Solfej Öğretiminde Deşifre Başarısının Değerlendirilmesi
Özet
Müzik eğitiminde vokal deşifre becerisi, müzisyenlerin bir eğitmene ihtiyaç duymadan yeni eserleri bağımsız olarak seslendirebilmeleri ve mesleki yaşamlarında avantaj sağlamaları açısından hayati bir öneme sahiptir. Ancak, bu performans becerisinin değerlendirilmesi, değerlendiricilerin öznel yargıları, ruh halleri ve sıra etkisi gibi müzik dışı faktörler nedeniyle çeşitli güçlükler ve önyargılar barındırmaktadır. Eğitim ve öğretim sürecinin bütünleşik bir parçası olan değerlendirmede biçimlendirici ve özetleyici işlevlerin nitelikli bir şekilde yerine getirilebilmesi için geçerlilik ile güvenilirlik ilkelerinin titizlikle uygulanması şarttır. Literatürde vokal deşifre başarısını ölçmek amacıyla nota-nota veya ölçü-ölçü değerlendirme, perde ile ritim unsurlarını ayırma gibi farklı yaklaşımlar benimsenmiş; Otterstein-Mosher, Cooper, Thostenson ve Henry'nin geliştirdiği VSRI gibi çeşitli ölçme araçları tasarlanmıştır. Buna karşın, geleneksel değerlendirme araçlarının teşhis edici veri sağlama yetersizliği, zaman alıcı yapısı ve sınıf içi bireysel uygulamalardaki kısıtlılıkları aşmak adına günümüzde teknoloji kullanımına ağırlık verilmektedir. SmartMusic benzeri bilgisayar tabanlı yazılımlar ve ses kayıt sistemleri, öğrencilere anında nesnel geri bildirim sağlama, insan kaynaklı önyargıları ortadan kaldırma ve değerlendirme güvenilirliğini artırma yönüyle öne çıkmaktadır. Sonuç olarak, vokal deşifre alanında geçerli ve güvenilir ölçme araçlarının artırılması ve teknolojik imkânların solfej öğretimine entegre edilmesi önerilmektedir.
In music education, vocal sight-reading ability is of vital importance for musicians to independently perform new works without needing an instructor and to gain an advantage in their professional lives. However, evaluating this performance skill involves various difficulties and biases due to subjective judgments of evaluators, moods, and non-musical factors such as performance order. To properly fulfill formative and summative functions in evaluation as an integrated part of the teaching and learning process, validity and reliability principles must be meticulously applied. In the literature, various approaches such as note-by-note or measure-by-measure assessment and separating pitch from rhythm components have been adopted to measure vocal sight-reading success; several assessment tools such as Otterstein-Mosher, Cooper, Thostenson, and Henry's VSRI have been designed. Nevertheless, to overcome the limitations of traditional assessment tools, such as lack of diagnostic data, time-consuming nature, and constraints in classroom individual evaluation, significant emphasis is placed on the use of technology today. Computer-based software like SmartMusic and audio recording systems stand out by providing instant objective feedback to students, eliminating human biases, and increasing evaluation reliability. Consequently, it is recommended to increase valid and reliable assessment tools in vocal sight-reading and integrate technological capabilities into solfège instruction.
Referanslar
Abeles, H. F. (1973). Development and validation of a clarinet performance adjudication scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 21(3), 246–255. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3345094
Abeles, H. F. (2010). Assessing music learning. In H. Abeles & L. Custodero (Eds.), Critical issues in music education: From theory to practice (pp. 167-193). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Airasian, P. W. (2004). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Allen, J. D. (2005). Grades as valid measures of academic achievement of classroom learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78(5), 218-223. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30189912
Darrow, A.A., & Marsh, K. (2006). Examining the validity of self-report: middle-level singers’ ability to predict and assess their sight-singing skills. International Journal of Music Education, 24(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761406063101
DeLuca, C. ve Bolden, B. (2014). Music Performance Assessment: Exploring Three Approaches for Quality Rubric Construction. Music Educators Journal, 101(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432114540336
Farenga, J. (2013). Arizona high school choral educators' attitudes toward the teaching of group sight singing and preferences for instructional practices (Order No. 3605207). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1477861721).
Goss, D. A. (2010). Sight-singing assessment: A study of current beliefs and practices of Georgia middle and high school choral directors (Order No. 3398032). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (305244889).
Graves, D. L. (1980). The Development of an Objective Sight Singing Achievement Test Employing Electronic Measurement Apparatus (Order No. 8107914). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (303008678).
Henry, M. (1999). The development of an individual vocal sight-reading inventory (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 683A.
Henry, M. (2001). The Development of a Vocal Sight-Reading Inventory. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 150, 21–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319097
Henry, M. (2003). A comparison of testing formats for vocal sight reading. Texas Music Education Research, 24-31.
Henry, M. (2015). Vocal Sight-Reading Assessment: Technological Advances, Student Perceptions, and Instructional Implications. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 33(2), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123314547908
Jensen, M. C. (2016). Measuring Music Reading: A Guide to Assessment Methods (Master’s thesis). University of Ottawa.
LaCognata, J. P. (2010). Current student assessment practices of high school band directors (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3436343)
Lopez, C. (2001). Assessing elementary improvisation. In MENC (Ed.), Spotlight on assessment in music education (pp. 32-34). Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
Lucas, K. V. (1991). The effect of contextual condition on the sightsinging achievement of middle school choral music students. Dissertation Abstracts International.
McPherson, G. E. ve Schubert, E. (2004). Measuring performance enhancement in music. Musical excellence: Strategies and techniques to enhance performance. In A. Williamon (Ed.), Enhancing Musical Performance (pp. 61-82). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
McPherson, G. E. ve Thompson, W. F. (1998). Assessing music performance: Issues and influences. Research Studies in Music Education, 10(1), 12-24.
Nelson, J. (1970). A comparison of two methods of measuring achievement in sight singing. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI 7015629).
Palmer, C. (1997). Music performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 115-138.
Pretorius, J. (2007). A Critical Evaluation of Assessment Practices in Music Literacy Programmes for Young Adults (Master’s thesis). North-West University.
Reynolds, C. R. (2009) Measurement and Assessment in Education. N.J.: Pearson.
Russell, J. A. ve Austin, J. R. (2010). Assessment Practices of Secondary Music Teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(1), 37-54.
Scofıeld, W. R. (1980). The Construction and Validation of a Method for The Measurement of the Sight-singing Abilities of High School and College Students (Order No. 8020739). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (288220319).
Scott, T. B. (1996). The construction of a holistic, criterion-referenced sight-singing test for high school sopranos based on the voluntary national standards for music education (Order No. 9712431). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304302233).
Shih, Y. J. (2018) Evaluation of Music Performance: Computerized Assessment Versus Human Judges (Doctoral dissertation). University of Hawaii.
Sloboda, J. A. (1978). The psychology of music reading. Psychology of Music, 6, 3-20.
Sloboda, J. A. (1984). Experimental studies of musical reading: A review. Music Perception, 2, 222–236.
Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Wesolowski, B. C., Wind: A., & Engelhard, G. (2015). Rater fairness in music performance assessment: Evaluating model-data fit and differential rater functioning. Musicae Scientiae, 19(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864915589014
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
