A Method of Formative Assessment: Learning Trajectories
Özet
This text explores formative assessment with a specific focus on learning trajectories as a complementary and powerful formative method in education, particularly within mathematics teaching. It begins by defining educational evaluation as a multi-step, systematic process to determine teaching effectiveness, highlighting the shift from traditional, periodic examinations to complementary evaluation methods that actively involve students in the process. Formative assessment is emphasized as a planned, highly interactive cycle providing crucial feedback that allows teachers to reorganize instruction according to individual student characteristics, aiming to close the gap between current student understanding and desired learning goals. The author directly connects this approach to teacher knowledge frameworks, such as Shulman’s pedagogical content knowledge and the "Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching" model developed by Ball, Thames, and Phelps. Learning trajectories, originally conceptualized by Simon, serve as hypothetical roadmaps that trace how children's mathematical thinking and mental processes grow and change over time. This research adapts a specific six-step learning trajectory model encompassing essential elements: content knowledge, concept knowledge, mathematical validity analysis, conceptual comprehension analysis, trajectory creation, and instructional decision-making. Ultimately, effectively creating and utilizing learning trajectories empowers teachers to accurately predict student difficulties, construct realistic learning environments, facilitate productive classroom discussions, and deliver highly tailored pedagogical support.
Referanslar
Alakurt, T. (2006). Puanlama yönergesine dayalı değerlendirme ve geleneksel değerlendirme açısından ilköğretim öğrencilerinin bilgisayar dersi başarılarının karşılaştırılması, Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Aslan Tutak, F. & Köklü, O. (2016). Öğretmek için matematik bilgisi. Erhan Bingölbali, Selahattin Arslan, İsmail Özgür Zembat (Editörler). Matematik Eğitiminde Teoriler (syf.712-716). Ankara: Pegem
Atılgan, H. (2009). Değerlendirme ve not verme. H. Atılgan (Editör). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme (350-395). Ankara: Anı
Bakan, Ü. (2019). Biçimlendirici değerlendirme uygulamalarıyla zenginleştirilmiş etkileşimli kısa tarihsel hikâyelerin öğrencilerin bilimin doğası anlayışlarına etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sivas.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: Whatmakes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407
Başol, G. (2013). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme. Ankara: Pegem Akademi
Bekar Kebapçı, Ç. (2016). Türkçe öğretmenlerinin ölçme değerlendirme araçlarını kullanma ve önemseme düzeylerine yönelik bir değerlendirme. Yüksek lisans tezi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. İzmir.
Biggs, J. B. & Watkins, D. (1996). Classroom learning: educational psychology for the asian teacher. New York: Prentice Hall
Black, P. &Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy ve Practice, 5(1), 7–75.
Bol, D.J. (2002). The use of alternative assessment in physical education clasrooms. Doktora dissertation, Kinesiology and Health Promotion, faculty of California State University
Brookhart, M. S. (2008). Successful students formative and summative uses of assessment ınformation, assessment in education: principles. Policy & Practice, 8(2).
Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological the oryand the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.). Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289-325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Canbazoğlu, S. (2008). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının maddenin tanecikli yapısı ünitesine ilişkin pedagojik alan bilgilerinin değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara
Cankoy, O. (2010). Mathematics teachers’ topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge in the context of teaching a 0, 0! and a ÷ 0. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(2), 749-769.
CERI. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: OECD
Clarke S. (2001). Unlocking formative assessment: practical strategies for enhancing pupil‟s learning in the primary classroom. London: Hodder & Stoughton Educational
Clements, D. & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning trajectories: Foundations for effective, researchbased education. In A. P. Maloney, J. Confrey, & K. H. Nguyen (Eds.), Learning over time: Learning trajectories in mathematics education (pp.1–30). Charlotte, NC: Information Age
Cochran, K. F. DeRuiter, J. A. & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263-272.
Cowie, B. & Bell, B. (1999). A Model of Formative Assessment in Science Education. Assessment in Education, 6, 101-116.
Donovan, J. L. (2019). An examinatıon of preservice teachers’ use of learning trajectories to guıde instruction. Doktora dissertation. Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University Detroit, Michigan
Elden, A. (2019). Okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin biçimlendirici değerlendirme uygulamaları. Yüksek lisans tezi. Başkent Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara
Ertürk, S. (1982). Eğitimde program geliştirme (4.baskı). Ankara: Yelkentepe.
Fennema, E. & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 147-164). New York: Macmillan
Fisher, D. & Frey, N. (2007). Checking for understanding, formative assessment techniques for your classroom. ASCD Publication: United States of America
Friedrichsen, P. M. & Dana, T. M. (2005). Substantive level theory of highly regarded secondary biology teachers' science teaching orientations. JRST, 42(2), 218-244
Gökkurt, B. & Soylu, Y. (2016). Ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin pedagojik alan bilgilerinin incelenmesi: Koni örneği. İlköğretim Online, 15(3), 946-973
Gürbüz, R., Erdem, E. & Gülburnu, M. (2013). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin matematik yeterliklerini etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 14(2), 255-272
Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College
Harlen, W. (2003). Enhancing inquiry through formative assessment. Exploratorium: USA
Hill, H. C. Rowan, B. & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406.
Howell, K. W. & Nolet, V. (2000). Curriculum – basedevaluation: teaching and decision making. Belmont, California: Wadsworth
Irons, A. (2008), Enhancing Learning Through Formative Assessment and Feedback, Routledge: U.S.A and Canada
Kahan, J., Cooper, D. & Bethea, K. (2003). The role of mathematics teachers’ content knowledge in their teaching: A framework for research applied to a study of student teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 223-252
Keeley, P., Eberle, F. & Farrin, L. (2005). Uncovering student ıdeas in science, formative assessment probes. California: Corwin ve NSTA.
Kilmen, S. (2017). Ölçme ve değerlendirmede temel kavramlar. R. N. Demirtaşlı (Editör). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme (25-55). Ankara: Anı
Lai, E. (2002), Formative assessment and quality teaching and learning. Student Assessment and Feedback, 3, 4-7
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J. & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of PCK for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N.G. Lederman (Eds.) Examining PCK: The construct and its implications for science education (pp.95-120). Boston: Kluwer Academic
Council for Chief State
ations/details.cfm?PublicationsID=362
McManus, S. (2008). Attributes of effective formative assessment. Washington, DC: Council for Chief State School Officers.
McMillan, J.H. (2007). Formative classroom assessment, theory ınto practice. Teachers College Press: United States of America
Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) (2013a). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. Ankara: MEB
Özçelik, D. A. (2013). Okullarda ölçme ve değerlendirme (2. baskı). Ankara: Pegem
Park, S. & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284
Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Rowland, T., Turner, F., Thwaites, A. & Huckstep, P. (2009). Developing primary mathematics teaching: reflecting on practice with the knowledge quartet. London: Sage
Semerci, Ç. (2008). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. E. Karip (Editör). Ölçme ve değerlendirme (1-15). Ankara: Pegem
Senemoğlu, N. (2012). Gelişim öğrenme ve öğretim. Ankara: Pegem
Shavelson, R. J., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., Young, D. B. & Pottenger, F. (2008). On the role and impact of formative assessment on science inquiry teaching and learning. In J. Coffey, R. Douglas, & C. Stern (Eds.). Science assessment: Research and practical approaches. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association, 21–36
Shulman L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: a contemporary perspective. In M, Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. NY: Macmillian.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2). 114-145.
Smith, M. S. & Stein, M. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(5), 344-50
Taşkın, N. R. (2018). Biçimlendirici değerlendirme tasarlama etkinliklerinin biyoloji öğretmen adaylarının modern genetik öğrenme progresyonu temelli alan bilgilerine ve pedagojik alan bilgilerine etkisi. Doktora tezi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Balıkesir
Taylor, R. L. (2003). Assessment exceptional students: Educational and psychological procedures (6 th Ed). Pearson Education, Inc.
Tchoshanov, M. A. (2011). Relationship between teacher knowledge of concepts and connections, teaching practice, and student achievement in middle grades mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76, 141-164.
William, D. (2008). Changing clasroom practice. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 36-41
Yaşar, M. (2008). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirmenin önemi. S. Tekindal (Editör). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme (1-8). Ankara: Pegem
Yılmaz, Z. (2015). Öğrenme rotaları temelli öğretimin sınıf öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel alan ve öğrenci bilgilerini yeniden yapılandırılmasında kullanımı. Doktora tezi. Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Ankara
Yıldırım, A. (2013). Türkiye’de öğretmen eğitimi araştırmaları: Yönelimler, sorunlar ve öncelikli alanlar. Eğitim ve Bilim.38 (169). 175-191
Yin, Y., Tomita, M.K. & Shavelson, R. J. (2014) Using formal embedded formative assessments aligned with a short-term learning progression to promote conceptual change and achievement in science, International Journal of Science Education, 36(4), 531-552
Zengin, S. (2019). Matematiksel modelleme etkinliklerinin ders içi uygulamalarının değerlendirme türleri bağlamında incelenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi. Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. İstanbul
