Şeffaf Plakların Erken Ortodontik Tedavide Kullanımı
Özet
Şeffaf plaklar, günümüzde estetik ve konforlu yapıları nedeniyle erken dönem ortodontik tedavilerde (Faz 1) giderek daha popüler hale gelen proaktif tekniklerdir. Bu yöntem; hafif çapraşıklıklar, yer darlıkları, derin veya açık kapanışlar ile fonksiyonel çene kaymaları gibi anomalilerin karma dişlenme dönemindeki çocuklarda düzeltilmesini amaçlar. Geleneksel sabit apareylere kıyasla daha az ağrıya yol açması, ağız içi yaralanmaları minimuma indirmesi, dijital simülasyon imkanı sunması ve klinikte kısa kontrol seansları gerektirmesi en belirgin avantajlarındandır. Ayrıca çocuklarda motivasyonu artırmak amacıyla plakların arka bölümlerinde kullanım süresine göre renk değiştiren özel indikatör alanlar yer almaktadır. Buna karşın, başarısının tamamen hasta kooperasyonuna (günlük 20-22 saatlik kullanım) bağlı olması, apareylerin kaybolma riskinin yüksekliği ve Türkiye şartlarındaki maliyetinin klasik yöntemlere kıyasla daha fazla olması gibi dezavantajları bulunmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, şeffaf plaklar büyüme ve gelişim sürecindeki çocuklarda doğru vaka seçimi ve hekim tecrübesiyle başarılı sonuçlar verirken, uzun dönemli etkinliğinin netleşmesi için daha fazla bilimsel çalışmaya ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.
Clear aligners have become increasingly popular in early orthodontic treatment (Phase 1) due to their aesthetic and comfortable nature, shifting practice from reactive to proactive approaches. This technique aims to correct anomalies such as mild crowding, space deficiencies, deep or open bites, and functional shifts in children during the mixed dentition period. Compared to traditional fixed appliances, key advantages include lower pain levels, minimal intraoral injuries, predictability through digital simulations, and shorter clinical appointment times. Additionally, to monitor compliance in pediatric patients, these aligners feature specific color-changing indicators in the posterior region that transition based on wear time. Conversely, significant disadvantages involve strict dependence on patient cooperation (20-22 hours of daily wear), a high risk of losing the appliances, and elevated treatment costs in Turkey compared to conventional methods. In conclusion, clear aligners yield successful outcomes in growing children when paired with precise case selection and clinical expertise, although further long-term comparative studies are required to fully establish their efficacy.
Referanslar
Ali SA, Miethke HR. Invisalign, an innovative invisible orthodontic appliance to correct malocclusions: Advantages and limitations. Dent Update 2012;39:254– 256,258–260.
Align Technology, Inc. http://www.aligntech.com/. Accessed 6 April 2022.
Andrews LF. The straight-wire appliance. Br J Orthod 1979;6:125–143.
Asbell MB. A brief history of orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:206–213.
Chatoo A. A view from behind: A history of lingual orthodontics. J Orthod 2013;40(suppl 1):S2–S7.
Archambault A, Lacoursiere R, Badawi H, Major PW, Car- ey J, Flores-Mir C. Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review. Angle Orthodontics 2010;80:201–210.
Baccetti T, Franchi L, Camporesi M, Defraia E. Orthodontic forces released by low-friction versus conventional sys- tems during alignment of apically or buccally malposed teeth. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:50–54.
Buschang PH, Shaw SG, Ross M, Crosby D, Campbell PM. Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces. Angle Orthod 2014; 84:391–396.
Cai Y, He B, Yang X, Yao J. Optimization of configuration of attachment in tooth translation with transparent tooth correction by appropriate moment-to-force ratios: Biomechanical analysis. Biomed Mater Eng 2015; 26(suppl 1):S507–S517.
Djeu G, Shelton C, Maganzini A. Outcome assessment of Invisalign and traditional orthodontic treatment com- pared with the American Board of Orthodontics objec- tive grading system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:292–298.
T. Eliades, A. Athanasios; Orthodontic Aligner Treatment;2021, Pages; 58-68.
Palma S,Zafra J. Aligner Tecniques in Orthodontics. 2021. 250-275.
Ravera S, Castroflorio T, Garino F, Daher S, Cugliari G, Deregibus A. Maxillary molar distalization with aligners in adult patients: A multicenter retrospective study. Prog Orthod 2016;17:12.
T. Eliades, A. Athanasios; Orthodontic Aligner Treatment;2021, Pages; 59-61
Proffit WR, Sarver DM, Ackerman JL. Orthodontic diag- nosis: The problem-oriented approach. In: Proffit WR, Fields H, Sarver DM (eds). Contemporary Orthodontics, ed 5. St Louis: Mosby, 2012:150–219.
T. Eliades, A. Athanasios; Orthodontic Aligner Treatment; 2021, Pages; 61-68.
Baek MS, Choi YJ, Yu HS, Lee KJ, Kwak J, Park YC. Long- term stability of anterior open-bite treatment by intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:396.e1396.e9.
T. Eliades, A. Athanasios; Orthodontic Aligner Treatment;2021, Page:64.
T. Eliades, A. Athanasios; Orthodontic Aligner Treatment;2021, Page; 65.
Rossini G, Parrini S, Castroflorio T, Deregibus A, Debernar- di CL. Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2015;85:881.
Palma S,Zafra J. Aligner Tecniques in Orthodontics.
Başkent Üniversitesi Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı 2022 Erken Ortodontik Tedavi ve Şeffaf Plaklar ile Tedavi Fiyat Tablosu
T. Eliades, A. Athanasios; Orthodontic Aligner Treatment;2021, Pages:66-68..
