Endodontide Kullanılan Geleneksel ve İleri Görüntüleme Teknikleri-Geçmişten Günümüze Genel Bir Bakış
Özet
Endodontik tedavilerde teşhisten prognoz değerlendirmesine kadar her aşamada ağız içi periapikal radyografiler temel ve vazgeçilmez bir araçtır. Ancak bu geleneksel iki boyutlu (2D) görüntüleme yöntemi; üç boyutlu (3D) anatominin iki boyuta sıkışması, sagittal düzlemin görülememesi, anatomik süperpozisyonlar (yapıların üst üste binmesi), geometrik distorsiyonlar ve standardizasyon zorlukları gibi ciddi kısıtlılıklara sahiptir. Bu kısıtlılıkları aşmak amacıyla diş hekimliğinde ileri görüntüleme teknikleri geliştirilmiştir. Tuned Aperture Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (TACT), Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (CT), Manyetik Rezonans Görüntüleme (MRI), Ultrason ve Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (CBCT) bu ileri yöntemler arasında yer almaktadır. Bu teknikler, özellikle CBCT, üç boyutlu veri setleri sunarak periapikal lezyonların gerçek boyutlarını, kök kırıklarını, kanal morfolojilerini ve komşu anatomik ilişkileri netleştirip teşhis başarısını büyük ölçüde artırır. MRI yumuşak doku ve pulpa incelemelerinde, ultrason ise radyasyonsuz olarak kist-granülom ayrımında avantaj sağlar. Mikro-CT ise yüksek doğruluğuyla in vitro çalışmalarda tercih edilir. İleri görüntüleme yöntemleri endodontide klinik yönetime önemli katkılar sunsa da yüksek maliyet, radyasyon dozu ve artefakt gibi dezavantajları nedeniyle rutin olarak değil, yalnızca geleneksel periapikal radyografilerin yetersiz kaldığı karmaşık vakalarda tercih edilmelidir.
Intraoral periapical radiographs are essential and indispensable tools in every stage of endodontic treatments, from diagnosis to prognosis evaluation. However, this traditional two-dimensional (2D) imaging method has significant limitations, such as the compression of three-dimensional (3D) anatomy into two dimensions, the inability to visualize the sagittal plane, anatomical superpositions (overlapping of structures), geometric distortions, and standardization difficulties. Advanced imaging techniques have been developed in dentistry to overcome these limitations. Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography (TACT), Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Ultrasound, and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) are among these advanced methods. These techniques, especially CBCT, provide three-dimensional data sets, thereby greatly increasing diagnostic success by clarifying the true dimensions of periapical lesions, root fractures, canal morphologies, and adjacent anatomical relationships. While MRI offers advantages in soft tissue and pulpal examinations, ultrasound provides benefits in the differential diagnosis of cysts and granulomas without ionizing radiation. Micro-CT is preferred in in-vitro studies due to its high accuracy. Although advanced imaging methods contribute significantly to clinical management in endodontics, due to disadvantages such as high cost, radiation dose, and artifacts, they should not be used routinely but only preferred in complex cases where conventional periapical radiographs remain insufficient.
Referanslar
Jacobsohn PH, Fedran RJ. Making darkness visible: the discovery of x-ray and its introduction to dentistry. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1995;126(10): 1359-1366. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0044.
Langland OE, Langlais RP. Early pioneers of oral andmaxillofacial radiology. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 1995;80(5): 496-511. doi:10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80149-0
Deepak BS, Subash TS, Narmatha VJ, et al. Imaging techniques in endodontics: an overview. Journal of Clinical Imaging Science. 2012;2:13. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.94227
Gröndahl HG, Huumonen S. Radiographic manifestations of periapical inflammatory lesions. Endodontic Topics. 2004;8(1): 55-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2004.00082.x
Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, et al. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. International Endodontic Journal. 2009;42(6): 447-462. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01530.x
Cotti E, Campisi G. Advanced radiographic techniques for the detection of lesions in bone. Endodontic Topics. 2004;7(1): 52-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2004.00064.x
Whaites E. Chapter 8. Periapical radiography. Essentials of Dental Radiology and Radiography. 3th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Churchill Livingston Elsevier; 2003. p. 75-100.
Whaites E. Chapter 17. Alternative and specialized imaging modalities. Essentials of Dental Radiology and Radiography. 3th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Churchill Livingston Elsevier; 2003. p. 191-208.
Velvart P, Hecker H, Tillinger G. Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2001;92(6): 682-688. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.118904.
Low KM, Dula K, Bürgin W, et al. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. Journal of Endodontics. 2008;34(5): 557-562. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.022.
Glickman GN, Vogt MW. Chapter 5. Preparation for treatment. In:Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, eds. Pathways of the Pulp. 10th ed. St. Louis,MI: Mosby Elsevier; 2011. p. 88-123.
Barton DJ, Clark SJ, Eleazer PD, Scheetz JP, Farman AG. Tunedaperture computed tomography versus parallax analog and digital radiographic images in detecting second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2003;96(2): 223-228. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00061-1.
Forsberg J, Halse A. Radiographic simulation of a periapical lesion comparing the paralleling and the bisecting-angle techniques. International Endodontic Journal. 1994;27(3): 133-138. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1994.tb00242.x
Vande Voorde HE, Bjorndahl AM. Estimating endodontic ‘‘working length’’ with paralleling radiographs. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 1969;27(1): 106-110. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(69)90037-1.
White SC, Pharoah MJ. Chapter 13. Advanced Imaging. Oral Radiology. Principles and Interpretation. 6th ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2009. p. 207-224.
Bender IB, Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: I. The Journal of the American Dental Association 1961;62(2): 152-160. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1961.0030
Huumonen S, Ørstavik D. Radiological aspects of apical periodontitis. Endodontic Topics. 2002;1(1): 3-25. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-1546.2002.10102.x
Goldman M, Pearson AH, Darzenta N. Endodontic success--who’s reading the radiograph Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology 1972;33(3): 432-437. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(72)90473-2.
Goldman M, Pearson AH, Darzenta N. Reliability of radiographic interpretations Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology 1974;38(2): 287-293. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(74)90070-X.
Brynolf I. A histological and roentenological study of the periapical region of human upper incisors. Odontologist Revy. 1967;18 (Suppl.11): 1-176.
Marmary Y, Koter T, Heling I. The effect of periapical rarefying osteitis on cortical and cancellous bone. A study comparing conventional radiographs with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 1999;28(5): 267-271. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600453.
Schwartz SF, Foster JK Jr. Roentgenographic interpretation of experimentally produced bony lesions. Part 1. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology 1971;32(4): 606-612. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(71)90326-4.
Friedman S. Prognosis of initial endodontic therapy. Endodontic Topics. 2002;2: 59-98. doi: 10.1.1.1082.8204.
Duckworth JE, Judy PF, Goodson JM, et al. A method for the geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs. Journal of Periodontology.1983;54(7): 435-440. doi: 10.1902/jop.1983.54.7.435
Rudolph DJ, White SC. Film-holding instruments for intraoral subtraction radiography. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology 1988;65(6): 767-772. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(88)90027-8.
Nair MK, Nair UP. Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: a review. Journal of Endodontics. 2007;33(1): 1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.08.013.
Webber RL, Messura JK. An in vivo comparison of diagnostic information obtained from tuned-aperture computed tomography and conventional dental radiographic imaging modalities. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology 1999;88(2): 239-247. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70122-8.
Webber RL, Horton RA, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB. Tuned-aperture computed tomography (TACT). Theory and application for threedimensional dento-alveolar imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 1997;26(1): 53-62. doi: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600201
Nair MK. Diagnostic accuracy of Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography (TACT). Swedish Dental Journal. 2003;159 (Suppl.): 1-93.
Nair MK, Nair UDP, Gröndahl HG, et al. Detection of artificially induced vertical radicular fractures using tuned aperture computed tomography. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2001;109(6): 375-379. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00085.x.
Nance R, Tyndall D, Levin LG, et al. Identification of root canals in molars by tuned-aperture computed tomography. International Endodontic Journal. 2000;33(4): 392-396. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00330.x.
Webber RL, Horton RA, Underhill TE, et al. Comparison of film, direct digital, and tuned-aperture computed tomography images to identify the location of crestal defects around endosseous titanium implants. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 1996;81(4): 480-490. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80029-1.
Tyndall DA, Clifton TL, Webber RL, et al. TACT imaging of primary caries. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 1997;84(2): 214-225. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90072-X.
Nair MK, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, et al. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 1998;27(2): 80-84. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600323.
Abreu Junior M, Tyndall DA, Platin E, et al. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT). Dentomaxillofacial radiology. 1999;28(3): 152-157. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600430.
Yamamoto K, Hayakawa Y, Kousuge Y, et al. Diagnostic value of tuned-aperture computed tomography versus conventional dentoalveolar imaging in assessment of impacted teeth. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2003;95(1): 109-118. doi: 10.1067/moe.2003.17.
Liang H, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, et al. Cross-sectional presurgical implant imaging using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT). Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 1999;28(4): 232-237. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600451.
Shi XQ, Han P, Welander U, et al. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2001;30(1): 45-49. doi:10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600576.
Harase Y, Araki K, Okano T. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2006;101(6): 791-796. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.04.005.
Nair MK, Grondahl HG, Webber RL, et al. Effect of iterative restoration on the detection of artificially induced vertical radicular fractures by Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2003;96(1): 118-125. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00304-4.
Tachibana H, Matsumoto K. Applicability of X-ray computerized tomography in endodontics. Dental Traumatology. 1990;6(1): 16-20. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.1990.tb00381.x.
Robinson S, Czerny C, Gahleitner A, et al. Dental CT evaluation of mandibular first premolar root configurations and canal variations. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2002;93(3): 328-332. doi: 10.1067/moe.2002.120055.
Ngan DC, Kharbanda OP, Geenty JP, et al. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs. Australian Orthodontic Journal. 2003;19(2): 67-75. doi: 10.3316/informit.967055338250650.
Goto TK, Nishida S, Nakamura Y, et al. The accuracy of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance 3D vibe images of the mandible: an in vitro comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2007;103(4): 550-559. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.03.011.
Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW. Pre-surgical dental implant assessment by magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Oral Implantology. 1996;22(2): 147-153.
Monsour PA, Dudhia R. Implant radiography and radiology. Australian Dental Journal. 2008;53 (Suppl.1): 11-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00037.x.
Tutton LM, Goddard PR. MRI of the teeth. The British Journal of Radiology. 2002;75(894): 497-569. doi: 10.1259/bjr.75.894.750552.
DelBalso AM. Lesions of the jaws. Seminars in Ultrasound,CT and MRI. 1995;16(6): 487-512. doi: 10.1016/S0887-2171(06)80022-3.
Eggers G, Rieker M, Kress B, et al. Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine. 2005;18: 103-111. doi: 10.1007/s10334-005-0101-0.
Gahleitner A, Solar P, Nasel C, et al. Magnetic resonance tomography in dental radiology dental MRI). Radiologe. 1999;39: 1044-1050. doi: 10.1007/s001170050600.
Gundappa M, Ng SY, Whaites EJ. Comparison of ultrasound, digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2006;35(5): 326-333. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/60326577.
Cotti E, Campisi G, Garau V, et al. A new technique for the study of periapical bone lesions: ultrasound real time imaging. International Endodontic Journal. 2002;35(2): 148-152. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00458.x
Cotti E, Campisi G, Ambu R, Dettori C. Ultrasound real-time imaging in the differential diagnosis of periapical lesions. International Endodontic Journal. 2003;36(8): 556-563. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00690.x.
Barnett SB, Ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC, et al. International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 2000;26(3): 355- 366. doi: 10.1016/S0301-5629(00)00204-0.
Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, et al. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. International Endodontic Journal. 2007;40(10): 818-830. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01299.x.
Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2009;42(6): 463-475. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01531.x.
Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. Journal-Canadian Dental Association 2006;72(1): 75-80.
Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Araki M, et al. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT. Journal of Oral Science. 2006;48(1): 27-34. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.48.27.
Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Kameoka S, et al. Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2007;36(8): 465-471. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/22818643.
Mora MA, Mol A, Tyndall DA, et al. In vitro assessment of local computed tomography for the detection of longitudinal tooth fractures. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2007;103(6): 825-829. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.09.009.
Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, et al. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography forthe diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2007;103(1): 114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.001.
Estrela C, Bueno MR, Leles CR, et al. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramicand periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis. Journal of Endodontics. 2008;34(3): 273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.023.
Patel S, Dawood A, Mannocci F, et al. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws usingcone beam computedtomography and intraoralradiography. International Endodontic Journal. 2009;42(6): 507-515. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01538.x.
Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2006;35(6): 410-416. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/20987648.
Farman AG. ALARA still applies. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology. 2005;4(100): 395-397. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.05.055.
Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. International Endodontic Journal. 2003;36(2): 86-92.
Peters OA, Schonenberger K, Laib A. Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. International Endodontic Journal. 2001;34(3): 221-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00373.x
