Sabit Retansiyon Apareyleri
Özet
Ortodontik tedavi sonrası diş pozisyonlarının korunmasını sağlayan sabit retansiyon apareyleri (retainerler), estetik görünümü, hasta kooperasyonuna ihtiyacı azaltması ve daimi retansiyondaki güvenilirliği nedeniyle klinisyenler ile hastalar tarafından sıklıkla tercih edilmektedir. Bu apareylerin avantajlarının yanı sıra periodontal probleme yol açma riskleri ve bağlantı sorunları gibi dezavantajları da bulunmaktadır. Geç mandibular büyüme, diastema kapatılması ve boşlukların korunması gibi durumlarda endike olan sabit retainerlar, gelişen teknolojiyle birlikte çeşitlenmiştir. Geleneksel kanin-kanin düz çelik telleri ve esnek çok sarımlı tellerin yanı sıra estetik avantaj sunan fiberle güçlendirilmiş kompozit rezinler ile son yıllarda biyolojik uyumu yüksek dijital CAD/CAM tabanlı sistemler klinikte yerini almıştır. Direkt veya indirekt yöntemlerle diş yüzeyine kompozit rezin ya da cam iyonomer simanlarla yapıştırılan bu apareylerin başarısı, hassas bir klinik teknik ve pasif uyum gerektirmektedir. Birçok ortodontist nüksü önlemek ve uzun vadeli stabilite sağlamak adına hastalarına ömür boyu ya da postpubertal büyüme tamamlanana kadar daimi sabit retansiyon protokolü uygulamayı önermektedir.
Orthodontic fixed retention appliances (retainers), which maintain tooth positions after treatment, are frequently preferred by clinicians and patients due to their aesthetic appearance, reduction of patient cooperation needs, and reliability in permanent retention. In addition to their advantages, these appliances also have disadvantages such as the risk of causing periodontal problems and bonding failures. Fixed retainers, indicated in cases like late mandibular growth, closure of diastemas, and space maintenance, have diversified with advancing technology. Alongside traditional canine-to-canine flat steel wires and flexible multistranded wires, aesthetic fiber-reinforced composite resins and highly biocompatible digital CAD/CAM-based systems have been introduced in clinics recently. The success of these appliances, bonded to tooth surfaces using direct or indirect methods with composite resins or glass ionomer cements, requires a precise clinical technique and passive adaptation. To prevent relapse and ensure long-term stability, many orthodontists recommend implementing a permanent fixed retention protocol for patients, either lifelong or until postpubertal growth is fully completed.
Referanslar
Little RM, Riedel RA, Artun J. An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1988;93(5): 423–428. doi:10.1016/0889-5406(88)90102-3
Keim RG. 2002 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures Part 1 results and trends. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2002;36: 553–568.
Renkema A-M, Renkema A, Bronkhorst E, et al. Long-term effectiveness of canine-to-canine bonded flexible spiral wire lingual retainers. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2011;139(5): 614–621. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.041
Renkema AM, Hélène Sips ET, Bronkhorst E, et al. A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in The Netherlands. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009;31(4): 432–437. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjn131
Pratt MC, Kluemper GT, Hartsfield Jr JK, et al. Evaluation of retention protocols among members of the American Association of Orthodontists in the United States. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2011;140(4): 520–526. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.023
Pratt MC, Kluemper GT, Lindstrom AF. Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2011;140(2): 196–201. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.035
Cerny R, Cockrell D, Lloyd D. A survey of patient opinions on fixed vs. removable retainers. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2009;43(12): 784–787.
Knierim RW. Invisible lower cuspid to cuspid retainer. Angle Orthodontist. 1973;43(2): 218–219. doi:10.1043/0003-3219(1973)043<0218:ILCTCR>2.0.CO;2
Zachrisson BU. Long-term experience with direct-bonded retainers: update and clinical advice. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2007;41(12): 728-737.
Chinvipas N, Hasegawa Y, Terada K. Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture. Odontology. 2014;102(1): 89–97. doi:10.1007/s10266-012-0095-9
Durbin DD. Relaps and need for permanent fixed retention. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2001;35: 723–727.
Proffit W.R, Fields H.W, Sarver D.M. Contemporary orthodontics. 5th ed. Elsevier/Mosby (ed.). 2013.
Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL, Huang GJ. Orthodontics-e-book: current principles and techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.
Bearn DR. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1995;108(2): 207–213. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70085-4
Zachrisson BU. Improving orthodontic results in cases with maxillary incisors missing. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1978;73(3): 274–289. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(78)90134-3
Renkema A-M, Al-Assad S, Bronkhorst E, et al. Effectiveness of lingual retainers bonded to the canines in preventing mandibular incisor relapse. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2008;134(2): 179-e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.021
Årtun J, Zachrisson B. Improving the handling properties of a composite resin for direct bonding. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1982;81(4): 269–276. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(82)90212-3
Zachrisson BU. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 1983;17: 838–846.
Zachrisson BU. The bonded lingual retainer and multiple spacing of anterior teeth. Swedish Dental journal. Supplement. 1982;15: 247–255.
Degirmenci Z, Ozsoy OP. Retention after fixed orthodontic treatment. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2009;12: 83–90.
Årtun J. Caries and periodontal reactions associated with long-term use of different types of bonded lingual retainers. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1984;86(2): 112–118. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(84)90302-6
Zachrisson BJ. Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3-3 retainer. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 1995;29(1): 39–48.
Zachrisson BU, Usumez S. Buyukyilmaz. Bonding in orthodontics. Orthod Curr Princ Tech Missouri Mosby. 2012;727–784.
Lee RT. The lower incisor bonded retainer in clinical practice: a three year study. British journal of orthodontics. 1981;8(1): 15–18. doi:10.1179/bjo.8.1.15
Zachrisson BU. Multistranded wire bonded retainers: from start to success. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2015;148(5): 724–727. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.015
Katsaros C, Livas C, Renkema A-M. Unexpected complications of bonded mandibular lingual retainers. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;132(6): 838–841. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.011
Kucera J, Marek I, Hanzelka T, et al. Undesirable side effects of orthodontic retainers. Systematic review.Ortodoncie. 2015;24: 22–35.
Liu Y. Application of fiber-reinforced composite as fixed lingual retainer. West China journal of stomatology. 2010;28(3): 290–293.
Karaman AI, Kir N, Belli S. Four applications of reinforced polyethylene fiber material in orthodontic practice. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2002;121(6): 650–654. doi:10.1067/mod.2002.123818
Rose E, Frucht S, Jonas IE. Clinical comparison of a multistranded wire and a direct-bonded polyethylene ribbon--reinforced resin composite used for lingual retention. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2002;33(8).
Salehi P, Najafi HZ, Roeinpeikar SM. Comparison of survival time between two types of orthodontic fixed retainer: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Progress in Orthodontics. 2013;14(1): 1–6. doi:10.1186/2196-1042-14-25
Sobouti F, Rakhshan V, Saravi MG, et al. Two-year survival analysis of twisted wire fixed retainer versus spiral wire and fiber-reinforced composite retainers: a preliminary explorative single-blind randomized clinical trial. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2016;46(2): 104–110. doi:10.4041/kjod.2016.46.2.104
Tacken MPE, Cosyn J, De Wilde P, et al. Glass fibre reinforced versus multistranded bonded orthodontic retainers: a 2 year prospective multi-centre study. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2010;32(2): 117–123. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp100
Foek DLS, Özcan M, Krebs E, et al. Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: Stainless steel wire versus fiber-reinforced composites. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2009;11: 381–390. doi:10.5167/uzh-30474
Bolla E, Cozzani M, Doldo T, et al. Failure evaluation after a 6-year retention period: a comparison between glass fiber-reinforced (GFR) and multistranded bonded retainers. International Orthodontics. 2012;10(1): 16–28. doi:10.1016/j.ortho.2011.12.005
Sfondrini MF, Fraticelli D, Castellazzi L, et al. Clinical evaluation of bond failures and survival between mandibular canine-to-canine retainers made of flexible spiral wire and fiber-reinforced composite. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2014;6(2): e145. doi:10.4317/jced.51379
Baysal A, Uysal T, Gul N, et al. Comparison of three different orthodontic wires for bonded lingual retainer fabrication. Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2012;42(1): 39–46. doi:10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.39
Taner T, Aksu M. A prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular lingual retainer survival. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2012;34(4): 470–474. doi:doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr038
Shim H, Foley P, Bankhead B, et al. Comparative assessment of relapse and failure between CAD/CAM stainless steel and standard stainless steel fixed retainers in orthodontic retention patients: A randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthodontist. 2022;92(1): 87–94. doi:10.2319/121720-1015.1
Sachdeva RCL. SureSmile technology in a patient-centered orthodontic practice. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2001;35(4): 245–253.
Kravitz ND, Grauer D, Schumacher P, et al. Memotain: A CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2017;151(4): 812–815. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.11.021
Knaup I, Wagner Y, Wego J, et al. Potential impact of lingual retainers on oral health: comparison between conventional twistflex retainers and CAD/CAM fabricated nitinol retainers. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2019;80(2): 88–96. doi:10.1007/s00056-019-00169-7
Kartal Y, Kaya B, Polat-Özsoy Ö. Comparative evaluation of periodontal effects and survival rates of Memotain and five-stranded bonded retainers. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2021;82(1): 32–41. doi:10.1007/s00056-020-00243-5
Alrawas MB, Kashoura Y, Tosun Ö, et al. Comparing the effects of CAD/CAM nickel‐titanium lingual retainers on teeth stability and periodontal health with conventional fixed and removable retainers: A randomized clinical trial. Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research. 2021;24(2): 241–250. doi:10.1111/ocr.12425
Vibhute P. Two new methods for direct bonding lingual retainers. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2009;27(2): 111-115. doi:10.4103/0970-4388.55337
Karaman AI, Polat Ö, Büyükyilmaz T. A practical method of fabricating a lingual retainer. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2003;124(3): 327–330. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00451-7
Hahn W, Fricke J, Fricke-Zech S, et al. The use of a neodymium–iron–boron magnet device for positioning a multi-stranded wire retainer in lingual retention—a pilot study in humans. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008;30(5): 433–436. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjn037
Corti AF. An indirect-bonded lingual retainer. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 1991;25(10): 631–632.
Sahu SK, Jayam BK, Barik AK. Retainer positioner. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society. 2012;46(1): 53–54. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10021-1058
Yadav S, Upadhyay M. Easy-to-Bond Lower Lingual Retainer. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2006;40(8): 502.
Rossouw PE, Joseph VP. Indirect fabrication of a bonded lower lingual retainer. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 1992;26(7): 413–415.
Lai Heuberger C, Grossen J, Renkema A-M, et al. Orthodontic retention procedures in Switzerland. Swiss dental journal. 2014;124(6): 655–661.
Bovali E, Kiliaridis S, Cornelis MA. Indirect vs direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial comparing placement time and failure over a 6-month period. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2014;146(6): 701–708. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.08.015
Bearn DR, McCabe JF, Gordon PH, et al. Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1997;111(1): 67–74. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70304-4
Geserick M, Ball J, Wichelhaus A. Bonding fiber-reinforced lingual retainers with color-reactivating flowable composite. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 2004;38: 560–562.
Forss H, Seppä L, Lappalaimen R. In vitro abrasion resistance and hardness of glass-ionomer cements. Dental Materials. 1991;7(1): 36–39.doi:10.1016/0109-5641(91)90024-S
Baysal A, Uysal T. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements for bonding orthodontic retainers. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2010;32(3): 254–258. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp066
Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T. Bonded retainers. Orthod Curr Princ Tech 5th ed Philadelphia Elsevier Mosby. 2012;756–784.
Wong P, Freer TJ. Patients’ attitudes towards compliance with retainer wear. Australian orthodontic journal. 2005;21(1): 45-53.
Behrents RG. The consequences of adult craniofacial growth. Orthodontics in an aging society.Monograph. 1989;22: 53–99.
Gorman JC, Smith RJ. Comparison of treatment effects with labial and lingual fixed appliances. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1991;99(3): 202–209. doi:10.1016/0889-5406(91)70002-E
Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ, BeGole EA, et al. Long-term stability after orthodontic treatment: nonextraction with prolonged retention. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1994;106(3): 243–249. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70043-5
Valiathan M, Hughes E. Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2010;137(2): 170–177. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.023
