Görüntüleme Algoritması: Periapikal Radyografı, Panoramik Radyografi, Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi Endikasyonları ve Yorumlama

Freire BB, Nascimento EHL, de Faria VK, et al. Radiologic assessment of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study of panoramic radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography, and cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2019;128(2): 166-175.

Gupta S, Bhowate RR, Nigam N, et al. Evaluation of impacted mandibular third molars by panoramic radiography. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2011;2011(1): 406714.

White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology-E-Book: Principles and interpretation: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.

Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dental Clinics of North America. 2008;52(4): 707-730.

Flygare L, Ohman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clinical Oral Investigation. 2008;12(4): 291-302.

Nguyen E, Grubor D, Chandu A. Risk factors for permanent injury of inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during third molar surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;72(12): 2394-2401.

European Commission. Cone beam ct for dental and maxillofacial radiology; evidencebased guidelines. RP 172, Luxembourg. 2012

Matzen LH, Wenzel A. Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review - based on a hierarchical model of evidence. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2015;44: 20140189. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20140189

Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, et al. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2007;65: 1303–1308.

Khojastepour L, Khaghaninejad MS, Hasanshahi R, et al. Does the Winter or Pell and Gregory Classification System indicate the apical position of impacted mandibular third molars? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;77(11): 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.06.004.

Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1990;28: 20–25.

Gilvetti C, Haria S, Gulati A. Is juxta-apical radiolucency a reliable risk factor for injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during removal of lower third molars? British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;57(5): 430-434.

Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2007;103(2): 253-259.

Jung YH, Cho BH. Assessment of maxillary third molars with panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2015;45(4): 233-240.

Pauwels R. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: dose matters. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2015;165(4): 156-161.

Brown J, Jacobs R, Levring JE, et al. Basic training requirements for the use of dental CBCT by dentists: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2014;43(1): 20130291.

Jaju PP, Jaju SP. Cone-beam computed tomography: Time to move from ALARA to ALADA. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2015;45(4): 263-265.

Ertaş E, Arslan H, Çapar İ, ve ark. Endodontide konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015;24(1): 113-118.

Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. International Journal of Dentistry. 2009;2009: 634567.

Baccher S, Gowdar IM, Guruprasad Y, et al. CBCT: A comprehensive overview of its applications and clinical significance in dentistry. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2024;16(Suppl 3):1923-1925.

Kutalmış Büyük S, Ramoğlu Sİ. Ortodontik teşhiste konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2011;20(3):227-34.

Assiri H, Dawasaz AA, Alahmari A, et al. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in periodontal diseases: a systematic review based on the efficacy model. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1): 191.

Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1): 102-121.

Pamukçu U, İspir NG, Alkurt MT, ve ark. Dental implantlardaki komplikasyonların konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2021;8(2): 367-371.

Akay G, Yıldızer Keriş E, Güngör K. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile gömülü dişlerin değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology-Special Topics. 2019;5(1): 145-150.

Larheim T, Abrahamsson A, Kristensen M, et al. Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2015;44(1): 20140235.

Bromberg N, Brizuela M. Dental cone beam computed tomography. 1th ed. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.

Guerrero M, Shahbazian M, Elsiena BG, et al. The diagnostic efficacy of cone beam CT for impacted teeth and associated features: a systematic review. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2011;38(3):208-16.

Ness GM, Blakey GH, Hechler BL. Impacted teeth. Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Springer Cham. 2022: 131-69.

Balcı AA, Öztürk HP, Avsever İH. The prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in nonsyndromic dental patients of a Turkish subpopulation. Journal of International Dental Sciences. 2024;10(2): 85-94.

Jerjes W, Swinson B, Moles DR, et al. Permanent sensory nerve impairment following third molar surgery: a prospective study. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Endodontic. 2006;102(4): 1-7.

Jerjes W, Upile T, Shah P, et al. Risk factors associated with injury to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves following third molar surgery-revisited. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Endodontic. 2010;109(3): 335-345.

Koong B, Pharoah MJ, Bulsara M, et al. Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Austuralian Dental Journal. 2006;51(1): 64-68.

Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, et al. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009;38(9): 964-971.

Wang D, He X, Wang Y, et al. External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Investigation. 2017;21(4):1335-42.

Keskin Tunç S, Koc A. Evaluation of risk factors for external root resorption and dental caries of second molars associated with impacted third molars. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020;78(9): 1467-1477.

Oenning AC, Neves FS, Alencar PN, et al. External root resorption of the second molar associated with third molar impaction: comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;72(8): 1444-1455.

Agarwal P, Kumar S, Jain K, et al. Inverted maxillary third molar impactions. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;9(2):484-488.

Lanzer M, Pejicic R, Kruse AL, et al. Anatomic (positional) variation of maxillary wisdom teeth with special regard to the maxillary sinus. Swiss Dental Journal. 2015;125(5): 555-571.

Meara DJ. Evaluation of third molars: clinical examination and imaging techniques. Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2012;20(2): 163-168.

Kirkham-Ali K, La M, Sher J, et al. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic imaging in assessing the relationship between posterior maxillary tooth roots and the maxillary sinus: A systematic review. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry. 2019;10(3): 12402.

Jung Y-H, Cho B-H. Assessment of maxillary third molars with panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2015;45(4):233-40.

Pico CL, do Vale FJ, Caramelo FJ,et al. Comparative analysis of impacted upper canines: Panoramic radiograph Vs Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2017;9(10): 1176-1182.

Peralta-Mamani M, Rubira CM, López-López J,et al. CBCT vs panoramic radiography in assessment of impacted upper canine and root resorption of the adjacent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2024;16(2): 198-222.

Rossini G, Cavallini C, Cassetta M,et al. Localization of impacted maxillary canines using cone beam computed tomography. Review of the literature. Annals of Stomatology. 2012;3(1): 14-18.

Mossaz J, Kloukos D, Pandis N, et al. Morphologic characteristics, location, and associated complications of maxillary and mandibular supernumerary teeth as evaluated using cone beam computed tomography. European Journal of Orthodontic. 2014;36(6): 708-718.

Liu D-g, Zhang W-l, Zhang Z-y, et al. Three-dimensional evaluations of supernumerary teeth using cone-beam computed tomography for 487 cases. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2007;103(3): 403-4011.

Drage N. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in general dental practice. Primary Dental journal. 2018;7(1): 26-30.

Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2011;40(5): 265-273.

Freire BB, Nascimento EHL, de Faria VK, et al. Radiologic assessment of mandibular third molars: an ex vivo comparative study of panoramic radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography, and cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2019;128(2): 166-175.

Gupta S, Bhowate RR, Nigam N, et al. Evaluation of impacted mandibular third molars by panoramic radiography. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2011;2011(1): 406714.

White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology-E-Book: Principles and interpretation: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.

Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dental Clinics of North America. 2008;52(4): 707-730.

Flygare L, Ohman A. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clinical Oral Investigation. 2008;12(4): 291-302.

Nguyen E, Grubor D, Chandu A. Risk factors for permanent injury of inferior alveolar and lingual nerves during third molar surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;72(12): 2394-2401.

European Commission. Cone beam ct for dental and maxillofacial radiology; evidencebased guidelines. RP 172, Luxembourg. 2012

Matzen LH, Wenzel A. Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review - based on a hierarchical model of evidence. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2015;44: 20140189. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20140189

Nakagawa Y, Ishii H, Nomura Y, et al. Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2007;65: 1303–1308.

Khojastepour L, Khaghaninejad MS, Hasanshahi R, et al. Does the Winter or Pell and Gregory Classification System indicate the apical position of impacted mandibular third molars? Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;77(11): 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.06.004.

Rood JP, Shehab BA. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1990;28: 20–25.

Gilvetti C, Haria S, Gulati A. Is juxta-apical radiolucency a reliable risk factor for injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during removal of lower third molars? British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;57(5): 430-434.

Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology. 2007;103(2): 253-259.

Jung YH, Cho BH. Assessment of maxillary third molars with panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2015;45(4): 233-240.

Pauwels R. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: dose matters. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2015;165(4): 156-161.

Brown J, Jacobs R, Levring JE, et al. Basic training requirements for the use of dental CBCT by dentists: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2014;43(1): 20130291.

Jaju PP, Jaju SP. Cone-beam computed tomography: Time to move from ALARA to ALADA. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2015;45(4): 263-265.

Ertaş E, Arslan H, Çapar İ, ve ark. Endodontide konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015;24(1): 113-118.

Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. International Journal of Dentistry. 2009;2009: 634567.

Baccher S, Gowdar IM, Guruprasad Y, et al. CBCT: A comprehensive overview of its applications and clinical significance in dentistry. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences. 2024;16(Suppl 3):1923-1925.

Kutalmış Büyük S, Ramoğlu Sİ. Ortodontik teşhiste konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2011;20(3):227-34.

Assiri H, Dawasaz AA, Alahmari A, et al. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in periodontal diseases: a systematic review based on the efficacy model. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1): 191.

Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry. 2017;51(3 Suppl 1): 102-121.

Pamukçu U, İspir NG, Alkurt MT, ve ark. Dental implantlardaki komplikasyonların konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2021;8(2): 367-371.

Akay G, Yıldızer Keriş E, Güngör K. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi ile gömülü dişlerin değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Klinikleri Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology-Special Topics. 2019;5(1): 145-150.

Larheim T, Abrahamsson A, Kristensen M, et al. Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2015;44(1): 20140235.

Bromberg N, Brizuela M. Dental cone beam computed tomography. 1th ed. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.

Guerrero M, Shahbazian M, Elsiena BG, et al. The diagnostic efficacy of cone beam CT for impacted teeth and associated features: a systematic review. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2011;38(3):208-16.

Ness GM, Blakey GH, Hechler BL. Impacted teeth. Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Springer Cham. 2022: 131-69.

Balcı AA, Öztürk HP, Avsever İH. The prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in nonsyndromic dental patients of a Turkish subpopulation. Journal of International Dental Sciences. 2024;10(2): 85-94.

Jerjes W, Swinson B, Moles DR, et al. Permanent sensory nerve impairment following third molar surgery: a prospective study. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Endodontic. 2006;102(4): 1-7.

Jerjes W, Upile T, Shah P, et al. Risk factors associated with injury to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves following third molar surgery-revisited. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Endodontic. 2010;109(3): 335-345.

Koong B, Pharoah MJ, Bulsara M, et al. Methods of determining the relationship of the mandibular canal and third molars: a survey of Australian oral and maxillofacial surgeons. Austuralian Dental Journal. 2006;51(1): 64-68.

Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, et al. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009;38(9): 964-971.

Wang D, He X, Wang Y, et al. External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography. Clinical Oral Investigation. 2017;21(4):1335-42.

Keskin Tunç S, Koc A. Evaluation of risk factors for external root resorption and dental caries of second molars associated with impacted third molars. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020;78(9): 1467-1477.

Oenning AC, Neves FS, Alencar PN, et al. External root resorption of the second molar associated with third molar impaction: comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;72(8): 1444-1455.

Agarwal P, Kumar S, Jain K, et al. Inverted maxillary third molar impactions. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019;9(2):484-488.

Lanzer M, Pejicic R, Kruse AL, et al. Anatomic (positional) variation of maxillary wisdom teeth with special regard to the maxillary sinus. Swiss Dental Journal. 2015;125(5): 555-571.

Meara DJ. Evaluation of third molars: clinical examination and imaging techniques. Atlas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2012;20(2): 163-168.

Kirkham-Ali K, La M, Sher J, et al. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic imaging in assessing the relationship between posterior maxillary tooth roots and the maxillary sinus: A systematic review. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry. 2019;10(3): 12402.

Jung Y-H, Cho B-H. Assessment of maxillary third molars with panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 2015;45(4):233-40.

Pico CL, do Vale FJ, Caramelo FJ,et al. Comparative analysis of impacted upper canines: Panoramic radiograph Vs Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2017;9(10): 1176-1182.

Peralta-Mamani M, Rubira CM, López-López J,et al. CBCT vs panoramic radiography in assessment of impacted upper canine and root resorption of the adjacent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. 2024;16(2): 198-222.

Rossini G, Cavallini C, Cassetta M,et al. Localization of impacted maxillary canines using cone beam computed tomography. Review of the literature. Annals of Stomatology. 2012;3(1): 14-18.

Mossaz J, Kloukos D, Pandis N, et al. Morphologic characteristics, location, and associated complications of maxillary and mandibular supernumerary teeth as evaluated using cone beam computed tomography. European Journal of Orthodontic. 2014;36(6): 708-718.

Liu D-g, Zhang W-l, Zhang Z-y, et al. Three-dimensional evaluations of supernumerary teeth using cone-beam computed tomography for 487 cases. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2007;103(3): 403-4011.

Drage N. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in general dental practice. Primary Dental journal. 2018;7(1): 26-30.

Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2011;40(5): 265-273.