Analysis of Common and Civil Law Legal Traditions and Applications
Özet
-
Referanslar
Adams v Cape Industries plc [1990] Ch 433
Aggeliki Charis Compania Maritima SA v Pagnan SpA [1995] 1 Ll Rep 87)
Allianz SpA v West Tankers Inc (Case C-185/07) [2009] AC 1138
Amir Weissfisch v Anthony Julius. [2006] EWCA Civ 218, [2006] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 71641, Kluwer 2016) 508
Axo Sport SpA v Nosa Inc [2017] Italian LJ 278
Beals v Saldanha [2003] 3 S.C.R. 416, 2003 SCC 72
Carl Zeis Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853, HL
Firm C. (Czechoslovakia) v. OHG Sch. & B;Sch. & H & B. personally, (F.R. Germany), Yearbook, Vol. II-1977 (F. R. Germany, no. 5)
Flaminio Costa v ENEL [1964] ECR 585
Foley v. Classique Coaches Ltd. [1934] 2 K.B. 1 (Eng. C.A.).
Frontini v. Ministero delle Finanze, [1974] 2 C.M.L.R. 372
Godard v. Gray (1870), L.R. 6 Q.B. 139
Greek Supreme Court, 6 July 1999, case no 17/1999
Henry v Geoprosco International Ltd [1976] QB 726
Hilton v. Guyot 159 U.S. 113 (1895)
Lithuanian Supreme Court [2015] case no 3K-3-483- 321/2015
Lud Distributors International Inc. Ltd. v. JSC “Moscow Oil Refinery” [2006] 296 JPMorgan Chase, 328 Judaeo-Christian traditions, 336-337
Miller Import Co. and Florence S.R.L. v. Alabastres Alfredo, [2001] (Exequatur No. 2039/1999)
Morguard Investments Ltd v De Savoye, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1077
Murjani v. State Bank of India, [1991] 935 F.2d 1277 (2d Cir. 1991)
Navigation Maritime Bulgare v. Rustal Trading Ltd. and Others (The “Ivan Zagubanski”). [2002] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 106
Nouvion v. Freeman’’ [1889] 15 App. Cas. 1 (Eng.)
Phillip Alexander Futures & Securities Ltd v Bamberger [1996] CLC 1757
Pierson v. Post, (1805) 3 Cai. R. 175
Presidium of Supreme Arbitrazh (Commercial) Court of the Russian Federation, [2013] 26th February
Rakesh Malhotra v Rajinder Kumar Malhotra. [2012] EWHC 3020 (Comm), [2013] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 285
Re Dulles' Settlement (No. 2) [1951] Ch 842
Republic Of India And Others -V- India Steamship Co Ltd [1993] A.C. 410, [1993] 2 W.L.R. 461
RGZ 157, 136-137 (136) (FRG)
Rubin v Eurofinance SA, [2012] 3 W.L.R. 1019
Schibsby v Westenholz (1870) LR 6 QB 155
Schiffahrtsgesellschaft Detlev von Appen GmbH v Voest Alpine Intertrading GmbH (The Jay Bola) [1997] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 279 (16 April 1997)
Through Transport. Mutual Insurance As- sociation (Eurasia) Ltd v New India Assurance. Co Ltd. [2004] EWCA Civ 1598,. [2005] 1 All ER (Comm). 715
Toepfer International GmbH v. Société Cargill France [1998] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 379 (CA) 385
Turkish Supreme Court Case, 12. Circle E.2008/22583, K.2009/4706, T.5.3.2009
Turner v Grovit [2001] UKHL 65
UK P&I Club & Anor v Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela [2023] EWCA Civ 1497
United States v. Robbins 269 U.S. 315 (1926)
Websense v Itway [2014] IESC 5
West Tankers Case [2012] EWCA Civ 27
Wiva v Royal Dutch Petroleum Co 31 ELR 20166 No. Nos. 99-7223[L], 7245[XAP], 226 F.3d 88/(2d Cir., 09/14/2000)
WSG Nimbus Pte Ltd v Board of Control for Cricket in Sri Lanka [2002] 1 SLR(R) 1088
X & Y v. Fountaine Pajot [2011] No. 08-16824
XL Insurance Ltd v Owens Corning [2001] 1 All. ER (Comm) 530
Act of Establishment of Family courts no: 4787 art. 4. (2003)
Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Regulations 2007, SI 2001/3928
Code of Civil Procedure as promulgated on 5 December 2005 (Bundesgesetzblatt (BGBl., Federal Law Gazette)
Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 [2001] OJ L12/1
German Civil Code 1994 (ZPO) (FRG)
Milletler Arası Özel Hukuk ve Usul Hukuku Act no:5718 Recognition and enforcement of Foreign Judgements Second part, chapter II (Articles 50-59)
Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 [2012] OJ L351/1
Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, [OJ L 265 of 29.9.2012]
The UNCITRAL Model Law (1985) 24 ILM 1302 (1985)
Uniform Foreign Money Judgements Recognition Act 13 U.L.A. 149 (1986)
Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 330 UNTS 38; 21 UST 2517; 7 ILM 1046 (1968)
Hague Convention on Choice of Courts Agreements, 44 I.L.M. 1294 2005
Lugano Convention 2007/712/EC
Amro, Ihab Abdel Salam. Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in theory and in practice: A comparative study in common law and civil law countries. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014
Amro, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Theory and in Practice: A Comparative Study in Common Law and Civil Law Countries (2014) Cambridge
Andrews, The Three Paths of Justice, Netherlands (2012)
Barnett, Res Judicata, Estoppel and Foreign Judgements the Preclusive Effects of Foreign Judgements in Private International Law, Oxford (2001)
Blackaby, Nigel, Constantine Partasides, and Alan Redfern. “Redfern and Hunter on international arbitration.” (No Title) (2009)
Blackman, Josh. “OutFoxed Pier son v. Post and the Natural Law.” American Journal of Legal History 51, no. 3 (2011): 417-460
Brand/Herrup The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements (2008) Cambridge
Cook/Garcia, International Intellectual Property Arbitration, London (2010)
Daradkeh, Lafi Mohammad Mousa. “Recognition and enforcement of foreign commercial arbitral awards relating to international commercial disputes: comparative study (English and Jordanian law).” PhD diss., University of Leeds, (2004)
Dicey, Morris and Collins, Conflict of Laws, 15th ed, London 2012
Duker, William F. “A constitutional history of habeas corpus.” (No Title) (1980)
Epstein, Richard A. “The static conception of the common law.” The Journal of Legal Studies 9, no. 2 (1980): 253-275
Farbey, Judith, Robert J. Sharpe, and Simon Atrill. The law of habeas corpus. Oxford University Press, (2011)
Fullerton Joireman, Sandra. “The evolution of the common law: Legal development in Kenya and India.” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 44, no. 2 (2006): 190-210
Ghodoosi, Farshad. “The Concept of Public Policy in Law: Revisiting the Role of the Public Policy Doctrine in the Enforcement of Private Legal Arrangements.” Neb. L. Rev. 94 (2015): 685
Haakonssen, Knud, ed. Natural law and enlightenment classics. Liberty Fund, (2008)
Hakeem, Injunctive Relief and International Arbitration, New York (2015)
Hale, Matthew. The history of the common law. James Moore, 45, College-Green, (1792)
Harding, Conflict of Laws, Fifth Edition 2014 Abingdon
International Business Law Consortium, Hopkins Paul (editor), International Enforcement of Foreign Judgements, Lulu.com (1 Jun. 2006)
Jenkins, The American Courts a Procedural Approach, U.S. (2011)
Krause, Jan. Anti-suit injunctions als Mittel der Jurisdiktionsabgrenzung. Vol. 253. LIT Verlag Münster, (2005)
Kutner, Peter. “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments-The Common Law's Jurisdiction Requirement.” Rabels Zeitschrift 83, no. 1 (2019): 1-76
Lutz, A Lawyer's Handbook for Enforcing Foreign Judgments in the United States and Abroad, (2006) Cambridge
Monestier, Tanya J. “Foreign Judgments at Common Law: Rethinking the Enforcement Rules.” Dalhousie LJ 28 (2005): 163
Paul, About America How the United States is Governed, Washington (2004)
Plucknett, Theodore Frank Thomas. A concise history of the common law. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., (2001)
Rogerson, Collier’s Conflict of Laws 4th edition, (2013) Cambridge
Salazar, Juan Carlos. “The burden of proof of the air cargo claimant under international law.” (1999)
Şanlı/Esen/Ataman-Figanmeşe, Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk (International Private Law) Istanbul (2014) (In Turkish)
Tang, Zheng Sophia. Jurisdiction and arbitration agreements in international commercial law. Routledge, (2014)
Van Lith, Helene. “International jurisdiction and commercial litigation.” Uniform Rules for Contract Disputes, Den Haag (2009)
Van Lith, Helene. “International jurisdiction and commercial litigation.” Uniform Rules for Contract Disputes, Den Haag (2009)
Ambrose, Clare. “Can Anti-Suit Injuctions Survive European Community Law?.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 52, no. 2 (2003): 401-424
Amro, Ihab. “Review of a Foreign Arbitral Award by National Courts: A Comparative Study in Common Law and Civil Law Countries.” In Hague Yearbook of International Law/Annuaire de La Haye de Droit International, Vol. 24 (2011), pp. 391-413. Brill Nijhoff, (2012)
Bahta, Tecle Hagos. “Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in civil and commercial matters in Ethiopia.” Mizan Law Review 5, no. 1 (2011): 105-140
Balan, Violeta I. “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in the United States: the need for federal legislation.” J. Marshall L. Rev. 37 (2003): 229
Behr, Enforcement of United States Money Judgements in Germany, 13 J.L & Com. 211,222
Bermann, George A. “The use of anti-suit injunctions in international litigation.” Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 28 (1990): 589
Bessler, John D. “The Marquis Beccaria: An Italian penal reformer’s meteoric rise in the British Isles in the transatlantic Republic of Letters.” Diciottesimo Secolo 4 (2019): 107-120
Bolgar, Vera. “Why no trusts in the civil law?.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 2, no. 2 (1953): 204-219
Borris, Common law and civil law: fundamental differences and their impact on arbitration, 60 ARB. J CHARTERED INST. ARBS 78 (1994)
Brand, Ronald A. “Punitive Damages Revisited: Taking the Rationale for Non-Recognition of Foreigh Judgments Too Far.” JL & Com. 24 (2004): 181
Briggs, “Which Foreign Judgments Should We Recognize Today?” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 36.2 (1987) 240-59
Briggs, Adrian. “Crossing the River by Feeling the Stones: Rethinking the Law on Foreign Judgments.” SYBIL 8 (2004): 1
Briggs, Adrian. “Which Foreign Judgments Should We Recognise Today?.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 36, no. 2 (1987): 240-259
Choi, Susan. “Judicial enforcement of arbitration awards under the ICSID and New York Conventions.” NYUJ Int'l L. & Pol. 28 (1995): 175
Coco, Sarah E. “The value of a new judgments convention for US litigants.” NYUL Rev. 94 (2019): 1209
Cohen, Connor. “Foreign Antisuit Injunctions and the Settlement Effect.” Nw. UL Rev. 116 (2021): 1577
Collins, Methods and Aims of Comparative Law, 11 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies (1991) 396-406
Contreras, Jorge L., and Michael Eixenberger. “The Anti-Suit Injunction-A Transnational Remedy for Multi-Jurisdictional SEP Litigation.” Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law-Patent, Antitrust and Competition Law (Jorge L. Contreras, ed., 2017, Forthcoming), University of Utah College of Law Research Paper 209 (2017)
Cuniberti, The Recognition of Foreign Judgments Lacking Reasons In Europe: Access To Justice, Foreign Court Avoidance, And Efficiency, 57 International and Comparative Law Quarterly (2008) 25-52
Dariescu, Cosmin. “The Jurisdictional Competence for the Recognition of the Foreign Judgements Compliant to Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012.” Available at SSRN 2553847 (2015)
Davies, Kate, and Valeriya Kirsey. “Anti-Suit Injunctions in Support of London Seated Arbitrations Post-Brexit: Are All Things New Just Well-Forgotten Past?.” Journal of international arbitration 33, no. 7 (2016)
Dodge, William S. “Jurisdiction, state immunity, and judgments in the Restatement (Fourth) of US Foreign Relations Law.” Chinese Journal of International Law 19, no. 1 (2020) 101-135
Douglas, Michael. “Anti-suit injunctions in Australia.” Melbourne University Law Review 41, no. 1 (2017) 66-105
Finkelman, Paul. “Thomas Jefferson, original intent, and the shaping of American law: Learning constitutional law from the writings of Jefferson.” NYU Ann. Surv. Am. L. 62 (2006): 45
Fisher, Geoffrey. “Anti-suit injunctions to restrain foreign proceedings in breach of an arbitration agreement.” Bond L. Rev. 22 (2010)
Francesco/Nita, The Role of Reciprocity in International Law, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 36, No. 1, , Spring 2003 93-123
Frank, Jerome. “Civil Law Influences on the Common Law--Some Reflections on Comparative and Contrastive Law.” U. Pa. L. Rev. 104 (1955): 887
Freedman, Eric M. “Habeas Corpus in Three Dimensions: Dimension I: Habeas Corpus as a Common Law Writ.” Harv. CR-CLL Rev. 46 (2011): 591
Gamboa, Remarks on the Cooperation between the Latin American Judiciary and Arbitral Tribunals with Respect to the Taking of Evidence,” International Commercial Arbitration Brief 1, no. 1 (2011): 11-13
Gotanda, John Y. “Charting developments concerning punitive damages: Is the tide changing.” Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 45 (2006): 507
Gottwald, Peter. “The European law of civil procedure.” Ritsumeikan Law Review 22 (2005): 37-67
Haakonssen, Knud, ed. Natural law and enlightenment classics. Liberty Fund, 2008
Harris, Troy L. “The “Public Policy” Exception to Enforcement of International Arbitration Awards Under the New York Convention—With Particular Reference to Construction Disputes.” Journal of international arbitration 24, no. 1 (2007)
Hess, F. K. US Anti‐suit Injunctions and German Anti‐anti‐suit injunctions in SEP disputes. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 25(2), (2022): 536-555
Hijjawi, H. Brexit and its Implications for International Arbitration. The Anti-Suit Injunction (2021)
Huang, Conflicts between Civil Law and Common Law in Judgment Recognition and Enforcement: When is the Finality Dispute Final? Wisconsin International Law Journal, Vol 29, (2012): 71-109
Jackson, Full Faith and Credit: the lawyer’s clause of the Constitution Columbia Law Review Vol. 45, No. 1 (1945): 1-34
Kaminsky, Clay H. “The Rome II Regulation: A comparative perspective on federalizing choice of law.” Tul. L. Rev. 85 (2010): 55
Khanderia, Saloni. “The Hague Conference on Private International Law's Proposed Draft Text on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Should South Africa Endorse it?.” Journal of African Law 63, no. 3 (2019): 413-433.
Kohler. Practical Experience of the Brussels Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention in the Six Original Contracting States. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 34, (1985): 563-583
Lavelle, Jennifer. “Uncertainty ad infinitum: the inadequate clarification of the arbitration exclusion by the recast regulation.” PhD diss., University of Southampton, 2018.
Leeming, Mark. “Theories and principles underlying the development of the common law-the statutory elephant in the room.” The UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES LAW JOURNAL 36, no. 3 (2013): 1002-1029.
Lei, Chen. “The historical development of the Civil Law tradition in China: a private law perspective.” Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis/Revue d'histoire du droit/The Legal History Review 78, no. 1-2 (2010): 159-181.
Lévy, Anti-suit Injunctions Issued by Arbitrators, LAI International Arbitration Series No. 2, Antisuit Injunctions in International Arbitration, (2005): 128-129
Lew, Julian DM. “Does National Court Involvement Undermine the International Arbitration Processes?.” American University International Law Review 24, no. 3 (2009): 3
Lijuan, Xing. “Tempering the Extraterritoriality of Foreign Issued Anti-Suit Injunctions in Chinese Admiralty Proceedings.” Tsinghua China L. Rev. 15 (2022): 255
Linton, M. (2013). » Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments under The Brussels I Regulation and The Regulation on a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims.«. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet), dostopno na: http://www. eracomm. eu/Cross_border_civil_litigation/kiosk/PDF/113DT114_Linton. pdf (11. 8. 2021)
Lunsford, Enforcement of Foreign Judgements in California, Martsen Wright PC (2015)
Mancuso, Salvatore. “The New African Law: Beyond the difference between common law and civil law.” Ann. Surv. Int'l & Comp. L. 14 (2008): 39
Mclaughlin, “Arbitration and Developing Countries”. Vol. 13, No. 2 (1979): 211–232
Merrett, The Enforcement of Jurisdiction Agreements within the Brussels Regime. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, (2006): 315-336
Merryman, John, and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo. The civil law tradition: an introduction to the legal systems of Europe and Latin America. Stanford University Press, (2018)
Meurkens, Lotte, and Cedric Vanleenhove. “The recognition and Enforcement of Punitive Damages Judgments Across the Globe: Insights from Various Continents.” (2023): 1-180.
Michaels, Ralf. “Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments.” (2009)
Mikelénas, Valentinas. “The Proposed ALI/UNIDROIT Principles and rules of transnational civil procedure and the new code of civil procedure in Lithuania.” Unif. L. Rev. ns 6 (2001): 981.
Navarrete, Ph D. Miguel Ángel Moreno. “The Concept of Civil Law Historical Dimension.”
Obesi/Nyombi, “Recognition of anti-suit injunctions in Civil and Common Law jurisdictions” European Competition Law Review (Sweet & Maxwell), 36(11): 473-483
Okpaluba, Chuks, and Anthony Nwafor. “The Common Law Remedy of Habeas Corpus Through the Prism of a Twelve-Point Construct.” Erasmus L. Rev. 14 (2021): 55
Onuzulike, Chimezie. “An Appraisal of the Concept of Anti-Suit Injunction in International Arbitration.” Available at SSRN 3940080 (2021)
Pejovic, Caslav. “Civil law and common law: Two different paths leading to the same goal.” Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo 155 (2001): 7
Pejovic, Caslav. “Civil law and common law: Two different paths leading to the same goal.” Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo 155 (2001): 7
Pinheiro, Luís De Lima. “Report on the application of Regulation (EU) No. 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters by Portuguese courts.” (2019): 31-59
Raisch, Marylin Johnson. “Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. By H. Patrick Glenn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pp. xxiv, 371. ISBN 0-19-876575-4.” International Journal of Legal Information 31, no. 1 (2003): 124-126
Reese, Willis LM. “Status in This Country of Judgments Rendered Abroad, The.” Colum. L. Rev. 50 (1950): 783
Rehse, The ‘torpedo’: recent developments in Europe, Intellectual Property Magazine. April 2014: 76-78
Rheinstein, Max. “Common law and civil law: an elementary comparison.” Rev. Jur. UPR 22 (1952): 90
Richards, Peter Judson. “Hugo Grotius, Hosti Humani Generis, and the Natural Law in Time of War.” Liberty UL Rev. 2 (2007): 881
Richardson, Sally Brown. “Civil Law Compromise, Common Law Accord and Satisfaction: Can the Two Doctrines Coexist in Louisiana.” La. L. Rev. 69 (2008): 175
Rozehnalová, Nadežda, Jirí Valdhans, and Tereza Kyselovská. “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: From Brussels Convention to Regulation Brussels I Recast.” Remedies Concerning Enforcement of Foreign Judgements (1970): 39
Rubinoff, L. L. P. “Modernizing Canada's” Modern Approach” To Foreign Judgments.”
Sahan, F.C. The Conflict Between Civil and Common Law Traditions Through the Enforcement and Recognition of Foreign Judgements in ŞAHİN, Yelda DURGUN (ed.). Current Studies in Social Sciences VIII. Akademisyen Kitabevi (2024): 53-85
Sebok, Anthony J. “Punitive damages: from myth to theory.” Iowa L. Rev. 92 (2006): 957
Shalaan, Wael SE. “Interim Measures in International Commercial Arbitration–A Comparative Study of the Egyptian, English and Scottish Law.” (2013)
Shenoy, Nivedita Chandrakanth. “Public Policy under Article V (2)(b) of the New York Convention: Is there a Transnational Standard.” Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 20 (2018): 77
Shtromberg, Alexandra. “Substantive Public Policy Concept in Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Russia.” (2017)
Silberman, Linda J., and Aaron D. Simowitz. “Recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and awards: What hath Daimler wrought.” NYUL Rev. 91 (2016): 344
Stein, Peter G. “Judge and Jurist in the Civil Law: A Historical Interpretation.” La. L. Rev. 46 (1985): 241
Stewart, David P. “The Hague Conference adopts a new convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil or commercial matters.” American Journal of International Law 113, no. 4 (2019): 772-783
Strong, Stacey I. “Reasoned Awards in International Commercial Arbitration: Embracing and Exceeding the Common Law-Civil Law Dichotomy.” Mich. J. Int'l L. 37 (2015): 1
Strong, Stacie I. “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements in US Courts: Problems and Possibilities.” Rev. Litig. 33 (2014): 45
Symeonides, Symeon C. “The Conflicts Book of the Lousiana Civil Code: Civilian, American, or Original.” Tul. L. Rev. 83 (2008): 1041.
Tan, Daniel. “Anti-suit injunctions and the vexing problem of comity.” Va. J. Int'l L. 45 (2004): 283
Tapola, Diana V. “Enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: Application of the public policy rule in Russia.” Arbitration International 22, no. 1 (2006): 151-164
Tatjana, E. V. A. S. “Common minimum standards of civil procedure-European Added Value Assessment.” (2016)
Tetley, William. “Mixed jurisdictions: Common Law v. Civil Law (codified and uncodified).” La. L. Rev. 60 (1999): 677
Thiele. The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: Was It worth the Effort? In: Eckart Gottschalk et al. (eds.) Conflict of Laws in a Globalized World. (2007) 63-88
Tosun, 'Révision au Fond in Turkish Arbitration Practice' (2015) 33 ASA Bulletin, Issue 1, 58–65
Trooboff, Foreign Judgements, 26 NAT’L. L. J. 48 (2004) Ungar, Kenneth T. “The enforcement of arbitral awards under UNCITRAL's Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration.” Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 25 (1986): 717
-Ustundag, Medeni Yargılama Hukuku, p 327; Alangoya, (2000), p 180,184,185. Çelikel p.608 (In Turkish)
Von Mehren, Arthur T. “Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: A New Approach for the Hague Conference?” Law and Contemporary Problems 57, no. 3 (1994): 271-287
Walker, Robert. “Developing the common law: How far is too far?” Melbourne University Law Review 37, no. 1 (2013): 232-253
Wautelet, Chapter III: Recognition and Enforcement (Art. 32), European Law Publishers in BRUSSELS I REGULATION 535, 540 Ulrich Magnus & Peter Mankowski eds., (2007)
Whitten, U.S. Conflict-of-Laws Doctrine and Forum Shopping, International and Domestic (Revisited), (11/28/2010), Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 37: 559
Worthington Fran, Asymmetric jurisdiction clauses valid as a matter of English law, Commercial litigation newsletter, (2013)
Zeynalova, Yuliya. “The Law on Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments: Is it broken and how do we fix it.” Berkeley J. Int'l L. 31 (2013): 150
Zhu, Yuan Yi, and Richard Johnson. “Sceptical Perspectives on the Changing Constitution of the United Kingdom.” (2023): 1-512
Zipursky, Benjamin C. “A theory of punitive damages.” Tex. L. Rev. 84 (2005): 105
Yayınlanan
Lisans
LisansBu İnternet Sitesi içeriğinde yer alan tüm eserler (yazı, resim, görüntü, fotoğraf, video, müzik vb.) Akademisyen Kitabevine ait olup, 5846 sayılı Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu ve 5237 sayılı Türk Ceca Kanunu kapsamında korunmaktadır. Bu hakları ihlal eden kişiler, 5846 sayılı Fikir ve Sanat eserleri Kanunu ve 5237 sayılı Türk Ceza Kanununda yer alan hukuki ve cezai yaptırımlara tabi olurlar. Yayınevi ilgili yasal yollara başvurma hakkına sahiptir.