Kapsayıcı Liderlik
Özet
Liderlik, grup amaçlarına ulaşmak için bireyleri etkileme süreci olup zaman içerisinde dönüştürücü, bürokratik, karizmatik, görev veya çalışan odaklı, hizmetkar ve otokratik gibi çeşitli liderlik stilleriyle ele alınmıştır. 2000'li yıllardan itibaren literatürde öne çıkan kapsayıcı liderlik ise, çalışanların kendi fikirlerini ve değerlerini özgürce paylaşabildiği samimi ve açık bir iletişim ortamı sunarak onları karar alma mekanizmalarına dahil eden katılımcı bir yaklaşımdır. Kapsayıcı liderler, ekip içerisindeki bireysel farklılıkları analiz edip bu farklılıklar arasında köprüler kurarak örgütsel çatışmaları önler; böylesine güvenli bir iklim sayesinde çalışanların örgütsel aidiyet, güven, işe adanmışlık ve motivasyon seviyelerini yükseltir. Carmeli ve arkadaşları tarafından açıklık, hazır bulunuşluk ve erişilebilirlik boyutlarıyla kavramsallaştırılan bu model; dönüştürücü liderlik, yetki devri ve hizmetkar liderlikten liderin kendi vizyonunu ekibin geri bildirimlerine göre esnetebilmesi ve ekibi bir bütün olarak yükseltme yeteneğiyle ayrılmaktadır. Alan yazınındaki ampirik araştırmalar, kapsayıcı liderliğin yenilikçi çalışan davranışı, psikolojik güçlendirme, çalışan refahı ve proje başarısı ile anlamlı ve pozitif yönlü ilişkiler taşıdığını göstermektedir. Türkiye'de henüz kısıtlı sayıda çalışmaya konu olan kapsayıcı liderlik, kapsayıcı bir örgüt iklimi ve örgütsel adalet algısı oluşturarak çalışan performansını ve verimliliğini maksimum düzeye çıkarmada stratejik bir role sahiptir.
Leadership is a process of influencing individuals to achieve group goals and has been addressed throughout time through various leadership styles such as transformational, bureaucratic, charismatic, task- or employee-oriented, servant, and autocratic leadership. Emerging in the literature since the 2000s, inclusive leadership is a participatory approach that incorporates employees into decision-making mechanisms by providing a sincere and open communication environment where they can freely share their ideas and values. Inclusive leaders analyze individual differences within the team and build bridges between them to prevent organizational conflicts; through such a safe climate, they enhance employees' organizational sense of belonging, trust, work engagement, and motivation levels. Conceptualized by Carmeli and colleagues through the dimensions of openness, availability, and accessibility, this model differs from transformational leadership, delegation of authority, and servant leadership by the leader's ability to adapt their vision based on team feedback and elevate the team as a whole. Empirical research in the literature demonstrates that inclusive leadership shares significant and positive relationships with innovative employee behavior, psychological empowerment, employee well-being, and project success. Subject to a limited number of studies in Turkey so far, inclusive leadership plays a strategic role in maximizing employee performance and productivity by fostering an inclusive organizational climate and perception of organizational justice.
Referanslar
Ahearne, M. & Mathieu, J. & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945–955.
Barbuto, J. E. (1997). Taking the charisma out of transformational leadership. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12(3), 689-697.
Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bass, B. M. (2008). The bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press
Carmeli, A. & Reiter-Palmon, R. & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260.
Choi, S. B. & Tran, T. B. H. & Kang, S. W. (2017). Inclusive leadership and employee well being: The mediating role of person-job fit. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(6), 1877–1901.
Choi, S. B. & Tran, T. B. H. & Park, B. I. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement: Mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality, 43(6), 931–944.
Collins, J. C. & Porras, J. I. (2008). CMR classics: organizational vision and visionary organizations. California management review, 50(2), 117-137.
Galvin, B. M. & Waldman, D. A. & Balthazard, P. (2010). Visionary communication qualities as mediators of the relationship between narcissism and attributions of leader charisma. Personnel Psychology, 63(3), 509–537.
Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. & Johnson, D. (1984). Managing organizational behavior.
Khan, J. & Jaafar, M. & Javed, B. & Mubarak, N. & Saudagar, T. (2020). Does inclusive leadership affect project success? The mediating role of perceived psychological empowerment and psychological safety. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13(5), 1077–1096.
Liden, R. C. & Wayne, S. J. & Zhao, H. & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–177.
Lirio, P. & Lee, M. D. & Williams, M. L. & Haugen, L. K. &Kossek, E. E. (2008). The inclusion challenge with reduced‐load professionals: The role of the manager. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, The University of Michigan and in alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 47(3), 443–461.
Mitchell, R. & Boyle, B. & Parker, V. & Giles, M. & Chiang, V. & Joyce, P. (2015). Managing inclusiveness and diversity in teams: How leader inclusiveness affects performance through status and team identity. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 217–239.
Nembhard, I. M. & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(7), 941–966.
Nishii, L. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754–1774.
Randel, A. E. & Dean, M. A. & Ehrhart, K. H. & Chung, B. & Shore, L. (2016). Leader inclusiveness, psychological diversity climate, and helping behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1), 216–234.
Trottier, T. & Van Wart, M., & Wang, X. (2008). Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations. Public administration review, 68(2), 319-333.
Wang, Y. X. & Yang, Y. J. & Wang, Y. & Su, D. & Li, S. W. & Zhang, T. & Li, H. P. (2019). The mediating role of inclusive leadership: Work engagement and innovative behaviour among Chinese head nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(4), 688–696.
Wasserman, I. C. &Blake-Beard, S. (2010). Leading inclusively: Mind-Sets, skills and actions for a diverse, complex world. K. Bunker, D. T. Hall ve K. E. Kram (Ed.), In extraordinary leadership: Addressing the gaps in senior executive development içinde (ss. 197–212). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1. baskı.
Wasserman, I. C. & Gallegos, P. V. & Ferdman, B. M. (2008). Dancing with resistance: Leadership challenges in fostering a culture of inclusion. K. M. Thomas (Ed.), In diversity resistance in organizations içinde (ss. 175–200). New York: Taylor & Francis Group/Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.1. baskı.
Wuffli, P. A. (2016). Inclusive leadership: A framework for the global era. Switzerland: Springer.
