013). CAD/CAM-based implant abutments. International journal of computerized dentistry, 16(2), 125–141.
Tinschert, J., Natt, G., Mautsch, W., Augthun, M., & Spiekermann, H. (2001). Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. The International journal of prosthodontics, 14(3), 231–238.
Chevalier J, Olagnon C, Fantozzi G, Cales B. Crack propagation behavior of Y-TZP ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 1995;78:1889–94.
Chevalier J, Olagnon C, Fantozzi G. Crack Propagation and fatigue in zirconia-based composites. 1999;30: 525–530.
Marchack CB, Yamashita T. Fabrication of a digitally scanned, custom-shaped abutment: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85(2): 113-5
Turkiye Klinikleri J Prosthodont-Special Topics 2015;1(1):69-76
Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research Volume 10, Issue 1, January–March 2020, Pages 372-374 40
DuVall NB, DeReis SP, Vandewalle KS. Fracture strength of various titanium-based, CAD-CAM and PFM implant crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;e12672.
Adrien Naveau, DDS, PhD,a Christophe Rignon-Bret, DDS, PhD,b and Claudine Wulfman, DDS, PhDc Systematıc Revıew Zirconia abutments in the anterior region: A systematic review of mechanical and esthetic outcomes
Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Schärer P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported singletooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:285–290.
Canullo L. Clinical outcome study of customized zirconia abutments for single-implant restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20:489–493
Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutmentsfor single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3- year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:802–808. 38
Rinke, S., Anterior all-ceramic superstructures: chance or risk? Quintessence Int, 2015. 46(3): p. 217-27.
Elsayed, A., et al., Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments. Clinical oral implants research, 2018. 29(1): p. 20-27.
Levin, L., 2008, Dealing with the Dental Implant Failures, J Appl Oral Sci, 16:171-5.
Mieda, M., et al., The effective design of zirconia coping on titanium base in dental implant superstructure. Dent Mater J, 2017.
Kapos, T. and C. Evans, CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2014. 29.
Pereira, Anne Karoline de Holanda Cavalcanti, et al. "Mechanical behavior of titanium and zirconia abutments at the implant-abutment interface: A systematic review." The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2022).
Long, L., H. Alqarni, and R. Masri, Influence of implant abutment fabrication method on clinical outcomes: a systematic review. European journal of oral implantology, 2017. 10: p. 67-77.
Güngör, M.B., et al., Ön bölge implantlarinin hasta başı cad-cam kişisel seramik abutmentlarla rehabilitasyonu: 2 olgu sunumu. Sağlık Akademisi Kastamonu, 2 (2), 142-153 2017.
Foong, J.K., et al., Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent, 2013. 109(5): p. 304-12.
Cooper, L.F., et al., Prospective assessment of CAD/CAM zirconia abutment and lithium disilicate crown restorations: 2.4 year results. J Prosthet Dent, 2016. 116(1): p. 33-9.
Nilsson, A., et al., One-piece internal zirconia abutments for single-tooth restorations on narrow and regular diameter implants: A 5-year prospective follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017. 19(5): p. 916-925.
Rinke, S., et al., Practice-based clinical evaluation of zirconia abutments for anterior single-tooth restorations. Quintessence Int, 2015. 46(1): p. 19-29.
Thulasidas, S., et al., Influence of implant angulation on the fracture resistance of zirconia abutments. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2015. 24(2): p. 127-135.
Moon, Seung-Jin, et al. "Axial wall thickness of zirconia abutment in anterior region." The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 53.4 (2015): 345-351.
Çelik, M., Bural, C., & Bayrakdar, G. (2014). Diş Hekimliğinde Zirkonya Uygulamalari. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(Supplement 8), 106-116.
Fischer, Nicholas G., et al. "Effect of clinically relevant CAD/CAM zirconia polishing on gingival fibroblast proliferation and focal adhesions." Materials 10.12 (2017): 1358.
Gültekin, P. (2017). Volkan Turp. Turkiye Klinikleri J Prosthodont-Special Topics, 3(2), 77-83.
Uludamar A, Şeyda A, Özkan Y. Zirkonya esaslı tam seramik restorasyonlar. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2012;132-41.
Denry I, Kelly JR. Emerging ceramic-based materials for dentistry. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 1235- 42
Varol, M., Güncü, M. B., Aktaş, G., & Canay, M. Ş. (2016). Diş hekimliği pratiğinde zirkonyum ve uygulamalarına panoramik bakış. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(3), 534-541.
Modgi, C.M. and M.A. Aras, zirconia abutments in ımplant dentistry. International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Research, 2012. 3(1): p. 39-42.
Nakamura, K., et al., Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont, 2010. 23(4): p. 299-309.
Zembic, A., et al., Eleven‐year follow‐up of a prospective study of zirconia ımplant abutments supporting single all‐ceramic crowns in anterior and premolar regions. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 2015. 17(S2).
Nascimento, Cássio do, et al. "Bacterial adhesion on the titanium and zirconia abutment surfaces." Clinical oral implants research 25.3 (2014): 337-343.
Thammajaruk, P., et al., Bonding of composite cements to zirconia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ın vitro studies. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2018.
Çakır, T., Vanlıoğlu, B., & Özkan, Y. K. (2014). Platform swıtchıng konsepti. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2)..
Hürzeler M, Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel HC. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(7 Suppl 1):33–39.
Linkevicius, T. and J. Vaitelis, The effect of zirconia or titanium as abutment material on soft periimplant tissues: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015. 26 Suppl 11: p. 139-47.
Naveau A, Rignon-Bret C, Wulfman C, Zirconia abutments in the anterior region: A systematic reviewof mechanical and esthetic outcomes, The Journal Of Prosthetıc Dentıstry
