Dengeli Puan Kartının Dönüşümü ve Dördüncü Nesil Dengeli Puan Kartı
Özet
Bu çalışma, işletmelerin performans ölçümünde sıklıkla başvurduğu dengeli puan kartı (Balanced Scorecard) sisteminin tarihsel gelişimini ve yaşadığı dönüşümleri dört nesil kapsamında incelemektedir. Geleneksel performans ölçüm sistemlerinin yalnızca kısa vadeli finansal verilere odaklanması ve geleceğe yönelik stratejik karar almada yetersiz kalması, Robert Kaplan ve David Norton tarafından dengeli puan kartının geliştirilmesine yol açmıştır. 1990'ların başında ortaya çıkan birinci nesil dengeli puan kartı; finansal, müşteri, içsel iş süreçleri ile öğrenme ve gelişme olmak üzere dört boyutta sınırlı sayıda finansal ve finansal olmayan göstergeyi bir araya getirerek operasyonel bir kontrol aracı işlevi görmüştür. 1990'ların ortasında geliştirilen ikinci nesil, stratejik hedefler ile ölçümler arasındaki neden-sonuç ilişkilerini gösteren strateji haritalarını sürece dâhil etmiştir. 2000'lerin başında sunulan üçüncü nesil dengeli puan kartı ise hedef beyanlarını kullanarak stratejik uygunluğu artırmış ve boyutları faaliyet ile çıktı olarak ikiye indirgemiştir. 2006'dan itibaren gelişen dördüncü nesil dengeli puan kartında odak noktası ölçüm ve hedeflerden ziyade davranışlara, sürekli öğrenmeye, uyum sağlamaya ve performans kültürüne kaymıştır. Dördüncü nesil, belirsiz ve riskli çevre koşullarını yönetmeyi amaçlarken sosyal ve çevresel etkileri de kapsayan İş Pusulası gibi araçlarla kurumsal değer ile strateji arasında entegrasyon sağlamaktadır.
This study examines the historical development and transformations across four generations of the Balanced Scorecard system, which is frequently utilized by businesses for performance measurement. The inadequacy of traditional performance measurement systems, due to their exclusive focus on short-term financial data and inability to support forward-looking strategic decision-making, led to the development of the Balanced Scorecard by Robert Kaplan and David Norton. Emerging in the early 1990s, the first-generation Balanced Scorecard functioned as an operational control tool by aggregating a limited number of financial and non-financial indicators across four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth. The second generation, developed in the mid-1990s, introduced strategy maps that illustrate cause-and-effect relationships between strategic objectives and measures. Introduced in the early 2000s, the third-generation Balanced Scorecard enhanced strategic alignment through destination statements and reduced the perspectives into two dimensions: activity and outcome. Evolving from 2006 onward, the fourth-generation Balanced Scorecard shifted its focus from mere measurements and targets toward behaviors, continuous learning, adaptability, and performance culture. Aiming to manage uncertain and risky environmental conditions, the fourth generation integrates corporate value and strategy through tools such as the Business Compass, which also encompasses social and environmental impacts.
Referanslar
Abdel-Kader, M., Moufty, S., & Laitinen, E. K. (2011). Balanced scorecard development: a review of literature and directions for future research. Review of management accounting research, 214-239.
Ahn, H. (2001). Applying the balanced scorecard concept: an experience report. Long range planning, 34(4), 441-461.
Ali, M. R. M. (2019). Balanced scorecard development over the last 26 years. IOSR Journal of Business and management, 21(1), 13-16.
Anita, N. (2022). The Changes of Balanced Scorecard (BSC): A Comprehensive Review. Jurnal Akuntansi, Manajemen dan Ekonomi, 23(4), 22-28.
Behrouzi, F., Shaharoun, A. M., Ma’aram, A. (2014). Applications of the balanced scorecard for strategic management and performance measurement in the health sector. Australian Health Review, 38(2), 208-217.
Brudan, A. (2005). Balanced Scorecard typology and organisational impact. actKM Online Journal of Knowledge Management. 2(1). 2-12.
Cobbold, I., Lawrie, G. (2002). The development of the balanced scorecard as a strategic management tool. Performance measurement association, 35(1), 37-56.
Excitant, (t.y.) The Fourth Generation Balanced Scorecard approach. (01.08.2022 tarihinde https://www.excitant.co.uk/fourth-generation-balanced-scorecard-approach/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
Gallo, P., Mihalčová, B., Timková, V., Tomčíková, Ľ. (2018). Importance of financial and non-financial indicators in companies with the balanced scorecard concept. Calitatea, 19(165), 34-38.
Gautreau, A., Kleiner, B. H. (2001). Recent trends in performance measurement systems–the balanced scorecard approach. Management Research News. 153-156.
Horváthová, J., Mokrišová, M., Vrábliková, M. (2019). Integration of balanced scorecard and data envelopment analysis to measure and improve business performance. Management Science Letters, 9(9), 1321-1340.
Ievdokymov, V., Zavalii, T. (2020). Conceptual framework of a balanced scorecard: a value-oriented approach. Fundamental and applied researches in practice of leading scientific schools, 37(1), 17-26.
Kádárová, J., Durkáčová, M., Kalafusová, L. (2014). Balanced scorecard as an issue taught in the field of industrial engineering. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 174-179.
Kádárová, J., Durkáčová, M., Teplická, K., Kádár, G. (2015). The proposal of an innovative integrated BSC–DEA model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1503-1508.
Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. (1996). Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy. California Management Review 39 (1): 53-79.
Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. (2001). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kaplan, R. S., D. P. Norton. 1992. The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review (January-February): 71-79.
Lawrie, G., Cobbold, I. (2002). Development of the 3rd generation balanced scorecard. Management Review, 13(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237516329.
Lawrie, G., Cobbold, I. (2004). Third‐generation balanced scorecard: evolution of an effective strategic control tool. International journal of productivity and performance management, 53(7), 611-623.
Mata, S. V., Serrato, R. B. (2021). Design and Development of A First-and Second-Generation Balanced Scorecard in a Company in the South of Guanajuato. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(3), 77-83.
Mbugua, L. M., Harris, P., Holt, G. D., vd. O. (1999, September). A framework for determining critical success factors influencing construction business performance. In Proceedings of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management 15th Annual Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 255-64).
Mooraj, S., Oyon, D., Hostettler, D. (1999). The balanced scorecard: a necessary good or an unnecessary evil?. European Management Journal, 17(5), 481-491.
Nair, M. (2004). Essentials of balanced scorecard.
Narayanamma, P. L. Babu D. S. Jayasankaraprasad, Ch. (2016). Balanced Scorecard and Its Iterations. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. 18 (12). 78-82.
Özer, G., Çam, İ. (2018). Dengeli puan kartı ve risk yönetimi: entegrasyon için alternatif yaklaşımların incelenmesi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(4), 141-169.
Perkins, M., Grey, A., Remmers, H. (2014). What do we really mean by “Balanced Scorecard”?. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 63(2). 148-169.
Phillips, P. A. (2007). The balanced scorecard and strategic control: a hotel case study analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 27(6), 731-746.
Rodrigues, A. (t.y.) 3G-4G balanced scorecards & performance scorecards. (01.08.2022 tarihinde https://www.thebusinessbinnacle.co.nz/services/balanced-scorecards/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
Rodrigues, A. (t.y.) The Business Compass. (01.08.2022 tarihinde https://www.thebusinessbinnacle.co.nz/services/balanced-scorecards/the-business-compass/ adresinden ulaşılmıştır).
Stefanovska, L., Soluncevski, M. (2016). Usıng the Fourth Generatıon Balanced Scorecard In The Process Of Strategıc Plannıng In The Publıc Sector Organızatıons. International May Conference on Strategic Management - IMKSM2016 May 28 – 30, 2016, Bor, Serbia. 130-138.
Štofova, L., Szaryszova, P., Vilamova, S. (2017). Development of the integrated quality management model for increasing the strategic performance of enterprises in the automotive industry. Problems and perspectives in management, 15(3), 4-15.
Valmohammadi, C., Servati, A. (2011). Performance measurement system implementation using Balanced Scorecard and statistical methods. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(5), 493-511.
