Monolitik Zirkonya
Özet
Monolitik zirkonya, geleneksel metal seramik restorasyonlardaki estetik sorunları ve kaplama porseleninin ufalanma (chipping) gibi klinik başarısızlıklarını önlemek amacıyla geliştirilmiş, polikristalin yapıda güncel bir dental materyaldir. Cam komponent içermeyen saf zirkonya, oda sıcaklığında tetragonal fazda stabil tutulması için yitriyum oksit ile desteklenerek üstün mekanik özelliklere sahip Y-TZP yapısını oluşturur. Diş hekimliğinde en yüksek eğilme mukavemetine ve kırılma tokluğuna sahip olması sebebiyle "seramik çelik" olarak anılan bu malzeme, kaplama seramiği gerektirmediğinden restorasyon kalınlığının posterior bölgede 0.5 mm'ye kadar düşürülmesine olanak tanır ve konservatif diş preparasyonunu destekler. Materyalin yarı saydamlığı ve estetik özellikleri; alümina miktarının azaltılması, tane boyutunun kontrolü ve mikroyapıya optik izotropi sağlayan kübik zirkonya fazının eklenmesi gibi kritik modifikasyonlarla artırılmıştır. Monolitik zirkonyanın yüksek sertlik değeri antagonist diş yapısında aşınma endişesi doğursa da, yapılan in vitro ve klinik araştırmalar mükemmel şekilde cilalanmış yüzeylerin karşıt minede fizyolojik sınırlar dahilinde, kabul edilebilir düzeyde aşınmaya neden olduğunu ve hatta glazürlü yüzeylere kıyasla daha az abrazif olduğunu kanıtlamıştır. CAD/CAM teknolojisiyle üretilen ve özellikle çiğneme kuvvetlerinin yüksek olduğu posterior bölgede, bruksizm gibi parafonksiyonel alışkanlığı olan hastalarda başarıyla uygulanan monolitik zirkonya, konvensiyonel veya adeziv simantasyon yöntemleriyle diş yüzeyine güvenle bağlanabilmektedir.
Monolithic zirconia is a contemporary, polycrystalline dental material developed to prevent aesthetic issues in traditional metal-ceramic restorations and clinical failures such as chipping of the veneering porcelain. Pure zirconia, which contains no glass component, is supported with yttrium oxide to remain stable in the tetragonal phase at room temperature, forming the Y-TZP structure with superior mechanical properties. Referred to as "ceramic steel" due to having the highest flexural strength and fracture toughness in dentistry, this material eliminates the need for veneering ceramic, allowing restoration thickness to be reduced down to 0.5 mm in the posterior region and supporting conservative tooth preparation. The translucency and aesthetic properties of the material have been enhanced through critical modifications such as reducing the amount of alumina, controlling grain size, and adding a cubic zirconia phase that provides optical isotropy to the microstructure. Although the high hardness value of monolithic zirconia raises concerns about wear on antagonist tooth structure, in vitro and clinical studies have proven that excellently polished surfaces cause acceptable wear on opposing enamel within physiological limits and are even less abrasive compared to glazed surfaces. Manufactured via CAD/CAM technology and successfully applied in the posterior region where masticatory forces are high, as well as in patients with parafunctional habits like bruxism, monolithic zirconia can be reliably bonded to the tooth surface using conventional or adhesive cementation methods.
Referanslar
Zarone F, Russo S, Sorrentino R. From porcelain-fused-to- metal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considera- tions. Dent Mater. 2011;27: 83-96.
Walton TR. A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics: clinical characteristics and outcome of single-unit metal-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12: 519-526.
Lin WS, Ercoli C, Feng C, et al. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics. J Prosthodont. 2012;21: 353-362.
Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, et al. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008; 116:272-279.
Land CH. Porcelain dental art: no.II. Dent Cosmos. 1903;45: 615-620.
Mc Lean JW. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br Dent J. 1965; 119:251-267.
Sjogren G, Lantto R, Granberg A, etal. Clinical examination of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns (Empress) in general practice: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12: 122-128.
Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999;20: 125.
Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37: 641-652.
Guess PC, Kulis A, Witkowski S, et al. Shear bond strengths between different zirconia cores and veneering ceramics and their susceptibility to thermocycling. Dent Mater. 2008;24: 1556-1567.
Guess PC, Schultheis S, Bonfante EA, et al. All-ceramic systems: laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am. 2011;55: 333-352.
Andreiuolo RF, Sabrosa CE, Dias KR. Dual-scan technique for the customization of zirconia computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing frameworks. Eur J Dent. 2013;7: 115-118.
Fischer J, Stawarczyk B. Compatibility of machined Ce- TZP/Al2O3 nanocomposite and a veneering ceramic. Dent Mater. 2007;23: 1500-1505.
Manicone PF, Iommetti PR, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent. 2007;35: 819-826.
Fischer J, Stawarczyk B, Hammerle CHF. Flexural strength of veneering ceramics for zirconia. J Dent. 2008;36: 316-321.
Tan JP, Sederstrom D, Polansky JR, et al. The use of slow heating and slow cooling regimens to strengthen porce- lain fused to zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107: 163-169.
Cho Y, Raigrodski AJ. The rehabilitation of an edentulous mandible with a CAD/CAM zirconia framework and heat- pressed lithium disilicate ceramic crowns: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111: 443-447.
Ishibe M, Raigrodski AJ, Flinn BD, et al. Shear bond strengths of pressed and layered veneering ceramics to high-noble alloy and zirconia cores. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106: 2937.
Sailer I, Philipp A, Zembic A, et al. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20: 431.
Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, et al. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater. 2009;25: 121-128.
Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater. 2006;22: 857-863.
Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont. 2008;17: 9-13.
Zhang Y, Lee JJW, Srikanth R, et al. Edge chipping and flexural resistance of monolithic ceramics. Dent Mater 2013;29: 1201-1208.
Sabrah AH, Cook NB, Luangruangrong P, et al. Full-con- tour Y-TZP ceramic surface roughness effect on synthetic hydroxyapatite wear. Dent Mater. 2013;29: 666-673.
Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, et al. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109: 22-29.
Kontos L, Schille C, Schweizer E, et al. Influence of surface treatment on the wear of solid zirconia. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71: 482-487.
Kim MJ, Oh SH, Kim JH, et al. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains. J Dent. 2012;40: 979-988.
Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112: 114-150.
Jung YS, Lee JW, Choi YJ, et al. A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirco- nia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010;2: 111-115.
Amer R, Kurklu D, Kateeb E, et al. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112: 1151-1155.
Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Schmutz F, et al. Two-body wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia and their cor- responding enamel antagonists. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71: 102-112.
Preis V, Weiser F, Handel G, et al. Wear performance of monolithic dental ceramics with different surface treatments. Quintessence Int. 2013;44: 393-405.
Mormann WH, Stawarczyk B, Ender A, et al. Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and Martens hardness. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;20: 113-125.
Luangruangrong P, Cook NB, Sabrah AH, et al. Influence of full-contour zirconia surface roughness on wear of glass-ceramics. J Prosthodont. 2014;23: 198-205.
Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Gueth J. et al. In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns. Dent Mater. 2012;28: 449-456.
Hmaidouch R, Mu€ller WD, Lauer HC, et al. Surface rough- ness of zirconia for full-contour crowns after clinically simulated grinding and polishing. Int J Oral Sci. 2014;6: 241-216.
Preis V, Schmalzbauer M, Bougeard D, et al. Surface properties of monolithic zirconia after dental adjustment treat- ments and in vitro wear simulation. J Dent. 2015;43: 133-139.
Amer R, Kurklu D, Johnston W. Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness of three ceramic systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114: 260-265.
Preis V, Behr M, Hahnel S, et al. In vitro failure and fracture resistance of veneered and full-contour zirconia restorations. J Dent. 2012;40: 921-928.
Zesewitz TF, Dent M, Knauber W, et al. Fracture resistance of a selection of full-contour all-ceramic crowns: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2014;27: 264-266.
Sun T, Zhou S, Lai R, et al. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns. Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;35: 93-101.
Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, et al. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thick- ness. Acta Odontol Scand. 2015;73: 602-608.
Johansson C, Kmet G, Rivera J, et al. Fracture strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns made of high translucent yttrium oxide-stabilized zirconium dioxide compared to porcelain-veneered crowns and lithium disilicate crowns. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72: 145-153.
Kok P, Kleverlaan CJ, Jager N, et al. Mechanical perfor- mance of implant-supported posterior crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114: 59-66.
Nakamura K, Harada A, Inagaki R, et al. The influence of low-temperature degradation and cyclic loading on the fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns. Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015;47: 49-56.
Ebeid K, Wille S, Hamdy A, et al. Effect of changes in sintering parameters on monolithic translucent zirconia. Dent Mater. 2014;30: 419-424.
Sari T, Tuncel I, Usumez A, et al. Transmission of Er:YAG laser through different dental ceramics. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32: 37-41.
Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, et al. Influence of low- temperature environmental exposure on the mechanical properties and structural stability of dental zirconia. J Prosthodont. 2012;21: 363-369.
Bonfante E, Rafferty BT, Silva NRF, et al. Residual thermal stress simulation in three-dimensional molar crown systems: a finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2012;21: 529-534.
Kim HK, Kim SH. Effect of the number of coloring liquid applications on the optical properties of monolithic zirconia. Dent Mater. 2014;30: 229-237.
Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, et al. Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia. J Adv Prosthodontics. 2013;5: 296-304.
Ilie N, Stawarczyk B. Quantification of the amount of light passing through zirconia: the effect of material shade, thickness, and curing conditions. J Dent. 2014;42: 684-690.
Ilie N, Stawarczyk B. Quantification of the amount of blue light passing through monolithic zirconia with respect to thickness and polymerization conditions. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;113: 114-121.
Sulaiman TA, Abdulmajeed AA, Donovan TE, et al. Degree of conversion of dual-polymerizing cements light polymerized through monolithic zirconia of different thicknesses and types. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114: 103-108.
Harianawala HH, Kheur MG, Apte SK, et al. Comparative analysis of transmittance for different types of commercially available zirconia and lithium disilicate materials. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6: 456-461.
Wang F, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N. Translucency of dental ceramics with different thicknesses. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;110: 14-20.
Uludamar A, Aygün Ş, Özkan YK. Tam seramik restorasyonların simantasyonu. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2011; 21(2): 150-62.
Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008;24(3):299-307.
Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007; 98(5): 389-404.
Cottom BA, Mayo MJ. Fracture toughness of nanocrystalline ZrO2-3mol% Y2O3 determined by Vickers indentation. Scripta Materialia 1996;34(5): 809-814.
Chevalier J, Society LG-J. Ceramics for medical applications: A picture for the next 20 years. Elsevier. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2009;29(7): 1245-1255.
Asharaf Ali, R. Mani.Zirconia: properties and application" a review. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal; Peshawar 2014;34(1).
Lughi V, Sergo V. Low temperature degradation -aging- of zirconia: A critical review of the relevant aspects in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2010;26(8):807-820.
Zhang H, Li Z, Kim B-N, Morita K, Yoshida H, Hiraga K et al. Effect of alumina dopant on transparency of tetragonal zirconia. J Nanomater. 2012. ID269064. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/269064
Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater. 2014;30(10): 1195-1203
Cheng J, Agrawal D, Zhang Y, Roy R. Microwave sintering of transparent alumina. Mater Lett. 2002;56(4): 587-592.
Klimke J, Trunec M, Krell A. Transparent tetragonal yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics: influence of scattering caused by bire-fringence. J Am Ceram Soc. 2011;94(6):1850–1858.
Kim HK, Kim SH. Optical properties of pre-colored dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Dent. 2016;55: 75-81.
Sedda M, Vichi A, Carrabba M, Capperucci A, Louca C, Ferrari M. Influence of coloring procedure on flexural resistance of zirconia blocks. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(1): 98-102.
Rinke S, Fischer C. Range of indications for translucent zirconia modifications: clinical and technical aspects. Quintessence Int. 2013;44(8): 557-566.
Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Ha SR. Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(1): 37-42.
Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(4): 316-320.
Stawarczyk B, Frevert K, Ender A, Roos M, Sener B, Wimmer T. Comparison of four monolithic zirconia materials with conventional ones: contrast ratio, grain size, four-point flexural strength and two-body wear. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 59:128-138.
Lawson NC, Janyavula S, Syklawer S, McLaren EA, Burgess JO. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing and glazing. J Dent. 2014;42(12):1586-1591.
Park JH, Park S, Lee K, Yun KD, Lim HP. Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111(1): 20-29.
Lohbauer U, Reich S. Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(4):1165-1172.
Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, et al. Relative trans-lucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J ProsthetDent. 2002;88(1): 4–9.
SrdićVV, Winterer M, Hahn H. Sintering behavior of nanocrystal-line zirconia doped with alumina prepared by chemical vapor syn-thesis. J Am Ceramic Soc. 2000;83(8):1853–60.
Chevalier J. What future for zirconia as a biomaterial? Biomaterials.2006;27(4):535–543.
Fathy SM, El-Fallal AA, El-Negoly SA, et al. Translucency ofmonolithic and core zirconia after hydrothermal aging. ActaBiomater Odont Scand. 2015;1(2–4):86–92.
Casolco SR, Xu J, Garay JE. Transparent/translucent polycrystal-line nanostructured yttria stabilized zirconia with varying colors.Scr Mater. 2008;58(6): 516–519.
Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent.Dent Mater. 2014;30(10): 1195–1203.
Jiang L, Liao Y, Wan Q, et al. Effects of sintering temperature andparticle size on the translucency of zirconium dioxide dental ceram-ic. J Mater Sci: Mater in Med. 2011;22(11): 2429–2435.
Papanagiotou HP, Morgano SM, Giordano RA, et al. In vitro eval-uation of low-temperature aging effects and finishing procedures onthe flexural strength and structural stability of Y-TZP dental ce-ramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;96(3):154–64.
Matsuzaki F, Sekine H, Honma S, et al. Translucency and flexuralstrength of monolithic translucent zirconia and porcelain-layeredzirconia. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(6): 910–917.
Anselmi-Tamburini U, Woolman JN, Munir ZA. Transparentnanometric cubic and tetragonal zirconia obtained by high-pressure pulsed electric current sintering. Adv Functional Mater.2007;17(16): 3267–373.
Denry I, Kelly J. Emerging ceramic-based materials for dentistry. JDent Res. 2014;93(12):1235–1242.
Chevalier J, Deville S, Münch E, et al. Critical effect of cubic phaseon aging in 3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics for hip re-placement prosthesis. Biomaterials. 2004;25(24):5539–5545.
Garvie RC, HanninkRH, PascoeRT. Ceramic steel? Nature. 1975;258(5537): 703–704.
Tong H, Tanaka CB, Kaizer MR, et al. Characterization of threecommercial Y-TZP ceramics produced for their high-translucency, high-strength and high-surface area. Ceram Int. 2016;42(1 Pt B):1077–1085.
Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel bydifferent dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res. 1991;70(3): 221–225.
Preis V, Behr M, Handel G, et al. Wear performance of dentalceramics after grinding andpolishing treatments. J MechBehavior Biomed Mater. 2012;10: 13–22.
Al-Haj Husain N, Camilleri J, Özcan M. Effect of polishing instru-ments and polishing regimens on surface topography and phasetransformation of monolithic zirconia: an evaluation with XPSand XRD analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;64: 104–112.
Sadid-Zadeh R, Liu PR, Aponte-Wesson R, et al. Maxillary cementretained implant supported monolithic zirconia prosthesis in a fullmouth rehabilitation: a clinical report. J Adv Prosthodont.2013;5(2): 209–217.
Limmer B, Sanders AE, Reside G, et al. Complications and patient-centered outcomes with an implant-supported monolithic zirconiafixed dental prosthesis: 1 year results. J Prosthodont. 2014;23(4): 267–275.
Keuper M, Eder K, Berthold C, Nickel KG. Direct evidence for continuous linear kinetics in the lowtemperature degradation of Y-TZP. Acta Biomater 2013;9: 4826-4835.
Hjerppe J, Narhi T, Fröberg K, Valittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Effects of shading the zirconia framework on biaxial strength and surface microhardness. Acta Odontol Scand 2008;66: 262-267
Durkan R, Özkır SE. Protetik diş tedavisi uygulamalarında kullanılan monolitik zirkonya seramik sistemleri ve kullanım alanları. A.Ü. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2018;45(3): 211-219
