Saygısızlık ve istismardan saygılı ve şefkatli bakıma: küresel bir bakış açısı
Özet
Doğumların hastanelere taşınmasıyla başlayan süreçte kadınların maruz kaldığı kötü muamele, küresel sağlık gündeminin üst sıralarına yerleşmiştir. Bowser ve Hill tarafından tanımlanan yedi saygısızlık ve istismar kategorisi, bu alandaki araştırmaların temelini oluşturmuştur. Ancak küresel sağlık politikasında, randomize kontrollü çalışmalar gibi katı "kanıt hiyerarşilerinin" ve nicel ölçütlerin altın standart olarak dayatılması, kadınların özgün deneyimlerini görünmez kılma ve yerel koşulları gözden kaçırma riski taşımaktadır. Karmaşık bir sosyal sorun olan istismara karşı sadece bürokratik sayım ve teknolojik ölçütlere odaklanmak, hastanelerin bakım işlevini zedeleyerek anne ölüm oranlarındaki kırılganlığı artırabilir. Buna karşın, Hindistan ve Nepal gibi ülkelerde uygulanan basit anketler, sivil toplum eylemleri ve milletvekillerinin kendi paylaştığı yaşanmış hikayeler, saygılı doğum bakımının ulusal yasalara ve politikalara dahil edilmesini sağlayarak güçlü bir siyasi irade ve olumlu değişim yaratmıştır. Sonuç olarak, küresel sağlık camiasının yalnızca kaynak gerektiren denemelere yatırım yapmak yerine, insan haklarını, ilişkileri ve kadınların doğrudan deneyimlerini merkeze alan çok boyutlu bir bilgi matrisini benimsemesi gerekmektedir.
The mistreatment faced by women in institutional childbirth has risen to the top of the global health agenda since births shifted to hospitals. The seven categories of disrespect and abuse defined by Bowser and Hill have formed the basis of research in this field. However, the imposition of rigid "evidence hierarchies" and quantitative metrics, such as randomized controlled trials, as the gold standard in global health policy risks making women's unique experiences invisible and overlooking highly localized conditions. Focusing solely on bureaucratic counts and technological metrics against abuse, which is a complex social problem, can undermine the care function of hospitals and exacerbate the fragility in maternal mortality rates. Conversely, simple surveys, civil society actions, and lived stories shared by parliamentarians in countries like India and Nepal have generated strong political will and positive change, leading to the integration of respectful maternity care into national laws and policies. Consequently, instead of investing only in resource-intensive trials, the global health community needs to adopt a multi-layered matrix of knowledge that centers on human rights, relationships, and the direct experiences of women and communities.
Referanslar
Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse D, Barros A, Barros F, Juan L et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-1348.
Homer C, Friberg I, Dias M, ten Hoope-Bender P, Sandall J, Speciale A et al. The projected effect of scaling up midwifery. The Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1146-1157.
International Confederation of Midwives. Essential competencies for midwifery practice. ICM 2018. www. internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/general-files/2018/10/icm-competencies---english-document_final_ oct-2018.pdf
Kennedy H, Yoshida S, Costello A, Declercq E, Dias M, Duff E et al. Asking different questions: research priorities to improve the quality of care for every woman, every child. The Lancet Global Health. 2016;4(11):e777-e779.
Kennedy H, Cheyney M, Dahlen H, Downe S, Foureur M, Homer C et al. Asking different questions: A call to action for research to improve the quality of care for every woman, every child. Birth. 2018;45(3):222-231.
Nove A, ten Hoope-Bender P, Moyo N, Bokosi M. The Midwifery services framework: What is it, and why is it needed? Midwifery. 2018;57:54-58.
Renfrew M, McFadden A, Bastos M, Campbell J, Channon A, Cheung N et al. Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. The Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1129- 1145.
ten Hoope-Bender P, de Bernis L, Campbell J, Downe S, Fauveau V, Fogstad H et al. Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. The Lancet. 2014;384(9949):1226-1235.
UN General Assembly, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 10 December 1948, 217 A (III), available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3712c.html [accessed 8 January 2019]
UN General Assembly, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, 18 December 1979, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1249, p. 13, available at: www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b3970.html [accessed 8 January 2019]
UN General Assembly, Convention on the Rights of the Child, 20 November 1989, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1577, p. 3, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f0.html [accessed 8 January 2019]
UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), General Comment No. 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12 of the Covenant), 11 August 2000, E/C.12/2000/4, available at: www.refworld. org/docid/4538838d0.html [accessed 8 January 2019]
UN Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescent’s Health 2016-2030. New York: United Nations, 2015. https://www.who.int/life-course/partners/global-strategy/en/
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). New York: United Nations, 2015. https://sustainabledevelopment. un.org
UNFPA. The State of the World’s Midwifery 2014: a universal pathway, a woman’s right to health. New York: UNFPA Van Lerberghe W, Matthews Z, Achadi E, Ancona C, Campbell J, Channon A et al. Country experience with strengthening of health systems and deployment of midwives in countries with high maternal mortality. The
Lancet. 2014;384(9949):1215-1225.
World Health Organization. Midwives’ voices, midwives’ realities: findings from a global consultation on providing quality midwifery care. 2016. Geneva, WHO
World Health Organization 2017. Together on the Road to Universal Health Coverage. WHO, Geneva. WHO/HIS/ HGF/17.1 https://www.who.int/universal_health_coverage/road-to-uhc/en/of Minnesota Press; 1994.
