Görüntüleme Yöntemleri
Özet
Kas-iskelet sistemi görüntülemesi, travmatik ve dejeneratif hastalıkların tanısı, karakterizasyonu, tedavi planlaması ve izleminde önemli bir yere sahiptir. Radyografi, bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT), manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) ve ultrasonografi (US), farklı anatomik yapıların ve patolojik süreçlerin değerlendirilmesinde birbirini tamamlayan yöntemlerdir. Radyografi; yaygın erişilebilirliği, hızlı uygulanabilirliği ve kemik yapıların değerlendirilmesindeki etkinliği nedeniyle özellikle akut travmada ilk basamak görüntüleme yöntemi olarak kullanılmaktadır. BT, yüksek uzaysal çözünürlüğü ve multiplanar görüntüleme özelliği sayesinde kompleks ve intraartiküler kırıkların, kemik morfolojisinin ve cerrahi anatominin ayrıntılı değerlendirilmesine olanak sağlar. MRG, üstün yumuşak doku kontrastı nedeniyle kemik iliği, intervertebral disk, kıkırdak, menisküs, kas, tendon ve bağ patolojilerinin değerlendirilmesinde önemli bir role sahiptir. US ise yüzeyel kas-iskelet yapılarının gerçek zamanlı ve dinamik olarak incelenmesine olanak sağlamasının yanı sıra görüntüleme eşliğinde gerçekleştirilen girişimlerde de yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Kırıkların ve kırık iyileşmesinin değerlendirilmesinde, omurganın dejeneratif hastalıklarında ve ekstremitelerin sık görülen kemik, eklem ve yumuşak doku patolojilerinde görüntüleme bulgularının doğru yorumlanması klinik yaklaşımın belirlenmesinde önemli rol oynar. Sonuç olarak, uygun görüntüleme yönteminin klinik bulgular ve şüphelenilen patoloji doğrultusunda seçilmesi ve radyolojik bulguların klinik verilerle bütünleştirilmesi; doğru tanı, uygun tedavi planlaması ve rehabilitasyon sürecinin etkin biçimde yönlendirilmesi açısından kritik öneme sahiptir.
Musculoskeletal imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis, characterization, treatment planning, and follow-up of traumatic and degenerative disorders. Radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasonography (US) provide complementary information in the evaluation of different anatomical structures and pathological processes. Radiography remains the first-line imaging modality, particularly in acute trauma, because of its widespread availability, rapid acquisition, and effectiveness in assessing osseous structures. CT, with its high spatial resolution and multiplanar imaging capabilities, allows detailed evaluation of complex and intra-articular fractures, osseous morphology, and surgical anatomy. MRI provides superior soft-tissue contrast and is particularly valuable for assessing the bone marrow, intervertebral discs, cartilage, menisci, muscles, tendons, and ligaments. US enables real-time and dynamic evaluation of superficial musculoskeletal structures and is also widely used to guide interventional procedures. Accurate interpretation of imaging findings plays an important role in clinical decision-making in the assessment of fractures and fracture healing, degenerative spinal disorders, and common osseous, articular, and soft-tissue abnormalities of the extremities. In conclusion, selecting the appropriate imaging modality according to clinical findings and the suspected pathology, together with integrating radiological findings with clinical data, is essential for accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment planning, and effective guidance of the rehabilitation process.
Referanslar
Abaraa B. Insights into musculoskeletal imaging: comprehending techniques, applications, and advances. International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology. 2024;19(2):71-73. doi: 10.37532/1758- 4272.
Kumar Y, Hayashi D. Role of imaging in musculoskeletal care. Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports. 2016; 4:28–36. doi: 10.1007/s40141-016-0106-9
Sehgal S. Imaging modalities in musculoskeletal examination 2023. [cited 2026 March 9] Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books
Seidenberg PH, Howe AH. Musculoskeletal imaging: types and indications. The Medical clinics of North America . 2014;98(4):895-xiv. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2014.04.003
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006 ;37(8):691-697. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130.
Perron AD, Miller MD, Brady WJ. Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: radiographically occult hip fracture.The American journal of emergency medicine. 2002;20(3):234-237. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.33007.
Rammelt S, Zwipp H. Calcaneus fractures: facts, controversies and recent developments. Injury. 2004;35(5):443-461. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.10.006.
Brunner A, Horisberger M, Ulmar B et al. Classification systems for tibial plateau fractures; does computed tomography scanning improve their reliability? Injury. 2010;41(2):173-178. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.08.016.
Cabarrus MC, Ambekar A, Lu Y et al. MRI and CT of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis and the proximal femur. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2008;191(4):995-1001. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3714.
Fredericson M, Bergman AG, Hoffman KL et al. Tibial stress reaction in runners. Correlation of clinical symptoms and scintigraphy with a new magnetic resonance imaging grading system. The American journal of sports medicine. 1995;23(4):472-481. doi: 10.1177/036354659502300418.
Sepúlveda M, Téllez C, Villablanca V et al. Distal femoral fractures in children. EFORT open reviews. 2022;7(4):264-273. doi: 10.1530/EOR-21-0110.
Vaccaro AR, Lehman RA Jr, Hurlbert RJ et al. A new classification of thoracolumbar injuries: the importance of injury morphology, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurologic status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(20):2325-2333. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182986.43345.cb.
Schwarzenberg P, Darwiche S, Yoon RS, Dailey HL. Imaging modalities to assess fracture healing. Current osteoporosis reports. 2020;18(3):169-179. doi:10.1007/s11914-020-00584-5
Islam O, Soboleski D, Symons S et al. Development and duration of radiographic signs of bone healing in children.AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2000 ;175(1):75-78. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750075.
Haughton V. Imaging intervertebral disc degeneration.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2006 ;88(2):15-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00010.
Masui T, Yukawa Y, Nakamura S et al. Natural history of patients with lumbar disc herniation observed by magnetic resonance imaging for minimum 7 years. Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. 2005 ;18(2):121-126. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000154452.13579.b2.
Fardon DF, Williams AL, Dohring EJ et al. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society. 2014;14(11):2525-2545. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.04.022.
Carette S, Fehlings MG. Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy.The New England journal of medicine. 2005 ;353(4):392-399. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp043887.
Post NH, Cooper PR, Frempong-Boadu AK et al. Unique features of herniated discs at the cervicothoracic junction: clinical presentation, imaging, operative management, and outcome after anterior decompressive operation in 10 patients. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(3):497-501.doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000197118.86658.A6.
Brinjikji W, Diehn FE, Jarvik JG et al. MRI Findings of Disc Degeneration are More Prevalent in Adults with Low Back Pain than in Asymptomatic Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology. 2015;36(12):2394-2399. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4498.
Konieczny MR, Reinhardt J, Prost M et al. Signal intensity of lumbar disc herniations: correlation with age of herniation for extrusion, protrusion, and sequestration.International journal of spine surgery. 2020;14(1):102-107. doi: 10.14444/7014.
Cowley P. Neuroimaging of spinal canal stenosis.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America. 2016 ;24(3):523-539. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2016.04.009.
Yasuda T, Suzuki K, Kawaguchi Y et al. Clinical and imaging characteristics in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar epidural lipomatosis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2018;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1988-8.
Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH et al. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study.The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society. 2009;9(7):545-550. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005.
Kim K, Mendelis J, Cho W. Spinal epidural lipomatosis: a review of pathogenesis, characteristics, clinical presentation, and management.Global spine journal. 2019;9(6):658-665. doi: 10.1177/2192568218793617.
Genevay S, Atlas SJ. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology. 2010;24(2):253-265. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2009.11.001.
Ogikubo O, Forsberg L, Hansson T. The relationship between the cross-sectional area of the cauda equina and the preoperative symptoms in central lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 2007;32(13):1423-1428. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318060a5f5.
Expósito Jiménez D, Álvarez de Sierra Garcia B. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis and classification of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis-a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery. 2024;14(11):7891-7907. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-574.
Akkawi I, Zmerly H. Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: anarrative review.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis. 2022 ;92(6):e2021313. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i6.10526.
Alomari S, Judy B, Sacino AN et al. Isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults… A review of the current literature. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2022;101:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.04.042
Koslosky E, Gendelberg D. Classification in brief: the meyerding classification system of spondylolisthesis.Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2020;478(5):1125-1130. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001153.
Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2006;17(12):1726-1733. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4.
Memarsadeghi M, Breitenseher MJ, Schaefer-Prokop C et al. Occult scaphoid fractures: comparison of multidetector CT and MR imaging--initial experience. Radiology. 2006 ;240(1):169-176. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2401050412.
Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. Epidemiology and classification.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 1998;80(3):476-484. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b3.8079.
Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: part I. Classification and evaluation. 1970.Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2006;442:77-82. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000198718.91223.ca.
Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Birkmeyer JD. Trends in the United States in the treatment of distal radial fractures in the elderly.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2009;91(8):1868-1873. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01297.
Kaya T. Kas iskelet- yumuşak doku radyolojisi. (1. baskı). Bursa:Nobel&Güneş Tıp Kitapevi; 2008.
Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Abe H et al. Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: From mass-screening in one village.Journal of orthopaedics. 2013;10(1):8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.008.
Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Osawa T et al. Prevalence and risk factors of a rotator cuff tear in the general population.Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2010;19(1):116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.006.
Seitz AL, McClure PW, Finucane S et al. Mechanisms of rotator cuff tendinopathy: intrinsic, extrinsic, or both? Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2011;26(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.08.001.
Roy JS, Braën C, Leblond J et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, MRI and MR arthrography in the characterisation of rotator cuff disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British journal of sports medicine2015;49(20):1316-1328. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094148.
Rutten MJ, Maresch BJ, Jager GJ et al. Ultrasound of the rotator cuff with MRI and anatomic correlation.European journal of radiology. 2007;62(3):427-436. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.12.003.
McCrum E. MR imaging of the rotator cuff. Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America. 2020 ;28(2):165-179. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2019.12.002.
Lapegue F, André A, Lafourcade F et al. Ultrasound of lateral epicondylitis. Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology. 2024;28(6):683-693. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791510.
Karanasios S, Korakakis V, Moutzouri M et al. Diagnostic accuracy of examination tests for lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) - A systematic review. Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists. 2022 ;35(4):541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.02.002.
Konarski W, Poboży T, Kotela A et al. Ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of medial epicondylalgia and medial elbow pain-imaging findings and narrative literature review. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;10(8):1529. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10081529.
Cho MJ, Chai JW, Kim DH et al. Ultrasonographic differential diagnosis of medial elbow pain. Ultrasonography. 2024;43(5):299-313. doi: 10.14366/usg.24102
Paluch AJ, Burden EG, Batten TJ et al. Defining tennis elbow characteristics - The assessment of magnetic resonance imaging defined tendon pathology in an asymptomatic population. Shoulder Elbow. 2024;16(2):206-213. doi: 10.1177/17585732221146731.
Padua L, Cuccagna C, Giovannini S et al, Carpal tunnel syndrome: updated evidence and new questions. The Lancet. Neurology. 2023;22(3):255-267. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00432-X.
Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. The Lancet. Neurology. 2016;15(12):1273-1284. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30231-9
Cartwright MS, Hobson-Webb LD, Boon AJ, et al. Evidence-based guideline: neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle & nerve. 2012;46(2):287-293. doi:10.1002/mus.23389
Ng AWH, Griffith JF, Tong CSL, et al. MRI criteria for diagnosis and predicting severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. Skeletal radiology. 2020;49(3):397-405. doi:10.1007/s00256-019-03291-0
Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture. The Toronto experience 1968--1975. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 1979;(138):94-104.
Pandey R, McNally E, Ali A, et al. The role of MRI in the diagnosis of occult hip fractures. Injury. 1998;29(1):61-63. doi:10.1016/s0020-1383(97)00165-4.
Buckley R, Tough S, McCormack R, et al. Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 2002;84(10):1733-1744. doi:10.2106/00004623-200210000-00001
Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393(10182):1745-1759. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9
Lespasio MJ, Sultan AA, Piuzzi NS, et al. Hip osteoarthritis: a primer. The Permanente journal. 2018;22:17-084. doi:10.7812/TPP/17-084
Altman RD, Gold GE. Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15 Suppl A:A1-A56. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.009
Taljanovic MS, Graham AR, Benjamin JB, et al. Bone marrow edema pattern in advanced hip osteoarthritis: quantitative assessment with magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with clinical examination, radiographic findings, and histopathology. Skeletal radiology. 2008;37(5):423-431. doi:10.1007/s00256-008-0446-3
Tannast M, Siebenrock KA, Anderson SE. Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2007;188(6):1540-1552. doi:10.2214/AJR.06.0921
Fearon AM, Cook JL, Scarvell JM et al. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome negatively affects work, physical activity and quality of life: a case control study. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2014;29(2):383-386. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.016
Connell DA, Bass C, Sykes CA et al. Sonographic evaluation of gluteus medius and minimus tendinopathy. European radiology. 2003;13(6):1339-1347. doi:10.1007/s00330-002-1740-4
Westacott DJ, Minns JI, Foguet P. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in gluteal tendon tears--a systematic review. Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy. 2011;21(6):637-645. doi:10.5301/HIP.2011.8759
Englund M, Guermazi A, Lohmander LS. The meniscus in knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America. 2009;35(3):579-590. doi:10.1016/j.rdc.2009.08.004
De Smet AA. How I diagnose meniscal tears on knee MRI. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2012;199(3):481-499. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.8663
Helms CA. The meniscus: recent advances in MR imaging of the knee. AJR. American journal of roentgenology. 2002;179(5):1115-1122. doi:10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791115
Stäbler A, Glaser C, Reiser M. Musculoskeletal MR: knee. European radiology. 2000;10(2):230-241. doi:10.1007/s003300050039
Jones AC, Ledingham J, McAlindon T, et al. Radiographic assessment of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 1993;52(9):655-658. doi:10.1136/ard.52.9.655
Fan T, Ruan G, Antony B, et al. The interactions between MRI-detected osteophytes and bone marrow lesions or effusion-synovitis on knee symptom progression: an exploratory study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021;29(9):1296-1305. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2021.06.008
Schadow JE, Maxey D, Smith TO, et al. Systematic review of computed tomography parameters used for the assessment of subchondral bone in osteoarthritis. Bone. 2024;178:116948. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2023.116948.
Margetic P, Salaj M, Lubina IZ. The value of ultrasound in acute ankle injury: comparison with MR. European journal of trauma and emergency surgery . 2009;35(2):141-146. doi:10.1007/s00068-008-7174-1
Ahmad ZY, Rasiej MJ. Imaging of the ankle ligaments and cartilage injuries as an aid to ankle preservation surgery. Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR. 2023;44(4):319-331. doi:10.1053/j.sult.2023.04.002
Chhabra A, Subhawong TK, Carrino JA. MR imaging of deltoid ligament pathologic findings and associated impingement syndromes. Radiographics. 2010;30(3):751-761. doi:10.1148/rg.303095756
Nielson JH, Gardner MJ, Peterson MG, et al. Radiographic measurements do not predict syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures: an MRI study. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2005;(436):216-221. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000161090.86162.19
Knapik JJ, Pope R. Achilles tendinopathy: pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and screening. Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2020;20(1):125-140. doi:10.55460/QXTX-A72P.
Tarantino D, Mottola R, Resta G, et al. Achilles tendinopathy pathogenesis and management: a narrative review. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2023;20(17):6681. doi:10.3390/ijerph20176681
Dams OC, Reininga IHF, Gielen JL et al. Imaging modalities in the diagnosis and monitoring of Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review. Injury. 2017;48(11):2383-2399. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.09.013
Gatz M, Spang C, Alfredson H. Partial Achilles tendon rupture-a neglected entity: a narrative literature review on diagnostics and treatment options. Journal of clinical medicine. 2020;9(10):3380. doi:10.3390/jcm9103380
Goff JD, Crawford R. Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis. American family physician. 2011;84(6):676-682.
Trojian T, Tucker AK. Plantar Fasciitis. American family physician. 2019;99(12):744-750.
