Doğumun medyadaki temsili
Özet
Medya, gebelik ve doğum süreçlerini tasvir etme biçimiyle toplumsal algıyı ve kadınların kararlarını önemli ölçüde etkilemektedir. Sağlanan metinde, Bulgaristan ve Birleşik Krallık vaka çalışmaları üzerinden doğumun medyadaki temsili incelenmektedir. Bulgaristan'da komünist rejim döneminde totaliter medya politikaları ve merkezi yayınlar nedeniyle kadınların doğum yeri veya uzmanı seçme hakkı bulunmazken, kararları üzerinde tıbbi uzmanların mutlak gücü hâkimdi. 1989 sonrası dönemde ve dijitalleşmeyle birlikte kurulan "bg-mamma.com" gibi platformlar, kadınların bilgiye erişmesini sağlayarak eski uygulamaları sorgulamalarına ve haklarını savunmalarına kapı açmıştır. Birleşik Krallık medyasında ise doğum, genellikle "korku" hikâyeleri, yüksek riskli dramatik vakalar ve yoğun tıbbi müdahale gerektiren süreçler olarak sunulmaktadır. "One Born Every Minute" gibi realite programları doğumu abartılı ve tıbbileştirilmiş şekilde tasvir ederken, "Call the Midwife" gibi alternatif yapımlar doğumun doğal ve topluluk yaşamının bir parçası olduğunu vurgulayan karşı anlatılar sunar. Bu dramatik temsiller, kadınlarda doğum korkusunu artırmakta, kendi bedenlerine olan güvenlerini sarsmakta ve hormonal süreçleri olumsuz etkileyebilecek psikolojik tepkilere yol açmaktadır. Buna karşılık Pozitif Doğum Hareketi gibi taban organizasyonları, korku yerine doğru bilgi ve seçim özgürlüğüne dayalı olumlu hikâyelerin paylaşılmasını teşvik ederek kadınları güçlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.
Media significantly influences public perception and women's decisions through its portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth. In the provided text, the representation of birth in the media is examined through case studies of Bulgaria and the United Kingdom. In Bulgaria, during the communist regime period, women lacked the right to choose their place of birth or specialist due to totalitarian media policies and centralized publications, while the absolute power of medical experts dominated their decisions. In the post-1989 period and with digitalization, platforms like "bg-mamma.com" enabled women to access information, opening doors for them to question outdated practices and advocate for their rights. In the United Kingdom media, however, childbirth is generally presented as "fear" stories, high-risk dramatic events, and processes requiring intensive medical intervention. While reality shows like "One Born Every Minute" portray birth in an exaggerated and medicalized manner, alternative productions like "Call the Midwife" offer counter-narratives emphasizing that birth is natural and part of the fabric of community life. These dramatic representations increase the fear of childbirth in women, undermine their confidence in their bodies, and lead to negative psychological responses that can affect hormonal processes. In response, grassroots organizations such as the Positive Birth Movement aim to empower women by encouraging the sharing of positive stories based on accurate information and freedom of choice rather than fear.
Referanslar
Bainbridge, J. (2006) Unsolicited advice: A rite of passage through your first pregnancy. British Journal of Midwifery 14(5): 265.
Bak, C. (2004). Cultural lack of birth experience empowers media representations not women. Midwifery Today - International Midwife. Winter 2004, 44.
Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism and the politics of childbirth in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Byrom, S & Byrom, A. (2017). Around the world in 80 tweets – social media and midwifery. In: Luce, A., Hundley, V. and van Teijlingen, E (Eds). Media and Midwifery. London: Palgrave
Call the Midwife. 2012-2015. Directed by Heidi Thomas. Television Series. BBC.
Center for the Study of Democracy, Civil Society in Bulgaria (CSD) (2010) Trends and Risks. Available from: http:// www.csd.bg/artShow.php?id=15423
Clement, S. (1997). Childbirth on television. British Journal of Midwifery 5(1): 37-42.
DeBenedictis, S.,Johnson,C.,Roberts,J., Spiby, H.(2018). Quantitative insightsinto televised birth: a content analysis of ‘One Born Every Minute’. Critical Studies in Media Communication, DOI: 10.1080/15295036.2018.1516046.
Declercq, E., Sakala, C., Corry, M., Applebaum, S. (2006). Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National U.S. Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences. New York: Childbirth Connection. Available from: http://www. nationalpartnership.org/research-library/maternalhealth/listening-to-mothers-ii-2006.pdf
Deenichina, M (2005). Institutions of Hidden Media Censorship in Bulgaria (1956-1989). // Yearbook of the Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski “, FJMC, T. 11. Sofia, Univ. Ed. St. Kliment Ohridski.
Elliot, A. (2009). The Social animal. Sofia: Damyan Yakov. EUSCOOP, News from Bulgaria, 2018. Available at: https://www.euscoop.com/en/2018/8/20/woman-died-giving- birth-investigation-ongoing
Fenwick, J., Gamble, J., Nathan, E., Bayes, S., & Hauck, Y. (2009). Pre- and postpartum levels of childbirth fear and the relationship to birth outcomes in a cohort of Australian women. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(5), 667-677. Doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02568.x
Hundley, V., Duff, E., Dewberry, J., Luce, A., van Teijlingen, E. (2014). Fear in childbirth: are the media
responsible? MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 24:4:444-447.
Hundley V., van Teijlingen E., & Luce A. (2015). Do midwives need to be more media savvy? MIDIRS Midwifery Digest 25:1:5-10.
Kay, L., Downe, S., Thomson, G. & Finlayson, K. 2017, “’Engaging with birth stories in pregnancy: a hermeneutic phenomenological study of women’s experiences across two generations’”, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 17, pp. 283.
Lowe, N. (1993). Maternal confidence for labor: Development of the childbirth self‐efficacy inventory. Research in Nursing & Health, 16(2), 141-149.
Luce A,. Hundley V. & van Teijlingen E. (2017). Midwives’ Engagement with the Media. In: Luce, A., Hundley, V. and van Teijlingen, E (Eds) Media and Midwifery. London: Palgrave.
Martin, K. (2003). Giving birth like a girl. Gender and Society, 17(1), 54-72. Maslow, A. (2013). Toward a psychology of being. London: Start Publishing LLC.
Miller, T. (2000). Losing the plot: Narrative construction and longitudinal childbirth research. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 309-323.
Mindova, V. (2014). The speech of the totalitarian regime - the (not) heard truth or the unfortunate excommunication of the novel “Tobacco” // Media and public communications. Ed., UNWE; Alma communication. 2014, No. 19. Available from: [www.media-journal.info]
Morris, T., & McInerney, K. (2010). Media representations of pregnancy and childbirth: An analysis of reality television programs in the United States. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, 37(2), 134- 140. Doi:10.1111/j.1523- 536X.2010.00393.x.
NICE (2017) Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies [CG190] Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/ guidance/cg190/chapter/recommendations
One Born Every Minute. 2010-2018. Television Series. Channel 4 Television Corporation. Otley, H. (2011). Fear of childbirth: Understanding the causes, impact and treatment. British Journal of Midwifery, 19(4), 215-220.
Positive Birth Movement. (2018). What is a positive birth? Retrieved from http://www.positivebirthmovement.org/ what-is-positive-birth.html
Positive birth stories. (2018) Retrieved from http://www.positivebirthstories.com/ Raskoff, S. (2013) Pregnancy and Social Interactions. Everday Sociology. Available at: https://www. everydaysociologyblog.com/2013/07/pregnancy-and-social-interactions.html
Reiger, K., & Dempsey, R. (2006). Performing birth in a culture of fear: An embodied crisis of late modernity. Health Sociology Review, 15(4), 364-374.
Roberts J., De Benedictis, S., & Spiby, H. (2017). Love Birth, Hate One Born Every Minute? Birth community discourse around televised childbirth. In: Luce, A., Hundley, V. and van Teijlingen, E (Eds) Media and Midwifery. London: Palgrave
Slavchev, M, The development of obstetrics in Bulgaria in the last 50 years, Central Medical Library, // Chronicles of the Bulgarian Medical Association, Jubilee speech by Dr. Metodi Slavchev to the medical community, January and February XXXV, Book 1 & 2, Sofia, 1942
Takeshita, C. (2017) Countering technocracy: “natural” birth in The Busines of Being Born and Call the Midwife. Feminist Media Studies, 17 (3), 332-346.
Tyler, I., & Baraitser, L. (2013). Private view, public birth: Making feminist sense of the new visual culture of childbirth. Studies in the Maternal, 5 (2), 1-27.
Tzekulova, N. (2017). Unpublished quotes from the Bulgarian forums, groups and social media.
Uvnäs Moberg, K. (2003). The oxytocin factor: Tapping the hormone of calm, love and healing. USA: Da Capo Press.
