Dirsek Artroskopisi
Özet
Dirsek anatomisinin anlaşılması ve teknik ilerlemeler, debridman, sinovektomi, serbest cisim çıkarma ve lateral epikondilit gevşetmesi gibi geniş endikasyonları olan dirsek artroskopisinin gelişimini hızlandırmıştır. Cerrahi öncesinde travma öyküsü, kilitlenme, hareket açıklığı ve detaylı nörovasküler durum muayene ve radyografiler, MRG gibi yöntemlerle dikkatlice değerlendirilmelidir. Operasyon sırasında standart 4.0 mm veya 2.7 mm artroskoplar ile nörovasküler yapıları koruyan künt uçlu kanül sistemleri tercih edilir. Hastalar supin, sırt üstü asılı, pron veya en sık tercih edilen lateral dekübit pozisyonlarında ameliyat edilebilir. Müdahale ve görüntüleme amacıyla lateral, proksimal-medial, anterolateral, anteromedial, posterolateral ve posterior olmak üzere farklı anatomik portaller kullanılır. Cerrahi teknikte komplikasyon riskini azaltmak için portal açılmadan önce eklem kapsülünün şişirilmesi ve dirseğin 90° fleksiyona getirilmesi kritik öneme sahiptir. En önemli komplikasyonlar arasında geçici veya kalıcı nörovasküler yaralanmalar, hareket kaybı ve enfeksiyon yer almaktadır. Günümüzde kuru artroskopi, pediatrik vakalar ve lateral kollateral ligaman onarımı gibi yenilikçi alanlara odaklanan bu yöntem, teknolojik gelişmeler, yapay zeka ve robotik cerrahi entegrasyonu sayesinde gelecekte iyileşme sürelerini daha da kısaltarak açık cerrahiye oranla daha fazla tercih edilen güvenli bir prosedür haline gelmektedir.
Advances in elbow anatomy and techniques have accelerated the development of elbow arthroscopy, which has broad indications such as debridement, synovectomy, loose body removal, and lateral epicondylitis release. Prior to surgery, trauma history, locking, range of motion, and detailed neurovascular status must be carefully evaluated using physical examination and radiological modalities like radiographs and MRI. During the operation, standard 4.0 mm or 2.7 mm arthroscopes and blunt-tipped cannula systems that protect neurovascular structures are preferred. Patients can be operated on in supine, suspended supine, prone, or the most commonly used lateral decubitus positions. Different anatomical portals, including lateral, proximal-medial, anterolateral, anteromedial, posterolateral, and posterior, are utilized for intervention and visualization. In the surgical technique, inflating the joint capsule before establishing portals and bringing the elbow to 90° of flexion are critical to reduce the risk of complications. The most significant complications include transient or permanent neurovascular injuries, loss of motion, and infection. Today, this method focuses on innovative areas such as dry arthroscopy, pediatric cases, and lateral collateral ligament repair; and with the integration of technological advancements, artificial intelligence, and robotic surgery, it will continue to be a more preferred, safe procedure that shortens recovery times compared to open surgery.
Referanslar
Yeoh KM, King GJ, Faber KJ, et al. Evidence-based indications for elbow arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2012:28(2):272-282
Sahajpal DT. Blonna D, O’Driscoll SW. Anteromedial elbpw arthroscopy portals in patients with prior ulnar nerve transposition or subluxation. Arthroscopy 2010;26(8):1045-1052
Clarke RP. Symptomatic, lateral synovial fringe (plica) of the elbow joint. Arthroscopy 4:112-116, 1988
Janarv PM, Hesser U, Hirsch G. Osteochondral lesions in the radiocapitellar joint in the skeletally immatur: Radiographic, MRI, and arthroscopic findings in 13 consecutive cases. J Pediatr Orthop 17:311-314, 1997
Phillips NJ, Stanley D. Arthroscopy of the elbow. Curr Orthop 2002;16:355-361
Camp CL, Degen RM, Dines JS, et al. Basics of the elbow arthroscopy Part 2: Positioning and diagnostic arthroscopy in the supine poition. Arthrosc Tech 2016;5:1345-9
Stetson WB, Vogeli K, Chung B, et al. Avoiding neuroogical complications of the elbow arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech 2018;7:717-24
Camp CL, Degen RM, Dines JS, et al. Basics of the elbow arthroscopy Part 3: Positioning and diagnostic arthroscopy in the lateral decubitus position. Arthrosc Tech 2016;5:1351-5
Baker CL, Brooks AA. Arthroscopy of the elbow. Clin Sports Med 15:261-281, 1996
Lindenfeld TN. Medial approach in the elbow arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 18:413-417, 1990
Marshall PD, Fairclough JA, Johnson SR, et al. Avoiding nerve damage during elbow arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg 75:129-131, 1993
Stothers K, Day B, Regan WR. Arthroscopy of the elbow: Anatomy, portal sites, and a description of the proximal lateral portal. Arthroscopy 11:449-457, 1995
Lynch GJ, Meyers JF, Whipple TL, et al. Neurovascular anatomy and elbow arthroscopy: Inherent risks. Arthroscopy 2:190-197, 1986
Andrews JR, Pierre RK, Carson WG Jr. Arthroscopy of the elbow. Clin Sports Med 5:653-662, 1986
Miller CD, Jobe CM, Wright MH. Neuroanatomy in the elbow arthroscopy. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:168-174, 1995
Verhaar J, Van Mameren H, Brandsma A. Risks of neurovascular injury in elbow arthroscopy: Starting anteromedially or anterolaterally? Arthroscopy 7:287-290, 1991
Ruch DS, Poehling GG. Anterior interosseous nerve injury following elbow arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 13:756-758, 1997
Phadnis J, Bain G. Dry arthroscopy of the elbow. Arthrosc Tech 2015;4:335-9
Rubin TA, Gluck MJ, Robinson J, et al. Arthroscopic assisted treatment of pediatric elbow fractures. In: Bain G, Eygendaal D, van Riet RP, editors. Surgical Techniques for Trauma and Sports Related Injuries of the Elbow. 1st ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2020. p.637-50
Mica MC, Caekebeke P, van Riet R. Lateral collateral ligament injuries of the elbow-chronic posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI). Efort Open Rev 2017;1:461-8
Kamineni S, Savoie FH, ElAttrache N. Endoscopic extracapsular capsulectomy of the elbow: A neurovascularly safe technique for high-grade contractures. Arthroscopy 2007;23:789-92
Kamineni S, Hamilton DA Jr. Arthroscopic ulnar nerve identification during posterior elbow arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech 2012;1:113-7
Merrell G, DaSilva MF. Arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg 2009;34:1130-4