Araştırma ve Yayınlarda Üretken Yapay Zeka Kullanımı ve Etik

Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlükleri. https://sozluk.gov.tr/ (Erişim Tarihi:06.09.2024)

Topakkaya A, Eyibaş Y. Yapay zekâ ve etik ilişkisi. Felsefe Dünyası Dergisi. 2019;70: 81-99.

Küçükvardar M, Aslan A, Bayrakcı S. Yapay zekâ ve etik üzerine bir araştırma. Atlas Journal, 2020;6(36): 1065-1077.

Scherer MU. Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. 2016;29(2): 354-400.

Yeşilkaya N. Yapay Zekâya Dair Etik Sorunlar. Journal of Oriental Scientific Research. 2022;14(3): 949-963.

Ünal E. Üretken yapay zekâ çağı ve ChatCPT. Bilim ve Teknik, 2023; 56-64.

Patil NH, Patel SH, Lawand SD. Research Paper On Artificial Intelligence And It’s Applications. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 2023;44(S-8): 229-238.

Çelebi V, İnal A. Yapay zekâ bağlamında etik problemi. The Journal of International Social Research. 2019;12(66): 651-661.

Çelebi V. Searle ve Nagel’in Bilinç Kuramlarında Fizikalizm Eleştirisi Bağlamında Yapay Zekânın Sınırı Tartışması. Beytülhikme Felsefe Dergisi. 2019;9(2): 351-376.

Gözet M, Filiz U, Yılmaz AE. Üretken yapay zekâ. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies. 2023;7(1): 32-40.

Khalifa M, Albadawy M. Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update. 2024;5: 1-11.

Khlaif ZN, Mousa A, Hattab MK, Itmazi J, Hassan AA, Sanmugam M, Ayyoub A. The potential and concerns of using AI in scientific research: ChatGPT performance evaluation. JMIR Med. Educ. 2023;14(9): e47049. doi:10.2196/47049.

Dergaa I, Chamari K, Zmijewski P, Ben Saad H. From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biol. Sport. 2023;40(2): 615-622.

Baidoo-Anu D, Ansah LO. Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI. 2023;7(1): 52-62.

Huang J, Tan M, The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2023;13(4): 1148-1154.

Semrl N, Feigl S, Taumberger N, Bracic T, Fluhr H, Blockeel C, Kollman M. AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT’s potential to assist academic writing. Hum. Reprod. 2023;38(12): 2281-2288. doi:10.1093/humrep/dead207.

Yükseköğretim Kurumları Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Faaliyetlerinde Üretken Yapay Zekâ Kullanımına Dair Etik Rehber, Yükseköğretim Kurulu, 2024.

Pehlivanlı EA. Güncel İşletme Yönetimi Çalışmaları. Yılmaz S, Kandır SY, Nakipoğlu B. (ed). Yapay Zekâ Etiği içinde. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi; 2021. p. 29-38.

Jia F, Sun D, Looi C. Artificial Intelligence in Science Education (2013–2023): Research Trends in Ten Years. Journal of Science Education and Technology (2024);33: 94–117. doi:10.1007/s10956-023-10077-6.

Baker-Brunnbauer J. Management perspective of ethics in artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics. 2020;1(2): 173-181. doi:10.1007/s43681-020-00022-3.

Ball Dunlap P, Michalowski M. Advancing AI Data Ethics in Nursing: Future Directions for Nursing Practice, Research, and Education. JMIR Nursing. 2024;7: e62678. doi:10.2196/62678.

Zhang R, Zhang Z, Wang D, Liu Z. Editorial: Responsible AI in healthcare: opportunities, challenges, and best practices. Front Comput Sci. 2023;5. doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2023.1265902.

Merhi MI. An assessment of the barriers impacting responsible artificial intelligence. Inf Syst Front. Jun. 2023;25(3): 1147-1160. doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10276-3.

Morandín-Ahuerma, F. Veintitrés principios de Asilomar para la inteligencia artificial y elfuturo de la vida. F. Morandín (ed.) Principios Normativos Para Una Ética De La İnteligencia Artificial içinde. Mexico: 2023. p.5-27.

A definition of AI: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. 2019.

Draft text of the Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence with track-changes. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377898 (Erişim Tarihi: 09.09.2024)

Golan R, Reddy R, Muthigi A, Ramasamy R. Artificial intelligence in academic writing: A paradigm-shifting technological advance. Nature Reviews Urology. 2023. doi:10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x.

Alshater MM. Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing academic performance: A case study of ChatGPT. SSRN Electronik Journal. 2022; doi:10.2139/ssrn.4312358.

Májovský M, Černý M, Kasal M, Komarc M, Netuka D. Artificial intelligence can generate fraudulent but authentic-looking scientific medical articles: Pandora’s box has been opened. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2023;25: e46924. doi:10.2196/46924.

Resnik DB, Hosseini M. The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: New guidance needed for a new tool. AI and Ethics. 2024. doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8.

The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives, European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels, European Union, 2020.

Giray L. Prompt engineering with ChatGPT: a guide for academic writers. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51(12): 2629-2633. doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03272.

Svab I, Klemenc-Ketis Z, Zupanic S, New challenges in scientific publications: Referencing, artificial intelligence and ChatGPT, Zdr Varst. 2023;62(3): 109-112. doi:10.2478/sjph-2023-0015

Hammad M. The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) Programs on writing scientific research. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51(3): 459-460. doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03140-1.

Christou P, Нow to use Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a resource, methodological and analysis tool in qualitative research?. The Qualitative Report. 2023;28(7): 1968-1980. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406.

Lubowitz JH. Guidelines for the use of generative artificial intelligence tools for biomedical journal authors and reviewers. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2024;40(3): 651-652.

Tang A, Li KK, Kwok KO, Cao L, Luong S, Tam W. The importance of transparency: declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2024;56: 314-318. doi:10.1111/jnu.12938.

Wagner G, Lukyanenko R, Pare G. Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews, J. Inform. Technol. 20222;37(2): 209-226. doi:10.1177/02683962211048201.

Ossa LA, Lorenzini G, Milford SR, Shaw D, Elger BS, Rost M. Integrating ethics in AI development: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics. 2024;25(1): 1-11. doi:10.1186/s12910-023-01000-0.

Pinzolits R. AI in academia: An overview of selected tools and their areas of application. MAP Education and Humanities. 2023;4(1): 37-50. doi:10.53880/2744-2373.2023.4.37.

Limongi R. The use of artificial intelligence in scientific research with integrity and ethics. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies. 2024;16(1): e845. doi:10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2024.v16i1.845.

Özdemir L, Bilgin A. Sağlıkta Yapay Zekanın Kullanımı ve Etik Sorunlar. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi. 2021;8(3): 439-445. doi:10.54304/SHYD.2021.63325.

Güvenilir Yapay Zeka İçin Etik Kurallar, Yapay Zeka Yüksek Düzey Uzman Grubu, Avrupa Komisyonu, 2019.

Yapay Zeka Sistemlerinin Kullanımında Kamu Görevlilerinin Uyması Gereken Etik Davranış İlkeleri, T.C. Kamu Görevlileri Etik Kurulu, 2024.

Bensason İ, Dericioğlu Egemen A, Kaspi R, Küzeci E, Sezgin Ö, Uyan B. Yapay Zekâ Etik İlkeleri ve Hukuki Düzenlemeler Raporu. Türkiye Yapay Zekâ İnisiyatifi (TRAI), 2024.

Türk Dil Kurumu Sözlükleri. https://sozluk.gov.tr/ (Erişim Tarihi:06.09.2024)

Topakkaya A, Eyibaş Y. Yapay zekâ ve etik ilişkisi. Felsefe Dünyası Dergisi. 2019;70: 81-99.

Küçükvardar M, Aslan A, Bayrakcı S. Yapay zekâ ve etik üzerine bir araştırma. Atlas Journal, 2020;6(36): 1065-1077.

Scherer MU. Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. 2016;29(2): 354-400.

Yeşilkaya N. Yapay Zekâya Dair Etik Sorunlar. Journal of Oriental Scientific Research. 2022;14(3): 949-963.

Ünal E. Üretken yapay zekâ çağı ve ChatCPT. Bilim ve Teknik, 2023; 56-64.

Patil NH, Patel SH, Lawand SD. Research Paper On Artificial Intelligence And It’s Applications. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 2023;44(S-8): 229-238.

Çelebi V, İnal A. Yapay zekâ bağlamında etik problemi. The Journal of International Social Research. 2019;12(66): 651-661.

Çelebi V. Searle ve Nagel’in Bilinç Kuramlarında Fizikalizm Eleştirisi Bağlamında Yapay Zekânın Sınırı Tartışması. Beytülhikme Felsefe Dergisi. 2019;9(2): 351-376.

Gözet M, Filiz U, Yılmaz AE. Üretken yapay zekâ. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies. 2023;7(1): 32-40.

Khalifa M, Albadawy M. Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update. 2024;5: 1-11.

Khlaif ZN, Mousa A, Hattab MK, Itmazi J, Hassan AA, Sanmugam M, Ayyoub A. The potential and concerns of using AI in scientific research: ChatGPT performance evaluation. JMIR Med. Educ. 2023;14(9): e47049. doi:10.2196/47049.

Dergaa I, Chamari K, Zmijewski P, Ben Saad H. From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biol. Sport. 2023;40(2): 615-622.

Baidoo-Anu D, Ansah LO. Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning. Journal of AI. 2023;7(1): 52-62.

Huang J, Tan M, The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2023;13(4): 1148-1154.

Semrl N, Feigl S, Taumberger N, Bracic T, Fluhr H, Blockeel C, Kollman M. AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT’s potential to assist academic writing. Hum. Reprod. 2023;38(12): 2281-2288. doi:10.1093/humrep/dead207.

Yükseköğretim Kurumları Bilimsel Araştırma ve Yayın Faaliyetlerinde Üretken Yapay Zekâ Kullanımına Dair Etik Rehber, Yükseköğretim Kurulu, 2024.

Pehlivanlı EA. Güncel İşletme Yönetimi Çalışmaları. Yılmaz S, Kandır SY, Nakipoğlu B. (ed). Yapay Zekâ Etiği içinde. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitabevi; 2021. p. 29-38.

Jia F, Sun D, Looi C. Artificial Intelligence in Science Education (2013–2023): Research Trends in Ten Years. Journal of Science Education and Technology (2024);33: 94–117. doi:10.1007/s10956-023-10077-6.

Baker-Brunnbauer J. Management perspective of ethics in artificial intelligence. AI and Ethics. 2020;1(2): 173-181. doi:10.1007/s43681-020-00022-3.

Ball Dunlap P, Michalowski M. Advancing AI Data Ethics in Nursing: Future Directions for Nursing Practice, Research, and Education. JMIR Nursing. 2024;7: e62678. doi:10.2196/62678.

Zhang R, Zhang Z, Wang D, Liu Z. Editorial: Responsible AI in healthcare: opportunities, challenges, and best practices. Front Comput Sci. 2023;5. doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2023.1265902.

Merhi MI. An assessment of the barriers impacting responsible artificial intelligence. Inf Syst Front. Jun. 2023;25(3): 1147-1160. doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10276-3.

Morandín-Ahuerma, F. Veintitrés principios de Asilomar para la inteligencia artificial y elfuturo de la vida. F. Morandín (ed.) Principios Normativos Para Una Ética De La İnteligencia Artificial içinde. Mexico: 2023. p.5-27.

A definition of AI: Main capabilities and scientific disciplines. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. 2019.

Draft text of the Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence with track-changes. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377898 (Erişim Tarihi: 09.09.2024)

Golan R, Reddy R, Muthigi A, Ramasamy R. Artificial intelligence in academic writing: A paradigm-shifting technological advance. Nature Reviews Urology. 2023. doi:10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x.

Alshater MM. Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing academic performance: A case study of ChatGPT. SSRN Electronik Journal. 2022; doi:10.2139/ssrn.4312358.

Májovský M, Černý M, Kasal M, Komarc M, Netuka D. Artificial intelligence can generate fraudulent but authentic-looking scientific medical articles: Pandora’s box has been opened. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2023;25: e46924. doi:10.2196/46924.

Resnik DB, Hosseini M. The ethics of using artificial intelligence in scientific research: New guidance needed for a new tool. AI and Ethics. 2024. doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00493-8.

The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives, European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels, European Union, 2020.

Giray L. Prompt engineering with ChatGPT: a guide for academic writers. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51(12): 2629-2633. doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03272.

Svab I, Klemenc-Ketis Z, Zupanic S, New challenges in scientific publications: Referencing, artificial intelligence and ChatGPT, Zdr Varst. 2023;62(3): 109-112. doi:10.2478/sjph-2023-0015

Hammad M. The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) Programs on writing scientific research. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;51(3): 459-460. doi:10.1007/s10439-023-03140-1.

Christou P, Нow to use Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a resource, methodological and analysis tool in qualitative research?. The Qualitative Report. 2023;28(7): 1968-1980. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406.

Lubowitz JH. Guidelines for the use of generative artificial intelligence tools for biomedical journal authors and reviewers. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2024;40(3): 651-652.

Tang A, Li KK, Kwok KO, Cao L, Luong S, Tam W. The importance of transparency: declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2024;56: 314-318. doi:10.1111/jnu.12938.

Wagner G, Lukyanenko R, Pare G. Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews, J. Inform. Technol. 20222;37(2): 209-226. doi:10.1177/02683962211048201.

Ossa LA, Lorenzini G, Milford SR, Shaw D, Elger BS, Rost M. Integrating ethics in AI development: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics. 2024;25(1): 1-11. doi:10.1186/s12910-023-01000-0.

Pinzolits R. AI in academia: An overview of selected tools and their areas of application. MAP Education and Humanities. 2023;4(1): 37-50. doi:10.53880/2744-2373.2023.4.37.

Limongi R. The use of artificial intelligence in scientific research with integrity and ethics. Future Studies Research Journal: Trends and Strategies. 2024;16(1): e845. doi:10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2024.v16i1.845.

Özdemir L, Bilgin A. Sağlıkta Yapay Zekanın Kullanımı ve Etik Sorunlar. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi. 2021;8(3): 439-445. doi:10.54304/SHYD.2021.63325.

Güvenilir Yapay Zeka İçin Etik Kurallar, Yapay Zeka Yüksek Düzey Uzman Grubu, Avrupa Komisyonu, 2019.

Yapay Zeka Sistemlerinin Kullanımında Kamu Görevlilerinin Uyması Gereken Etik Davranış İlkeleri, T.C. Kamu Görevlileri Etik Kurulu, 2024.

Bensason İ, Dericioğlu Egemen A, Kaspi R, Küzeci E, Sezgin Ö, Uyan B. Yapay Zekâ Etik İlkeleri ve Hukuki Düzenlemeler Raporu. Türkiye Yapay Zekâ İnisiyatifi (TRAI), 2024.