Karmaşık ihtiyaçları olan kadınlar ve bebekler için fizyolojik doğumu optimize etme
Özet
Bu bölüm, karmaşık tıbbi veya obstetrik ihtiyaçları olan kadınlar için fizyolojik doğum süreçlerini optimize etmeyi ve doğumu mümkün olduğunca normal tutmayı araştırmaktadır. Makat prezentasyonu olan gebelerle çalışan Shawn Walker, vajinal makat doğum taleplerinin karşılanması adına İngiltere'de "Makat Doğum Uzman Ebe" rolüne öncülük etmiş ve kanıta dayalı eğitim programları geliştirmiştir. Araştırmalar, annenin dik pozisyonda makat doğum yapmasının süreyi kısalttığını, yaralanmaları ve sezaryen oranlarını azalttığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, Doğu Lancashire'da sezaryen sonrası vajinal doğum planlayan kadınlar için ebe liderliğindeki doğum merkezleri sunulmakta, risk profiline dayalı ilişkisel bakım modelleriyle riskler azaltılmaktadır. Vajinal doğumda yardıma ihtiyacı olanlar için litotomi dışı pozisyonlarda vakum veya forseps uygulanarak kadının merkeze alınması sağlanmaktadır. Planlı sezaryenlerde ise cerrahi prosedürlerin yanında optimal kord klemplenmesi, erken ten tene temas ve emzirme desteği gibi fizyolojik süreçler entegre edilerek "fizyolojik bilgiye dayalı sezaryen" uygulanmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, karmaşık doğum süreçlerinde ebelik ve obstetrik bakımdaki süreklilik ile şefkatli liderlik, kadın merkezli, esnek ve yüksek kaliteli bir bakım sağlamanın, olumlu sağlık sonuçları elde etmenin temel taşıdır.
This chapter explores optimizing physiological birth processes for women with complex medical or obstetric needs, aiming to maintain birth as normal as possible. Working with pregnant women with breech presentation, Shawn Walker pioneered the "Breech Specialist Midwife" role in the UK to meet demands for vaginal breech birth and developed evidence-based training programs. Research indicates that an upright maternal position during breech birth shortens duration, reducing injuries and cesarean rates. Furthermore, midwife-led birth centers are offered in East Lancashire for women planning a vaginal birth after cesarean, mitigating risks through relational care models based on risk profiling. For those requiring assistance in vaginal birth, vacuum or forceps are applied in non-lithotomy positions, ensuring the woman remains centered. In planned cesareans, physiological processes such as optimal cord clamping, early skin-to-skin contact, and breastfeeding support are integrated alongside surgical procedures, practicing a "physiological-informed cesarean". In conclusion, continuity in midwifery and obstetric care, coupled with compassionate leadership in complex birth processes, constitutes the cornerstone of delivering woman-centered, flexible, and high-quality care, thereby achieving positive health outcomes.
Referanslar
Allen, J., Kildea, S., Hartz, D.L., Tracy, M., Tracy, S., 2017. The motivation and capacity to go ‘above and beyond’: Qualitative analysis of free-text survey responses in the M@NGO randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery. Midwifery 50, 148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.03.012
Andrews, S., Leeman, L., Yonke, N., 2017. Finding the breech: Influence of breech presentation on mode of delivery based on timing of diagnosis, attempt at external cephalic version, and provider success with version. Birth 44, 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12290
Angood, P.B., Armstrong, E.M., Ashton, D., Burstin, H., Corry, M.P., Delbanco, S.F., Fildes, B., Fox, D.M., Gluck, P.A., Gullo, S.L., Howes, J., Jolivet, R.R., Laube, D.W., Lynne, D., Main, E., Markus, A.R., Mayberry, L., Mitchell, L. V, Ness, D.L., Nuzum, R., Quinlan, J.D., Sakala, C., Salganicoff, A., 2010. Blueprint for action: steps toward a high-quality, high-value maternity care system. Womens. Health Issues 20, S18-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2009.11.007
Association of Ontario Midwives & Contributors, 2019. Emergency Skills Workshop Manual, 6th ed. AOM.
Aten, L., Beers, L., Bijsterveld-Smid, B., Goodarzi, B., Hageraats, E., Theeuwen, K., 2017. LVOV richtlijn Baring in stuit.
Birthplace in England Collaborative Group, 2011. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ 343, d7400–d7400. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d7400
Bogner, G., Strobl, M., Schausberger, C., Fischer, T., Reisenberger, K., Jacobs, V.R., 2015. Breech delivery in the all fours position: a prospective observational comparative study with classic assistance. J. Perinat. Med. 43, 707–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2014-0048
Bogner, G., Xu, F., Simbrunner, C., Bacherer, A., Reisenberger, K., 2012. Single-institute experience, management, success rate, and outcome after external cephalic version at term. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 116, 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.027
Bovbjerg, M.L., Cheyney, M., Brown, J., Cox, K.J., Leeman, L., 2017. Perspectives on risk: Assessment of risk profiles and outcomes among women planning community birth in the United States. Birth. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12288
Carcopino, X., Shojai, R., D’Ercole, C., Boubli, L., 2007. French trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology theoretical training and practice of vaginal breech delivery: a national survey. Eur J Obs. Gynecol Reprod Biol 135, 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.023
Catling, C., Petrovska, K., Watts, N., Bisits, A., Homer, C.S.E., 2015. Barriers and facilitators for vaginal breech births in Australia: Clinician’s experiences. Women Birth 29, 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.09.004
Chinnock, M., Robson, S., 2007. Obstetric trainees’ experience in vaginal breech delivery: implications for future practice. Obstet. Gynecol. 110, 900–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000267199.32847.c4
Dahlke, J.D., Mendez-Figueroa, H., Rouse, D.J., Berghella, V., Baxter, J.K., Chauhan, S.P., 2013. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 209, 294–306. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.043
David, S., Fenwick, J., Bayes, S., Martin, T., 2010. A qualitative analysis of the content of telephone calls made by women to a dedicated ‘Next Birth After Caesarean’ antenatal clinic. Women and Birth 23, 166–171. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.wombi.2010.07.002
Devarajan, K., Seaward, P.G., Farine, D., 2011. Attitudes among Toronto obstetricians towards vaginal breech delivery. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 33, 437–42.
Dhingra, S., Raffi, F., 2010. Obstetric trainees’ experience in VBD and ECV in the UK. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. (Lahore).30, 10–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/01443610903315629
Dresner-Barnes, H., Bodle, J., 2014. Vaginal breech birth – the phoenix arising from the ashes. Pract. Midwife 17, 30–33.Foureur, M., Turkmani, S., Clack, D.C., Davis, D.L., Mollart, L., Leiser, B., Homer, C.S.E., 2017. Caring for women wanting a vaginal birth after previous caesarean section: A qualitative study of the experiences of midwives and obstetricians. Women and Birth 30, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.05.011
Gardner, K., Henry, A., Thou, S., Davis, G., Miller, T., 2014. Improving VBAC rates: The combined impact of two management strategies. Aust. New Zeal. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 54, 327–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12229
Garrard, N. and, 2011. Rethinking provision of care: a radical restructuring of antenatal care services for women with complex pregnancies. MIDIRS Midwifery Dig. 21, 279–285.
GMC, 2008. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. General Medical Council, London.
Gruen, R.L., Weeramanthri, T.S., Knight, S.S.E., Bailie, R.S., 2003. Specialist outreach clinics in primary care and rural hospital settings. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. Art. No.: CD003798. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858. CD003798.pub2
Guittier, M.-J., Bonnet, J., Jarabo, G., Boulvain, M., Irion, O., Hudelson, P., 2011. Breech presentation and choice of mode of childbirth: a qualitative study of women’s experiences. Midwifery 27, e208-13. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.08.008
Hakala, M., Kaakinen, P., Kääriäinen, M., Bloigu, R., Hannula, L., Elo, S., 2017. The realization of BFHI Step 4 in Finland– Initial breastfeeding and skin-to-skin contact according to mothers and midwives. Midwifery 50, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.03.010
Henry, A., Lees, N., Bein, K.J., Hall, B., Lim, V., Chen, K.Q., Welsh, A.W., Hui, L., Shand, A.W., 2015. Pregnancy outcomes before and after institution of a specialised twins clinic: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15, 217. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0654-5
Hickland, P., Gargan, P., Simpson, J., McCabe, N., Costa, J., 2018. A novel and dedicated multidisciplinary service to manage breech presentation at term; 3 years of experience in a tertiary care maternity unit. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 31, 3002–3008. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1362382
Hofmeyr, G.J., Kulier, R., West, H.M., 2015. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane database Syst. Rev. CD000083. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000083.pub3
Impey, L., Murphy, D., Griffiths, M., Penna, L., on behalf of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2017. Management of Breech Presentation. BJOG. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14465
Korteweg, F.J., de Boer, H.D., van der Ploeg, J.M., Buiter, H.D., van der Ham, D.P., 2017. [Skin-to-skin caesarean section: a hype or better patient care?]. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 161, D582.
Kotaska, A., Menticoglou, S., Gagnon, R., Maternal Fetal Med, C., 2009. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation No. 226, June 2009. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 107, 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.07.002
Louwen, F., Daviss, B., Johnson, K.C., Reitter, A., 2017. Does breech delivery in an upright position instead of on the back improve outcomes and avoid cesareans? Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 136, 151–161. https://doi. org/10.1002/ijgo.12033
Lundgren, I., van Limbeek, E., Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K., Nilsson, C., 2015. Clinicians’ views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15, 196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0629-6
McDonald, S.J., Middleton, P., Dowswell, T., Morris, P.S., 2013. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes, in: McDonald, S.J. (Ed.), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004074.pub3
Melo, P., Georgiou, E., Hedditch, A., Ellaway, P., Impey, L., 2018. External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years’ experience. BJOG An Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15475
Montgomery, E., 2013. Feeling Safe: A Metasynthesis of the Maternity Care Needs of Women Who Were Sexually Abused in Childhood. Birth 40, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12043
Montgomery, E., Pope, C., Rogers, J., 2015. The re-enactment of childhood sexual abuse in maternity care: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15, 194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0626-9
Moore, E.R., Bergman, N., Anderson, G.C., Medley, N., 2016. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants, in: Moore, E.R. (Ed.), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003519.pub4
Moss, E.L., Redman, C.W.E., Arbyn, M., Dollery, E., Petry, K.U., Nieminen, P., Myerson, N., Leeson, S.C., 2015. Colposcopy training and assessment across the member countries of the European Federation for Colposcopy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 188, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.012
Myriknas, S., Papadakis, K., 2018. Anterior non-episiotomy or natural forceps delivery: refining the technique and improving communication as a way of reducing obstetric anal sphincter injuries in instrumental deliveries. J. Pelvic, Obstet. Gynaecol. Physiother. 122, 50–55.
NHS Diabetes, 2010. Lead Midwife in Diabetes: Standards, Role and Competencies. NHS Diabetes, London.
NICE, 2014. Intrapartum Care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. NICE Guideline, CG190.
Petrovska, K., Watts, N.P., Catling, C., Bisits, A., Homer, C.S., 2017. ‘Stress, anger, fear and injustice’: An international qualitative survey of women’s experiences planning a vaginal breech birth. Midwifery 44, 41–47. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.11.005
Plested, M., Walker, S., 2014. Building confident ways of working together around higher risk birth choices. Essentially MIDIRS 5, 13–16.
Priddis, H.S., Schmied, V., Kettle, C., Sneddon, A., Dahlen, H.G., 2014. “A patchwork of services” – caring for women who sustain severe perineal trauma in New South Wales – from the perspective of women and midwives. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14, 236. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-236
Rana, N., KC, A., Målqvist, M., Subedi, K., Andersson, O., 2019. Effect of Delayed Cord Clamping of Term Babies on Neurodevelopment at 12 Months: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neonatology 115, 36-42. https://doi. org/10.1159/000491994
Reitter, A., Daviss, B.-A., Bisits, A., Schollenberger, A., Vogl, T., Herrmann, E., Louwen, F., Zangos, S., 2014. Does pregnancy and/or shifting positions create more room in a woman’s pelvis? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 211, 662. e1-662.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.029
Reitter, A., Döhring, N., Maden, Z., Hessler, P., Misselwitz, B., 2018. Is it reasonable to establish an independent obstetric leadership in a small hospital and does it result in measurable changes in quality of maternity care? Z. Geburtshilfe Neonatol.
Royal College of Midwives, 2015. Caring for Women with Mental Health Problems: Standards and Competency Framework for Specialist Maternal Mental Health Midwives [WWW Document]. URL https://www.rcm.org.uk/ sites/default/files/Caring for Women with Mental Health Difficulties 32pp A4_h.pdf (accessed 5.17.17).
Sandall, J., Coxon, K., Mackintosh, N., Rayment-Jones, H., Locock, L., Page, L., 2016. Relationships: the pathway to safe, high-quality maternity care. Report from the Sheila Kitzinger symposium at Green Templeton College October 2015. Green Templeton College, Oxford.
Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A., Devane, D., 2016. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. Art. No.: CD004667. https://doi. org/10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5
Sandall, J., Tribe, R.M., Avery, L., Mola, G., Visser, G., Homer, C., Gibbons, D., Kelly, N., Kennedy, H.P., Kidanto, H., Taylor, P., Temmerman, M., 2018. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5
Schiller, R., 2018. Maternal Request Caesarean.
Shore, C., 2015. A day in the life of a specialist perineal care clinic. Pract. Midwife 18, 21–3.
Tracy, S.K., Hartz, D.L., Tracy, M.B., Allen, J., Forti, A., Hall, B., White, J., Lainchbury, A., Stapleton, H., Beckmann, M., Bisits, A., Homer, C., Foureur, M., Welsh, A., Kildea, S., 2013. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61406-3
Vlemmix, F., Bergenhenegouwen, L., Schaaf, J.M., Ensing, S., Rosman, A.N., Ravelli, A.C.J., van der Post, J.A.M., Verhoeven, A., Visser, G.H., Mol, B.W.J., Kok, M., 2014. Term breech deliveries in the Netherlands: did the increased cesarean rate affect neonatal outcome? A population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 93, 888–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12449
Vlemmix, F., Kazemier, B., Rosman, A., Schaaf, J., Ravelli, A., Duvekot, H., Kok, M., Mol, B., 2013. 764: Effect of increased caesarean section rate due to term breech presentation on maternal and fetal outcome in subsequent pregnancies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 208, S321. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.102
Walker, S., Breslin, E., Scamell, M., Parker, P., 2017a. Effectiveness of vaginal breech birth training strategies: An integrative review of the literature. Birth 44, 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12280
Walker, S., Parker, P., Scamell, M., 2018a. Expertise in physiological breech birth: A mixed-methods study. Birth 45, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12326
Walker, S., Perilakalathil, P., Moore, J., Gibbs, C.L., Reavell, K., Crozier, K., 2015. Standards for midwife practitioners of external cephalic version: A Delphi study. Midwifery 31, e79–e86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.004
Walker, S., Reading, C., Siverwood-Cope, O., Cochrane, V., 2017b. Physiological breech birth: Evaluation of a training programme for birth professionals. Pract. Midwife 20, 25–28.
Walker, S., Scamell, M., Parker, P., 2018b. Deliberate acquisition of competence in physiological breech birth: A grounded theory study. Women and Birth 31, e170–e177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.09.008
Walker, S., Scamell, M., Parker, P., 2016a. Standards for maternity care professionals attending planned upright breech births: A Delphi study. Midwifery 34, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.007
Walker, S., Scamell, M., Parker, P., 2016b. Principles of physiological breech birth practice: A Delphi study. Midwifery 43, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.09.003
Watts, N.P., Petrovska, K., Bisits, A., Catling, C., 2016. This baby is not for turning: Women’s experiences of attempted external cephalic version. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 16, 248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1038-1
West, M., Eckert, R., Collins, B., Chowla, R., 2017. Caring to change: How compassionate leadership can stimulate innovation in health care.
White, H.K., le May, A., Cluett, E.R., 2016. Evaluating a Midwife-Led Model of Antenatal Care for Women with a Previous Cesarean Section: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study. Birth 43, 200–208. https://doi. org/10.1111/birt.12229
Zwedberg, S., Blomquist, J., Sigerstad, E., 2015. Midwives’ experiences with mother–infant skin-to-skin contact after a caesarean section: ‘Fighting an uphill battle’. Midwifery 31, 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. midw.2014.08.014
