Afetlerde Bilgi Yönetimi ve Dijital Bilgi Ekosistemi: Verinin Karar Desteğine Dönüşümü ve Bilgi Düzensizliğinin Yönetimi

Yazarlar

Ebru Koca
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8098-7586

Özet

Bu kavramsal derleme, afetlerde veri yönetiminin karar desteğine dönüşüm sürecini, dijital bilgi ekosistemini ve bilgi düzensizliğinin yönetimini bütüncül bir yaklaşımla incelemektedir. Çalışmada; bilginin planlanması, toplanması, kalite güvencesi, standartlaştırılması ve karar ürünlerine dönüştürülmesini kapsayan veri yönetimi yaşam döngüsü ele alınmaktadır. Kriz bilişimi bağlamında sosyal medya, kitle kaynaklı veriler ve dijital gönüllülerin erken durumsal farkındalığa katkıları vurgulanırken; bu verilerin taşıdığı temsil yanlılığı, bilgi kirliliği ve mahremiyet (ifşa) riskleri de tartışılmaktadır. Karar vericilerin kaynakları yönlendirebilmesi ve afetten etkilenen toplulukların hizmetlere erişebilmesi için verinin erişilebilir, eyleme dönük ve güvenilir olması gerektiği belirtilmektedir. Ayrıca, afetlerde karşılaşılan yanlış bilgi, söylenti ve sentetik (yapay zekâ üretimi) içeriklerin yönetimi için sosyal dinleme, kanıta dayalı doğrulama ve risk düzeyine orantılı yanıt stratejileri sunulmaktadır. Türkiye'nin TAMP ve AYDES gibi mevcut afet bilgi yönetimi kapasiteleri incelenerek; veri paylaşımında kurumsal birlikte işlerlik, veri sorumluluğu, insan denetimi ve toplumdan gelen geri bildirimlerin karar süreçlerine entegrasyonuna yönelik temel değerlendirme odakları önerilmektedir.

Referanslar

ACAPS. (2022). Scenario-building methodology: How to build scenarios in preparation for or during humanitarian crises. ACAPS. https://www.acaps.org/fileadmin/Technical_notes/202202_acaps_technical_brief_scenario_building_methodology.pdf

Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. (2022). Türkiye afet müdahale planı (TAMP). AFAD. https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/e_Kutuphane/Planlar/TAMP.pdf

Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. (2024). AFAD 2024–2028 stratejik planı. AFAD. https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/e_Kutuphane/Planlar/2024_2028-AFAD-Stratejik-Plani.pdf

Arif, A., Robinson, J. J., Stanek, S. A., & Starbird, K. (2017). A closer look at the self-correcting crowd: Examining corrections in online rumors. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (ss. 155–168). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998294

Arnold, M., Goldschmitt, M., & Rigotti, T. (2023). Dealing with information overload: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1122200. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122200

Beduschi, A. (2022). Harnessing the potential of artificial intelligence for humanitarian action: Opportunities and risks. International Review of the Red Cross, 104(919), 1149–1169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383122000261

Betterle, A., & Salamon, P. (2024). Water depth estimate and flood extent enhancement for satellite-based inundation maps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 24(8), 2817–2836. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2817-2024

Blomeier, E., Schmidt, S., & Resch, B. (2024). Drowning in the information flood: Machine-learning-based relevance classification of flood-related tweets for disaster management. Information, 15(3), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15030149

Chandra, B., Dunietz, J., Roberts, K., & Vasserman, L. (2024). Reducing risks posed by synthetic content: An overview of technical approaches to digital content transparency (NIST AI 100-4). National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-4

CHS Alliance, Groupe URD, & Sphere. (2024). Core humanitarian standard on quality and accountability (2. baskı). https://www.corehumanitarianstandard.org/languages

Cintora-Sanz, A. M., Blanco-Hermo, P., Gómez-De la Oliva, S., & López-Mesa, M. (2024). INtelligent toolkit for reconnaissance, assessments and prehospital support in Perilous InciDents: A realistic experiment in prehospital environment. BMC Health Services Research, 24, 1331. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11786-3

Comes, T. (2024). AI for crisis decisions. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09750-0

Çalı, B., Finnerty, J., Freeman, L., & McDermott, Y. (2024). Evaluating digital open source imagery: A guide for judges and fact-finders. TRUE Project. https://www.trueproject.co.uk/osguide

Demir Özbek, E., Yomralıoğlu, T., & Ateş Aydar, S. (2023). Development of interoperability principles for disaster and emergency management system of Türkiye. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 10(4), 90–104. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.1396579

Di Muri, C., Pulieri, M., Raho, D., & Nitti, V. (2024). Assessing semantic interoperability in environmental sciences: Variety of approaches and semantic artefacts. Scientific Data, 11, 1055. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03669-3

Enderami, S. A., Sutley, E., Helgeson, J., & Dillard, M. (2024). Measuring post-disaster accessibility to essential goods and services: Proximity, availability, adequacy, and acceptability dimensions. Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience, 5, 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-024-00104-0

Fathi, R., & Fiedrich, F. (2022). Social media analytics by Virtual Operations Support Teams in disaster management: Situational awareness and actionable information for decision-makers. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 941803. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.941803

Froeschl, G., Zagli, B., Erucar, E., & Özgüler, A. (2025). Needs and early response towards internally displaced people in Hatay Province in the aftermath of the 2023 earthquake in Turkey. BMC Public Health, 25, 1706. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22501-0

Gevaert, C. M., Buunk, T., & van den Homberg, M. J. C. (2024). Auditing geospatial datasets for biases: Using global building datasets for disaster risk management. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 17, 12579–12590. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3422503

Gilga, C., Hochwarter, C., Knoche, L., & Merz, B. (2025). Legal and ethical considerations for demand-driven data collection and AI-based analysis in flood response. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 122, 105441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105441

Gopal, L. S., Prabha, R., Thirugnanam, H., & Balaji, R. (2026). Review article: Social media for managing disasters triggered by natural hazards: A critical review of data collection strategies and actionable insights. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 26, 215–250. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-215-2026

Grass, E., Ortmann, J., Balcik, B., & Çelik, M. (2023). A machine learning approach to deal with ambiguity in the humanitarian decision-making. Production and Operations Management, 32(9), 2956–2974. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.14018

Groß, S., Herfort, B., Marx, S., & Zipf, A. (2023). Exploring MapSwipe as a crowdsourcing tool for (rapid) damage assessment: The case of the 2021 Haiti earthquake. AGILE: GIScience Series, 4, 5. https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-4-5-2023

Guo, S., Zhong, Y., & Hu, X. (2025). People are more susceptible to misinformation with realistic AI-synthesized images that provide strong evidence to headlines. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-189

H2H Network. (2026). Vision and functional framework for the evolving humanitarian data ecosystem. H2H Network. https://h2hnetwork.org/documents/191/Humanitarian_Data_Ecosystem_Framework.pdf

Hanashima, M., Sano, H., & Usuda, Y. (2024). Designing and developing dynamic decision support information for disaster response. Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 386, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-386-189-2024

Hillin, J., Alizadeh, B., Li, D., & Nadi, S. (2024). Designing user-centered decision support systems for climate disasters: What information do communities and rescue responders need during floods? Journal of Emergency Management, 22(7), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0741

Hosseinzadeh, E., Afkanpour, M., Momeni, M., & Kazemi, A. (2025). Data quality assessment in healthcare, dimensions, methods and tools: A systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 25, 296. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-03136-y

Huang, Y. L., Starbird, K., Orand, M., Stanek, S. A., & Pedersen, H. T. (2015). Connected through crisis: Emotional proximity and the spread of misinformation online. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (ss. 969–980). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675202

Iazzolino, G., & Dhungana, N. (2025). Prediction and data curation in digital humanitarianism. Big Data & Society, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251361111

Information Management Working Group. (2016). Guidance on common operational datasets (CODs) in emergency preparedness and response. https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/2235170878

Joint and Intersectoral Analysis Framework. (2024). JIAF 2: Technical manual. https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/hpc/pages/3993829401/JIAF+Manuals

Khallouli, W., Li, J., Huang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2025). An integrated machine learning approach for identifying emergency rescue messages on social media during natural disasters. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 15, 50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01462-7

Kohli, N., Aiken, E., & Blumenstock, J. E. (2024). Privacy guarantees for personal mobility data in humanitarian response. Scientific Reports, 14, 28565. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79561-2

Lam, N. S. N., Meyer, M., Reams, M., & Lee, K. (2023). Improving social media use for disaster resilience: Challenges and strategies. International Journal of Digital Earth, 16(1), 3023–3044. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2023.2239768

Laurila-Pant, M., Pihlajamäki, M., Lanki, A., & Leino, M. (2023). A protocol for analysing the role of shared situational awareness and decision-making in cooperative disaster simulations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 86, 103544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103544

Li, X., Xu, D., Liu, Y., & Chen, Y. (2025). How does physical distance from the epicenter influence misinformation sharing? The roles of negative affect and social media engagement. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1428. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05740-9

Lim, N. J., Brandt, S. A., & Seipel, S. (2024). Assessment of how uncertainty representation in flood maps can affect geographic-based decisions. Discover Water, 4, 120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-024-00170-1

Marelli, M. (2024). Data protection principles in humanitarian action. M. Marelli (Ed.), Handbook on data protection in humanitarian action içinde (3. baskı, ss. 11–74). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009414630.005

Masinde, B. K., Gevaert, C. M., Nagenborg, M. H., & Oude Elberink, S. J. (2023). Group-privacy threats for geodata in the humanitarian context. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(10), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12100393

Meesters, K. (2021). Crisis information management: From technological potential to societal impact. E. Aarts, H. Fleuren, M. Sitskoorn, & T. Wilthagen (Eds.), The new common: How the COVID-19 pandemic is transforming society içinde (ss. 153–159). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65355-2_22

Meesters, K., & Wang, Y. (2021). Information as humanitarian aid: Delivering digital services to empower disaster-affected communities. L. Oliveira, F. Tajariol, & L. B. Gonçalves (Eds.), Digital services in crisis, disaster, and emergency situations içinde (ss. 328–351). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6705-0.ch015

Meesters, K., Steenbergen, O. L., & Wang, Y. (2023). Data management in emergency response: Observations from the field during COVID19 and Storm Ana. Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (ss. 1818–1827). University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2023.228

Nielsen, A. B., Landwehr, D., Nicolaï, J., & Becker, P. (2024). Social media and crowdsourcing in disaster risk management: Trends, gaps, and insights from the current state of research. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 15(2), 104–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12297

Palen, L., Anderson, K. M., Mark, G., Martin, J., Sicker, D., Palmer, M., & Grunwald, D. (2010). A vision for technology-mediated support for public participation & assistance in mass emergencies & disasters. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-BCS Visions of Computer Science Conference, Article 8. British Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/VOCS2010.8

Paulus, D., Fathi, R., Fiedrich, F., & Fiedrich, F. (2024). On the interplay of data and cognitive bias in crisis information management. Information Systems Frontiers, 26, 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10241-0

Reuter, C., & Kaufhold, M.-A. (2018). Fifteen years of social media in emergencies: A retrospective review and future directions for crisis informatics. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12196

Ruohonen, H., & Backholm, K. (2023). Matter of trust: How to include digital volunteers in crisis management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 31(4), 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12484

Ryan, B. J., Kako, M., Garner, S., & Johnston, K. A. (2024). Prioritizing strategies for building the resilience of public health systems to disasters across multiple communities and countries. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 15, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00537-x

Schneider, M., Cotton, F., & Schweizer, P.-J. (2023). Criteria-based visualization design for hazard maps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 23(7), 2505–2521. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2505-2023

Schotten, R., Mühlhofer, E., Chatzistefanou, G.-A., & Koks, E. E. (2024). Data for critical infrastructure network modelling of natural hazard impacts: Needs and influence on model characteristics. Resilient Cities and Structures, 3(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcns.2024.01.002

Seneviratne, K., Nadeeshani, M., Senaratne, S., & Amaratunga, D. (2024). Use of social media in disaster management: Challenges and strategies. Sustainability, 16(11), 4824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114824

Sköld Gustafsson, V., Andersson Granberg, T., Pilemalm, S., & Henriksson, A. (2024). Identifying decision support needs for emergency response to multiple natural hazards: An activity theory approach. Natural Hazards, 120, 2777–2802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06305-2

Sosea, T., Li, J. J., & Caragea, C. (2024). Sarcasm detection in a disaster context. Proceedings of the 2024 Joint International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-COLING 2024) (ss. 14313–14324). ELRA and ICCL. https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.1247/

Tavra, M., Lisec, A., Galešić Divić, M., & Cetl, V. (2024). Unpacking the role of volunteered geographic information in disaster management: Focus on data quality. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 15(1), 2300825. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2300825

Ternovski, J., Kalla, J., & Aronow, P. M. (2022). The negative consequences of informing voters about deepfakes: Evidence from two survey experiments. Journal of Online Trust and Safety, 1(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v1i2.28

Therrien, M.-C., Manrique Rueda, G., Normandin, J.-M., & Pelling, M. (2024). The common operating picture as a collaborative governance tool for urban resilience. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 32(1), e12500. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12500

Thompson, P. T., Ojha, S., Powell, C. D., & Shute, V. J. (2023). A proposed FAIR approach for disseminating geospatial information system maps. Scientific Data, 10, 389. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02281-1

Torpan, S., Hansson, S., Orru, K., & Krüger, M. (2024). Mitigating vulnerabilities with social media: A cross-national study of European disaster managers’ practices. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 15(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12286

Tuncer, C. O. (2022). Kamu yönetimi bağlamında afet yönetiminde örnek bir uygulama: AYDES. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, (59), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.1154104

Türk, A., & Bilican Gökkaya, V. (2023). Deprem sonrası çocukların karşılaşabileceği psikososyal riskler ve sosyal hizmet. İ. Aydemir & M. Öztürk (Ed.), Afet ve krizlerde sosyal hizmet içinde (ss. 163–188). Akademisyen Kitabevi. https://doi.org/10.37609/akya.2794

Uluçam, Ş. (2025). Korku iklimi. M. A. Canbolat (Ed.), Örgütsel davranış: Modern yaklaşımlar zıt kutuplar içinde (ss. 195–211). Gazi Kitabevi.

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2017). Sendai framework data readiness review 2017: Global summary report. United Nations. https://www.undrr.org/publication/sendai-framework-data-readiness-review-2017-global-summary-report

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2022). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2022: Our world at risk—Transforming governance for a resilient future. United Nations. https://www.undrr.org/gar2022-our-world-risk

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2022). Providing metadata for your datasets on HDX (updated as of Nov 8, 2022). https://centre.humdata.org/providing-metadata-for-your-datasets-on-hdx/

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2024a). Briefing note on artificial intelligence and the humanitarian sector. Centre for Humanitarian Data. https://centre.humdata.org/briefing-note-on-artificial-intelligence-and-the-humanitarian-sector/

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2024b). P-codes. https://knowledge.base.unocha.org/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/222265609/P-codes

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2025a). OCHA data responsibility guidelines. Centre for Humanitarian Data. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/2048a947-5714-4220-905b-e662cbcd14c8/resource/8bc5b848-8ece-4f1f-a78b-18dd972bb21a/download/data-responsibility-guidelines-2025.pdf

United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. (2025b). Who does What Where (3W). https://humanitarian.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/imtoolbox/pages/214499412/Who+does+What+Where+3W/

Vandrevala, T., Morrow, E., Coates, T., & Reicher, S. (2024). Strengthening the relationship between community resilience and health emergency communication: A systematic review. BMC Global and Public Health, 2, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-024-00112-y

Vraga, E. K., Ecker, U. K. H., Žeželj, I., & Kende, A. (2023). To debunk or not to debunk? Correcting (mis)information. T. D. Purnat, T. Nguyen, & S. Briand (Eds.), Managing infodemics in the 21st century: Addressing new public health challenges in the information ecosystem içinde (ss. 85–98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4_7

Wang, Z., Shi, X., Yang, H., & Zhou, L. (2024). Automatic extraction and cluster analysis of natural disaster metadata based on the unified metadata framework. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 13(6), 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13060201

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making (DGI(2017)09). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c

Wieland, M., Schmidt, S., Resch, B., & Hahmann, T. (2025). Fusion of geospatial information from remote sensing and social media to prioritise rapid response actions in case of floods. Natural Hazards, 121(7), 8061–8088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07120-7

World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. (2024). Addressing dangerous health narratives in emergencies: An operational toolkit. https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/25-01-2024-addressing-dangerous-health-narratives-in-emergencies--an-operational-toolkit

World Health Organization, & United Nations Children’s Fund. (2023). How to build an infodemic insights report in six steps. World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240075658

World Health Organization. (2017). WHO strategic communications framework for effective communications. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/communicating-for-health/communication-framework.pdf

World Health Organization. (2019). Health emergency and disaster risk management framework. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241516181

World Health Organization. (2024). WHO policy brief: Building trust through risk communication and community engagement and infodemic management. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/who-policy-brief-building-trust-through-risk-communication-and-community-engagement-and-infodemic-management

Zhang, L., Ekmekci, P. E., Murray, V., & Huda, Q. (2024). The ‘PROTECT’ essential elements in managing crisis data policies. Data Science Journal, 23, 12. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2024-012

Zheng, L., Chen, L., Long, F., & Li, X. (2024). Reducing social media attention inequality in disasters: The role of official media during rainstorm disasters in China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 15, 388–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00562-w

Zomignani Barboza, J., & Jasmontaite-Zaniewicz, L. (2024). Social media. M. Marelli (Ed.), Handbook on data protection in humanitarian action içinde (3. baskı, ss. 230–247). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009414630.019

Yayınlanan

13 Kasım 2026

Lisans

Lisans