Doğum yeri ve ortamının tasarımı
Özet
Bu metin, doğum ortamlarının mimari tasarımının ve mekansal düzenlemesinin, doğum sürecindeki insan sağlığı, stres seviyeleri, kullanıcı deneyimleri ve bakım kalitesi üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Doğum tesisleri geleneksel olarak hastane yapısı içinde değerlendirilse de, kullanıcılarının çoğunun hasta olmaması ve doğumun doğal bir olay olması nedeniyle bu alanların tasarımı özel bir yaklaşım gerektirir. Günümüzde birçok doğum odası hâlâ yüksek riskli senaryolara göre, dikdörtgen ve merkezinde yatak olacak şekilde tasarlanmaktadır. Ancak normal fizyolojik doğumu desteklemek adına mimarlıkta kültürel bir değişime ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Yazıda ilişkileri desteklemek, kullanıcı ve ortam ekolojisi (esneklik, uyarlanabilirlik), mahremiyet/mevcudiyet dengesi ile yuva ve dışarısı kavramı olmak üzere dört anahtar kavram ele alınmaktadır. Tasarımın, doğum ekiplerinin iş akışlarını, iletişimini ve hatta sezaryen gibi klinik müdahale oranlarını doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak etkileyebileceği belirtilmektedir. Bu doğrultuda, "mekan dizimi" (space syntax) ve "Kullanım Sonrası Değerlendirme" (BUDSET) gibi araçların önemi vurgulanmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, ailelerin ve bakım ekibinin ihtiyaçlarını bütünleştiren, disiplinler arası ve esnek tasarım yaklaşımlarının geliştirilmesi gerektiği savunulmaktadır.
This text examines the effects of the architectural design and spatial layout of birth environments on human health, stress levels, user experiences, and care quality during childbirth. Although birthing facilities are traditionally considered part of hospital properties, their design requires a specific approach since most users are not "patients" and childbirth is a natural event. Today, many birth rooms are still designed based on high-risk scenarios, featuring rectangular shapes with a bed at the center. However, a cultural shift in architecture is needed to support normal physiological birth. The text addresses four key concepts: supporting relationships, ecology of users and environment (flexibility, adaptability), the privacy/presence balance, and the concept of the nest and the outside. It is stated that design can directly or indirectly affect the workflows and communication of care teams, and even clinical intervention rates such as cesarean sections. Accordingly, the importance of tools like "space syntax" and "Post Occupancy Evaluation" (BUDSET) is emphasized. In conclusion, it is argued that interdisciplinary and flexible design approaches that integrate the needs of families and care teams must be developed.
Referanslar
Aus HFG, 2017. Part B. Health Facility Briefing and Planning HPU 510 Maternity Unit; [Internet]. Available from: https://www.healthfacilityguidelines.com.au/health-planning-units [cited 2018, Oct 10].
Al-Sayed, K., Turner, A., Hillier, B., Iida, S. and Penn, A. (2014) Space Syntax Methodology. 4th edition. London: Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL.
Balabanoff Doreen. 2016. Light in the Reimagined Birth Environment PROCESS WORK. A document accompanying the doctoral dissertation submitted September 2, 2016 to University College Dublin. Available at: https://indd. adobe.com/view/3a35bb36-7f43-4e94-b79f-7ce4b989f452
Berridge Emma-Jane, Nicola J.Mackintosh, Della S.Freeth, 2010. Supporting patient safety: Examining communication with in delivery suite teams through contrasting approaches to research observation. Midwifery 26(2010)512–519
Bowden Calida, Athena Sheehan, Maralyn Foureur. 2016. Birth room images: What they tell us about childbirth. A discourse analysis of birth rooms in developed countries. Midwifery 35(2016)71–77
Dalke Hilary, Jenny Little, Elga Niemann, Nilgun Camgoz, Guillaume Steadman, Sarah Hill, Laura Stott. 2006. Colour and lighting in hospital design. Volume 38, Issues 4–6, June–September 2006, Pages 343–365
Del Nord R. (2006). Environmental stress prevention in children’s hospital design. Technical guidelines and architectural suggestions. Milano: Motta Architettura
De Botton A., 2006, The Architecture of Happiness: the Secret Art of Furnishing Your Life, Penguin, New York Department of Health, 2013. Health Building Note 09-02: Maternity care facilities; [Internet]. Available from:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ [cited 2018, Oct 10].
Edelstein E., 2004, Neuroscience and Architecture: Health Care Facilities, Erik Jonsson Center of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Sciences, Woods Hole, Academy of Neuroscience for Architecture Edwards L. and P. Torcellini. 2002. A Literature Review of the Effects of Natural Light on Building Occupants. Technical Report of National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Available at http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy02osti/30769.pdf
Evans GW. 2003. The built environment and mental health. J Urban Health. 2003 Dec;80(4):536-55.
Evans GM., McCoy JM, 1998, When buildings don’t work: the role of architecture in human health, Journal of Environmental Psycology 18, 85-94
FGI, 2018. Guidelines for Design and Construction of Hospitals; [Internet]. Available from: http://www.madcad. com/store/subscription/FGI-Guidelines-Hospital-2018/ [cited 2018, Oct 10].
Forbes, I, Homer, CSE, Foureur, M, Leap, N. Birthing Unit Design: Researching New Principles. Design & Health Scientific Review 1, 47–53. World Health Design, London; 2008
Foureur, M. 2008. Creating birth space to enable undisturbed birth. In: Birth Territory and Midwifery Guardianship: Theory for Practice, Education and Research, 1e 1st Edition by Kathleen Fahy, Maralyn Foureur, Carolyn Hastie. Elsevier Books for Midwifes. pp.57-77
Foureur Maralyn, Deborah Davis, Jennifer Fenwick, Nicky Leap, Rick Iedema,BA, Ian Forbes, Caroline S.E. Homer. 2010a. The relationship between birth unit design and safe, satisfying birth: Developing a hypothetical model. Midwifery 26(2010)520–525
Foureur MJ, Leap N, Davis D, Forbes I, Homer CSE. (2010b) Developing the Birth Unit Design Spatial Evaluation Tool (BUDSET): A qualitative study. Health Environments Research and Design Journal. 3(4): 43-57.
Foureur MJ, Leap N, Davis D, Forbes I, Homer CSE. (2011) Testing the Birth Unit Design Spatial Evaluation Tool
(BUDSET) in Australia: A Pilot Study. HERD Volume 4, Number 2, pp 36-60
Freeman Lesa M., Vivienne Adair, Helen Timperley, Sandra H. West. 2006. The influence of the birthplace and models of care on midwifery practice for the management of women in labour. Women and Birth (2006) 19, 97
Franck, R. and Lepori Bianca. 2007. Architecture from the Inside Out: From the Body, the Senses, the Site and the Community, 2nd Edition. Wiley
Gesler W, Bell M, Curtis S, Hubbard P, Francis S. Therapy by design: evaluating the UK hospital building program.
Health Place 2004;10 :117– 28.
Hamilton, D. K., Walkins, D.H., Evidence-Based Design for Multiple Building Types: Applied Research-Based Knowledge for Multiple Building Types, Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York ,2008,
Hammond A. D., Homer C. S. E. & Foureur M. (2014). Messages from space: An exploration of the relationship between hospital birth environments and midwifery practice. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(4), 81– 95
Haq, S. and LUO, Y. (2012) Space Syntax in health-care facilities research: a review. Health Environments Research & Design. 5(4), pp. 98–117.
Harte, J. D., Sheehan, A., Stewart, S. C., & Foureur, M. (2016). Childbirth supporters’ experiences in a built hospital birth environment: Exploring inhibiting and facilitating factors in negotiating the supporter role. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(3), 135–161
Hauck Y., Rivers C, Doherty K. 2008, Women’s experiences of using a Snoezelen room during labour in Western Australia, Midwifery 24, 460-470
Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J. and XU, J. (1993) Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 20, pp. 29–66.
Hillier, B. (2007) Space Is the Machine. [Online] London: Space Syntax. Available from: http://discovery.ucl. ac.uk/3881/1/SITM.pdf [accessed 14 December 2015].
Hillier, B. and Hanson, J. (1984) The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B. and Raford, N. (2010) Description and discovery in socio-spatial analysis: the case of Space Syntax. In Walford, G. et al. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Measurement. London: SAGE, pp. 265–281.
Hodnett ED, Stremler R, Weston JA, McKeever P., 2009, Re-conceptualizing the hospital labor room: the PLACE (Pregnant and Laboring in an Ambient Clinical Environment) pilot trial. Birth 36(2), 159-166
Hunt, S., & Symonds, A. (1995). The Social Meaning of Midwifery. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Khan, N. (2012) Analyzing patient flow: reviewing literature to understand the contribution of space syntax to improve operational efficiency in healthcare settings. In Greene, M., Reyes, J. and Castro, A. (eds) Proceedings: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium. 8183, pp. 1–11. Santiago de Chile: PUC.
Iannuzzi, Laura (2016). An exploration of midwives’ approaches to slow progress of labour in birth centres, using case study methodology. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham. Available on line at http://eprints. nottingham.ac.uk/37758/1/Iannuzzi%20PhD%20Thesis%20DEFINITIVE.pdf
Ispsel Guidelines, 2007. Linee guida per gli interventi di prevenzione relativi alla sicurezza e all’igiene del lavoro nel blocco parto. Istituto superiore per la prevenzione e la sicurezza del lavoro; [Internet]. Available from: https://appsricercascientifica.inail.it/ [cited 2018, Oct 10].
Jenkinson, B., Josey, N., & Kruske, S. (2014). BirthSpace: An evidence-based guide to birth environment design.
Queensland Centre for Mothers & Babies, The University of Queensland.
Lepori B. 1994. Freedom of Movement in birth Places. Children’s Environments 11(2): 1-12
Lepori B., Fourer M., Hastie C. 2008. Mindbodyspirit architecture: Creating Birth Space. In: Birth Territory and Midwifery Guardianship: Theory for Practice, Education and Research, 1e 1st Edition by Kathleen Fahy, Maralyn Foureur, Carolyn Hastie. Elsevier Books for Midwifes.pp.95-112
Lynch, K. (1960) Image of a City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Longo E., Setola N., “Towards a spatial dimension of social rights. New prospectives in architecture and law studies”, Interdisciplinary Themes Journal, Vol.1/2009. pp. 100-111.
Markus, T.A. (1993) Buildings and Power. Freedom and Control in the Origin of Modern Building Types. New York: Routledge.
Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard Met al. 2016 Beyond too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet 388(10056):2176-2192.
Newburn M., Culture, control and the birth environment. The Practising Midwife [2003, 6(8):20-25]
Newburn M. and Debbie Singh, 2003, “Creating a Better Birth Environment. Women’s views about the design and facilities in maternity units: a national survey”. The National Childbirth Trust. London, UK
Penn, A. (2008) Architectural research. In Knight, A. and Ruddock, L. (eds) Advanced Research Methods in the Built Environment. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 14–27.
Peponis, J., Zimring, C. and Scanlon, M.M. (1996) New design technologies: using computer technology to improve design quality. Part I: Designing friendly hospital layouts – the contribution of Space Syntax. Journal of Healthcare Design. VIII, pp. 109–115.
Plough A, Polzin-Rosenberg D, Galvin G, Shao A, Sullivan B, Henrich N, T Shah N.2018a An Exploratory Study of the Relationship between Facility Design and the Provision of Childbirth Care. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018 Nov 8. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12920. [Epub ahead of print]
Plough A, Polzin-Rosenberg D, Galvin G, Shao A, Sullivan B, Henrich N, Shah NT. 2018b Assessing the Feasibility of Measuring Variation in Facility Design Among American Childbirth Facilities. HERD. 2018 Oct 3:1937586718796641. doi: 10.1177/1937586718796641. [Epub ahead of print]
Preiser, W. F., White, E., & Rabinowitz, H. (2015). Post-Occupancy Evaluation (Routledge Revivals). Routledge. Priddis H., Hannah Dahlen, and Virginia Schmied. Juggling Instinct and Fear. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHILDBIRTH Volume 1, Issue 4, 2011
Priddis Holly, Hannah Dahlen, Virginia Schmied, What are the facilitators, inhibitors, and implications of birth positioning? A review of the literature. Women and Birth (2012) 25, 100—106
Sadek AH, Shepley MM.2016. Space Syntax Analysis: Tools for Augmenting the Precision of Healthcare Facility Spatial Analysis. HERD. 2016 Oct;10(1):114-29.
Sailer, K. (2013). Organizational Learning and Physical Space: How Office Configurations Inform Organizational Behaviors. In A. Berthoin Antal, T. Meusburger, L. Suarsana (Eds.), Learning Organizations. Extending the Field (pp. 103-127). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Netherlands.
Sailer, K., Budgen, A., Lonsdale, N., Turner, A., & Penn, A. (2009). Comparative studies of offices pre and post – how changing spatial configurations affect organisational behaviours. Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, 96. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).
Setola and Borgianni, 2016. Designing Public Spaces in Hospitals. Routledge, NY
Setola N., 2014, Quality of space and right to health. An interdisicplinary research in hospital facilities, Techne n.7/2014. pp. 157-164.
Setola, N. (2013) Percorsi, flussi e persone nella progettazione ospedaliera. L’analisi configurazionale, teoria e applicazione. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
Setola N., Naldi E., Cocina G.G., Bodil Eide L., Iannuzzi L., Daly D. (2019) The Impact of the Physical Environment on Intrapartum Maternity Care. Identification of Eight Crucial Building Spaces. HERD -Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Stenglin M, Foureur M. 2013. Designing out the Fear Cascade to increase the likelihood of normal birth. Midwifery. 2013 Aug;29(8):819-25.
Symon, Andrew; Paul, Jeanette; Butchart, Maggie; Carr, Val; Dugard, Pat. 2008a. Maternity Unit Design study part 2: perceptions of space and layout. In: British Journal of Midwifery, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2008, p. 110-114.
Symon, Andrew; Paul, Jeanette; Butchart, Maggie; Carr, Val; Dugard, Pat. 2008b. Maternity Unit Design part 3 : environmental comfort and control. In: British Journal of Midwifery, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2008, p. 167-171.
Symon, Andrew; Paul, Jeanette; Butchart, Maggie; Carr, Val; Dugard, Pat. 2008c. Maternity Unit Design part 4 : midwives’ perceptions of staff facilities. In: British Journal of Midwifery, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2008, p. 228-231.
Townsend B., J. Fenwick , V. Thomson , M. Foureur. 2016. The birth bed: A qualitative study on the views of midwives regarding the use of the bed in the birth space. Women and Birth 29 (2016) 80–84
Ulrich, R.S. et al. (2008) A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD. 1(3), pp. 61–125
Ulrich R., Barach P., 2006, Designing Safe Healthcare Facilities What are the Data and Where do we Go from Here?
Healthcare Environments Research Summit, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Atlanta, GA
Williams, H. (2003). Storied births: narrative and organisational culture in a midwifery-led birth Centre. London: Kings College
