Kemik Adacığı (Enostosis)
Synopsis
Kemik adacığı (enostoz), endokondral kemikleşme sürecindeki gelişimsel bir hata sonucu medüller kavitede oluşan, neoplazi olmayan ve hamartom olarak kabul edilen kompakt bir kemik odağıdır. Genellikle asemptomatik seyreden bu benign lezyonlar, çoğunlukla iskelet sisteminin her yerinde, özellikle uzun kemiklerde ve pelviste rastlantısal olarak tespit edilir. Boyutları tipik olarak 1 mm ile 2 cm arasında değişmekle birlikte, 2 cm’den büyük olanlar nadir görülen "dev kemik adası" kategorisinde sınıflandırılır ve bazen ağrı gibi semptomlara yol açabilir. Teşhisinde direkt grafi, bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) ve manyetik rezonans (MR) görüntüleme yöntemleri kullanılır; BT’de çevreleyen trabeküllerle karışan "fırça benzeri" veya "yıldızlı" görünüm patognomoniktir. Enostozlar, iskelet sintigrafisinde genellikle "soğuk" karakterde olup düşük FDG alımı sergilediklerinden, yüksek metabolizma gösteren osteoblastik metastazlar ve osteosarkom gibi malign tümörlerin ayırıcı tanısında kritik öneme sahiptir. Klinik yaklaşımda, asemptomatik vakalar tedavi gerektirmeyip takip edilirken; hızlı büyüme gösteren şüpheli lezyonlarda biyopsi veya cerrahi eksizyon planlanabilir.
A bone island (enostosis) is a developmental focus of compact bone located within the medullary cavity, resulting from an error in endochondral ossification, and is classified as a hamartoma rather than a neoplasm. Typically asymptomatic, these benign lesions are predominantly discovered incidentally across various parts of the skeletal system, most frequently in the long bones and pelvis. While their size usually ranges between 1 mm and 2 cm, lesions exceeding 2 cm are categorized as rare "giant bone islands" and may occasionally present with symptoms like localized pain. Diagnosis leverages plain radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); a "brush-like" or "stellate" border blending with surrounding trabeculae on CT is pathognomonic. Enostoses are generally "cold" on bone scintigraphy and exhibit low FDG uptake on PET-CT, which serves as a crucial feature in differentiating them from malignant processes like osteoblastic metastases or osteosarcoma. In clinical practice, asymptomatic cases require no intervention other than routine clinical observation, whereas biopsy or conservative surgical excision is indicated for symptomatic lesions or those showing rapid intervals of growth.
References
Norman A, G.A., Sclerosing dysplasias of bone, in Radiology - Diagnosis, imaging, F.J. Taveras JM, Editor. 1986, Lippincott: Philadelphia.
Ulano, A., et al., Distinguishing Untreated Osteoblastic Metastases From Enostoses Using CT Attenuation Measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2016. 207(2): p. 362-8.
Baumhoer D, B.M., Sumathi VP, Osteoma, in WHO Classification of Tumours Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours, V.A.W. Dilani Lokuhetty, Ian A. Cree, Editor. 2020, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): France. p. 391-393.
Gold, R.H., et al., Case report 527: Giant bone island of tibia. Skeletal Radiol, 1989. 18(2): p. 129-32.
Benli, I.T., et al., Epidemiological, clinical and radiological aspects of osteopoikilosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1992. 74(4): p. 504-6.
Gould, C.F., et al., Bone Tumor Mimics: Avoiding Misdiagnosis. Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology, 2007. 36(3): p. 124-141.
Ng, C., et al., Osteopoikilosis: A Benign Condition With the Appearance of Metastatic Bone Disease. J Clin Oncol, 2015. 33(18): p. e77-8.
Korkmaz, M.F., et al., Osteopoikilosis: report of a familial case and review of the literature. Rheumatol Int, 2015. 35(5): p. 921-4.
Burger, B., et al., Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome in a three-generation family: influence of a novel LEMD3 mutation to tropoelastin expression. Eur J Dermatol, 2010. 20(6): p. 693-7.
Hellemans, J., et al., Loss-of-function mutations in LEMD3 result in osteopoikilosis, Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome and melorheostosis. Nat Genet, 2004. 36(11): p. 1213-8.
Sala, F., et al., Bone islands incidentally detected on computed tomography: frequency of enostosis and differentiation from untreated osteoblastic metastases based on CT attenuation value. Br J Radiol, 2019. 92(1103): p. 20190249.
Greenspan, A., G. Steiner, and R. Knutzon, Bone island (enostosis): clinical significance and radiologic and pathologic correlations. Skeletal Radiol, 1991. 20(2): p. 85-90.
Trombetti, A. and E. Noël, Giant bone islands: a case with 31 years of follow-up. Joint Bone Spine, 2002. 69(1): p. 81-4.
Onitsuka, H., Roentgenologic aspects of bone islands. Radiology, 1977. 123(3): p. 607-12.
Go, R.T., G.Y. El-Khoury, and M.A. Wehbe, Radionuclide bone image in growing and stable bone island. Skeletal Radiol, 1980. 5(1): p. 15-8.
Buğdaycı, O., I. Cengic, and D. Türeli, The Value of Computed Tomography in Evaluating Benign and Malignant Bone Lesions. Nükleer Tıp Seminerleri, 2016. 2: p. 15-20.
Hwang, Y.J., Follow-up CT and MR findings of osteoblastic spinal metastatic lesions after stereotactic radiotherapy. Jpn J Radiol, 2012. 30(6): p. 492-8.
Gou, Q., et al., Case report of a rare giant bone island in a vertebral body combined with hemangioma. J Int Med Res, 2021. 49(5): p. 3000605211010699.
Dähnert, W., Radiology Review Manual. 2017: Wolters Kluwer.
Greenspan, A., Bone island (enostosis): current concept--a review. Skeletal Radiol, 1995. 24(2): p. 111-5.
Gould, C.F., et al., Bone tumor mimics: avoiding misdiagnosis. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol, 2007. 36(3): p. 124-41.
