Neoliberal bir sağlık ortamında doğum hizmetlerinin sürdürülebilirliği: ebelik modelinin potansiyeli
Özet
Sağlık sektöründeki neoliberal serbest piyasa odaklı politikalar, küresel ölçekte doğum hizmetlerini kriz noktasına getirmiş ve altyapısal, sosyoekonomik sorunlara yol açmıştır. Sürdürülebilirlik kavramı, bu hegemonik dünya görüşüne karşı ekolojik, ekonomik ve sosyal olmak üzere üç temel sütun (Üçlü Alt Çizgi) üzerinden bütünsel bir alternatif sunmaktadır. Bu ilkeler; yerel felsefelerin, manevi, etik ve nesiller arası zamansal bağların sürece dahil edilmesiyle genişletilebilir. Birinci basamak bakıma dayalı toplum temelli ebelik modeli, gebeliği ve doğumu normal fizyolojik bir yaşam deneyimi olarak kabul eden sosyal bir modeldir. Gereksiz müdahaleleri en aza indiren "düşük teknoloji, yüksek temas" yaklaşımıyla kaynak kullanımını azaltır ve atıkları minimuma indirir. Bakımın sürekliliği esasına dayanan bu bütünsel model, ebe ile kadın arasında güçlü bağlar kurarak anne-bebek ilişkisini ve sosyal sürdürülebilirliği destekler. Ebeler, kadınları toplulukla buluşturan birer "sosyal bağlayıcı" rolü üstlenerek toplumsal desteği artırırlar. Evde veya doğum merkezlerinde gerçekleştirilen doğumlar, hastane ortamına kıyasla hem daha az müdahale riski taşır hem de ciddi maliyet avantajları sağlar. Sonuç olarak, doğum hizmetlerinin uzun vadeli sürdürülebilirliği için paradigmatik bir dönüşüm ve ebelerin bu değişimdeki öncü rolü kritik bir öneme sahiptir.
Neoliberal free market-oriented policies in the healthcare sector have brought maternity services to a crisis point globally and caused infrastructural and socioeconomic problems. The concept of sustainability offers a holistic alternative to this hegemonically driven worldview through three fundamental pillars: ecological, economic, and social, known as the Triple Bottom Line. These principles can be expanded by integrating indigenous philosophies, spiritual, ethical, and intergenerational temporal connections into the process. The primary care-based, community-based midwifery model operates within a social framework where pregnancy and childbirth are viewed as normal physiological life experiences rather than medical events. By championing a "low-tech, high-touch" approach that minimizes unnecessary interventions, it reduces resource consumption and ensures minimal waste production. Based on the continuity of care, this holistic model fosters strong relationships between the caregiver and the woman, supporting the mother-infant bond and social sustainability. Midwives act as "social connectors," linking women to their local communities and enhancing social support networks. Furthermore, births occurring at home or in birth centers carry less risk of intervention and offer significant cost advantages compared to hospital births. Consequently, achieving long-term sustainability in maternity care necessitates a paradigmatic shift in thinking and requires utilizing the historic adaptability of midwives to drive this essential change.
Referanslar
Adler, MD., Dolan, Kavetsos, G. (2017) Would you choose to be happy? Tradeoffs between happiness and the other dimensions of life in a large population survey, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. Vol. 139 Pages 60-73,
Avdic, D. Lundborg, P . Vikström J (2018) Mergers and Birth Outcomes: Evidence from Maternity Ward Closures IZA Institute of Labour Economics. Bonn http://ftp.iza.org/dp11772.pdf
Barker I, Steventon A, Deeny SR 2017 Association between continuity of care in general practice and hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: cross sectional study of routinely collected, person level data. BMJ. 1;356:j84. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j84.
Barron, L. and Gauntlett, E. (2002) “‘Housing and Sustainable Communities Indicators Project’,.” In, 4. Adelaide. http://www.adelaide.sa.gov.au/soc/pdf/barron_gauntlett.pdf.
Bick, D (Findings from a UK feasibility study of the Centering Pregnancy model.British Journal of Midwifery. Vol. 19 N0.12 pp.796-802
Blewitt, J. (2014) Understanding Sustainable Development. 2nd ed. Milton Park, Didcot: Taylor and Francis. BMJ (2019) Climate Change. https://www.bmj.com/campaign/climate-change
Capra, F. (1986) The Concept of Paradigm and Paradigm Shift. ReVision 9 (1): 14
Coburn, D. (2014). Neoliberalism and Health. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society.
Crowther S, and Hall, J. (2017) Spirituality and Childbirth, Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge.
Crowther, S. (2017) Resilience and sustainability amongst maternity care providers. In Thomson G Schmied V, editors: Psychosocial resilience and risk in the perinatal period: Implications and guidance for professionals. Abingdon, Oxon, Routledge, pp.185-200.
Davis, E. (2004). Heart & Hands: A Midwife’s Guide to Pregnancy & Birth. Celestial Arts.
Downe, S., Finlayson, K., Oladapo, O. T., Bonet, M., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2018). What matters to women during childbirth: A systematic qualitative review. PloS one, 13(4), e0194906. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194906
Elkington, J. (1998) Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. New Society Publishers. Gaudion, A. Menka, Y. Demilew, J. Walton, C. Yiannouzis, K. Robbins, J. And Schindler- Rising,S. (2011) Centering
Pregnancy: Moving from ‘Traditional’ Individual Antenatal Care to Group Care. British journal of Midwifery. Vol 19.No 7.433-438
Grace, N. (2018) Agnes Gereb sentenced to two years in prison for attending home births. ARM News. 18th January 2018 www.midwifery.org.uk/news/agnes-gereb-sentenced-to-two-years-in-prison-for-attending-home-births
Gladwell, M. (2000). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Little Brown.
Glynos, J. (2014) “Neoliberalism, Markets, Fantasy: The Case of Health and Social Care.” Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society, 19 (1). 5 – 12
Harper, D. (2018) Online Etymology Dictionary. https://www.etymonline.com/ Helne, T and Hirvi lammi T (2015) Wellbeing and Sustainability: A relational approach. Sustainable Development. 23: (3) 167-175 https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1581
Homer, C.S.E. (2016) “Models of Maternity Care: Evidence for Midwifery Continuity of Care.” The Medical Journal of Australia 205 (8): 370–74. doi:10.5694/mja16.00844.
Humpage, L. (2014) Policy Change, Public Attitudes and Social Citizenship: Does Neoliberalism Matter? Bristol: Policy Press.
Hunter, B. and Warren, L. (2014). “Midwives’ Experiences of Workplace Resilience.” Midwifery, Special Focus on Mental Health and Special Focus on Education, 30 (8): 926–34. doi:10.1016/j. midw.2014.03.010.
International Confederation Midwives (2014) Philosophy and Model of Midwifery Care. https://www. internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/definitions-files/2018/06/eng-philosophy-and-model-of-midwifery- care.pdf
Lancet Planetary Health Series 2017 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30013-X https://www.thelancet. com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(17)30013-X/fulltext
McAra-Couper, J. Gilkison, A. Crowther,S. Hunter, M. Hotchin, C. and Gunn.J. (2014) “Partnership and Reciprocity with Women Sustain Lead Maternity Carer Midwives in Practice.” New Zealand College of Midwives Journal 49 (June): 29–33. doi:10.12784/nzcomjnl49.2014.5.29-33.
McMichael, A.J. (2013) Globalisation, Climate Change and Human Health. N Engl J Med;368:1335-1343April 4, 2013DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1109341.
McNamara, C. (2017) Trade liberalization and social determinants of health: A state of the literatüre review, Social Science & Medicine, 176, (1): 1-13 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.017
Martis, (2011) “Good Housekeeping in Midwifery Practice.” In Sustainability, Midwifery and Birth, edited by Davies,L. Daellenbach, R. and Kensington, M. 141–55. London: Routledge.
Miller, S. and Wilkes, L. (2015). “Working in Partnership.” In Preparation for Practice, edited by Sally Pairman, Sally K Tracy, Jan Pincombe, and Carol Thorogood, 3rd ed., 412–26. Morrinsville: Elsevier Health Sciences.
Milne, M. J. and Gray, R. (2012). “W(h)Ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Repor- ting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting.” Journal of Business Ethics 118 (1): 13–29. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8.
Morgan, B. (2004). “A Tangata Whenua Perspective on Sustainability Using the Mauri Model.” In , 14. Auckland. Murphy-Lawless, J. (2006). “Birth and Mothering in Today’s Social Order: The Challenge of New Knowledge’s.” MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 16 (4): 439–44.
Murphy-Lawless, J. (2018) Confronting the state of emergency which is our maternity services in Murphy Lawless,
Mander, R. and Edwards N (Eds) (2018) Untangling the Maternity Crisis, First, London, Routledge,
Neumayer, E. (2013). Weakversus Strong Sustainability : Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Page, L. (2014) “The known and trusted midwife.” British Journal of Midwifery, 22(4), p. 234
Prost A, Colbourn T, Seward N, Azad K, Coomarasamy A, Copas A, Houweling TA, Fottrell E, Kud-
dus A, Lewycka S, MacArthur C, Manandhar D, Morrison J, Mwansambo C, Nair N, Nambiar
B, Osrin D, Pagel C, Phiri T, Pulkki- Brännström AM, Rosato M, Skordis-Worrall J, Saville N, More NS, Shrestha B, Tripathy P, Wilson A, Costello A 2013 Women’s groups practising parti- cipatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013 May 18;381(9879):1736-46. doi: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(13)60685-6.
Renfrew, M.J., McFadden, A., Bastos, M.H., Campbell, J., Channon, A.A., Cheung, N.F., Delage, D., Downe, S.M., Kennedy, H.P. Malata, A .McCormick, F. Wick,L. Declercq,E. ( 2014) Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence informed framework for maternal and newborn care, The Lancet 384(9948):11291145, 2014
Rogers, A. J., Rogers, N. G., Kilgore, M. L., Subramaniam, A., & Harper, L. M. (2016). Economic
Evaluations Comparing a Trial of Labor with an Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review. Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 20(1), 163-173.
Sakellariou, D., & Rotarou, E. S. (2017). The effects of neoliberal policies on access to healthcare for people with disabilities. International journal for equity in health, 16(1), 199. doi:10.1186/s12939-017-0699-3
Sandall, J. (2014) The contribution of continuity of midwifery care to high quality maternity care. Royal College of Midwives https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/highqualitywomenshealth careproposalforchange.pdf.Accessed.
Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D.(2016) Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004667. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5.
Schroeder, K, Thompson, T. Frith, K. and Pencheon, D. (2012) Sustainable Healthcare. Chichester:
John Wiley & Sons. Shumba, Overson. 2011. “Commons Thinking, Ecological Intelligence and the Ethical and Moral Framework of Ubuntu : An Imperative for Sustainable Development.” Journal of Media and Communication Studies 3 (3): 84–96.
Small, J. (2016) “Government in Mediation with Midwives over Gender Pay Discrimination.” Sunday Star Times, August 10.
Thielen K. (2012). Exploring the group prenatal care model: a critical review of the literature. The Journal of perinatal education, 21(4), 209-18.
Viaux-Savelon S. (2016) Establishing Parent-Infant Interactions. In: Sutter-Dallay AL., Glangea-ud-Freudenthal NC., Guedeney A., Riecher-Rösler A. (eds) Joint Care of Parents and Infants in Perinatal Psychiatry. Springer Cham. Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London.
Wickham S (2016) Midwifery, resilience and sustainability. Dr Sarah Wickham. https://www.sarawick ham.com/ research-updates/midwives-resilience-and-sustainability/ accessed 5th January 2019.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
