Ortodontide Alerji: Güncel Bulgular, Risk Faktörleri ve Klinik Yönetim
Synopsis
The choice between 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot conventional bracket systems has been debated for decades. Laboratory studies have demonstrated that the 0.018-inch slot provides earlier full torque expression. However, whether this biomechanical difference translates into clinical outcomes remained unclear until recently. This review integrates the biomechanical rationale regarding slot dimension, manufacturing tolerances in commercial brackets, and current clinical evidence. Manufacturing variability, active ligation with stainless steel ligatures, and the adaptive response of the periodontal ligament explain why differences measured in the laboratory do not manifest clinically. Current evidence indicates that bracket slot size selection can be based on practical considerations such as archwire inventory and clinical workflow rather than a presumed biomechanical superiority.
References
Kerosuo H, Hensten-Pettersen A. Salivary nickel and chromium in subjects with different types of fixed orthodontic appliances. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthope- dics. 1997;111(6):595-8.
Imani MM, Mozaffari HR, Ramezani M, Sadeghi M. Effect of fixed orthodontic treatment on salivary nickel and chromium levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Dentistry journal. 2019;7(1):21.
Schmalz G, Arenholt-Bindslev D. Biocompatibility of dental materials: Springer; 2009.
Sifakakis I, Eliades T. Adverse reactions to orthodontic materials. Australian dental journal. 2017;62:20-8.
Thyssen JP, Menné T. Metal Allergy A Review on Exposures, Penetration, Genetics, Prevalen- ce, and Clinical Implications. Chemical research in toxicology. 2010;23(2):309-18.
Gell PGH, Coombs RRA. Clinical aspects of immunology. 1963.
Rajan T. The Gell–Coombs classification of hypersensitivity reactions: a re-interpretation. TRENDS in Immunology. 2003;24(7):376-9.
Hamann CP. Natural rubber latex protein sensitivity in review. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis. 1993;4(1):4-21.
Abbas AK, Lichtman AH, Pillai S. Cellular and molecular immunology E-Book: cellular and molecular immunology E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menné T, Johansen JD. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population–prevalence and main findings. Contact dermatitis. 2007;57(5):287-99.
Eliades T, Athanasiou AE. In vivo aging of orthodontic alloys: implications for corrosion poten- tial, nickel release, and biocompatibility. The Angle Orthodontist. 2002;72(3):222-37.
Chakravarthi S, Padmanabhan S, Chitharanjan AB. Allergy and orthodontics. Journal of ortho- dontic science. 2012;1(4):83-7.
Schalock PC, Crawford G, Nedorost S, Scheinman PL, Atwater AR, Mowad C, et al. Patch testing for evaluation of hypersensitivity to implanted metal devices: a perspective from the American Contact Dermatitis Society. Dermatitis. 2016;27(5):241-7.
Noble J, Ahing S, Karaiskos N, Wiltshire W. Nickel allergy and orthodontics, a review and re- port of two cases. British Dental Journal. 2008;204(6):297-300.
Minciullo PL, Paolino G, Vacca M, Gangemi S, Nettis E. Unmet diagnostic needs in contact oral mucosal allergies. Clinical and Molecular Allergy. 2016;14(1):10.
Johansen JD, Aalto‐Korte K, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bircher A, Bruze M, et al. European So- ciety of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing–recommendations on best practice. Contact dermatitis. 2015;73(4):195-221.
Syed M, Chopra R, Sachdev V. Allergic reactions to dental materials-a systematic review. Jour- nal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015;9(10):ZE04.
Sun C-H, Lin L-H, Hsu BS, Lee S-Y. Nickel Allergy in Orthodontic. Taiwanese Journal of Ort- hodontics. 2010;22(4):1.
Bakula A, Lugović-Mihić L, Šitum M, Turčin J, Šinković A. Contact allergy in the mouth: di- versity of clinical presentations and diagnosis of common allergens relevant to dental practice. Acta Clinica Croatica. 2011;50(4):553-61.
Rahilly G, Price N. Nickel allergy and orthodontics. Journal of orthodontics. 2003;30(2):171-4.
Raap U, Stiesch M, Reh H, Kapp A, Werfel T. Investigation of contact allergy to dental metals in 206 patients. Contact dermatitis. 2009;60(6):339-43.
Rai R, Dinakar D, Kurian SS, Bindoo Y. Investigation of contact allergy to dental materials by patch testing. Indian dermatology online journal. 2014;5(3):282-6.
De Graaf NP, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Bontkes H, Gibbs S, Rustemeyer T. A retrospective study on titanium sensitivity: Patch test materials and manifestations. Contact dermatitis. 2018;79(2):85-90.
Gawkrodger D. Investigation of reactions to dental materials. British journal of dermatology. 2005;153(3):479-85.
Heinzerling L, Mari A, Bergmann K-C, Bresciani M, Burbach G, Darsow U, et al. The skin prick test–European standards. Clinical and translational allergy. 2013;3(1):3.
Hain M, Longman L, Field E, Harrison J. Natural rubber latex allergy: implications for the ort- hodontist. Journal of Orthodontics. 2007;34(1):6-11.
Nucera E, Aruanno A, Rizzi A, Centrone M. Latex allergy: current status and future perspecti- ves. Journal of Asthma and Allergy. 2020:385-98.
Kloukos D, Pandis N, Eliades T. Bisphenol-A and residual monomer leaching from orthodontic adhesive resins and polycarbonate brackets: a systematic review. American journal of ortho- dontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2013;143(4):S104-S12. e2.
Lee T-H, Huang T-K, Lin S-Y, Chen L-K, Chou M-Y, Huang H-H. Corrosion resistance of different nickel-titanium archwires in acidic fluoride-containing artificial saliva. Angle Ortho- dontist. 2010;80(3):547-53.
Eliades T. Orthodontic materials research and applications: part 2. Current status and projected future developments in materials and biocompatibility. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;131(2):253-62.
Leite LP, Bell RA, editors. Adverse hypersensitivity reactions in orthodontics. Seminars in Ort- hodontics; 2004: Elsevier.
Kolokitha O-EG, Chatzistavrou E. Allergic reactions to nickel-containing orthodontic applian- ces: clinical signs and treatment alternatives. World journal of orthodontics. 2008;9(4).
Schultz JC, Connelly E, Glesne L, Warshaw EM. Cutaneous and oral eruption from oral expo- sure to nickel in dental braces. DERM. 2004;15(3):154-7.
Mikulewicz M, Chojnacka K. Release of metal ions from orthodontic appliances by in vitro studies: a systematic literature review. Biological trace element research. 2011;139(3):241-56.
Comino-Garayoa R, Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann J, Peláez J, López-Suárez C, Martínez-González JM, Suárez MJ. Allergies to titanium dental implants: what do we really know about them? A scoping review. Biology. 2020;9(11):404.
Kao C-T, Huang T-H. Variations in surface characteristics and corrosion behaviour of metal brackets and wires in different electrolyte solutions. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2010;32(5):555-60.
House K, Sernetz F, Dymock D, Sandy JR, Ireland AJ. Corrosion of orthodontic appli- ances—should we care? American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2008;133(4):584-92.
Wiertelak-Makała K, Szymczak-Pajor I, Bociong K, Śliwińska A. Considerations about cyto- toxicity of resin-based composite dental materials: A systematic review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;25(1):152.
Ferreira M, Costa H, Veiga N, Correia MJ, Gomes AT, Lopes PC. Do Clear Aligners Release Toxic Chemicals?—A Systematic Review. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2025;16(5):173.
Rashid H, Sheikh Z, Vohra F. Allergic effects of the residual monomer used in denture base acrylic resins. European journal of dentistry. 2015;9(04):614-9.
Yilmaz H, Aydin C, Çaglar A, Ya, scedil A. The effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the residual monomer content of two denture base resins. Quintessence International. 2003;34(2).
Bichu YM, Alwafi A, Liu X, Andrews J, Ludwig B, Bichu AY, et al. Advances in orthodontic clear aligner materials. Bioactive materials. 2023;22:384-403.
Awosika O, Kao S, Rengifo-Pardo M, Ehrlich A. Angioedema, Urticaria, and Stomatitis Cau- sed by Contact Allergy to Invisalign. Dermatitis: Contact, Atopic, Occupational, Drug: Offici- al Journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society, North American Contact Dermatitis Group. 2017.
Di Spirito F, Amato A, Di Palo MP, Ferraro R, Cannatà D, Galdi M, et al. Oral and extra-oral manifestations of hypersensitivity reactions in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2024;15(7):175.
Moreira MR, Matos LG, de Souza ID, Brigante TAV, Queiroz MEC, Romano FL, et al. Bisphe- nol A release from orthodontic adhesives measured in vitro and in vivo with gas chromatog- raphy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2017;151(3):477-83.
Hassan R, Aslam Khan MU, Abdullah AM, Abd Razak SI. A review on current trends of poly- mers in orthodontics: BPA-free and smart materials. Polymers. 2021;13(9):1409.
Bationo R, Jordana F, Boileau M-J, Colat-Parros J. Release of monomers from orthodontic ad- hesives. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2016;150(3):491-8.
Purushothaman D, Kailasam V, Chitharanjan AB. Bisphenol A release from orthodontic adhe- sives and its correlation with the degree of conversion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2015;147(1):29-36.
Schweikl H, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G. Genetic and cellular toxicology of dental resin mono- mers. Journal of dental research. 2006;85(10):870-7.
Tillberg A, Stenberg B, Berglund A. Reactions to resin‐based dental materials in patients–type, time to onset, duration, and consequence of the reaction. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;61(6):313- 9.
Alizadehgharib S, Östberg AK, Dahlstrand Rudin A, Dahlgren U, Christenson K. The effects of the dental methacrylates TEGDMA, Bis‐GMA, and UDMA on neutrophils in vitro. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research. 2020;6(4):439-47.
Ekambaram M, Yiu CKY, Matinlinna JP. An overview of solvents in resin–dentin bonding. International journal of adhesion and adhesives. 2015;57:22-33.
Pithon MM, Mendes JL, da Silva CA, Lacerda dos Santos R, Coqueiro RdS. Force decay of latex and non-latex intermaxillary elastics: a clinical study. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2016;38(1):39-43.
Santos RLd, Pithon MM, Martins FO, Romanos MTV, Ruellas ACdO. Cytotoxicity of latex and non-latex orthodontic elastomeric ligatures on L929 mouse fibroblasts. Brazilian Dental Jour- nal. 2010;21:205-10.
Kelso JM. Allergic contact stomatitis from orthodontic rubber bands. Annals of Allergy, Asth- ma & Immunology. 2007;98(1):99-100.
Dendooven E, Foubert K, Naessens T, Pieters L, Lambert J, Aerts O. Isocyanates may contribute to allergic contact dermatitis from diabetes devices and wound dressings. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87(5):414-9.
Amato A, Martina S, De Benedetto G, Michelotti A, Amato M, Di Spirito F. Hypersensitivity in Orthodontics: A systematic review of oral and extra-oral reactions. Journal of Clinical Medici- ne. 2025;14(13):4766.
Pazzini CA, Marques LS, Pereira LJ, Corrêa-Faria P, Paiva SM. Allergic reactions and nickel-free braces: a systematic review. Brazilian Oral Research. 2011;25:85-90.
Shah KM, Agrawal MR, Chougule SA, Mistry JD. Oral lichenoid reaction due to nickel alloy contact hypersensitivity. Case Reports. 2013;2013:bcr2013009754.
Lodolo M, Gobbo M, Bussani R, Torelli L, Rupel K, Ottaviani G, et al. Histopathology of oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: An exploratory cross‐sectional study. Oral Diseases. 2023;29(3):1259-68.
Waal IVd. Oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions; a critical appraisal with emphasis on the diagnostic aspects. 2009.
Peterson MR, Wong PH, Dickson SD, Coop CA. Allergic stomatitis from orthodontic adhesi- ves. Military Medicine. 2017;182(3-4):e1883-e5.
Kerosuo H, Kullaa A, Kerosuo E, Kanerva L, Hensten-Pettersen A. Nickel allergy in adolescents in relation to orthodontic treatment and piercing of ears. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 1996;109(2):148-54.
Bugude SS. A rare type 1 hypersensitivity to latex in dental treatment setting and management. Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii. 2022;39(2):421- 3.
Leone F, Gori A, Cinicola BL, Colletti G, Pignataro E, Capponi M, et al. Nickel-induced labial angioedema in a pediatric patient with orthodontic braces: a case report. Italian journal of pediatrics. 2025;51(1):2.
Jevon P, Shamsi S. Management of anaphylaxis in the dental practice: an update. British Dental Journal. 2020;229(11):721-8.
Resuscitation Council U. Emergency treatment of anaphylaxis: Guidelines for healthcare provi- ders. Working Group of Resuscitation Council UK. 2021.
Gölz L, Papageorgiou SN, Jäger A. Nickel hypersensitivity and orthodontic treatment: a syste- matic review and meta‐analysis. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73(1):1-14.
Fors R, Persson M, Bergström E, Stenlund H, Stymne B, Stenberg B. Nickel allergy–prevalence in a population of Swedish youths from patch test and questionnaire data. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;58(2):80-7.
Saǧlam AMŞ, Baysal V, Ceylan AM. Nickel and cobalt hypersensitive reaction before and after orthodontic therapy in children. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2006;5(4):79- 90.
Pantuzo MCG, Zenóbio EG, Marigo HdA, Zenóbio MAF. Hypersensitivity to conventional and to nickel-free orthodontic brackets. Brazilian oral research. 2007;21:298-302.
Menné T. Quantitative aspects of nickel dermatitis. Sensitization and eliciting threshold con- centrations. Science of the total environment. 1994;148(2-3):275-81.
Zuberbier T, Abdul Latiff AH, Abuzakouk M, Aquilina S, Asero R, Baker D, et al. The interna- tional EAACI/GA²LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria. Allergy. 2022;77(3):734-66.
Feller L, Wood NH, Khammissa RAG, Lemmer J. allergic contact stomatitis. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2017;123(5):559-65.
van Breugel M, Greenhawt M, Eguiluz-Gracia I, Jaen MJT, Anagnostou A, Koppelman GH. Ar- tificial Intelligence in allergy and immunology: recent developments, implementation challen- ges, and the road towards clinical impact. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2025.