Çocuk Diş Hekimliğinde Dijital Ölçü ve Ağız İçi Tarayıcılar
Özet
Bu bölüm, pediatrik diş hekimliğinde dijital ölçülerin ve ağız içi tarayıcıların rolünü inceler. Dijital teknolojinin ilerlemesiyle birlikte, diş hekimliği uygulamaları klinik sonuçları ve hasta deneyimini iyileştirmek için modern araçları benimsiyor. Dijital ölçüler, geleneksel ölçü tekniklerine olan ihtiyacı ortadan kaldıran önemli bir gelişmeyi temsil eder. Bu teknoloji, özellikle geleneksel yöntemlerin rahatsızlığa neden olabileceği pediatrik hastalarda hassas ve konforlu bir alternatif sunar. Ağız içi tarayıcılar, dişlerin ve ağız dokularının son derece doğru 3B görüntülerini yakalayarak, klinisyenlere özel diş restorasyonları oluşturmak için gerekli verileri sağlar. Bu tarayıcılar, gerçek zamanlı veri toplama, gelişmiş hasta iletişimi ve iyileştirilmiş klinik verimlilik gibi avantajlar sunar. Dijital ölçüler ayrıca işlem süresini azaltır, geleneksel ölçülerle ilişkili hataları en aza indirir ve hasta memnuniyetini artırır. Çalışmalar, dijital ölçülerin pediatrik hastalar tarafından iyi tolere edildiğini ve invaziv olmayan yapıları nedeniyle genellikle geleneksel yöntemlere tercih edildiğini göstermiştir. Bölüm, pediatrik bakımda dijital diş hekimliğinin artan önemini vurgular ve çocuklarda doğru teşhis, tedavi planlaması ve hasta iletişimi için ağız içi tarayıcıların kullanılmasının avantajlarını gösteren çeşitli klinik çalışmaları inceler.
This chapter explores the role of digital impressions and intraoral scanners in pediatric dentistry. With the advancement of digital technology, dental practices are adopting modern tools to improve clinical outcomes and patient experience. Digital impressions represent a key development, eliminating the need for traditional impression techniques. This technology offers a precise and comfortable alternative, especially in pediatric patients where traditional methods can cause discomfort. Intraoral scanners capture highly accurate 3D images of the teeth and oral tissues, providing clinicians with the necessary data to create custom dental restorations. These scanners offer benefits such as real-time data collection, enhanced patient communication, and improved clinical efficiency. Digital impressions also reduce procedural time, minimize errors associated with traditional impressions, and increase patient satisfaction. Studies have shown that digital impressions are well-tolerated by pediatric patients and are often preferred over traditional methods due to their non-invasive nature. The chapter highlights the growing importance of digital dentistry in pediatric care and examines various clinical studies that demonstrate the advantages of using intraoral scanners for accurate diagnoses, treatment planning, and patient communication in children.
Referanslar
Peşkersoy C, Acar G. Restoratif diş hekimliğinde dijitalleşme. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2023 43(50): 99-102.
Rekow ED. Digital dentistry: The new state of the art: Is it disruptive or destructive?. Dental Materials, 2020;36(1): 9–24.doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.08.103
Keleş Gülbahçe E, Şengün Berber E, Aykut Yetkiner A. Digital dentistry practices in pediatric dentistry. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;43(50): 55-60.
Alauddin MS, Baharuddin AS, Mohd Ghazali, MI. The modern and digital transformation of oral health care: A mini review. Healthcare, 2021;9(2): 118-133.doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020118
Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. Journal of Dental Research, 2014;93(12): 1232-1234.doi: 10.1177/0022034514553976
Lo Giudice, A. Advanced applications in pediatric dentistry: A worldwide perspective of the last 13 years. Children, 2023;10(10): 1678-1681.doi: 10.3390/children10101678
Hall MA, Karawia I, Mahmoud AZ, Mohamed OS. Knowledge, awareness, and perception of digital dentistry among Egyptian dentists: A cross-sectional study. BioMed Central Oral Health, 2023;23(1): 963-972.doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03698-1
Güth JF, Keul C., Stimmelmayr, M., Beuer, F., and Edelhoff, D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2013;17(4): 1201-1208.doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0
Akarçay Ç., Ulu Güzel K. İntraoral tarayıcı ve CAD/CAM sistemlerinin çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanım alanları. Ankara Diş Hekimleri Odası Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, 2022; 11(1): 78-84.doi:10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.942853
Çağlar İ, Yeşil Duymuş Z, Ateş S. Diş hekimliğinde kullanılan ölçü sistemlerinde güncel yaklaşımlar: Dijital ölçü. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2015;(25): 135-140.doi: 10.17567/dfd.96167
Angelone F, Ponsiglione AM, Ricciardi C, Cesarelli G, Sansone M, Amato F. Diagnostic applications of intraoral scanners: A systematic review. Journal of Imaging, 2023; 9(7): 134-157.doi: 10.3390/jimaging9070134
Naumovski B, Kapushevska B. Dimensional stability and acuracy of silicone-based impression materials using different impression techniques: A literature review. Prilozi, 2017;38(2):131-138.doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2017-0031
Pandey P, Mantri S, Bhasin A, Deogade SC.. Mechanical properties of a new vinyl polyether silicone in comparison to vinyl polysiloxane and polyether elastomeric impression materials. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 2019;10(2): 203-207.doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_324_18
Orhan A, Çetintaş Bezgin T, Orhan K. Digital Dentistry. 1st ed. İsviçre:Springer,Cham, 2024.
Sannino G, Germano F, Arcuri L, Bigelli E, Arcuri C, Barlattani A. CEREC CAD/CAM Chairside System. Oral and Implantology, 2015;7(3): 57-70.
Garino F, Garino GB. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts, World Journal Orthodontics, 2002;3(3): 250-254.
Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 2007;28(8): 422-431.
Onbaşı Y, Abu-Hossin S, Paulig M, Berger L, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Trueness of full-arch dental models obtained by digital and conventional impression techniques: An in vivo study. Scientific Reports, 2022;12(1): 1-9.doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26983-5
Cengiz S, Aksu Olcay F. Geleneksel ve dijital ölçülerin dezenfeksiyon ve sterilizasyon işlemleri. Dental and Medical Journal, 2021;3(2): 52-65.
Al-Hassiny A, Végh D, Bányai D, Végh Á, Géczi Z, Borbély J, Hermann P, Hegedüs T. User experience of intraoral scanners in dentistry: Transnational questionnaire study. International Dental Journal, 2023;73(5): 754-759.doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.04.002
Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: An assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2014;146(5): 673-682.doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.023
Yılmaz H, Aydın MN. Digital versus conventional impression method in children: Comfort, preference and time. International Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, 2019;29(6): 728-735.doi: 10.1111/ipd.12566
Bosoni C, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Souki BQ, Franchi L, Giuntini V. Comparison between digital and conventional impression techniques in children on preference, time and comfort: A crossover randomized controlled trial. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, 2023;26(4): 585-590.doi: 10.1111/ocr.12648
Serrano-Velasco D, Martín-Vacas A, Cintora-López P, Paz-Cortés MM, Aragoneses JM. Comparative analysis of the comfort of children and adolescents in digital and conventional full-arch ımpression methods: A crossover randomized trial. Children, 2024;1(2): 190-203.doi: 10.3390/children11020190
Ye JR, Park SH, Lee H, Hong SJ, Chae YK, Lee KE, Lee HS, Choi SC, Nam OH. Influence of limited mouth opening in children on intraoral scanning accuracy: An in vitro study. International Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, 2024;1-9.doi: 10.1111/ipd.13175
Patel J, Winters J, Walters M. Intraoral digital impression technique for a neonate with bilateral cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 2019; 56(8): 1120-1123.doi: 10.1177/1055665619835082
Choi YS, Shin HS. Preoperative planning and simulation in patients with cleft palate using ıntraoral three-dimensional scanning and printing. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2019;30(7): 2245-2248.doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005983
Schulz-Weidner N, Gruber M, Schraml EM, Wöstmann B, Krämer N, Schlenz MA. Improving the communication of dental findings in pediatric dentistry by using intraoral scans as a visual aid: A randomized clinical trial. Dentistry Journal. 2024;12(1): 15.doi: 10.3390/dj12010015
Schierz O, Hirsch C, Krey KF, Ganss C, Kämmerer PW, Schlenz MA. Digital dentistry and its impact on oral health-related quality of life. The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, 2024;24(15): 1-10.doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101946
Schulz-Weidner N, Gruber M, Wöstmann B, Uebereck CF, Krämer N, Schlenz MA. Occlusal caries detection with intraoral scanners in pediatric dentistry: A comparative clinical study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024;13(4): 925-936.doi: 10.3390/jcm13040925
Michou S, Vannahme C, Bakhshandeh A, Ekstrand KR, Benetti AR. Intraoral scanner featuring transillumination for proximal caries detection: An in vitro validation study on permanent posterior teeth. Journal of Dentistry, 2022;54(4): 324-325.doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103841
Schlenz MA, Schupp B, Schmidt A, Wöstmann B, Baresel I, Krämer N, Schulz-Weidner N. New caries diagnostic tools in intraoral scanners: A comparative in vitro study to established methods in permanent and primary teeth. Sensors, 2022;22(6): 2156-2174.doi: 10.3390/s22062156
Ntovas P, Michou S, Benetti AR, Bakhshandeh A, Ekstrand K, Rahiotis C, Kakaboura
Moro BLP, Michou S, Cenci MS, Mendes FM, Ekstrand KR. Secondary caries detection and treatment decision according to two criteria and the impact of a three-dimensional intraoral scanner on gap evaluation. Caries Research, 2023;57(2): 141-151.doi: 10.1159/000527292
Cuenin K, Chen J, Tai SK, Lee D, Gerges G, Oh H. Caries detection and characterization in pediatric patients using iTero 5D near-infrared technology. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2024;165(1): 54-63.doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.06.026
Schlenz MA, Schlenz MB, Wöstmann B, Glatt AS, Ganss C. Intraoral scanner-based monitoring of tooth wear in young adults: 24-month results. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023;27(6): 2775–2785.doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04858-x
Jung K, Giese-Kraft K, Fischer M, Schulze K, Schlueter N, Ganss C. Visualization of dental plaque with a 3D-intraoral-scanner: A tool for whole mouth planimetry. PloS One, 2022;17(10): 1-14.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276686
Skorulska A, Piszko P, Rybak Z, Szymonowicz M, Dobrzyński M. Review on polymer, ceramic and composite materials for CAD/CAM indirect restorations in dentistry: Application, mechanical characteristics and comparison. Materials, 2021;14(7): 1592-1616.doi: 10.3390/ma14071592
İnal CB, Bankoğlu Güngör M, Karakoca Nemli S. Hasta başı CAD-CAM uygulamaları. Ankara Diş Hekimleri Odası Klinik Bilimler Dergisi. 2023;12(3): 458-466.doi: 10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1174085
Jennes ME, Soetebeer M, Beuer F. In vivo full-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners: A narrative review. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 2022;25(1): 9-16.
Referanslar
Peşkersoy C, Acar G. Restoratif diş hekimliğinde dijitalleşme. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2023 43(50): 99-102.
Rekow ED. Digital dentistry: The new state of the art: Is it disruptive or destructive?. Dental Materials, 2020;36(1): 9–24.doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.08.103
Keleş Gülbahçe E, Şengün Berber E, Aykut Yetkiner A. Digital dentistry practices in pediatric dentistry. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;43(50): 55-60.
Alauddin MS, Baharuddin AS, Mohd Ghazali, MI. The modern and digital transformation of oral health care: A mini review. Healthcare, 2021;9(2): 118-133.doi: 10.3390/healthcare9020118
Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. Journal of Dental Research, 2014;93(12): 1232-1234.doi: 10.1177/0022034514553976
Lo Giudice, A. Advanced applications in pediatric dentistry: A worldwide perspective of the last 13 years. Children, 2023;10(10): 1678-1681.doi: 10.3390/children10101678
Hall MA, Karawia I, Mahmoud AZ, Mohamed OS. Knowledge, awareness, and perception of digital dentistry among Egyptian dentists: A cross-sectional study. BioMed Central Oral Health, 2023;23(1): 963-972.doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03698-1
Güth JF, Keul C., Stimmelmayr, M., Beuer, F., and Edelhoff, D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2013;17(4): 1201-1208.doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0
Akarçay Ç., Ulu Güzel K. İntraoral tarayıcı ve CAD/CAM sistemlerinin çocuk diş hekimliğinde kullanım alanları. Ankara Diş Hekimleri Odası Klinik Bilimler Dergisi, 2022; 11(1): 78-84.doi:10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.942853
Çağlar İ, Yeşil Duymuş Z, Ateş S. Diş hekimliğinde kullanılan ölçü sistemlerinde güncel yaklaşımlar: Dijital ölçü. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2015;(25): 135-140.doi: 10.17567/dfd.96167
Angelone F, Ponsiglione AM, Ricciardi C, Cesarelli G, Sansone M, Amato F. Diagnostic applications of intraoral scanners: A systematic review. Journal of Imaging, 2023; 9(7): 134-157.doi: 10.3390/jimaging9070134
Naumovski B, Kapushevska B. Dimensional stability and acuracy of silicone-based impression materials using different impression techniques: A literature review. Prilozi, 2017;38(2):131-138.doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2017-0031
Pandey P, Mantri S, Bhasin A, Deogade SC.. Mechanical properties of a new vinyl polyether silicone in comparison to vinyl polysiloxane and polyether elastomeric impression materials. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 2019;10(2): 203-207.doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_324_18
Orhan A, Çetintaş Bezgin T, Orhan K. Digital Dentistry. 1st ed. İsviçre:Springer,Cham, 2024.
Sannino G, Germano F, Arcuri L, Bigelli E, Arcuri C, Barlattani A. CEREC CAD/CAM Chairside System. Oral and Implantology, 2015;7(3): 57-70.
Garino F, Garino GB. Comparison of dental arch measurements between stone and digital casts, World Journal Orthodontics, 2002;3(3): 250-254.
Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, 2007;28(8): 422-431.
Onbaşı Y, Abu-Hossin S, Paulig M, Berger L, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Trueness of full-arch dental models obtained by digital and conventional impression techniques: An in vivo study. Scientific Reports, 2022;12(1): 1-9.doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26983-5
Cengiz S, Aksu Olcay F. Geleneksel ve dijital ölçülerin dezenfeksiyon ve sterilizasyon işlemleri. Dental and Medical Journal, 2021;3(2): 52-65.
Al-Hassiny A, Végh D, Bányai D, Végh Á, Géczi Z, Borbély J, Hermann P, Hegedüs T. User experience of intraoral scanners in dentistry: Transnational questionnaire study. International Dental Journal, 2023;73(5): 754-759.doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.04.002
Grünheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: An assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2014;146(5): 673-682.doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.023
Yılmaz H, Aydın MN. Digital versus conventional impression method in children: Comfort, preference and time. International Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, 2019;29(6): 728-735.doi: 10.1111/ipd.12566
Bosoni C, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Souki BQ, Franchi L, Giuntini V. Comparison between digital and conventional impression techniques in children on preference, time and comfort: A crossover randomized controlled trial. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, 2023;26(4): 585-590.doi: 10.1111/ocr.12648
Serrano-Velasco D, Martín-Vacas A, Cintora-López P, Paz-Cortés MM, Aragoneses JM. Comparative analysis of the comfort of children and adolescents in digital and conventional full-arch ımpression methods: A crossover randomized trial. Children, 2024;1(2): 190-203.doi: 10.3390/children11020190
Ye JR, Park SH, Lee H, Hong SJ, Chae YK, Lee KE, Lee HS, Choi SC, Nam OH. Influence of limited mouth opening in children on intraoral scanning accuracy: An in vitro study. International Journal of Pediatric Dentistry, 2024;1-9.doi: 10.1111/ipd.13175
Patel J, Winters J, Walters M. Intraoral digital impression technique for a neonate with bilateral cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 2019; 56(8): 1120-1123.doi: 10.1177/1055665619835082
Choi YS, Shin HS. Preoperative planning and simulation in patients with cleft palate using ıntraoral three-dimensional scanning and printing. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2019;30(7): 2245-2248.doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005983
Schulz-Weidner N, Gruber M, Schraml EM, Wöstmann B, Krämer N, Schlenz MA. Improving the communication of dental findings in pediatric dentistry by using intraoral scans as a visual aid: A randomized clinical trial. Dentistry Journal. 2024;12(1): 15.doi: 10.3390/dj12010015
Schierz O, Hirsch C, Krey KF, Ganss C, Kämmerer PW, Schlenz MA. Digital dentistry and its impact on oral health-related quality of life. The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice, 2024;24(15): 1-10.doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101946
Schulz-Weidner N, Gruber M, Wöstmann B, Uebereck CF, Krämer N, Schlenz MA. Occlusal caries detection with intraoral scanners in pediatric dentistry: A comparative clinical study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024;13(4): 925-936.doi: 10.3390/jcm13040925
Michou S, Vannahme C, Bakhshandeh A, Ekstrand KR, Benetti AR. Intraoral scanner featuring transillumination for proximal caries detection: An in vitro validation study on permanent posterior teeth. Journal of Dentistry, 2022;54(4): 324-325.doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103841
Schlenz MA, Schupp B, Schmidt A, Wöstmann B, Baresel I, Krämer N, Schulz-Weidner N. New caries diagnostic tools in intraoral scanners: A comparative in vitro study to established methods in permanent and primary teeth. Sensors, 2022;22(6): 2156-2174.doi: 10.3390/s22062156
Ntovas P, Michou S, Benetti AR, Bakhshandeh A, Ekstrand K, Rahiotis C, Kakaboura
Moro BLP, Michou S, Cenci MS, Mendes FM, Ekstrand KR. Secondary caries detection and treatment decision according to two criteria and the impact of a three-dimensional intraoral scanner on gap evaluation. Caries Research, 2023;57(2): 141-151.doi: 10.1159/000527292
Cuenin K, Chen J, Tai SK, Lee D, Gerges G, Oh H. Caries detection and characterization in pediatric patients using iTero 5D near-infrared technology. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2024;165(1): 54-63.doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.06.026
Schlenz MA, Schlenz MB, Wöstmann B, Glatt AS, Ganss C. Intraoral scanner-based monitoring of tooth wear in young adults: 24-month results. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2023;27(6): 2775–2785.doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04858-x
Jung K, Giese-Kraft K, Fischer M, Schulze K, Schlueter N, Ganss C. Visualization of dental plaque with a 3D-intraoral-scanner: A tool for whole mouth planimetry. PloS One, 2022;17(10): 1-14.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276686
Skorulska A, Piszko P, Rybak Z, Szymonowicz M, Dobrzyński M. Review on polymer, ceramic and composite materials for CAD/CAM indirect restorations in dentistry: Application, mechanical characteristics and comparison. Materials, 2021;14(7): 1592-1616.doi: 10.3390/ma14071592
İnal CB, Bankoğlu Güngör M, Karakoca Nemli S. Hasta başı CAD-CAM uygulamaları. Ankara Diş Hekimleri Odası Klinik Bilimler Dergisi. 2023;12(3): 458-466.doi: 10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1174085
Jennes ME, Soetebeer M, Beuer F. In vivo full-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners: A narrative review. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 2022;25(1): 9-16.
