Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi
Özet
Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (KIBT), tıbbi görüntülemenin dijitalleşmesiyle diş hekimliği radyolojisinde çığır açan, maksillofasiyal bölgenin dental ve iskeletsel dokularını üç boyutlu (3D) olarak inceleyen modern bir hacimsel tanı teknolojisidir. Geleneksel dental radyografilerin üst üste binen iki boyutlu sınırlamalarını aşan KIBT, tıbbi bilgisayarlı tomografiye kıyasla daha düşük maliyet, daha az yer kaplama ve daha düşük radyasyon dozu avantajlarıyla öne çıkmaktadır. Sistemin temel çalışma prensibi, konik şekilli x ışını demetinin iki boyutlu bir dedektör üzerine yönlendirilerek sabit hastanın başı etrafında tek bir rotasyonla (180-360 derece) ham veriler elde etmesine dayanır. Bu ham veriler, Feldkamp gibi çeşitli yazılımsal algoritmalarla rekonstrüksiyon sürecinden geçirilerek multiplanar (aksiyal, sagittal, koronal) görüntülere dönüştürülür. Cihazlarda yüksek uzamsal çözünürlük sağlayan amorf silikon veya CMOS teknolojisine sahip düz panel dedektörler ile her üç düzlemde de eşit netlik sunan izotropik vokseller kullanılır. Görüntü kalitesi; x ışını jeneratörü, tarama hacmi (FOV), hasta hareketi ve bit derinliği (gri skala) gibi faktörlerden doğrudan etkilenirken, ışın demetinin sertleşmesi veya metal objelere bağlı artefaktlar bozulmalara yol açabilir. Klinik uygulamalarda radyasyon güvenliğini korumak adına ALARA ilkesi gözetilmeli ve rutin bir prosedür yerine yalnızca geleneksel iki boyutlu yöntemlerin yetersiz kaldığı durumlarda tercih edilmelidir.
Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is a modern volumetric diagnostic technology that has revolutionized dental radiology through the digitization of medical imaging, allowing three-dimensional (3D) visualization of the dental and skeletal tissues of the maxillofacial region. Overcoming the superimposed two-dimensional limitations of traditional dental radiographs, CBCT stands out with benefits such as lower cost, smaller footprint, and reduced radiation dose compared to multi-slice medical computed tomography. The basic operating principle of the system relies on directing a cone-shaped X-ray beam onto a two-dimensional detector, acquiring raw projection data through a single rotation (180 to 360 degrees) around the patient's stable head. These raw data undergo a software-driven reconstruction process using algorithms, primarily the Feldkamp algorithm, to generate multiplanar (axial, sagittal, coronal) images. The devices utilize flat-panel detectors consisting of amorphous silicon or CMOS technology to achieve high spatial resolution, alongside isotropic voxels that ensure identical image quality across all three planes. While image quality is directly influenced by exposure factors, field of view (FOV) size, patient movement, and bit depth (gray scale), it can be degraded by various artifacts related to beam hardening, patient motion, or metallic streaking. In clinical practice, the ALARA principle must be strictly observed to minimize radiation exposure, and CBCT should be leveraged not as a routine procedure, but only when lower-dose two-dimensional imaging fails to provide sufficient diagnostic information.
Referanslar
Yoon DC, Mol A, Benn DK, et al. Digital radiographic image processing and analysis. 2018;62(3):341-359.
Boeddinghaus R, Whyte AJEjor. Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. 2008;66(3):396-418.
Nemtoi A, Czink C, Haba D, et al. Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. 2013;42(8):20120443.
Suomalainen A, Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E, Robinson SJIii. Dentomaxillofacial imaging with panoramic views and cone beam CT. 2015;6(1):1-16.
Kiljunen T, Kaasalainen T, Suomalainen A, et al. Dental cone beam CT: A review. 2015;31(8):844-860.
Jain S, Choudhary K, Nagi R, et al. New evolution of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: Combining digital technologies. 2019;49(3):179-190.
White SC, Pharoah MJJDCoNA. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. 2008;52(4):689-705.
Hayashi T, Arai Y, Chikui T, et al. Clinical guidelines for dental cone-beam computed tomography. 2018;34(2):89-104.
Durack C, Patel SJBdj. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. 2012;23:179-191.
Adibi S, Zhang W, Servos T, et al. Cone beam computed tomography in dentistry: what dental educators and learners should know. 2012;76(11):1437-1442.
Kalender WAJPiM, Biology. X-ray computed tomography. 2006;51(13):R29.
A. H. Görüntüleme Yöntemleri. In: Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi. 1st ed. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri Tic. Ltd. Şti; 2014. p. 215-221.
Tozoğlu ÜJTKJoO, Topics MR-S. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografinin çalışma prensibi ve kullanım alanları. 2016;2(1):9-13.
Robb RAJItomi. The dynamic spatial reconstructor: an x-ray video-fluoroscopic CT scanner for dynamic volume imaging of moving organs. 1982;1(1):22-33.
Cho PS, Johnson RH, Griffin TWJPiM, et al. Cone-beam CT for radiotherapy applications. 1995;40(11):1863.
Machin K, Webb SJPiM, Biology. Cone-beam X-ray microtomography of small specimens. 1994;39(10):1639.
Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic PJJ-CDA. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. 2006;72(1):75.
White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology-E-Book: Principles and interpretation. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
Scarfe WC, Farman AGJDCoNA. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? 2008;52(4):707-730.
Pauwels R. What Is CBCT and How Does It Work? In: Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Springer; 2018. p. 13-42.
Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C, de Azevedo BC, et al. Dental and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography. In: Handbook of X-ray Imaging. CRC Press; 2017. p. 867-886.
Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, et al. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. 2012;57:46-60.
Abramovitch K, Rice DDJDC. Basic principles of cone beam computed tomography. 2014;58(3):463-484.
Özcan İJİMSvY, İstanbul, Türkiye, ss. Diş hekimliğinde radyolojinin esasları. 2017;1188.
Stiller WJEjor. Basics of iterative reconstruction methods in computed tomography: a vendor-independent overview. 2018;109:147-154.
Bushberg JT SJ, Leidholdt Jr E. . The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging. 4th ed: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW); 2020.
Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, et al. Reduction of scatter-induced image noise in cone beam computed tomography: effect of field of view size and position. 2016;121(2):188-195.
Ludlow J, Timothy R, Walker C, et al. Effective dose of dental CBCT—a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. 2015;44(1):20140197.
Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen J, et al. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. 2015;44(1):20140224.
Baba R, Ueda K, Okabe MJDr. Using a flat-panel detector in high resolution cone beam CT for dental imaging. 2004;33(5):285-290.
Sheth NM, Zbijewski W, Jacobson MW, et al. Mobile C‐Arm with a CMOS detector: Technical assessment of fluoroscopy and Cone‐Beam CT imaging performance. 2018;45(12):5420-5436.
Kaasalainen T, Ekholm M, Siiskonen T, et al. Dental cone beam CT: An updated review. 2021;88:193-217.
Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, et al. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. 1999;28(4):245-248.
ÖZDEDE M, CS PJTKO, Topics MR-S. Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi: Teknik, Çalışma İlkeleri ve Görüntü Oluşumu. 2019;5(1):1-6.
Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JWJJa. Practical cone-beam algorithm. 1984;1(6):612-619.
Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel AJJodi. Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review. 2013;26(4):813-820.
Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, et al. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. 2008;106(4):561-562.
Use of cone-beam computed tomography in endodontics Joint Position Statement of the American Association of Endodontists and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics 2011;111(2):234-237.
Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, et al. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. 2012;113(6):817-826.
Association ADACoSAJTJotAD. The use of cone-beam computed tomography in dentistry: an advisory statement from the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. 2012;143(8):899-902.
Brüllmann D, Schulze RJDR. Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications—what do we know today? 2015;44(1):20140204.
Ralph W, Jefferies JJJooR. The minimal width of the periodontal space. 1984;11(5):415-418.
